Technical Papers
Sep 30, 2015

Industry Perceptions of Alternative Project Delivery Methods Applied to Trenchless Pipeline Projects

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 7, Issue 1

Abstract

The majority of trenchless pipeline projects delivered today use the traditional design-bid-build (DBB) system. Alternative project delivery methods (APDM) have been introduced to increase stakeholder integration and ultimately enhance project performance. The complex nature of trenchless pipeline projects renders them ideal candidates for APDM because of the gap that is often created by an inherent lack of technical knowledge exchange between design engineers and contractors when using DBB delivery. The use of APDM is only beginning to gain acceptance for trenchless pipeline projects. This paper has two objectives: (1) to examine the current usage, comfort level, and stakeholder perception of APDM through a survey of the trenchless industry; and (2) to investigate the published cost performance of completed trenchless projects that employed APDM. The results from the industry survey are threefold: (1) the most used project delivery system in the trenchless industry is DBB; (2) the comfort level of stakeholders in implementing each project delivery method is influenced by the amount each method is used; and (3) the industry respondents perceive APDM to impact certain performance metrics more than others. The initial results from the meta-analysis demonstrate the possible performance impact of APDM on trenchless construction projects, as realized through cost savings ranging from 2 to 44%. This study provides a contribution to the body of knowledge by assisting project stakeholders in better understanding the overall industry perceptions of APDM-related performance improvements. This understanding can guide stakeholders in selecting the most suitable delivery system for their trenchless projects.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Ablin, R. L., and Kinshella, P. (2002). “City of Phoenix Lower Buckeye sewer emergency repair, rehabilitation, and replacement.” Proc., Water Environment Federation, Water Environment Federation Technical Exhibition and Conf., Water Environment Federation, Alexandria, VA, 534–540.
Bantz, M., and Melcher, B. (2008). “Using design-build to rehabilitate a military base sewer system.” Proc., North American No-Dig 2008, North American Society of Trenchless Technology, Alexandria, VA.
Benner, G. (2010). “HDD project solves water supply problem for Canadian Yacht Club.”, 〈http://trenchlessonline.com/designbuild/〉 (Aug. 28, 2013).
Bennett, J., Pothecary, E., and Robinson, G. (1996). “Designing and building a world-class industry.”, University of Reading, Centre for Strategic Studies in Construction, Reading, U.K.
Bueno, S. (2012). “REHAB WINNER: Sewer rehabbed using design-build and sliplining.” Trenchless Technology Magazine, Brecksville, OH.
CH2M HILL. (2004). “Winter Park capital improvements projects and Swoope water treatment plant (FL).” 〈http://www.waterdesignbuild.com/wp-content/uploads/Winter-Park-Water-Treatment-Plant.pdf〉 (Aug. 25, 2013).
Cohen, A. (2013). “Applications of Maxi Rig horizontal directional drilling for municipal sewer/water markets.” Proc., 2013 Int. Conf. on Pipelines and Trenchless Technology, ASCE, Reston, VA, 535–544.
Doherty, D. (2013). “Managing trenchless projects from an engineers perspective.” Proc., 2013 North American No-Dig Show, North American Society for Trenchless Technology (NASTT), Alexandria, VA.
Doherty, D., and Kurzeja, W. (2015). “Engineer, procure, construct (EPC) type contracts: Are they good for trenchless industry?” Proc., 2015 North American No-Dig Show, North American Society for Trenchless Technology (NASTT), Denver, CO.
El Asmar, M., Hanna, A., and Loh, W. (2013). “Quantifying performance for the integrated project delivery system as compared to established delivery systems.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04013012.
El Asmar, M., Lotfallah, W., Whited, G., and Hanna, A. (2010). “Quantitative methods for design-build team selection.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 904–912.
Flatt, K., and Irby, K. (2013). “Bringing water to historic Roanoke Island and economic stimulus to dare county through construction manager-at-risk delivery.” Proc., American Waterworks Association Annual Conf. and Exposition 13, American Water Works Association, Denver, CO.
Francom, T., Ariaratnam, S., and El Asmar, M. (2014). “Industry perceptions of trenchless pipelines project performance when using alternative delivery systems.” Pipelines 2014: From Underground to the Forefront of Innovation and Sustainability, ASCE, Reston, VA, 405–414.
