Technical Papers
Mar 27, 2021

Use of Waste Gypsum, Reclaimed Asphalt Filler, and GGBS as a Full Replacement of Cement in Road Base

Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 33, Issue 6

Abstract

Laboratory experiments were used to determine the suitability of raw industrial by-products obtained within the United Kingdom that are being taken to landfill sites and develop a hydraulically bound cementitious material for applications in road (base), foundation, and subgrade in pavement construction. The by-products were predominantly sourced locally. Tests were carried out to determine the mechanical stability of the by-product binders and performance determined in strength development by time. High-pressure permeability tests were performed to determine the permeability of the materials, and frost susceptibility tests were conducted to determine the freeze–thaw resistance of the materials. Compressive strength tests were conducted at 7, 14, 28, 90, and 180 days of age. Strength development on the hydraulic paste was slow during the early stages of hydration for mixtures containing 40%–60% ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS). After 28 days and up to 90 days when the ultimate strength of the hydraulic paste was achieved, strength increased with the presence of GGBS of up to 60%. Ternary mixtures with proportions of 20% plasterboard waste gypsum (PWG); 20% reclaimed asphalt filler (RAF), 60% GGBS, and 10% vitamin B5 gypsum (V-B5G); 30% RAF; and 60% GGBS attained the highest compressive strengths of 41 and 40 MPa, respectively, at 90 days. One of the dominant factors that influenced the strength was the presence of calcium sulfate, CaSO4 (CaO+SO3), in the PWG and V-B5G materials; calcium silicate, CaSiO3 (CaO+SiO2), in the GGBS; and pozzolanic activity (SiO2+Fe2O3+Al2O3) in the RAF. The results suggest most of the mixes in the groups are suitable for use as road (base) and foundation materials.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
The items that will be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request are as follows:
1.
Input data on Minitab 18.
2.
Output data on Minitab 18.
3.
Laboratory compressive strength results at 7, 14, 28, 90, and 180 days of the different mixes (Group 2 and Group 2A) discussed in this manuscript.
4.
Laboratory high-pressure permeability results of Group 2–Mix 1 and Group 2A–Mix 13 at 28-day and 90-day tests.
5.
Laboratory freeze–thaw results of Group 2–Mix 1 and Group 2A–Mix 13.
6.
Input and output data in using the Malvern Mastersize 2000 to determine the particle size distributions of PWG, V-B5G, RAF, and GGBS.
7.
Evidence of test results carried out by other institutions (Leicester University and Warwick University) to determine the phases or component combinations of the mineralogical properties of the samples (materials) used in the experimental study.
8.
Evidence of test results carried out by other institutions (Leicester University and Warwick University) to determine the chemical composition or chemical oxides of the materials used in the experimental study.
9.
Evidence of e-mail correspondence with suppliers from which samples were obtained.
10.
Data for laboratory test results for compressive strength, high-pressure permeability tests, and freeze–thaw tests on request in Excel format. All other test results will be in the format generated by the packaging software used to undertake the experiments.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of Warwickshire County Council. The materials were kindly provided by Tarmac and DSM Nutritional Products UK Ltd, Scotland.

