Technical Papers
Feb 28, 2020

Tensile, Compressive, and Flexural Behaviors of Al5052-H32 in a Wide Range of Strain Rates and Temperatures

Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 32, Issue 5

Abstract

An experimental investigation on the deformation behaviors of the aluminum alloy Al5052-H32 is presented under tensile, compressive, and flexure loads at different strain rates and temperatures. Quasi-static tests on tension and compression are performed using an electromechanical universal testing machine in the strain rate range 0.00010.1  s1 at a room temperature of 25°C. Flexural tests (three-point bending) are conducted using the same universal testing machine at different crosshead speeds (1200  mm/min) for different span lengths (90, 120, and 150 mm) and orientations (flat and transverse). Split Hopkinson tensile bar and split Hopkinson pressure bar setups are used for dynamic tests on tension (6501,300  s1) and compression (4502,500  s1), respectively. The compression tests are conducted at three different aspect ratios (0.5, 1, and 1.5) of specimens to study the effects of their geometry on the compressive behavior of the alloy. The quasi-static tensile tests are repeated at different elevated temperatures (250, 350, and 450°C) at a constant strain rate of 0.001  s1 and a mixed brittle–ductile fracture mode is observed. The mechanism of the fracture surfaces of the broken tensile specimens at different temperatures are determined using a scanning electron microscope. The aforementioned aluminum alloy is found to be negatively sensitive to strain rates at different loads. Typical stress–strain curves of serration phenomenon are presented and it is found that the alloy is susceptible to Portevin–Le Chatelier effects.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

The experimental results obtained using the electromechanical universal testing machine, split Hopkinson tensile bar (SHTB), and split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) are provided in the present article. No models or codes were generated during this study.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Institute of Technology Patna, India. The corresponding author thanks Dr. P. Sharma, Dr. P. Chandel, and D. Kumar of the Terminal Ballistics Research Laboratory, Chandigarh, India, for their help in conducting the high-strain-rate experiments.

