Technical Papers
Jan 24, 2022

Integrating Household Decisions in Quantifying the Seismic Resilience of Communities Subjected to a Sequence of Earthquakes

Publication: Natural Hazards Review
Volume 23, Issue 2

Abstract

A distributed simulation model is presented that integrates post-earthquake household decisions into quantifying the seismic resilience of communities subjected to a sequence of earthquakes. A simple multi-attribute rating technique (SMART) is used to model post-earthquake household decision making at the building level, whereas the earthquake sequence is modeled using time-dependent analysis during recovery from the first shock. Incremental dynamic analysis is used to develop fragility curves for first shock–damaged structures, which are distinguished from the conventional fragility curves of undamaged structures. A case study of a prototype community that comprises households with different socioeconomic characteristics in accordance with a typical small US community is used to show the influence that household decisions have on the overall seismic resilience of the community. The results suggest that seismic events with a larger first shock have a more severe impact on the seismic resilience of communities than events with a smaller first shock regardless of the magnitude of the subsequent shock.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available in a repository online in accordance with funder data retention policies (https://doi.org/10.17603/ds2-zj63-ge63).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the University of Michigan and the US National Science Foundation (NSF) through grant ACI-1638186. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors.

References

Abdelnaby, A. E. 2018. “Fragility curves for RC frames subjected to Tohoku mainshock-aftershocks sequences.” J. Earthquake Eng. 22 (5): 902–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1264328.
Abdollahzadeh, G. R., A. Mohammadgholipour, and E. Omranian. 2019. “Seismic evaluation of steel moment frames under mainshock–aftershock sequence designed by elastic design and PBPD methods.” J. Earthquake Eng. 23 (10): 1605–1628. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1387198.
Adachi, T., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2009. “Serviceability assessment of a municipal water system under spatially correlated seismic intensities.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 24 (4): 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2008.00583.x.
Almufti, I., and M. Willford. 2013. REDi rating system: Resilience-based earthquake design initiative for the next generation of buildings. London: ARUP Group.
BLS (US Bureau of Labor Statistics). 2019. “About the construction sector.” Accessed January 20, 2019. http://www.bls.gov/iag/tgs/iag23.htm.
Brokopp, S., C. K. Baker, and J. P. Barile. 2015. “Rebuild or relocate? Resilience and postdisaster decision-making after Hurricane Sandy.” Am. J. Community Psychol. 56 (1–2): 180–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-015-9727-x.
Burton, H., H. Kang, S. Miles, A. Nejat, and Z. Yi. 2019. “A framework and case study for integrating household decision-making into post-earthquake recovery models.” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 37 (May): 101167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101167.
Burton, H. V., S. B. Miles, and H. Kang. 2018. “Integrating performance-based engineering and urban simulation to model post-earthquake housing recovery.” Earthquake Spectra 34 (4): 1763–1785. https://doi.org/10.1193/041017EQS067M.
Chandrasekhar, D., and D. Finn. 2015. Influence of household recovery capacity and urgency on post-disaster relocation: A case study of the Rockaways, NY after Hurricane Sandy. Boulder, CO: Natural Hazards Center, Univ. of Colorado.
Cong, Z., A. Nejat, D. Liang, Y. Pei, and R. J. Javid. 2018. “Individual relocation decisions after tornadoes: A multi-level analysis.” Disasters 42 (2): 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12241.
Edwards, W. 1971. “Social utilities.” In Vol. 6 of Proc., The Engineering Economist Summer Symp. Series, 119–129. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis.
Emrtath, P. 2013. Latest calculations show average buyer expected to stay in a home 13 years special. Washington, DC: National Association of Home Builders.
FEMA. 2003. Earthquake loss estimation methodology: Technical manual. Washington, DC: National Institute of Building for the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
FEMA. 2009. Quantification of building seismic performance factors (ATC-63 project). FEMA P695. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
FEMA. 2012. Seismic performance assessment of buildings. FEMA P-58-1. Redwood City, CA: Applied Technology Council.
Folz, B., and A. Filiatrault. 2001. “Cyclic analysis of wood shear walls.” J. Struct. Eng. 127 (4): 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:4(433).