References

Andrew, R. M. 2018. “Global CO2 emissions from cement production.” Earth Syst. Sci. Data 10 (1): 195. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-195-2018.
ASTM. 2013. Standard test methods for sampling and testing fly ash or natural pozzolans for use in portland-cement concrete. ASTM C311. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bai Kamara, K. B., E. Ganjian, and M. Khorami. 2020. “The effect of quarry waste dust and reclaimed asphalt filler in hydraulically bound mixtures containing plasterboard gypsum and GGBS.” J. Cleaner Prod. 279 (Jan): 123584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123584.
Benhelal, E., G. Zahedi, E. Shamsaei, and A. Bahadori. 2013. “Global strategies and potentials to curb CO2 emissions in cement industry.” J. Cleaner Prod. 51 (Jul): 142–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.049.
Bland, J. M., and D. G. Altman. 1995. “Multiple significance tests: The Bonferroni method.” BMJ 310 (6973): 170. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6973.170.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 2003. Unbound and hydraulically bound mixtures. Test method for determination of direct tensile strength of hydraulically bound mixtures. EN BS 13286-40. London: BSI.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 2009. Tests for geometrical properties of aggregates. Part 10: Assessment of fines-grading of filler aggregates (air jet sieving). EN TS. 933-10. London: BSI.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 2011. Cement, composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements. BS 197-1. London: BSI.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 2014. Unbound and hydraulically bound mixtures: Test method for the determination of frost susceptibility—Resistance to freezing and thawing of hydraulically bound mixtures. PD CEN/TS 13286-54. London: BSI.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2002. Aggregates for bituminous mixtures and surface treatments for roads, airfields and other trafficked areas. EN 13043. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Claisse, P., and E. Ganjian. 2006. “Gypsum: Prospects for recycling.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Constr. Mater. 159 (1): 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1680/coma.2006.159.1.3.
Claisse, P. A., E. Ganjian, and T. Adham. 2003. “In situ measurement of the intrinsic permeability of concrete.” Mag. Concr. Res. 55 (2): 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2003.55.2.125.
Dadhich, P., A. Genovese, N. Kumar, and A. Acquaye. 2015. “Developing sustainable supply chains in the UK construction industry: A case study.” Int. J. Prod. Econ. 164 (Jun): 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.012.
Ganjian, E., P. Claisse, M. Tyrer, and A. Atkinson. 2006. “Factors affecting measurement of hydraulic conductivity in low-strength cementitious materials.” Cem. Concr. Res. 36 (12): 2109–2114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.09.017.
Ganjian, E., P. A. Claisse, and H. Sadeghi-Pouya. 2007. “Use of recycled gypsum in road foundation construction.” Accessed February 2, 2021. https://pureportal.coventry.ac.uk/en/publications/use-of-recycled-gypsum-in-road-foundation-construction-2.
Ganjian, E., P. A. Claisse, M. Tyrer, and A. Atkinson. 2004. “Selection of cementitious mixes as a barrier for landfill leachate containment.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 16 (5): 477–486. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2004)16:5(477).
Ganjian, E., H. S. Pouya, P. Claisse, M. Waddell, S. Hemmings, and S. Johansson. 2008. “Plasterboard and gypsum waste in a novel cementitious binder for road construction.” Concr. London Concr. Soc. 42 (6): 20.
Hamoush, S., M. Picornell-Darder, T. Abu-Lebdeh, and A. Mohamed. 2011. “Freezing and thawing durability of very high strength concrete.” Am. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 4 (1): 42–51. https://doi.org/10.3844/ageassp.2011.42.51.
HM Government. 1991. “Environmental protection (duty of care) regulations.” Accessed April 13, 2020. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1991/2839/note/made.
HM Government. 2002. “Landfill England and Wales regulations.” Accessed April 13, 2020. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2002/1559/contents/made.
HM Government. 2010. “Environmental civil sanctions (England) order.” Accessed April 13, 2020. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2010/9780111492512/article/3.
Hogan, F., and J. Meusel. 1981. “Evaluation for durability and strength development of a ground granulated blast furnace slag.” Cem. Concr. Aggregates 3 (1): 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1520/CCA10201J.