Francom, T., El Asmar, M., and Ariaratnam, S. (2013). “Using alternative project delivery methods to enhance the cost performance of trenchless construction projects.” Proc., 2013 ASCE Construction Research Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Glass, G. (1976). “Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research.” Educational researcher, Vol. 5, American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC, 351–379.
Gokhale, S. (2011). “Integrated project delivery method for trenchless projects.” Int. Conf. on Pipeline and Trenchless Technology 2011, ASCE, Reston, VA, 604–614.
Guy, H. (2007a). “Design-build and trenchless—A perfect solution!” Pipelines 2007: Advances and Experiences with Trenchless Pipeline Projects, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1–7.
Guy, H. (2007b). “Increase your design” bottom line” with trenchless solutions.” Pipelines 2007: Advances and Experiences with Trenchless Pipeline Projects, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1–8.
Hasan, S. (2010). “Evaluation of project delivery methods for trenchless construction.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX.
Henning, T. (2011). “Products offer design-build contractor extra security.” 〈http://www.trenchlessonline.com/index/webapp-stories-action?id=1902〉 (Aug. 26, 2013).
Hunt, M. (1997). How science takes stock: The story of meta-analysis, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
Konchar, M., and Sanvido, V. (1998). “Comparison of U.S. project delivery systems.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 435–444.
Kramer, S. R., and Meinhart, T. J. (2004). “Alternative contract and delivery methods for pipeline and trenchless projects.” Pipelines 2004: Pipeline Engineering and Construction—What’s on the Horizon, ASCE, Reston, VA, 613–622.
Lehmann, E. L. (2006). Nonparametrics: Statistical methods based on ranks, Springer, Verlag, NY.
Mahdi, I. M., and Alreshaid, K. (2005). “Decision support system for selecting the proper project delivery method using analytical hierarchy process (AHP).” Int. J. Project Manage., 23(7), 564–572.
Molenaar, K. R., and Gransberg, D. (2001). “Design-builder selection for small highway projects.” J. Manage. Eng., 214–223.
Molenaar, K. R., Songer, A. D., and Barash, M. (1999). “Public-sector design/build evolution and performance.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 54–62.
Najafi, M. (2012). Trenchless technology: Planning, equipment, and methods, Mc-Graw Hill, New York.
Orton, C., Webb, R., Boschert, J., and Robinson, B. (2009). “Phoenix is bursting with more capacity.” Proc., Pipelines 2009: Infrastructures Hidden Assets, American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE, Reston, VA, 855–864.
Rush, J. W. (2003). “Teamwork key to Virgina sewer project.” 〈http://www.no-dig-pipe.com/pdf/project_of_the_year.pdf〉 (Aug. 30, 2013).
Scott, H. C., IV, and Timberlake, M. (2013). “Experienced trenchless contractor finds opportunity with new culvert liner pipe.” Proc., North American No-Dig 2013, North American Society of Trenchless Technology, Alexandria, VA.
Shrestha, P. P., O’Connor, J. T., and Gibson, G. E., Jr. (2012). “Performance comparison of large design-build and design-bid-build highway projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 1–13.
Songer, A. D., and Molenaar, K. R. (1996). “Selecting design-build: Public and private sector owner attitudes.” J. Manage. Eng., 47–53.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 7Issue 1February 2016

History

Received: May 31, 2015
Accepted: Aug 10, 2015
Published online: Sep 30, 2015
Published in print: Feb 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Feb 29, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Tober Francom, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate and Graduate Research Assistant, School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State Univ., P.O. Box 873005, Tempe, AZ 85287-3005. E-mail: [email protected]
Samuel T. Ariaratnam, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Professor and Construction Engineering Program Chair, School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State Univ., P.O. Box 873005, Tempe, AZ 85287-3005 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Mounir El Asmar, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor and Senior Sustainability Scientist, School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State Univ., P.O. Box 873005, Tempe, AZ 85287-3005. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share