Technical Papers
Jun 21, 2018

Energy-Based Approach to Quantify Cyclic Resistance and Pore Pressure Generation in Anisotropically Consolidated Sand

Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 30, Issue 9

Abstract

In practical engineering, sand fills or deposits are often under an anisotropic stress condition. Thus, these soil elements sustain an initial static shear stress before being acted upon by cyclic loading because of traffic, waves, and earthquakes. To experimentally explore the effect of consolidation condition on the undrained cyclic response of saturated sand, a series of triaxial tests were performed on both loose and dense samples under varying consolidation conditions. The results indicate that different densities and consolidation conditions lead to three distinct failure modes: flow liquefaction, cyclic mobility, and residual deformation failure. Given the presence of the limiting values of residual pore pressures, a pore pressure–based failure criterion was used to evaluate the cyclic resistance of sand. It was found that the consolidation stress condition affects the cyclic resistance differently in loose and dense sand. The concept of dissipated energy was then used to delineate the pore pressure development during cyclic loading, and the amount of energy dissipated in sand was closely correlated to its relative density, consolidation stress ratio, and cyclic stress ratio. Moreover, a unique relationship between the residual pore pressure and dissipated energy was obtained for both isotropically and anisotropically consolidated sand with varying densities and cyclic stress amplitudes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The research described was funded by the National Key R and D program of China (No. 2016YFC0800200), the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51578499, 51761130078), and the National Key Basic Research Program of China (No. 2015CB057801).