Khatib, J., and J. Hibbert. 2005. “Selected engineering properties of concrete incorporating slag and metakaolin.” Constr. Build. Mater. 19 (6): 460–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.07.017.
Latif, A., M. Rashid, K. Kheder, T. Sultan, and F. Mehvish. 2014. “Development of compressive strength for concrete with different curing durations.” Univ. Eng. Technol. Taxila Tech. J. 19 (2): 40.
Li, J., P. Tharakan, D. Macdonald, and X. Liang. 2013. “Technological, economic and financial prospects of carbon dioxide capture in the cement industry.” Energy Policy 61 (Oct): 1377–1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.082.
Limbachiya, V., E. Ganjian, and P. Claisse. 2015. “The impact of variation in chemical and physical properties of PFA and BPD semi-dry cement paste on strength properties.” Constr. Build. Mater. 96 (Oct): 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.002.
Mangulkar, M., and S. Jamkar. 2013. “Review of particle packing theories used for concrete mix proportioning.” Accessed February 2, 2021. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Review+of+particle+packing+theories+used+for+concrete+mix+proportioning&btnG=.
MCHW (Manual of Contract Documents for Highway Works). 2020. “Road pavements—Unbound.” Accessed February 2, 2021. http://origin.standardsforhighways.co.uk/ha/standards/mchw/vol1/pdfs/MCHW%20800.pdf.
Meyer, C. 2009. “The greening of the concrete industry.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 31 (8): 601–605. https://doi.org/101016/j.cemconcomp.2008.12.010.
Modarres, A., H. Ramyar, and P. Ayar. 2015. “Effect of cement kiln dust on the low-temperature durability and fatigue life of hot mix asphalt.” Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 110 (Feb): 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2014.11.010.
Neville, A. 2011. Properties of concrete. London: Pearson.
Pouya, H. S., E. Ganjian, P. Claisse, and S. Karami. 2007. “Strength optimization of novel binder containing plasterboard gypsum waste.” ACI Mater. J. 104 (6): 653–659.
Raghavendra, T., Y. Siddanagouda, F. Jawad, C. Adarsha, and B. Udayashankar. 2016. “Performance of ternary binder blend containing cement, waste gypsum wall boards and blast furnace slag in CLSM.” Procedia Eng. 145: 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.027.
Roy, D. 1982. “Hydration, structure, and properties of blast furnace slag cements, mortars, and concrete.” J. Proc. 79 (6): 444–457.
Sarkkinen, M., K. Kujala, and S. Gehör. 2019. “Efficiency of MgO activated GGBFS and OPC in the stabilization of highly sulfidic mine tailings.” J. Sustainable Min. 18 (3): 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsm.2019.04.001.
Sharma, R., and R. A. Khan. 2016. “Effect of different supplementary cementitious materials on mechanical and durability properties of concrete.” J. Mater. Eng. Struct. 3 (3): 129–147.
Sherwood, P. T. 1995. Alternative materials in road construction. London: Thomas Telford.
Siddique, R., and A. Rajor. 2012. “Use of cement kiln dust in cement concrete and its leachate characteristics.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 61 (Apr): 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.01.006.
Singh, S., D. P. Tripathy, and P. Ranjith. 2008. “Performance evaluation of cement stabilized fly ash–GBFS mixes as a highway construction material.” Waste Manage. 28 (8): 1331–1337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.09.017.
Suresh, D., and K. Nagaraju. 2015. “Ground granulated blast slag (GGBS) in concrete—A review.” IOSR J. Mechan. Civ. Eng. 12 (4): 76–82. https://doi.org/10.9790/1684-12467682.
Tan, Y. Y., S. I. Doh, and S. C. Chin. 2017. “Eggshell as a partial cement replacement in concrete development.” Mag. Concr. Res. 70 (13): 662–670. https://doi.org/10.1680/jmacr.17.00003.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 33Issue 6June 2021

History

Received: Oct 27, 2019
Accepted: Nov 9, 2020
Published online: Mar 27, 2021
Published in print: Jun 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Aug 27, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Kande Bure Bai Kamara [email protected]
CEng.
Research Student, School of Energy, Construction and Environment, Faculty of Engineering and Computing, Built and Natural Environment Research Centre, Coventry Univ., Coventry CV1 2JH, UK (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Professor of Civil Engineering Materials, Built and Natural Environment Research Centre, Faculty of Engineering, Environment and Computing, Coventry Univ., Coventry CV1 2JH, UK. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1522-1434
Morteza Khorami, Ph.D.
Lecturer in Civil Engineering, School of Energy, Construction and Environment, Faculty of Engineering, Environment and Computing, Built and Natural Environment Research Centre, Coventry Univ., Coventry CV1 2JH, UK.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share