Technical Papers
Apr 28, 2021

Slag-Based Geopolymer Concrete as Reinforced Concrete Jacketing Agent

Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 33, Issue 7

Abstract

The acceptance of geopolymeric systems in construction industry as an alternative to portland cement has paved the way for using it in the strengthening of reinforced concrete structures. In this regard, a study was carried out to develop a novel method of strengthening reinforced concrete beams by jacketing using ultrafine blast-furnace slag-based geopolymer. The reinforced concrete beams were in a fully damaged, partially damaged, or undamaged state prior to jacketing. Geopolymer concrete (GPC) exhibited appreciable performance as a jacketing agent. The results of GPC-jacketed beams in terms of strength, ductility, and stiffness degradation were superior compared to portland cement concrete (PCC). GPC-jacketed beams exhibited appreciable performance even at the early age of three days. The levels of damage also influenced the behavior of the jacketed beams.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the help and support extended by Counto Microfine Products Private Limited, India, Fosroc Chemicals India Private Limited, India, and Dalmia Bharat Limited by providing materials required for the laboratory tests in the current research at IIT Guwahati, Jorhat Engineering College, and NIT Mizoram.

References

Ahmad Zailani, W. W., A. Bouaissi, M. M. A. B. Abdullah, R. Abd Razak, S. Yoriya, M. A. A. Mohd Salleh, M. A. Z. Rozainy, and H. Fansuri. 2020. “Bonding strength characteristics of fa-based geopolymer paste as a repair material when applied on OPC substrate.” Appl. Sci. 10 (9): 3321. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10093321.
Altun, F. 2004. “An experimental study of the jacketed reinforced-concrete beams under bending.” Constr. Build. Mater. 18 (8): 611–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.04.005.
Belal, M. F., H. M. Mohamed, and S. A. Morad. 2015. “Behavior of reinforced concrete columns strengthened by steel jacket.” HBRC J. 11 (2): 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2014.05.002.
Benjeddou, O., M. B. Ouezdou, and A. Bedday. 2007. “Damaged RC beams repaired by bonding of CFRP laminates.” Constr. Build. Mater. 21 (6): 1301–1310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.01.008.
Binici, H., H. Temiz, and M. M. Kose. 2007. “The effect of fineness on the properties of the blended cements incorporating ground granulated blast furnace slag and ground basaltic pumice.” Constr. Build. Mater. 21 (5): 1122–1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.11.005.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standard). 1982. Specification for mild steel and medium tensile steel bars and hard-drawn steel wire for concrete reinforcement—Part 1: Mild steel and medium tensile steel bars. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standard). 2002. Specification for coarse and fine aggregates from natural sources for concrete. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standard). 2004a. 43 grade ordinary Portland cement-specification. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standard). 2004b. Methods of sampling and analysis of concrete. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standard). 2004c. Methods of test for pozzolanic materials. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standard). 2004d. Methods of tests for strength of concrete. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standard). 2004e. Plain and reinforced concrete—Code of practice. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standard). 2004f. Splitting tensile strength of concrete—Method of test. New Delhi, India: BIS.
Brough, A. R., and A. Atkinson. 2002. “Sodium silicate-based, alkali-activated slag mortars Part I. Strength, hydration and microstructure.” Cem. Concr. Res. 32 (6): 865–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00717-2.
Chajes, M. J., T. A. Thomson, and C. A. Farschman. 1995. “Durability of concrete beams externally reinforced with composite fabrics.” Constr. Build. Mater. 9 (3): 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-0618(95)00006-2.
Cheong, H. K., and N. MacAlevey. 2000. “Experimental behavior of jacketed reinforced concrete beams.” J. Struct. Eng. 126 (6): 692–699. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:6(692).
Choi, E., J. Jeon, B. Cho, and K. Park. 2013. “External jacket of FRP wire for confining concrete and its advantages.” Eng. Struct. 56 (Nov): 555–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.05.019.
Collins, F., and J. G. Sanjayan. 1999. “Effects of ultra-fine materials on workability and strength of concrete containing alkali-activated slag as the binder.” Cem. Concr. Res. 29 (3): 459–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00237-3.
Duan, P., C. Yan, and W. Luo. 2016. “A novel waterproof, fast setting and high early strength repair material derived from metakaolin geopolymer.” Constr. Build. Mater. 124 (Oct): 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.058.
Gamage, J. C. P. H., R. Al-Mahaidi, and M. B. Wong. 2006. “Bond characteristics of CFRP plated concrete members under elevated temperatures.” Compos. Struct. 75 (1–4): 199–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.068.
Gorhan, G., and G. Kurklu. 2014. “The influence of the NaOH solution on the properties of the fly ash-based geopolymer mortar cured at different temperatures.” Composites, Part B 58 (Mar): 371–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.082.
