Technical Papers
Dec 9, 2014

Minimum Effective Length and Modified Criteria for Damage Evaluation of Continuous Buried Straight Steel Pipelines Subjected to Seismic Waves

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 6, Issue 4

Abstract

It is impractical in the dynamic analysis of pipelines to consider the whole length of the pipe in a numerical model. Therefore, a minimum length is desired for the pipe model so that its midpoint responses are not affected by its end conditions. This length can be called the minimum effective length (MEL). In this study, at first, based on extensive nonlinear dynamic analyses, MEL values were determined for various types of soil using the equivalent bilinear springs for consideration of the soil-pipe-interaction. Then, by solving the dynamic equilibrium equation, assuming a linear behavior for the pipe and soil, it was shown that for very long buried straight pipes, the frequencies of all lateral modes are the same, and therefore the participation of higher modes is not negligible in long pipes. To take the higher modes into account, a relation was established between the unburied pipe frequencies and the MEL of the buried pipe. Then, assuming the local buckling of the pipe wall due to axial force and bending moment as the most probable damage of buried pipes subjected to seismic waves, a damage evaluation was performed to determine which conditions led to the reduction of the hollow-section area of the pipe and the loss of its efficiency. Finally, by analyzing various pipes subjected to three-component records, it was shown that the created strain could not lead to local buckling of the pipe. Consequently, other effective factors should be studied more thoroughly in evaluating the damage to buried continuous straight steel pipelines subjected to seismic waves.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

