Technical Papers
Jun 25, 2018

Effects of Scalping on Direct Shear Strength of Crusher Run and Crusher Run/Geogrid Interface

Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 30, Issue 9

Abstract

Crusher run is a type of construction aggregate produced in a quarry by breaking down the rock to various sizes using a mechanical crusher. Scalping is an essential process for a quarry to produce a series of crusher run products with specific grading specifications for various applications. To study the effects of scalping on the direct shear strength of crusher run, large-scale laboratory direct shear box tests were carried out on crusher run specimens scalped to pass 75, 37.5, 19, 9.5, 4.75, and 2.36 mm. Furthermore, to study the effects of scalping on interface shear strength between the crusher run and a geogrid, interface shear tests were also carried out between the crusher run scalpings and a geogrid reinforcement. The direct and interface shear-strength results were then analyzed to investigate the effects of scalping on the direct and interface shear stresses, failure envelopes, direct and interface friction angles, apparent cohesions and adhesions, and interface efficiencies. Sieving analyses were carried out before and after the shear tests to assess the degree of particle breakdown caused by loading and shearing in the direct and interface shear tests. The experimental shear test results show that scalping can cause a pronounced reduction in the direct and interface shear strengths. The results of the sieving analyses imply that the overall particle breakage of the crusher run specimens caused by large-scale direct and interface shear testing was not significant within a normal stress level of 1,000 kPa; however, some large-particle crushing on the top surface of the specimens was observed.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Abdelrahman, A., A. Ashmawy, and M. Abdelmoniem. 2008. “An apparatus for direct shear, pullout, and uniaxial testing of geogrids.” Geotech. Test. J. 31 (6): 470–479. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ100761.
Abu-Farsakh, M., J. Coronel, and M. Tao. 2007. “Effect of soil moisture content and dry density on cohesive soil-geosynthetic interactions using large direct shear tests.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 19 (7): 540–549. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:7(540).
Alfaro, M., N. Miura, and D. Bergado. 1995. “Soil-geogrid reinforcement interaction by pullout and direct shear tests.” Geotech. Test. J. 18 (2): 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10319J.
Arulrajah, A., M. A. Rahman, J. Piratheepan, M. W. Bo, and M. A. Imteaz. 2014. “Evaluation of interface shear strength properties of geogrid-reinforced construction and demolition materials using a modified large-scale direct shear testing apparatus.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 26 (5): 974–982. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000897.
ASTM. 2012. Standard test method for determining the coefficient of soil and geosynthetic or geosynthetic and geosynthetic friction by the direct shear method. ASTM D5321-12. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bakeer, R. M., S. M. Sayed, P. Cates, and R. Subramanian. 1998. “Pullout and shear tests on geogrid reinforced lightweight aggregate.” Geotext. Geomembr. 16 (2): 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(97)10025-5.
Bathurst, R., and R. Karpurapu. 1993. “Large-scale triaxial compression testing of geocell-reinforced granular soils.” Geotech. Test. J. 16 (3): 296–303. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10050J.
Cerato, A., and A. Lutenegger. 2006. “Specimen size and scale effects of direct shear box tests of sands.” Geotech. Test. J. 29 (6): 507–516. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ100312.
Chen, Q., M. Abu-Farsakh, and M. Tao. 2009. “Laboratory evaluation of geogrid base reinforcement and corresponding instrumentation program.” Geotech. Test. J. 32 (6): 516–525. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ102277.
Chen, X., J. Zhang, and Z. Li. 2014. “Shear behaviour of a geogrid-reinforced coarse-grained soil based on large-scale triaxial tests.” Geotext. Geomembr. 42 (4): 312–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2014.05.004.
Cho, G.-C., J. Dodds, and J. C. Santamarina. 2006. “Particle shape effects on packing density, stiffness, and strength: Natural and crushed sands.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (5): 591–602. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:5(591).
