Technical Papers
Dec 30, 2020

Effect of Curing Conditions on the Performance of Geopolymer Concrete Based on Granulated Blast Furnace Slag and Metakaolin

Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 33, Issue 3

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the performance of granulated blast furnace slag (GBFS) and metakaolin (MK)-based geopolymer concrete (GC) under different curing conditions. GC was derived from a portland self-compacting concrete (PC). Three curing modalities were considered: (1) 20°C50% relative humidity (RH); (2) 20°C90% RH; and (3) 20°C-water immersion. The results showed that both PC and GC cured under water possess similar compressive strength. However, GC presented a lower elastic modulus and higher shrinkage and porosity. It was also found that hardening at 90% RH reduces both water porosity and shrinkage and enhances the mechanical performance of GC, which can be explained by the formation of more compacted geopolymer matrix. The validity of a current European standard to predict the compressive strength evolution and shrinkage development was verified. It was established that the standard relationship proposed for the prediction of strength evolution can be extended to GC, and a modification of the shrinkage development model was proposed. Finally, it was concluded that the use of the GBFS/MK mixture overcomes the mechanical performance degradation commonly known for GC immersed in water.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express their gratitude to ECOCEM and IMERYS (France) for providing the granulated blast furnace slag and metakaolin, respectively.

References

Adak, D., and S. Mandal. 2019. “Strength and durability performance of fly ash–based process-modified geopolymer concrete.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 31 (9): 04019174. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002793.
Adapa, P., C. Karunakaran, L. Tabil, and G. Schoenau. 2009. “Potential applications of infrared and Raman spectromicroscopy for agricultural biomass.” Agri. Eng. Int: CIGR J. XI: 1–25.
AFNOR (Association Française de Normalisation). 2005. Eurocode 2—Design of concrete structures—General rules and rules for buildings and structural fire design. AFNOR NF EN 1992-1-1. Paris: Boutique AFNOR.
AFNOR (Association Française de Normalisation). 2014a. Concrete—Specification, performance, production and conformity—National addition to NF EN 206. AFNOR NF EN 206/CN. Paris: Boutique AFNOR.
AFNOR (Association Française de Normalisation). 2014b. Concrete—Testing hardened concrete—Testing porosity and density. AFNOR NF P 18-459. Paris: Boutique AFNOR.
Al-Shathr, B. S., and T. S. Al-Attar. 2016. “Effect of curing system on metakaolin based geopolymer concrete.” J. Univ. Babylon 24 (3): 569–576.
Aslani, F. 2015. “Thermal performance modeling of geopolymer concrete.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 28 (1): 04015062. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001291.
ASTM. 2016. Standard test method for linear drying shrinkage of concrete masonry units. ASTM C426. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2019. Standard test method for fundamental transverse, longitudinal, and torsional resonant frequencies of concrete specimens. ASTM C215. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bernal, S. A. 2015. “Effect of the activator dose on the compressive strength and accelerated carbonation resistance of alkali silicate-activated slag/metakaolin blended materials.” Constr. Build. Mater. 98 (Nov): 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.013.
Davidovits, J. 1994. “Properties of geopolymer cements.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Alkaline Cements and Concretes, 131–149. Kiev, Ukraine: Scientific Research Institute on Binders and Materials, Kiev State Technical Univ.
Davidovits, J. 2008. Geopolymer chemistry and applications. Saint-Quentin, France: Geopolymer Institute.
De, M., A. Mukherjee, and H. S. Tewari. 2015. “Characterization of cadmium substituted nickel ferrites prepared using auto-combustion technique.” Process. Appl. Ceram. 9 (4): 193–197. https://doi.org/10.2298/PAC1504193D.
Dirgantara, R., C. Gunasekara, D. W. Law, and T. K. Molyneaux. 2017. “Suitability of brown coal fly ash for geopolymer production.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 29 (12): 04017247. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002093.
Dolino, G., J. P. Bachheimer, F. Gervais, and A. F. Wright. 1983. “La transition α-β du quartz; le point sur quelques problèmes actuels: Transition ordre-désordre ou displacive, comportement thermodynamique.” Bulletin de Minéralogie 106 (3): 267–285. https://doi.org/10.3406/bulmi.1983.7706.
Franco de Carvalho, J. M., P. A. M. Campos, K. Defáveri, G. J. Brigolini, L. G. Pedroti, and R. A. F. Peixoto. 2019. “Low environmental impact cement produced entirely from industrial and mining waste.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 31 (2): 04018391. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002617.
Ghourchian, S., M. Wyrzykowski, and P. Lura. 2017. “A practical approach for reducing the risk of plastic shrinkage cracking of concrete.” RILEM Tech. Lett. 20: 40–44. https://doi.org/10.21809/rilemtechlett.2017.45.
Gruskovnjak, A., B. Lothenbach, L. Holzer, R. Figi, and F. Winnefeld. 2006. “Hydration of alkali-activated slag: Comparison with ordinary portland cement.” Adv. Cem. Res. 18 (3): 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1680/adcr.2006.18.3.119.
Guðmundsson, J. G. 2013. “Long-term creep and shrinkage in concrete using porous aggregate–the effects of elastic modulus.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Engineering, Reykjavík Univ.
Gunasekaran, S., G. Anbalagan, and S. Pandi. 2006. “Raman and infrared spectra of carbonates of calcite structure.” J. Raman Spectroc. 37 (9): 892–899. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.1518.
Hasnaoui, A., E. Ghorbel, and G. Wardeh. 2019. “Optimization approach of granulated blast furnace slag and metakaolin based geopolymer mortars.” Constr. Build. Mater. 198 (Feb): 10–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.251.
