Long-Term Maintenance of Culvert Networks
Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 6, Issue 4
Abstract
Infrastructure systems in the United States are in need of urgent maintenance and rehabilitations. Preservation of culvert networks, a major component of U.S. infrastructure systems, at an acceptable level of serviceability subject to the stringent yearly maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) budgets is a major challenge for culvert network owners and managers. Decision makers are required to develop an optimum financial plan to minimize the total cost of maintenance and rehabilitation for different expected improvements of the culvert network performance during a given planning horizon. This manuscript presents a discussion on budget planning for maintenance and rehabilitation scheduling and optimization of a culvert network. Any maintenance and rehabilitation expenditure should be justified such that net increase in the asset value should be more than the cost of rehabilitation, where the net worth of an asset should be based on performance rather than on book value. Government standards require owners to maintain or improve the overall condition state of their infrastructure systems with substantial annual investment. In this paper, three methods were proposed to compute the long-term annual investments for culvert networks. They are modified worst first method, network optimization approach, and estimation by the maximum deterioration rate. The performance of a 15-culvert system was simulated using the above methods. Based on the simulation results, the modified worst first method is computationally intensive but provides the optimum budget. The method using maximum deterioration rate provides the lower bound value and should be used as the absolute lowest value that should be allocated. The optimization method uses computer programming and provides an upper bound value for small networks. It is anticipated that for large culvert networks the network optimization approach can be used to provide reasonable long-term annual budgets. Out of the three methods, the modified worst first method provided a minimum long-term annual budget of $9,000 consistent with the government requirements.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was sponsored by a research contract from the U.S. DOT Region 2 University Transportation Research Center (UTRC) project (#49997-26-24) titled “Optimum Fund Allocation to Rehabilitate Transportation Infrastructure.” The contents of this paper reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect views or policies of NJIT, UTRC, or USDOT. This paper does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.
References
American Concrete Pipe Association. (2013). “Post installation evaluation and repair of installed reinforced concrete culvert.” 〈http://www.concrete-pipe.org/pdf/Post_Install_Inspect_081011.pdf〉 (Mar. 12, 2013).
Bhagwan, J. N. (2009). “Compendium of best practices in water infrastructure asset management.” Contributions from South Africa, Global Water Research Coalition, Stirling, SA, 211.
LINGO 14.0 [Computer software]. Chicago, IL, LINDO Systems Inc.
Matthews, J., Selvakumar, A., Sterling, R., and Condit, W. (2012). “Analysis of wastewater and water system renewal decision-making tools and approaches.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract., 99–105.
McNamee, P., Dornan, D., Bajadek, D., and Chait, E. (1999). “Understanding GASB-34’s infrastructure reporting requirement.”, Price Waterhouse Coopers, New York.
Meegoda, J., Juliano, T., and Banerjee, A. (2006). “A framework for automatic condition assessment of culverts.” J. Transp. Res. Board, (1948), 26–36.
Meegoda, J., Juliano, T., and Tang, C. (2009). A culvert information management system, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Meegoda, J., Juliano, T., and Wadhawan, S. (2008). Estimation of the remaining service life of culverts, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Meegoda, J. N., et al. (2012). Implementation of a drainage information, analysis and management system, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Meegoda, J. N. (2013). Long-term maintenance of culverts, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Meegoda, J. N., and Abdel-Malek, L. (2011). A stochastic framework for sustainable infrastructure-application to pipes and culverts, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Meegoda, J. N., Juliano, T. M., Ayoola, M. G., and Dhar, S. K. (2004). “Inspection, cleaning, condition assessment and prediction of remaining service life of culverts.” Proc., 83rd Transportation Research Board Meeting (CD-ROM), Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Meegoda, J. N., Juliano, T. M., Ratnaweera, P., and Abdel-Malek, L. (2005). “A framework for inspection, maintenance and replacement of corrugated steel culvert pipes.” J. Transp. Res. Board, (1911), 22–30.
Mills, D. (2002). “Asset management and reporting systems.” GASB 34 Workshop, Environmental Finance Center at Boise State Univ./American Water Works Association (EFC/AWWA), Chapel Hill, NC.
Rajani, B, and Makar, J. (2000). A methodology to estimate remaining service life of grey cast iron water mains, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa.
Water Research Centre. (2001). “Sewerage rehabilitation manual.” Rehabilitation planning, Vol. I, 4th Ed., Water Research Centre, Marlow, U.K.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 15, 2014
Accepted: Nov 24, 2014
Published online: Jan 12, 2015
Discussion open until: Jun 12, 2015
Published in print: Nov 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.