ABAQUS [Computer software]. Hibbitt, Karlsson, & Sorensen.
Abdoun, T. H., et al. (2009). “Factors influencing the behavior of buried pipelines subjected to earthquake faulting.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 29(3), 415–427.
ASCE. (1984). Guidelines for the seismic design of oil and gas pipeline systems, New York.
Ayala, A. G., and O’Rourke, M. (1989). Effects of the 1985 Michoacan earthquake on water systems and other buried lifelines in Mexico, US National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (NCEER), Buffalo, NY.
Chen, W. W., Shih, B. J., Chen, Y. C., Hung, J. H., and Hwang, H. H. (2002). “Seismic response of natural gas and water pipelines in the Ji-Ji earthquake.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 22(9), 1209–1214.
Chopra, A. K. (1995). Dynamics of structures theory and applications to earthquake engineering, Prentice Hall, NJ.
Clough, R. W., and Penzien, J. (2003). Dynamics of structures, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Datta, S. K., Shah, A. H., and El-Akily, N. (1982). “Dynamic behavior of a buried pipe in a seismic environment.” J. Appl. Mech., 49(1), 141–148.
Datta, S. K., Shah, A. H., and Wong, K. C. (1984). “Dynamic stresses and displacements in buried pipe.” J. Eng. Mech., 1451–1466.
Datta, T. K. (1999). “Seismic response of buried pipelines: A state-of-the-art review.” Nucl. Eng. Des., 192(2), 271–284.
Eguchi, R., Taylor, D., and Hasselman, T. (1983). “Seismic component vulnerability models for lifeline risk analysis.”, J. H. Wiggins, Redondo Beach, CA.
Elhmadi, K., and O’Rourke, M. J. (1990). “Seismic damage to segmented buried pipelines.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 19(4), 529–539.
Goltabar, A. M., and Shamstabar, K. R. (2008). “Experimental and numerical investigation of buried pipeline due to axial vibration.” Proc., 14th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Chinese Association of Earthquake Engineering (CAEE).
Hall, W. J., and Newmark, N. M. (1978). “Seismic design criteria for pipelines and facilities.” J. Tech. Councils, 104(1), 91–107.
Hosseini, M., and Ajideh, H. (2001). “Seismic analysis of buried jointed pipes considering multi-node excitations and wave propagation phenomena.” Proc., Pipelines 2001 Conf., ASCE, Reston, VA.
Hosseini, M., Jalili, S., Azizpour, M. O., and Alikhani, M. (2010). “Evaluating the functionality of water distribution networks in the aftermath of big earthquakes based on nonlinear modeling of pipes connections.” Proc., ASCE Pipeline 2010 Conf., Reston, CA.
Hosseini, M., and Mogharian, M. (1999). “A study on an existing buried water pipeline subjected to wave propagation.” Persian J. Bull. IIEES, 2, 110–121.
Hosseini, M., and Roudsari, M. T. (2010). “A study on the effect of surface transverse waves on buried steel pipelines considering the nonlinear behavior of soil and pipes” Proc., ASCE Pipeline 2010 Conf., RestonVA.
INBC (Iranian National Building Code). (2006). “Effective load on buildings.” Topic 6, MMSI, NASHR, Iran.
Muleski, G. E., Ariman, T., and Aumen, C. P. (1979). “A shell model of a buried pipe in a seismic environment.” J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 101(1), 44–50.
Newmark, N. M., and Rosenblueth, E. (1971). Fundamentals of earthquake engineering, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
O’Leary, P. M., and Datta, S. K. (1985). “Dynamics of buried pipelines.” Int. J. Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 4(3), 151–159.
O’Rourke, M., and Ayala, G. (1993). “Pipeline damage due to wave propagation.” J. Geotech. Eng., 1490–1498.
O’Rourke, M. J., and Elhmadi, K. (1988). “Analysis of continuous buried pipelines for seismic wave effects.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 16(6), 917–929.
O’Rourke, M. J., and Liu, X. (1999). Response of buried pipelines subjected to earthquake effect, Monograph Series MCEER.
O’Rourke, M. J., Pikul, R. R., and Wang, L. R. (1982). “Transverse seismic waves at pipeline junctions.” J. Tech. Councils, 108(1), 173–177.
Rofooie, F. R., and Qorbani, R. (2008). “A parametric study on seismic behavior of continuous buried pipelines due to wave propagation.” 14th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Chinese Association of Earthquake Engineering (CAEE).
Roudsari, M. T. (2011). “Using neural network for reliability assessment of buried pipelines subjected of earthquake.” Ph.D. thesis, Science and Research Branch of the Islamic Azad Univ., Tehran, Iran.
Shah, H. H., and Chu, S. L. (1974). “Seismic analysis of underground structural elements.” J. Power Div., 100(1), 53–62.
Shi, P., O’Rourke, T. D., Wang, Y., and Fan, K. (2008). “Seismic response of buried pipelines to surface wave propagation effect.” Proc., 14th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Chinese Association of Earthquake Engineering (CAEE).
Shih, B. J., and Chang, C. H. (2006). “Damage survey of water supply systems and fragility curve of PVC water pipelines in the Chi–Chi Taiwan earthquake.” Nat. Hazards, 37(1–2), 71–85.
Takada, S. (1977). “Earthquake resistant design of underground pipelines.” Proc., 6th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Indian Society of Earthquake Technology and the Institution of Engineers, India, 3376–3381.
Takada, S., Kuwata, Y., and Tanaka, Y. (2008). “Fragility function of buried pipelines under high level of ground motion with the aid of DEM analysis.” Proc.,14th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Chinese Association of Earthquake Engineering (CAEE).
Toprak, S., Koc, A. C., Cetin, O. A., and Nacaroglu, E. (2008). “Assessment of buried pipeline response to earthquake loading by using GIS.” Proc., 14th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Chinese Association of Earthquake Engineering (CAEE).
Toprak, S., and Taskin, F. (2007). “Estimation of earthquake damage to buried pipelines caused by ground shaking.” Nat. Hazards, 40(1), 1–24.
Wang, L. R., Pikul, R. R., and O’Rourke, M. J. (1982). “Imposed ground strain and buried pipelines.” J. Tech. Councils, 108(2), 259–263.
Wang, L. R. L., and O’Rourke, M. J. (1977). “State of the art of buried lifeline earthquake engineering.” The current state of knowledge of lifeline earthquake engineering, ASCE, Reston, VA, 252–266.
Zhao, J. X., Cousins, J., Lukovic, B., and Smith, W. (2008). “Critical factors for restoration of water supply pipelines in the Hutt city, NewZealand after a magnitude 7.5 earthquake from the Wellington fault.” Proc., 14th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Chinese Association of Earthquake Engineering (CAEE).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 6Issue 4November 2015

History

Received: Jun 9, 2014
Accepted: Oct 22, 2014
Published online: Dec 9, 2014
Discussion open until: May 9, 2015
Published in print: Nov 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mahmood Hosseini [email protected]
Associate Professor, Structural Engineering Research Center, International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Tehran, Iran (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Mehrzad Tahamouli Roudsari [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad Univ., Kermanshah, Iran. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share