Haselton, C. B., and G. G. Deierlein. 2007. Assessing seismic collapse safety of modern reinforced concrete moment frame buildings. Stanford, CA: John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ.
Hikichi, H., Y. Sawada, T. Tsuboya, J. Aida, K. Kondo, S. Koyama, and I. Kawachi. 2017. “Residential relocation and change in social capital: A natural experiment from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami.” Sci. Adv. 3 (7): e1700426. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700426.
Hu, S., P. Gardoni, and L. Xu. 2018. “Stochastic procedure for the simulation of synthetic main shock-aftershock ground motion sequences.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 47 (11): 2275–2296. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3068.
Ibarra, L. F., and H. Krawinkler. 2005. Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations. Stanford, CA: John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Stanford Univ.
ICoR (Interdependencies in Community Resilience). 2019. “Interdependencies in community resilience (ICoR) project.” Accessed February 22, 2019. https://icor.engin.umich.edu/.
III (Insurance Information Institute). 2018. Background on: Earthquake insurance and risk. New York: III.
Khansefid, A., and A. Bakhshi. 2019. “New model for simulating random synthetic stochastic earthquake scenarios.” J. Earthquake Eng. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2019.1699207.
Kong, A. M. 2015. “Finite element analysis of a conventional wood shear wall using detailed nail parameters and thermal performance of various green framing arrangements.” Thesis, Faculty of the Dept. of Civil Engineering, California State Univ.
Li, Y., R. Song, and J. W. Van De Lindt. 2014. “Collapse fragility of steel structures subjected to earthquake mainshock-aftershock sequences.” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (12): 04014095. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001019.
Lignos, D. G., and H. Krawinkler. 2012. Sidesway collapse of deteriorating structural systems under seismic excitations. Stanford, CA: John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Stanford Univ.
Lin, S. Y., et al. 2020. “A distributed computational tool for natural hazards simulation.” In Proc., 17th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (17WCEE). Tokyo: Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Lin, S. Y., et al. 2021. “Simple run-time infrastructure (SRTI): An accessible distributed computing platform for interdisciplinary simulation.” J. Comput. Sci. 55 (Oct): 101455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2021.101455.
Lin, S.-Y., and S. El-Tawil. 2020. “Time-dependent resilience assessment of seismic damage and restoration of interdependent lifeline systems.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 26 (1): 04019040. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000522.
Markhvida, M., and J. W. Baker. 2018. “Unification of seismic performance estimation and real estate investment analysis to model post-earthquake building repair decisions.” Earthquake Spectra 34 (4): 1787–1808. https://doi.org/10.1193/030118EQS048M.
McKenna, F., G. L. Fenves, and M. H. Scott. 2000. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Nazari, N., J. W. van de Lindt, and Y. Li. 2015. “Effect of mainshock-aftershock sequences on woodframe building damage fragilities.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 29 (1): 04014036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509-0000512.
NCES (National Center for Education Statistics). 2019. “Back to school statistics.” Accessed March 12, 2019. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=372.
NCSA (National Center for Supercomputing Applications). 2018. “ERGO-EQ Platform for Multi-Hazard Assessment, Response, and Planning.” National Center for Supercomputing Applications and Mid America Earthquake Center. Accessed August 10, 2018. http://ergo.ncsa.illinois.edu/?page_id=44.
Nejat, A., Z. Cong, and D. Liang. 2016. “Family structures, relationships, and housing recovery decisions after Hurricane Sandy.” Buildings 6 (2): 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings6020014.
NIST. 2010. Evaluation of the FEMA P695 methodology for quantification of building seismic performance factors. NIST GCR 10-917-8. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.
Nithin, V. L., S. Das, and H. B. Kaushik. 2020. “Stochastic simulation of fully nonstationary aftershock ground motions from known preceding main shock.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 130 (Mar): 106006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.106006.
Nojima, N. 2012. “Restoration processes of utility lifelines in the great east Japan earthquake Disaster, 2011.” In Proc., 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (15WCEE). Lisbon, Portugal: Sociedade Portuguesa de Engenharia Sismica (SPES).
PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center). 2019. “PEER ground motion database.” Accessed January 12, 2019. https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/.
