Numerical and Experimental Study of Uplift Mobilization of Buried Pipelines in Sands
Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 6, Issue 1
Abstract
Offshore oil and gas pipelines are commonly buried in seabed to provide environmental stability, thermal insulation and mechanical protection. These pipelines are frequently subjected to high thermal and pressure loadings that induce pipeline upheaval buckling (UHB). The uplift resistance provided by the cover soil increases with pipeline upward mobilization and reaches its peak at peak mobilization. This peak mobilization is fundamental for safe UHB designs. This paper highlights that the design guidelines underestimate the peak mobilization. The paper presents full-scale uplift results and finite-element parametric studies in which loose and dense cover soils of up to 3 m (soil cover height to diameter ratio up to 15) and pipeline diameters of 114 and 200 mm were investigated. Results from full-scale and finite-element modeling show that the peak pipe mobilization can be much greater than that suggested by current guidelines, and it is a function of the soil cover height to diameter ratio and soil relative density. A new relationship is proposed to predict peak mobilization from the soil cover height to diameter ratio for a given soil state.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
ABAQUS [Computer software]. Providence, RI.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). (2012). “Gas transmission and distribution piping systems.”, New York.
ASCE. (1984). “Guidelines for the seismic design of oil and gas pipeline systems.” Committee on Gas and Liquid Fuel Lifelines of the ASCE Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, Reston, VA.
Been, K., and Jefferies, M. G. (1985). “A state parameter for sands.” Geotechnique, 35(2), 99–112.
Bolton, M. D. (1986). “The strength and dilatancy of sands.” Geotechnique, 36(1), 65–78.
British Standards Institution. (2004). “Code of practice for pipelines Steel pipelines on land.”, London.
Cheong, T. P. (2006). “Numerical modelling of soil-pipeline interaction.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K.
Cheuk, C. Y., White, D. J., Bolton, M. D. (2008). “Uplift mechanisms of pipes buried in sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 154–163.
Croll, J. G. A. (1997). “A simplified model of upheaval thermal buckling of subsea pipelines.” Thin-Walled Struct., 29(1–4), 59–78.
Dasari, G. R., and Soga, K. (2000). “A guide book for soil models and soil-pipe analysis using ABAQUS.”, Tokyo, Japan.
Det Norske Veritas (DNV). (2007). “Global buckling of submarine pipelines—Structural design due to high temperature/high pressure.”, Oslo, Norway.
Dickin E. A. (1994). “Uplift resistance of buried pipelines in sand.” Soils Found., 34(2), 41–48.
Dickin, E. A., and Laman, M. (2007). “Uplift response of strip anchors in cohesionless soil.” Adv. Eng. Software, 38(8–9), 618–625.
Jefferies, M. G. (1993). “Nor-Sand: A simple critical state model for sand.” Geotechnique, 43(1), 91–103.
Palmer, A. C., et al. (2003). “Uplift resistance of buried submarine pipelines: comparison between centrifuge modeling and full-scale tests.” Géotechnique, 53(10), 877–883.
Palmer, A. C., Ellinas, C. P., Richards, D. M., and Guijt, J. (1990). “Design of submarine pipelines against upheaval buckling.” Proc., Offshore Technology Conf., OTC, Houston, TX, 551–560.
Pedersen, P. T., and Jensen, J. J. (1988). “Upheaval creep of buried pipelines with initial imperfections.” Marine Struct., 1(1), 11–22.
Robert, D. J. (2010). “Soil-pipeline interaction in unsaturated soils.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K.
Robert, D. J., and Soga, K. (2010). “Soil pipeline interaction in unsaturated soils.” Chapter 13, New trends in the mechanics of geomaterials, Wiley, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Schaminée, P. E. L., Zorn, N. F., and Schotman, G. J. M. (1990). “Soil response for pipeline upheaval buckling analysis: Full-scale laboratory tests and modelling.” Offshore Technology Conf., OTC, Houston, TX.
Thusyanthan, N. I., Mesmar, S., Robert, D. J., Wang, J., and Haigh, S. K. (2011). “Upheaval buckling assessment based on pipeline features.” Offshore Technology Conf., OTC, Houston, TX.
Thusyanthan, N. I., Sultan, M., Wang, J., Haigh, S. K. (2010). Uplift resistance of buried pipelines and DNV guidelines, IBC Energy, London.
Trautmann, C. H., and O’Rourke, T. D. (1983). “Behaviour of pipe in dry sand under lateral and uplift loading.”, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.
Wang, J., Haigh, S., Forrest, G., and Thusyanthan, N. (2012). “Mobilization distance for upheaval buckling of shallowly buried pipelines.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract., 106–114.
White, D. J., Barefoot, A. J., Bolton, M. D. (2001). “Centrifuge modelling of upheaval buckling in sand.” Int. J. Phys. Modell. Geotech., 2(1), 19–28.
Williams, E. S., Byrne, B. W., and Blakeborough, A. (2013). “Pipe uplift in saturated sand: Rate and density effects.” J. Geotechnique, 63(11), 946–956.
Yimsiri, S., Soga, K., Yoshizaki, K., Dasari, G. R., and O’Rourke, T. D. (2004). “Lateral and upward soil-pipeline interactions in sand for deep embedment conditions.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 830–842.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 6 • Issue 1 • February 2015
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 10, 2013
Accepted: May 27, 2014
Published online: Jul 21, 2014
Discussion open until: Dec 21, 2014
Published in print: Feb 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.