Einav, I. 2007a. “Breakage mechanics—Part I: Theory.” J. Mech. Phys. Solids 55 (6): 1274–1297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2006.11.003.
Einav, I. 2007b. “Breakage mechanics—Part II: Modelling granular materials.” J. Mech. Phys. Solids 55 (6): 1298–1320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2006.11.004.
Giroud, J. P., and J. Han. 2004. “Design method for geogrid-reinforced unpaved roads. I: Development of design method.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (8): 775–786. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:8(775).
Hardin, B. O. 1985. “Crushing of soil particles.” J. Geotech. Eng. 111 (10): 1177–1192.
Indraratna, B., S. Karimullah Hussaini, and J. Vinod. 2012. “On the shear behavior of ballast-geosynthetic interfaces.” Geotech. Test. J. 35 (2): 305–312. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ103317.
Indraratna, B., Q. D. Sun, and S. Nimbalkar. 2014. “Observed and predicted behaviour of rail ballast under monotonic loading capturing particle breakage.” Can. Geotech. J. 52 (1): 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2013-0361.
Indraratna, B., L. S. S. Wijewardena, and A. S. Balasubramaniam. 1993. “Large-scale triaxial testing of grey wacke rockfill.” Géotechnique 43 (1): 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1993.43.1.37.
Kim, D., and S. Ha. 2014. “Effects of particle size on the shear behavior of coarse grained soils reinforced with geogrid.” Materials 7 (2): 963–979. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7020963.
Kwon, J., and E. Tutumluer. 2009. “Geogrid base reinforcement with aggregate interlock and modeling of associated stiffness enhancement in mechanistic pavement analysis.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2116: 85–95. https://doi.org/10.3141/2116-12.
Lade, P. V., J. A. Yamamuro, and P. A. Bopp. 1996. “Significance of particle crushing in granular materials.” J. Geotech. Eng. 122 (4): 309–316. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:4(309).
Lee, K. L., and I. Farhoomand. 1967. “Compressibility and crushing of granular soil in anisotropic triaxial compression.” Can. Geotech. J. 4 (1): 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1139/t67-012.
Lenart, S., J. Koseki, Y. Miyashita, and T. Sato. 2014. “Large-scale triaxial tests of dense gravel material at low confining pressures.” Soils Found. 54 (1): 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2013.12.005.
Leps, T. M. 1970. “Review of shearing strength of rockfill.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Eng. Div. 96 (4): 1159–1170.
Liu, C.-N., Y.-H. Ho, and J.-W. Huang. 2009a. “Large scale direct shear tests of soil/PET-yarn geogrid interfaces.” Geotext. Geomembr. 27 (1): 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.03.002.
Liu, C.-N., J. G. Zornberg, T.-C. Chen, Y.-H. Ho, and B.-H. Lin. 2009b. “Behavior of geogrid-sand interface in direct shear mode.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (12): 1863–1871. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000150.
Maqbool, S., and J. Koseki. 2010. “Large-scale triaxial tests to study effects of compaction energy and large cyclic loading history on shear behavior of gravel.” Soils Found. 50 (5): 633–644. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.50.633.
Nair Asha, M., and G. M. Latha. 2015. “Large diameter triaxial tests on geosynthetic-reinforced granular subbases.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 27 (4): 04014148. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001088.
Nakao, T., and S. Fityus. 2008. “Direct shear testing of a marginal material using a large shear box.” Geotech. Test. J. 31 (5): 393–403. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ101237.
Qian, Y., D. Mishra, E. Tutumluer, and H. A. Kazmee. 2015. “Characterization of geogrid reinforced ballast behavior at different levels of degradation through triaxial shear strength test and discrete element modeling.” Geotext. Geomembr. 43 (5): 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.04.012.
Tutumluer, E., H. Huang, and X. Bian. 2012. “Geogrid-aggregate interlock mechanism investigated through aggregate imaging-based discrete element modeling approach.” Int. J. Geomech. 12 (4): 391–398. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000113.
Ueda, T., T. Matsushima, and Y. Yamada. 2011. “Effect of particle size ratio and volume fraction on shear strength of binary granular mixture.” Granular Matter 13 (6): 731–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-011-0292-1.