Hassan, A., M. Arif, and M. Shariq. 2019. “Use of geopolymer concrete for a cleaner and sustainable environment—A review of mechanical properties and microstructure.” J. Cleaner Prod. 223 (Jun): 704–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.051.
Khan, M. Z. N., F. U. A. Shaikh, Y. Hao, and H. Hao. 2017. “Effects of curing conditions and sand-to-binder ratios on compressive strength development of fly ash geopolymer.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 30 (2): 04017267. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002119.
Khoury, G. A. 1992. “Compressive strength of concrete at high temperatures: A reassessment.” Mag. Concr. Res. 44 (161): 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.1992.44.161.291.
Kim, M. S., Y. Jun, C. Lee, and J. E. Oh. 2013. “Use of CaO as an activator for producing a price-competitive non-cement structural binder using ground granulated blast furnace slag.” Cem. Concr. Res. 54 (Dec): 208–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.09.011.
Kubba, Z., G. F. Huseien, A. R. Sam, K. W. Shah, M. A. Asaad, M. Ismail, M. M. Tahir, and J. Mirza. 2018. “‘Impact of curing temperatures and alkaline activators on compressive strength and porosity of ternary blended geopolymer mortars.” Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 9 (Dec): e00205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2018.e00205.
Kumar, M., S. K. Saxena, and N. B. Singh. 2019. “Influence of some additives on the properties of fly ash based geopolymer cement mortars.” SN Appl. Sci. 1 (5): 481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0506-4.
Ly, L., E. R. Vance, D. S. Perera, Z. Aly, and K. Olufson. 2007. “Leaching of geopolymers in deionised water.” AZojomo (J. Mater. Online) 3: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2240/azojomo0238.
Ma, C.-K., A. Z. Awang, and W. Omar. 2018. “Structural and material performance of geopolymer concrete: A review.” Constru. Build. Mater. 186 (Oct): 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.111.
Mastali, M., P. Kinnunen, A. Dalvand, R. M. Firouz, and M. Illikainen. 2018. “Drying shrinkage in alkali-activated binders—A critical review.” Constr. Build. Mater. 190 (Nov): 533–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.125.
Mohammed, T. J., and I. A. Saeed. 2018. “Production of geopolymer concrete from local materials.” Kufa J. Eng. 9 (4): 174–186. https://doi.org/10.30572/2018/kje/090412.
Nagalia, G., Y. Park, A. Abolmaali, and P. Aswath. 2016. “Compressive strength and microstructural properties of fly ash–based geopolymer concrete.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 28 (12): 04016144. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001656.
Narayanan, R. S., and A. W. Beeby. 2005. Designers’ guide to EN 1992-1-1 and EN 1992-1-2. Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures: General rules and rules for buildings and structural fire design. London: Thomas Telford.
Peng, H., C. Cui, Z. Liu, C. S. Cai, and Y. Liu. 2019. “Synthesis and reaction mechanism of an alkali-activated metakaolin-slag composite system at room temperature.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 31 (1): 04018345. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002558.
Pouhet, R. 2015. Formulation and durability of metakaolin-based geopolymers. Toulouse, France: Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier.
Rosas-Casarez, C. A., S. P. Arredondo-Rea, J. M. Gómez-Soberón, J. L. Alamaral-Sánchez, R. Corral-Higuera, M. D. J. Chinchillas-Chinchillas, and O. H. Acuña-Agüero. 2014. “Experimental study of XRD, FTIR and TGA techniques in geopolymeric materials.” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl 4 (4): 221–226.
Samson, G., M. Cyr, and X. X. Gao. 2017. “Formulation and characterization of blended alkali-activated materials based on flash-calcined metakaolin, fly ash and GGBS.” Constr. Build. Mater. 144 (Jul): 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.160.
Singh, B., M. R. Rahman, R. Paswan, and S. K. Bhattacharyya. 2016. “Effect of activator concentration on the strength, ITZ and drying shrinkage of fly ash/slag geopolymer concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 118 (Aug): 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.008.
Singh, S. P., and M. Murmu. 2017. “Effects of curing temperature on strength of lime-activated slag cement.” Int. J. Civ. Eng. 15 (4): 575–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-017-0166-y.
Snell, C., B. Tempest, and T. Gentry. 2017. “Comparison of the thermal characteristics of portland cement and geopolymer cement concrete mixes.” J. Archit. Eng. 23 (2): 04017002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000240.
Vafaei, M., and A. Allahverdi. 2018. “Acid-resistant geopolymer based on fly ash–calcium aluminate cement.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 30 (7): 04018143. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002321.
Zuhua, Z., Y. Xiao, Z. Huajun, and C. Yue. 2009. “Role of water in the synthesis of calcined kaolin-based geopolymer.” Appl. Clay Sci. 43 (2): 218–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2008.09.003.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 33Issue 3March 2021

History

Received: Jan 30, 2020
Accepted: Aug 5, 2020
Published online: Dec 30, 2020
Published in print: Mar 1, 2021
Discussion open until: May 30, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Abdelaziz Hasnaoui [email protected]
Temporary Lecturer and Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil Engineering, CY Cergy Paris Université, L2MGC, Cergy 95000, France (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Full Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, CY Cergy Paris Université, L2MGC, Cergy 95000, France. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9042-2706. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, CY Cergy Paris Université, L2MGC, Cergy 95000, France. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0487-8182. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share