Hu, S., H. Wang, G. Zhang, and Q. Ding. 2008. “Bonding and abrasion resistance of geopolymeric repair material made with steel slag.” Cem. Concr. Comp. 30 (3): 239–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.04.004.
Hussain, M., A. Sharif, I. B. M. Baluch, and G. J. Al-Sulaimani. 1995. “Flexural behavior of precracked reinforced concrete beams strengthened externally by steel plates.” Struc. J. 92 (1): 14–23. https://doi.org/10.14359/1466.
Jamil, M. A., M. B. Zisan, M. R. Alam, and H. Alim. 2013. “Restrengthening of RCC beam by beam jacketing.” Malaysian J. Civ. Eng. 25 (2): 119–127.
Júlio, E. N. B. S., F. A. B. Branco, and V. D. Silva. 2005. “Reinforced concrete jacketing-interface influence on monotonic loading response” ACI Struct. J. 102 (2): 252–257. https://doi.org/10.14359/14276.
Jumaat, M. Z., M. A. Rahman, M. A. Alam, and M. M. Rahman. 2011. “Premature failures in plate bonded strengthened RC beams with an emphasis on premature shear: A review.” Int. J. Phys. Sci. 6 (2): 156–168. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJPS10.369.
Khan, M. I., K. Azizli, S. Sufian, and Z. Man. 2015. “Sodium silicate-free geopolymers as coating materials: Effects of Na/Al and water/solid ratios on adhesion strength.” Ceram. Int. 41 (2): 2794–2805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.10.099.
Kim, Y. J., S. C. Kim, and Y. T. Kim. 2003. “Corrosion resistance and hydration heat of concrete containing ground granulated blast furnace slag.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 7 (4): 399–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02895838.
Laskar, S. M., and S. Talukdar. 2017a. “Development of ultrafine slag-based geopolymer mortar for use as repairing mortar.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 29 (5): 04016292. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001824.
Laskar, S. M., and S. Talukdar. 2017b. “Preparation and tests for workability, compressive and bond strength of ultra-fine slag based geopolymer as concrete repairing agent.” Constr. Build. Mater. 154 (Nov): 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.187.
Law, D. W., A. A. Adam, T. K. Molyneaux, and T. Patnaikuni. 2012. “Durability assessment of alkali activated slag (AAS) concrete.” Mater. Struct. 45 (9): 1425–1437. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9842-1.
Li, A., J. Assih, and Y. Delmas. 2001. “Shear strengthening of RC beams with externally bonded CFRP sheets.” J. Struct. Eng. 127 (4): 374–380. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:4(374).
Manjunatha, G. S., K. Venugopal, and S. V. Maruthi. 2014. “Strength characteristics of open air cured geopolymer concrete.” T. Indian Ceram. Soc. 73 (2): 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/0371750X.2014.923330.
Oh, B. H., J. Y. Cho, and D. G. Park. 2003. “Static and fatigue behavior of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with steel plates for flexure.” J. Struct. Eng. 129 (4): 527–535. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:4(527).
Oner, M., K. Erdogdu, and A. Gunlu. 2003. “Effect of components fineness on strength of blast furnace slag cement.” Cem. Concr. Res. 33 (4): 463–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00713-5.
Phoo-ngernkham, T., V. Sata, S. Hanjitsuwan, C. Ridtirud, S. Hatanaka, and P. Chindaprasirt. 2015. “High calcium fly ash geopolymer mortar containing Portland cement for use as repair material.” Constr. Build. Mater. 98 (Nov): 482–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.139.
Raval, S. S., and U. V. Dave. 2013. “Effectiveness of various methods of jacketing for RC beams.” Procedia Eng. 51 (Jan): 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.01.032.
Sarker, P. K. 2011. “Bond strength of reinforcing steel embedded in fly ash based geopolymer concrete.” Mater. Struct. 44 (5): 1021–1030. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-010-9683-8.
Sirju, K., and A. K. Sharma. 2001. “Strengthening of reinforced concrete members under compression and bending.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Struct. Build. 146 (2): 227–231. https://doi.org/10.1680/stbu.2001.146.2.227.
Teng, S., T. Y. D. Lim, and B. S. Divsholi. 2013. “Durability and mechanical properties of high strength concrete incorporating ultra-fine ground granulated blast-furnace slag.” Constr. Build. Mater. 40 (Mar): 875–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.052.
Ueng, T. H., S. J. Lyu, H. W. Chu, H. H. Lee, and T. T. Wang. 2012. “Adhesion at interface of geopolymer and cement mortar under compression: an experimental study.” Constr. Build. Mater. 35 (Oct): 204–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.03.008.
Wang, W. W., J. G. Dai, and K. A. Harries. 2013. “Performance evaluation of RC beams strengthened with an externally bonded FRP system under simulated vehicle loads.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (1): 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000324.
Yang, K. H., J. K. Song, A. F. Ashour, and E. T. Lee. 2008. “Properties of cementless mortars activated by sodium silicate.” Constr. Build. Mater. 22 (9): 1981–1989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.07.003.
Zanotti, C., P. H. R. Borges, A. Bhutta, and N. Banthia. 2017. “Bond strength between concrete substrate and metakaolin geopolymer repair mortar: Effect of curing regime and PVA fiber reinforcement.” Cem. Concr. Comp. 80 (Jul): 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.12.014.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 33Issue 7July 2021