Vallerga, B., H. Seed, C. Monismith, and R. Cooper. 1957. “Effect of shape, size, and surface roughness of aggregate particles on the strength of granular materials.” ASTM Spl. Tech. Publ. 212: 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP39456S.
Vangla, P., and M. Latha Gali. 2016. “Effect of particle size of sand and surface asperities of reinforcement on their interface shear behaviour.” Geotext. Geomembr. 44 (3): 254–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.11.002.
Vieira, C. S., and P. M. Pereira. 2015. “Interface shear properties of geosynthetics and construction and demolition waste from large-scale direct shear tests.” Geosynthetics Int. 23 (1): 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.15.00030.
Wang, J.-J., H.-P. Zhang, S.-C. Tang, and Y. Liang. 2013. “Effects of particle size distribution on shear strength of accumulation soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (11): 1994–1997. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000931.
Wu, P., K. Matsushima, and F. Tatsuoka. 2008. “Effects of specimen size and some other factors on the strength and deformation of granular soil in direct shear tests.” Geotech. Test. J. 31 (1): 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ100773.
Xiao, Y., and H. Liu. 2017. “Elastoplastic constitutive model for rockfill materials considering particle breakage.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (1): 04016041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000681.
Xiao, Y., H. Liu, Q. Chen, Q. Ma, Y. Xiang, and Y. Zheng. 2017. “Particle breakage and deformation of carbonate sands with wide range of densities during compression loading process.” Acta Geotech. 12 (5): 1177–1184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-017-0580-y.
Xiao, Y., H. Liu, Y. Chen, and J. Jiang. 2014a. “Strength and deformation of rockfill material based on large-scale triaxial compression tests. I: Influences of density and pressure.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 140 (12): 04014070. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001176.
Xiao, Y., H. Liu, Y. Chen, and J. Jiang. 2014b. “Strength and deformation of rockfill material based on large-scale triaxial compression tests. II: Influence of particle breakage.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 140 (12): 04014071. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001177.
Xu, M., E. Song, and J. Chen. 2012. “A large triaxial investigation of the stress-path-dependent behavior of compacted rockfill.” Acta Geotech. 7 (3): 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-012-0160-0.
Yu, X., S. Ji, and D. Janoyan Kerop. 2006. “Direct shear testing of rockfill material.” In Proc., GeoShanghai Int. Conf., 149–155. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Zhang, B., Y. Jie, and D. Kong. 2013a. “Particle breakage of cement ellipsoid aggregate. II: Investigation of particle crushing.” J. Test. Eval. 41 (5): 761–769. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20120284.
Zhang, B., Y. Jie, and D. Kong. 2013b. “Particle size distribution and relative breakage for a cement ellipsoid aggregate.” Comput. Geotech. 53 (Sep): 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.04.007.
Zhang, B., Y. Jie, and D. Kong. 2014. “Particle breakage of cement ellipsoid aggregate—Part I: Triaxial compression tests.” J. Test. Eval. 42 (1): 20120283. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20120283.
Zhang, X., and B. A. Baudet. 2013. “Particle breakage in gap-graded soil.” Géotech. Lett. 3 (2): 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1680/geolett.13.00022.
Zhao, H. F., L. M. Zhang, and D. S. Chang. 2013. “Behavior of coarse widely graded soils under low confining pressures.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (1): 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000755.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 30Issue 9September 2018

History

Received: Oct 4, 2017
Accepted: Mar 6, 2018
Published online: Jun 25, 2018
Published in print: Sep 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Nov 25, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, School of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; Director, UWE Global Pty Ltd., Gaoxin South 7th Rd., Shenzhen 518000, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1400-7863. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
David J. Williams [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Mehdi Serati [email protected]
Postdoctoral Research Fellow, School of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Timothy Vangsness [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share