Numerical Finite-Element Investigation of the Parameters Influencing the Behavior of Flexible Pipes for Culverts and Storm Sewers under Truck Load
Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 6, Issue 2
Abstract
The objectives of this study are to evaluate the parameters that affect the behavior of flexible pipes for culverts and storm sewers and to examine the strength-limit states of such pipes proposed by the AASHTO bridge-design specifications. The flexible pipes investigated in the study are high-density polyethylene (HDPE), PVC, and metal pipes. The pipe diameters considered are 914 mm (36 in.) and 1,219 mm (48 in.). A three-dimensional finite-element (FE) model has been developed to simulate the behavior of buried pipes under truck load. Results from field tests conducted by the authors for large-diameter pipes under , , and burial depths, where is the pipe diameter, were used to evaluate the accuracy of the numerical model. Extensive parametric studies were then carried out to examine the effect of burial depth, backfill soil quality, and compaction level on the buried pipes, and their results are reported in this paper. The effect of these parameters has been evaluated in terms of thrust values at the pipe shoulder and springline, vertical diameter changes, and longitudinal strains. Regression analysis was carried out based on the FE model predictions for the first load pass and on results from a research study available in literature to predict the behavior of buried pipes with multiple load passes. The parametric study has shown that the performance of buried pipes varies with the soil type, and the increase of compaction level and soil cover reduces the stresses on buried pipes. The numerical predictions indicate that the provisions of AASHTO bridge-design specifications for HDPE pipes need to be reassessed for very shallow burial depths.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The field-test work was performed at the FDOT Structures Research Center in Tallahassee, Florida. Technicians Steve, Tony, Frank, Paul, and Dave, as well as engineers Adnan and Tom are gratefully acknowledged for their effective contribution to various aspects of the laboratory testing. Special thanks are due to Adnan Al-Saad, P.E., former project manager. His dedication and hard work on the project are gratefully acknowledged. The authors are grateful to T. Limpeteeprakarn, N. Wang, and N. Butrieng, research assistants, for their assistance in data processing and report preparation.
References
AASHTO. (2000a). “Classification of soils and soil-aggregate mixtures for highway, standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing.” Part I: Specifications, 20th Ed., M145, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2000b). “Moisture-density relations of soil using a 2.5-kg (5.5-lb) rammer and a 305-mm (12-12) drop, standard specifications for transportation materials, and methods of sampling and testing.” Part II: Tests, 20th Ed., T99-97, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2010). “Bridge construction specifications.” AASHTO LRFD, Washington, DC.
ANSYS 5.7 [Computer software]. Sussex, England, Century Dynamics.
ASTM. (2008). “Standard guide for construction procedures for buried plastic pipe.” F1668-08 West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2011). “Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system).” D2487-11 West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2012). “Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort ( ()).” D698-12 West Conshohocken, PA.
British Standards Institution. (2010). “Guide to the structural design of buried pipelines.” BS 9295, London.
Chaallal, O., Arockiasamy, M., and Godat, A. (2013). “Laboratory tests to evaluate mechanical properties and performance of flexible pipes for culverts and storm sewers.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 04014130.
Chaallal, O., Arockiasamy, M., and Godat, A. (2014a). “Field test performance of buried flexible pipes under live truck loads.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 04014124.
Conard, B. E., Lohnes, R. A., Klaiber, F. W., and Wipf, T. J. (1998). “Boundary effects on response of polyethylene pipe under simulated live load.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 196–205.
Faragher, E., Fleming, P. R., and Rogers, C. D. (2000). “Analysis of repeated-load field testing of buried plastic pipes.” J. Transp. Eng., 271–277.
Hoeg, K. (1968). “Stress against underground structural cylinders.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 94(SM4), 833–858.
Jayawickrama, P. W., Amarasiri, A. L., and Regino, P. E. (2002). “Minimum cover requirements for large-diameter HDPE pipe installed with granular backfill.” 81st TRB Annual Meeting (CD-ROM), Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Kang, J., Jung, Y., and Ahn, Y. (2013). “Cover requirements of thermoplastic pipes used under highways.” Composites, Part B, 55, 184–192.
Klaiber, F. W., Lohnes, R. A., Wipt, T. J., and Phares, B. M. (1996). “Investigation of high-density polyethylene pipe for highway applications.”, Engineering Research Institute, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA.
Lohnes, R. A., Wipt, T. J., Klaiber, F. W., Conard, B. E., and Ng, K. W. (1997). “Investigation of high-density polyethylene pipe for highway applications.”, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA.
McGrath, T. J., DelloRusso, S. J., and Boynton, J. (2002). “Performance of thermoplastic culvert pipe under highway vehicle loading.” 81st Annual Meeting Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Moore, I. D., and Hu, F. (1995). “Response of profiled high-density polyethylene pipe in hoop compression.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 29–36.
Moore, I. D., and Zhang, C. (1995). “Computer models for predicting HDPE pipe stiffness.” Annual Conf., Canadian Society of Civil Engineering, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Moser, A. P. (2001). Buried pipe design, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Phares, B. M., Wipf, T. J., Klaiber, F. W., and Lohnes, R. A. (1998). “Behavior of high-density polyethylene pipe with shallow cover.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 214–224.
Reddy, D. V. (1999). “Evaluation of plastic piping for culverts and storm sewers.”, Dept. of Ocean Engineering, Florida Atlantic Univ., Boca Raton, FL.
Rogers, C. D. F. (1988). “Some observations on flexible pipe response to load.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1–11.
Sargand, S. M., Hazen, G. A., and Masada, T. (1998). “Structural evaluation and performance of plastic pipe.” Final Rep., Ohio Dept. of Transportation and Federal Highway Administration, Ohio Univ., Athens, OH.
Sargand, S. M., Hazen, G. A., and Moran, W. K. (2001a). “Time-dependent deflection of thermoplastic pipes under deep burial.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 236–242.
Sargand, S. M., Masada, T., and Schehl, D. J. (2001b). “Soil pressure measured at various fill heights above deeply buried thermoplastic pipe.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 227–235.
Terzaghi, K. (1943). Theoretical soil mechanics, Wiley, New York.
Trantina, G., and Nimmer, R. (1995). Structural analysis of thermoplastic components, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 6 • Issue 2 • May 2015
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 13, 2013
Accepted: Aug 11, 2014
Published online: Sep 30, 2014
Discussion open until: Feb 28, 2015
Published in print: May 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.