References

Cadoni, E., M. Dotta, D. Forni, and H. Kaufmann. 2016. “Effects of strain rate on mechanical properties in tension of a commercial aluminium alloy used in armour applications.” Procedia Struct. Integrity 2: 986–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.126.
Chacón, R., E. Mirambell, and I. Arrayago. 2017. “Flexural response of multi-stiffened aluminium beams in dock platforms.” Mar. Struct. 56 (Nov): 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2017.07.001.
Chen, Y., A. H. Clausen, O. S. Hopperstad, and M. Langseth. 2009. “Stress–strain behaviour of aluminium alloys at a wide range of strain rates.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 46 (21): 3825–3835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.07.013.
Clausen, A. H., T. Børvik, O. S. Hopperstad, and A. Benallal. 2004. “Flow and fracture characteristics of aluminium alloy AA5083-H116 as function of strain rate, temperature and triaxiality.” Mater. Sci. Eng., A 364 (1–2): 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2003.08.027.
Hosford, W. F. 2005. Mechanical behavior of materials. 1st ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Huang, C. Q., J. Deng, S. X. Wang, and L. L. Liu. 2017. “A physical-based constitutive model to describe the strain-hardening and dynamic recovery behaviors of 5754 aluminum alloy.” Mater. Sci. Eng., A 699 (Jun): 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.04.086.
Huskins, E. L., B. Cao, and K. T. Ramesh. 2010. “Strengthening mechanisms in an Al–Mg alloy.” Mater. Sci. Eng., A 527 (6): 1292–1298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.11.056.
Jenq, S. T., and S. L. Sheu. 1994. “An experimental and numerical analysis for high strain rate compressional behavior of 6061-O aluminum alloy.” Comput. Struct. 52 (1): 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(94)90252-6.
Kabirian, F., A. S. Khan, and A. Pandey. 2014. “Negative to positive strain rate sensitivity in 5xxx series aluminium alloys: Experiment and constitutive modeling.” Int. J. Plast. 55 (Apr): 232–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.11.001.
Ke, H. B., P. Wen, H. L. Peng, W. H. Wang, and A. L. Greer. 2011. “Homogeneous deformation of metallic glass at room temperature reveals large dilatation.” Scr. Mater. 64 (10): 966–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.01.047.
Korbel, A., and P. Martin. 1988. “Microstructural events of macroscopic strain localization in prestrained tensile specimens.” Acta Metall. 36 (9): 2575–2586. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(88)90202-7.
Kuzmin, O. V., Y. T. Pei, C. Q. Chen, and H. J. T. M. De. 2012. “Intrinsic and extrinsic size effects in the deformation of metallic glass nanopillars.” Acta Mater. 60 (3): 889–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2011.11.023.
Lee, O. S., and M. S. Kim. 2003. “Dynamic material property characterization by using split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) technique.” Nucl. Eng. Des. 226 (2): 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(03)00189-4.
Li, J., F. Li, J. Cai, R. Wang, Z. Yuan, and F. Xue. 2012. “Flow behavior modeling of the 7050 aluminum alloy at elevated temperatures considering the compensation of strain.” Mater. Des. 42 (Dec): 369–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.06.032.
Liu, S., S. Wang, L. Ye, Y. Deng, and X. Zhang. 2016. “Flow behavior and microstructure evolution of 7055 aluminum alloy impacted at high strain rates.” Mater. Sci. Eng., A 677 (Nov): 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.09.047.
Lloyd, D. J. 1980. “The deformation of commercial aluminum-magnesium alloys.” Metall. Trans. A 11 (8): 1287–1294. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02653482.
McCormick, P. G. 1988. “Theory of flow localisation due to dynamic strain ageing.” Acta Metall. 36 (12): 3061–3067. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(88)90043-0.
Meyers, M., and K. Chawla. 2009. Mechanical behavior of materials. 2nd ed. [1st South Asian edition] New Delhi, India: Cambridge University Press.
Neuenschwander, M., M. Knobloch, and M. Fontana. 2017. “Elevated temperature mechanical properties of solid section structural steel.” Constr. Build. Mater. 149 (Sep): 186–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.124.
Picu, R. C., G. Vincze, F. Ozturk, J. J. Gracio, F. Barlat, and A. M. Maniatty. 2005. “Strain rate sensitivity of the commercial aluminum alloy AA5182-O.” Mater. Sci. Eng., A 390 (1–2): 334–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.08.029.
Piluso, V., A. Pisapia, E. Nastri, and R. Montuori. 2019. “Ultimate resistance and rotation capacity of low yielding high hardening aluminium alloy beams under non-uniform bending.” Thin Walled Struct. 135 (Feb): 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2018.11.006.
Pothnis, J. R., Y. Perla, H. Arya, and N. K. Naik. 2011. “High strain rate tensile behaviour of aluminum alloy 7075 – T651 and IS 2062 mild steel.” J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 133 (2): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4003113.
Rasheed, H. A., J. Abdalla, R. Hawileh, and A. K. Al-Tamimi. 2017. “Flexural behavior of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with externally bonded aluminum alloy plates.” Eng. Struct. 147 (Sep): 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.05.067.
Samantaray, D., S. Mandal, and A. K. Bhaduri. 2011. “A critical comparison of various data processing methods in simple uni-axial compression testing.” Mater. Des. 32 (5): 2797–2802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.01.007.
Schroers, J., and W. L. Johnson. 2004. “Ductile bulk metallic glass.” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (25): 255506. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.255506.
Smerd, R., S. Winkler, C. Salisbury, M. Worswick, and D. Lloyd. 2005. “Finn M. High strain rate tensile testing of automotive aluminium alloy sheet.” Int. J. Impact Eng. 32 (1–4): 541–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.04.013.
Su, M. N., B. Young, and L. Gardner. 2016. “Flexural response of aluminium alloy SHS and RHS with internal Stiffeners.” Eng. Struct. 121 (Aug): 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.021.
Tan, J. Q., M. Zhan, S. Liu, T. Huang, J. Guo, and H. Yang. 2015. “A modified Johnson–Cook model for tensile flow behaviors of 7050-T7451 aluminum alloy at high strain rates.” Mater. Sci. Eng., A 631 (Apr): 214–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.02.010.
Wang, Z. G., W. Liu, Y. B. Xu, T. Y. Zhang, and Y. Zhang. 1994. “Mechanical behavior of monocrystalline aluminum-lithium alloy at low temperatures.” Scr. Metall. Mater. 31 (11): 1513–1518. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-716X(94)90066-3.
Yan, S. L., H. Yang, H. W. Li, and X. Yao. 2016. “Variation of strain rate sensitivity of an aluminum alloy in a wide strain rate range: Mechanism analysis and modeling.” J. Alloys Compd. 688 (Dec): 776–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.07.077.
Yang, C., D. Li, T. Zhu, and S. Xiao. 2016a. “Special dynamic behavior of an aluminum alloy and effects on energy absorption in train collisions.” Adv. Mech. Eng. 8 (5): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814016649527.
Yang, Q., D. Yang, Z. Zhang, L. Cao, X. Wu, G. Huang, and Q. Liu. 2016b. “Flow behavior and microstructure evolution of 6A82 aluminium alloy with high copper content during hot compression deformation at elevated temperatures.” Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 26 (3): 649–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(16)64154-7.
Yang, Y., and C. T. Liu. 2012. “Size effect on stability of shear-band propagation in bulk metallic glasses: An overview.” J. Mater. Sci. 47 (1): 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-5915-8.
Ye, T., Y. Wu, A. Liu, C. Xu, and L. Li. 2019. “Mechanical property and microstructure evolution of aged 6063 aluminum alloy under high strain rate deformation.” Vacuum 159 (Jan): 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2018.10.013.
Yuan, Z., F. Li, and M. He. 2011. “Fast Fourier transform on analysis of Portevin-Le-Chatelier effect in Al5052.” Mater. Sci. Eng., A 530 (Dec): 389–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.09.101.
Zhang, L., H. He, S. Li, X. Wu, and L. Li. 2018. “Dynamic compression behavior of 6005 aluminum alloy aged at elevated temperatures.” Vacuum 155 (Sep): 604–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2018.06.066.
Zhang, X-M., H-J. Li, H-Z. Li, H. Gao, Z-G. Gao, Y. Liu, and B. Liu. 2008. “Dynamic property evaluation of aluminum alloy 2519A by Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar.” Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 18 (1): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(08)60001-1.
Zhang, Y., J. P. Liu, S. Y. Chen, X. Xie, P. K. Liaw, K. A. Dahmen, J. W. Qiao, and Y. L. Wang. 2017. “Serration and noise behaviors in materials.” Prog. Mater. Sci. 90 (Oct): 358–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.06.004.
Zhu, D., B. Mobasher, S. D. Rajan, and P. Peralta. 2011. “Characterization of dynamic tensile testing using aluminum alloy 6061-T6 at intermediate strain rates.” J. Eng. Mech. 137 (10): 669–679. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000264.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 32Issue 5May 2020

History

Received: Jun 8, 2019
Accepted: Oct 14, 2019
Published online: Feb 28, 2020
Published in print: May 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jul 28, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Gyan Prakash
Research Scholar, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Patna, Bihar 800005, India.
N. K. Singh [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Patna, Bihar 800005, India (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
P. Sharma
Scientist, Terminal Ballistics Research Laboratory, Defence Research and Development Organisation, Sector 30, Chandigarh 160030, India.
N. K. Gupta
Professor, Dept. of Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share