Technical Papers
Mar 31, 2021

Tensile- and Shear-Strength Tests with Adhesive Connections in Dynamic Message Signs

Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 33, Issue 6

Abstract

A dynamic message sign (DMS) is made up of a display, cabinet sheet aluminum skin, and internal structure along with electrical components. The aluminum skin is connected to the internal structure usually with a welded connection; however, adhesive or chemical bonding can be used instead for the connection between these two components. The goal of this paper is to examine the tensile and shear strengths along with other mechanical properties of adhesives used in the DMS under varying environmental and geometrical conditions. Adhesive tensile and shear specimens with different widths were tested according to accepted standards after conditioning them in different temperature and humidity conditions. Numerous data resulting from the tests were analyzed through graphical comparisons and statistical analysis so as to explore the effect of the considered parameters on tensile and shear strengths. As part of the statistical analysis, response surface metamodels (RSMs) were utilized not only to determine statistically significant parameters affecting the strengths, but also to develop separate regression models for the tensile and shear strengths. The highest decrement in the tensile stress was found to be 7.1%, 19.9%, and 7.9% with the increase in conditioning temperature, conditioning humidity, and specimen’s width, respectively. Owing to the effect of increases in conditioning temperature, conditioning humidity, and specimen width, the shear stress was increased most by 10%, 7%, and 19.3%, correspondingly. Key findings revealed that an increase in conditioning humidity decreases the tensile strength. The RSM model–based analysis also found conditioning humidity to be the most significant parameter negatively affecting the tensile stress because a probability value of 2.529% was observed from the RSM model. Finally, this work found adhesive or chemical bonding to be a possible substitute to welding for assembly of the DMS.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The contents of this paper reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. This work was sponsored by Daktronics and Mountain-Plains Consortium. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Mountain-Plains Consortium. The authors thank Dan Bierschbach, John Syrstad, Toby Pulscher, Jeff Haliburton, and Eric Johns at Daktronics for their financial support, invaluable comments and support for this work. The authors are grateful to Matthew Zobel for help with the literature review on adhesive strength.

