Effect of Kaolin Addition into Metakaolin Geopolymer Composite
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 33, Issue 1
Abstract
Industrially produced metakaolin may contain raw kaolin residues. Therefore, the aim of this work was to determine the influence of kaolin remains in the metakaolin on the final geopolymer quality. A series of mixtures based on metakaolin (Mefisto L05 by CLUZ Nove Straseci, Czech Republic) was prepared with the 0%–50% by weight gradual addition of raw kaolin, and the mechanical strength of the final geopolymer products was tested. It was found that up to a 20% by weight amount of kaolin in metakaolin does not weaken the geopolymer’s performance. Moreover, a geopolymer made of metakaolin with 2%–4% by weight of kaolin showed slightly better mechanical properties than the geopolymers made from metakaolin itself.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. This includes all experimental data including data shown in Figs. 1–4.
Acknowledgments
This research did not receive any specific grant from any funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The raw kaolin and the Mefisto L05 metakaolin were provided by the CLUZ Nove Straseci, Czech Republic. The mechanical tests, structural analysis, and SEM were carried out at the Czech Technical University in Prague.
References
Autef, A., E. Joussein, G. Gasgnier, S. Pronier, I. Sobrados, J. Sanz, and S. Rossignol. 2013. “Role of metakaolin dehydroxylation in geopolymer synthesis.” Powder Technol. 250 (Dec): 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2013.09.022.
Český Normalizační Institut. 1969. Stanovení Mrazuvzdornosti Betonu. ČSN 73 1322. Prague, Czech Republic: Český Normalizační Institut.
Český Normalizační Institut. 1999. Zkušební metody malt pro zdivo—Část 11: Stanovení pevnosti zatvrdlých malt v tahu za ohybu a v tlaku. ČSN EN 1015-11 (722400). Prague, Czech Republic: Český Normalizační Institut.
Davidovits, J. 1994. “High alkali cements for 21st century concretes in concrete technology—Past, present and future.” In Vol. 144 of Proc., V. Mohan Malhotra Symp., edited by P. Kumar Mehta, 383–398. Detroit: American Concrete Institute.
Davidovits, J. 2017. “Geopolymers: Ceramic-like inorganic polymers.” J. Ceram. Sci. Technol. 8 (3): 335–350. https://doi.org/10.4416/JCST2017-00038.
Duxson, P., G. C. Lukey, and J. S. J. Van Deventer. 2006. “Evolution of gel structure during thermal processing of Na-geopolymer gels.” Langmuir 22 (21): 8750–8757. https://doi.org/10.1021/la0604026.
Duxson, P., G. C. Lukey, and J. S. J. Van Deventer. 2007. “Thermal evolution of metakaolin geopolymers. Part 2: Phase stability and structural development.” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 353 (22–23): 2186–2200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2007.02.050.
Gökçe, H. S., M. Tuyan, K. Ramyar, and M. L. Nehdi. 2020. “Development of eco-efficient fly ash–based alkali-activated and geopolymer composites with reduced alkaline activator dosage.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 32 (2): 04019350. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003017.
Gunasekara, C., S. Setunge, D. W. Law, and N. Willis. 2018. “Engineering properties of geopolymer aggregate concrete.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 30 (11): 04018299. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002501.
ICDD (International Centre for Diffraction Data). 2013. ICDD PDF-2 database, version 2013. Newton Square, PA: ICDD.
Khale, D., and R. Chaudhary. 2007. “Mechanism of geopolymerization and factors influencing its development: A review.” J. Mater. Sci. 42 (3): 729–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0401-4.
Komnitsas, K. A. 2011. “Potential of geopolymer technology towards green buildings and sustainable cities.” Procedia Eng. 21: 1023–1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2108.
Oliver, W. C., and G. M. Pharr. 2004. “Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: Advances in understanding and refinements to methodology.” J. Mater. Res. 19 (1): 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3.
Parthiban, K., and S. Vaithianathan. 2015. “Effect of kaolin content an alkaline concentration on the strength development of geopolymer concrete.” Int. J. ChemTech Res. 8 (4): 974–4290.
Saikia, B. J., and G. Parthasarathy. 2010. “Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic characterization of kaolinite from Assam and Meghalaya, Northeastern India.” J. Mod. Phys. 1 (4): 206–210. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2010.14031.
Škvára F. 2007. “Alkali activated materials or geopolymers?” Ceram. Silik. 51 (3): 173–177.
Škvára, F. 2008. “Geopolymer concrete: An ancient material too?” Ceram. Silik. 52 (4): 296–298.
Van Deventer, J. S. J. 2017. “Chapter 10: Progress in the adoption of geopolymer cement.” Handbook of low carbon concrete, 217–262. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Van Deventer, J. S. J., J. L. Provis, and P. Duxson. 2012. “Technical and commercial progress in the adoption of geopolymer cement.” Miner. Eng. 29 (Mar): 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2011.09.009.
Wang, H., H. Li, and F. Yan. 2005. “Synthesis and mechanical properties of metakaolinite-based geopolymer.” Colloids Surf., A 268 (1–3): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.01.016.
Zhang, Z. H., H. J. Zhu, C. H. Zhou, and H. Wang. 2016. “Geopolymer from Kaolin in China: An overview.” Appl. Clay Sci. 119 (Jan): 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2015.04.023.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 19, 2019
Accepted: Jun 16, 2020
Published online: Oct 24, 2020
Published in print: Jan 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Mar 24, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.