Polese, M., M. Di Ludovico, and A. Prota. 2018. “Post-earthquake reconstruction: A study on the factors influencing demolition decisions after 2009 L’Aquila earthquake.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 105 (Feb): 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.12.007.
Potter, S. H., J. S. Becker, D. M. Johnston, and K. P. Rossiter. 2015. “An overview of the impacts of the 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquakes.” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 14 (Dec): 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.01.014.
Pressman, S. 2015. Defining and measuring the middle class. Great Barrington, MA: American Institute of Economic Research.
Ryu, H., N. Luco, S. R. Uma, and A. B. Liel. 2011. “Developing fragilities for mainshock-damaged structures through incremental dynamic analysis.” In Proc., 9th Pacific Conf. on Earthquake Engineering Building an Earthquake-Resilient Society. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering.
Sediek, O. A., S. El-Tawil, and J. McCormick. 2019a. “Quantifying the seismic resilience of communities: A distributed computing framework.” In Proc., Int. Conf. in Commemoration of 20th Anniversary of the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Sediek, O. A., S. El-Tawil, and J. McCormick. 2019b. “A scalable framework for assessing seismic resilience of communities.” In Proc., of the ASCE Structures Congress. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Sediek, O. A., S. El-Tawil, and J. McCormick. 2020a. “Dynamic modeling of in-event interdependencies in community resilience.” Nat. Hazard. Rev. 21 (4): 04020041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000413.
Sediek, O. A., S. El-Tawil, and J. McCormick. 2020b. “Integrating household decisions in quantifying the seismic resilience of communities.” In Proc., 17th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (17WCEE). Tokyo: Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Sediek, O. A., S. El-Tawil, and J. McCormick. 2021. “Models and illustrative case study for integrating household decisions in quantifying the seismic resilience of communities subjected to earthquake sequences.”. New York: DesignSafe-CI.
Silwal, B., and O. E. Ozbulut. 2018. “Aftershock fragility assessment of steel moment frames with self-centering dampers.” Eng. Struct. 168 (Aug): 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.071.
SRTI (Simple Run Time Infrastructure). 2019. “Simple run time infrastructure (SRTI).” Accessed February 12, 2019. https://github.com/hlynka-a/SRTI.
US Census Bureau. 2017a. “Comparative demographic estimates 2017 American community survey 1-year estimates.” Accessed March 7, 2019. https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_16_1YR_CP05&prodType=table.
US Census Bureau. 2017b. “Percentage distribution of household income in the United States in 2017.” Statista—The Statistics Portal. Accessed March 6, 2019. https://www.statista.com/statistics/203183/percentage-distribution-of-household-income-in-the-us/.
USGS. 2018. “Memphis, Shelby County seismic hazard maps and data download.” Accessed August 12, 2018. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/urban/memphis/grid_download.php.
Vamvatsikos, D., and C. A. Cornell. 2002. “Incremental dynamic analysis.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31 (3): 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141.
Wilson, G. A. 2013. “Community resilience, social memory and the post-2010 Christchurch (New Zealand) earthquakes.” Area 45 (2): 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12012.
Xiao, Y., and S. Van Zandt. 2012. “Building community resiliency: Spatial links between household and business post-disaster return.” Urban Stud. 49 (11): 2523–2542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011428178.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Natural Hazards Review
Natural Hazards Review
Volume 23Issue 2May 2022

History

Received: Apr 8, 2021
Accepted: Dec 3, 2021
Published online: Jan 24, 2022
Published in print: May 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jun 24, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2125 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3369-2598. Email: [email protected]
Sherif El-Tawil, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2125. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2125. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7379-4660. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Seismic Performance of Buildings Equipped with Four-Joint Rotational Friction Dampers in Mainshock–Aftershock Sequences, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12980, 150, 3, (2024).
  • A Decision Support Methodology for Seismic Design Requirements of Buildings to Achieve Community-Level Resilience Metrics, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1213, 10, 3, (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share