References

Agarwal, A., S. J. Foster, E. Hamed, and T. S. Ng. 2014. “Influence of freeze–thaw cycling on the bond strength of steel–FRP lap joints.” Composites, Part B 60 (Apr): 178–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.024.
ASTM. 2010. Standard test method for apparent shear strength of single-lap-joint adhesively bonded metal specimens by tension loading (metal-to-metal). ASTM D1002. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2014. Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics. ASTM D638. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Banea, M. D., L. F. M. da Silva, and R. D. Campilho. 2015. “The effect of adhesive thickness on the mechanical behavior of a structural polyurethane adhesive.” J. Adhes. 91 (5): 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2014.903802.
Chandorkar, A. N., S. Mande, and H. Iwai. 2008. “Estimation of process variation impact on DG-FinFET device performance using Plackett-Burman design of experiment method.” In Proc 9th Int. Conf. on Solid-State and Integrated-Circuit Technology, 215–218. New York: IEEE.
Chapman, J. 2010. “Bonding with adhesives.” Accessed October 4, 2019. https://www.compositesone.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/RE3043-LORD-Case-Study.pdf.
Çolak, A., T. Çoşgun, and A. E. Bakırcı. 2009. “Effects of environmental factors on the adhesion and durability characteristics of epoxy-bonded concrete prisms.” Constr. Build. Mater. 23 (2): 758–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.02.013.
Daktronics. 2020a. “Daktronics scoreboard product reliability.” Accessed July 17, 2020. https://www.daktronics.com/en-us/video-gallery/Daktronics-Scoreboard-Product-Reliability.
Daktronics. 2020b. “ITS dynamic message signs.” Accessed July 17, 2020. https://www.daktronics.com/en-us/products/its-dynamic-message-signs.
Da Silva, L. F., R. J. C. Carbas, G. W. Critchlow, M. A. V. Figueiredo, and K. Brown. 2009. “Effect of material, geometry, surface treatment and environment on the shear strength of single lap joints.” Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 29 (6): 621–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.02.012.
Goglio, L., and M. Rezaei. 2014. “Variations in mechanical properties of an epoxy adhesive on exposure to warm moisture.” J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 28 (14–15): 1394–1404. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2012.697392.
Hu, P., X. Han, L. Li, Q. Shao, and W. D. Li. 2012. Effect of temperature on shear strength of adhesively bonded joints for automobile industry, 1259–1265. Geneva: Trans Tech.
Kim, Y. J., M. Hossain, and I. Yoshitake. 2012. “Cold region durability of a two-part epoxy adhesive in double-lap shear joints: Experiment and model development.” Constr. Build. Mater. 36 (Nov): 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.026.
Lettieri, M., and M. Frigione. 2011. “Natural and artificial weathering effects on cold-cured epoxy resins.” J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 119 (3): 1635–1645. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.32835.
LORD Corporation. 2018. “LORD® 406 acrylic adhesive.” Accessed November 29, 2018. https://www.lord.com/products-and-solutions/adhesives/lord-406-acrylic-adhesive.
Machalicka, K., and M. Eliasova. 2017. “Adhesive joints in glass structures: effects of various materials in the connection, thickness of the adhesive layer, and ageing.” Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 72 (Jan): 10–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.09.007.
Moussa, O., A. P. Vassilopoulos, J. de Castro, and T. Keller. 2012. “Time–temperature dependence of thermomechanical recovery of cold-curing structural adhesives.” Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 35 (Jun): 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.02.005.
MTS Systems Corporation. 2018. “MTS Landmark® Servohydraulic test systems.” Accessed November 29, 2018. http://www.mts.com/en/products/producttype/test-systems/load-frames-uniaxial/servohydraulic/standard/index.htm.
Na, J., Y. Liu, Y. Fan, W. Mu, X. Chen, and Y. Yan. 2017. “Effect of temperature on the joint strength of a silyl-modified polymer-based adhesive.” J. Adhes. 93 (8): 626–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2015.1128330.
Na, J., Y. Liu, Y. Wang, L. Pan, and Y. Yan. 2016. “Effect of temperature on the joints strength of an automotive polyurethane adhesive.” J. Adhes. 92 (1): 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2014.996634.
Neto, J. A. B. P., R. D. Campilho, and L. F. M. Da Silva. 2012. “Parametric study of adhesive joints with composites.” Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 37 (Sep): 96–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.01.019.
Sakiyama, T., G. Murayama, Y. Naito, K. Saita, Y. M. H. Oikawa, and T. Nose. 2013. “Dissimilar metal joining technologies for steel sheet and aluminum alloy sheet in auto body.” Nippon Steel Tech. Rep. 103 (May): 91–98.
SAS Institute Inc. 2008. JMP statistics and graphics guide, version 5.1.2. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
Savvilotidou, M., A. P. Vassilopoulos, M. Frigione, and T. Keller. 2017. “Development of physical and mechanical properties of a cold-curing structural adhesive in a wet bridge environment.” Constr. Build. Mater. 144 (Jul): 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.145.
Seo, J. 2013. “Statistical determination of significant curved I-girder bridge seismic response parameters.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vib. 12 (2): 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-013-0168-y.
Seo, J., and D. G. Linzell. 2010. “Probabilistic vulnerability scenarios for horizontally curved steel i-girder bridges under earthquake loads.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2202 (1): 206–211. https://doi.org/10.3141/2202-24.
Seo, J., and D. G. Linzell. 2012. “Horizontally curved steel bridge seismic vulnerability assessment.” Eng. Struct. 34 (Jan): 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.09.008.
Seo, J., and D. G. Linzell. 2013a. “Influential curved steel bridge fragility analysis parameters.” In Proc., Sixth Congress on Forensic Engineering, 84–92. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Seo, J., and D. G. Linzell. 2013b. “Use of response surface metamodels to generate system level fragilities for existing curved steel bridges.” Eng. Struct. 52 (Jul): 642–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.023.
Seo, J., and J. Pokhrel. 2019. “Surrogate modeling for self-consolidating concrete characteristics estimation for efficient prestressed bridge construction.” Am. Concr. Inst. Spec. Publ. 333 (Oct): 19–39.
Silva, P., P. Fernandes, J. Sena-Cruz, J. Xavier, F. Castro, D. Soares, and V. Carneiro. 2016. “Effects of different environmental conditions on the mechanical characteristics of a structural epoxy.” Composites, Part B 88 (Mar): 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.10.036.
Sousa, J. M., J. R. Correia, and S. Cabral-Fonseca. 2018. “Durability of an epoxy adhesive used in civil structural applications.” Constr. Build. Mater. 161 (Feb): 618–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.1680950-0618.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 33Issue 6June 2021

History

Received: May 5, 2020
Accepted: Dec 1, 2020
Published online: Mar 31, 2021
Published in print: Jun 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Aug 31, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ibin Amatya [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, South Dakota State Univ., Brookings, SD 57006. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor and Chairman of ASCE Timber Bridges Committee, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, South Dakota State Univ., Brookings, SD 57006 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6046-9319. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, South Dakota State Univ., Brookings, SD 57006. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3914-2105. Email: [email protected]
Dan Bierschbach [email protected]
Solutions Manager, Transportation Engineering, Daktronics, 201 Daktronics Dr., Brookings, SD 57006. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share