References

Andersen, K. H. 2015. “Cyclic soil parameters for offshore foundation design.” In Proc., Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics III, 5–84. London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
ASTM. 2006a. Standard test methods for maximum index density and unit weight of soils using a vibratory table. ASTM D4253-00. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2006b. Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density. ASTM D4254-00. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2013. Standard method for load controlled cyclic triaxial strength of soil. ASTM D5311M-13. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Azeiteiro, R. J., P. A. Coelho, D. M. Taborda, and J. C. Grazina. 2017. “Energy-based evaluation of liquefaction potential under non-uniform cyclic loading.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 92 (Jan): 650–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.11.005.
Cai, Y. Q., L. Guo, R. J. Jardine, Z. X. Yang, and J. Wang. 2017. “Stress-strain response of soft clay to traffic loading.” Géotechnique 67 (5): 446–451. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.15.P.224.
Flora, A., S. Lirer, and F. Silvestri. 2012. “Undrained cyclic resistance of undisturbed gravelly soils.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 43 (Dec): 366–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.08.003.
Guo, L., Y. Q. Cai, R. J. Jardine, Z. X. Yang, and J. Wang. 2018. “Undrained behaviour of intact soft clay under cyclic paths that match vehicle loading conditions.” Can. Geotech. J. 55 (1): 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2016-0636.
Hyde, A. F., T. Higuchi, and K. Yasuhara. 2006. “Liquefaction, cyclic mobility, and failure of silt.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (6): 716–735. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:6(716).
Hyodo, M., A. F. L. Hyde, and N. Aramaki. 1998. “Liquefaction of crushable soils.” Géotechnique 48 (4): 527–543.
Hyodo, M., H. Murata, N. Yasufuku, and T. Fujii. 1991. “Undrained cyclic shear strength and residual strain of saturated sand by cyclic triaxial tests.” Soils Found. 31 (3): 60–76. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.31.3_60.
Hyodo, M., H. Tanimizu, N. Yasufuku, and H. Murata. 1994. “Undrained cyclic and monotonic triaxial behavior of saturated loose sand.” Soils Found. 34 (1): 19–32. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.34.19.
Idriss, I. M., and R. W. Boulanger. 2008. Vol. 264 of Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Ishibashi, I., M. A. Sherif, and C. Tsuchiya. 1977. “Pore-pressure rise mechanism and soil liquefaction.” Soils Found. 17 (2): 17–27. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.17.2_17.
Ishihara, K. 1993. “Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes.” Géotechnique 43 (3): 351–451. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1993.43.3.351.
Jafarian, Y., I. Towhata, M. H. Baziar, A. Noorzad, and A. Bahmanpour. 2012. “Strain energy based evaluation of liquefaction and residual pore water pressure in sands using cyclic torsional shear experiments.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 35 (2): 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.11.006.
Kammerer, A. M., J. M. Pestana, and R. B. Seed. 2005. “Behavior of Monterey 0/30 sand under multidirectional loading conditions.” In Proc., 1st Japan–U.S. Workshop on Testing, Modeling, and Simulation, 154–173. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Kayen, R. E., and J. K. Mitchell. 1997. “Assessment of liquefaction potential during earthquakes by Arias intensity.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 123 (12): 1162–1174. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:12(1162).
Kokusho, T. 2013. “Liquefaction potential evaluations: Energy-based method versus stress-based method.” Can. Geotech. J. 50 (10): 1088–1099. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0456.
Kokusho, T. 2016. “Major advances in liquefaction research by laboratory tests compared with in situ behavior.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 91 (Dec): 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.07.024.
Konstadinou, M., and V. N. Georgiannou. 2013. “Cyclic behaviour of loose anisotropically consolidated Ottawa sand under undrained torsional loading.” Géotechnique 63 (13): 1144–1158. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.12.P.145.
Law, K. T., Y. L. Cao, and G. N. He. 1990. “An energy approach for assessing seismic liquefaction potential.” Can. Geotech. J. 27 (3): 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1139/t90-043.
Lee, K. L., and H. Seed. 1967. “Dynamic strength of anisotropically consolidated sand.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 93 (5): 169–190.
Liang, L., J. L. Figueroa, and A. S. Saada. 1995. “Liquefaction under random loading: Unit energy approach.” J. Geotech. Eng. 121 (11): 776–781. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:11(776).
Mohamad, R., and R. Dobry. 1986. “Undrained monotonic and cyclic triaxial strength of sand.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 112 (10): 941–958. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1986)112:10(941).
Mohanty, S., and N. R. Patra. 2014. “Cyclic behavior and liquefaction potential of Indian pond ash located in Seismic zones III and IV.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 26 (7): 06014012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000964.
Nemat-Nasser, S., and A. A. Shokooh. 1979. “Unified approach to densification and liquefaction of cohensionless sand in cyclic shearing.” Can. Geotech. J. 16 (4): 659–678. https://doi.org/10.1139/t79-076.
Pan, K., and Yang, Z. X. 2018a. “Effects of initial static shear on cyclic resistance and pore pressure generation of saturated sand.” Acta Geotechnica 13 (2): 473–487.
Pan, K., and Z. X. Yang. 2018b. “Evaluation of the liquefaction potential of sand under random loading conditions: Equivalent approach versus energy-based method.” J. Earthquake Eng. 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1398693.
Pan, K., and Z. X. Yang. 2018c. “Undrained behavior of sand under cyclic paths that match storm-wave loading conditions.” Marine Georesour. Geotechnol. 36 (1): 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2017.1279697.
Polito, C., R. A. Green, E. Dillon, and C. Sohn. 2013. “Effect of load shape on relationship between dissipated energy and residual excess pore pressure generation in cyclic triaxial tests.” Can. Geotech. J. 50 (11): 1118–1128. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0379.
Polito, C. P., R. A. Green, and J. Lee. 2008. “Pore pressure generation models for sands and silty soils subjected to cyclic loading.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (10): 1490–1500. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:10(1490).
Porcino, D., and V. Diano. 2016. “Laboratory study on pore pressure generation and liquefaction of low-plasticity silty sandy soils during the 2012 earthquake in Italy.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (10): 04016048. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001518.
Randolph, M. F. 2012. “Offshore design approaches and model tests for sub-failure cyclic loading of foundations.” In Vol. 534 of Mechanical behaviour of soils under environmentally induced cyclic loads. CISM Courses and Lectures, 441–480. Vienna, Austria: Springer.
Sassa, K., G. Wang, H. Fukuoka, and D. A. Vankov. 2005. “Shear-displacement-amplitude dependent pore-pressure generation in undrained cyclic loading ring shear tests: An energy approach.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (6): 750–761. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:6(750).
Seed, H. B., P. P. Martin, and J. Lysmer. 1975. The generation and dissipation of pore water pressures during soil liquefaction. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Sivathayalan, S., and Y. P. Vaid. 2002. “Influence of generalized initial state and principal stress rotation on the undrained response of sands.” Can. Geotech. J. 39 (1): 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1139/t01-078.
Towhata, I., and K. Ishihara. 1985. “Shear work and pore water pressure in undrained shear.” Soils Found. 25 (3): 73–84. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.25.3_73.
Vaid, Y. P., and J. C. Chern. 1983. “Effect of static shear on resistance to liquefaction.” Soils Found. 23 (1): 47–60. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.23.47.
Vaid, Y. P., J. D. Stedman, and S. Sivathayalan. 2001. “Confining stress and static shear effects in cyclic liquefaction.” Can. Geotech. J. 38 (3): 580–591. https://doi.org/10.1139/t00-120.
Verdugo, R., and K. Ishihara. 1996. “The steady state of sandy soils.” Soils Found. 36 (2): 81–91. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.36.2_81.
Wang, S., J. Yang, and S. Onyejekwe. 2013. “Effect of previous cyclic shearing on liquefaction resistance of Mississippi River Valley silt.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 25 (10): 1415–1423. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000698.
Yang, J., and H. Y. Sze. 2011. “Cyclic behaviour and resistance of saturated sand under non-symmetrical loading conditions.” Géotechnique 61 (1): 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.9.P.019.
Yang, Z. X., X. S. Li, and J. Yang. 2007. “Undrained anisotropy and rotational shear in granular soil.” Géotechnique 57 (4): 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2007.57.4.371.
Yang, Z. X., and K. Pan. 2017. “Flow deformation and cyclic resistance of saturated loose sand considering initial static shear effect.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 92 (Jan): 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.002.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 30Issue 9September 2018

History

Received: Nov 21, 2017
Accepted: Mar 13, 2018
Published online: Jun 21, 2018
Published in print: Sep 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Nov 21, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Z. X. Yang, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Research Center of Coastal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang Univ., Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Postgraduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Zhejiang Univ., Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share