History

Received: Feb 7, 2019
Accepted: Dec 1, 2020
Published online: Apr 28, 2021
Published in print: Jul 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Sep 28, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sulaem Musaddiq Laskar, A.M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3455-7136
Faculty, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Mizoram, Aizawl 796012, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3455-7136
Sudip Talukdar [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati 781039, India (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Mechanical and bond behaviour of high volume Ultrafine-slag blended fly ash based alkali activated concrete, Construction and Building Materials, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131368, 383, (131368), (2023).
  • Performance of Geopolymer Mortar and Steel Fiber Reinforced Geopolymer Mortar on Rehabilitation of Seismically Detailed Beam-Column Joint, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 10.1080/13632469.2022.2086187, 27, 6, (1607-1628), (2022).
  • A review on structural performance of geopolymer beam and geopolymer for strengthening the beam, Materials Today: Proceedings, 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.001, 64, (74-78), (2022).
  • Investigation on the performance of reinforced concrete columns jacketed by conventional concrete and geopolymer concrete, Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 10.1016/j.jestch.2022.101275, 36, (101275), (2022).
  • Experimental and analytical study for shear strengthening of reinforced-concrete beams using a prefabricated geopolymer–mortar panel, Case Studies in Construction Materials, 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01568, 17, (e01568), (2022).
  • Geopolymers as Sustainable Material for Strengthening and Restoring Unreinforced Masonry Structures: A Review, Buildings, 10.3390/buildings11110532, 11, 11, (532), (2021).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share