Effect of a Recycling Agent on the Performance of High-RAP and High-RAS Mixtures: Field and Lab Experiments
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 29, Issue 1
Abstract
Reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingles (RAS) have been increasingly used in asphalt mixtures. The use of RAP and RAS in asphalt mixtures not only reduces the consumption of virgin materials, conserves energy, and protects the environment but also improves the rutting resistance of asphalt pavements. However, as more recycled materials are used in asphalt mixtures, there is increasing concern over their potential negative effects on the mix cracking resistance. To improve the cracking resistance of asphalt mixtures with high RAP/RAS contents, one of the approaches considered is using recycling agents to potentially restore performance properties of the aged binder. This project was conducted to evaluate the effect of a recycling agent (RA), known as Hydrogreen, on the long-term field performance of high RAP and RAS mixes. The field study consisted of three test sections, each constructed by placing a dense-graded surface lift at a depth of 4.5 cm (1.75 in.) on SR 7 near Harrisonville, Missouri, in August 2013. The three mixes placed in the three test sections included: (1) a control mix containing 30% RAP using an SBS-modified PG 70-22 binder with no RA; (2) a 40% RAP mix using the same PG 70-22 binder with RA; and (3) a 25% RAP and 5% RAS mix using a neat PG 64-22 with RA. This paper presents data collected during the construction of the test sections, laboratory performance testing results, and early field performance. The research results showed that the recycling agent could be used in the 40% RAP and 25% RAP and 5% RAS mixes to achieve similar construction quality, laboratory performance, and early field performance to the 30% RAP control mix. As these sections are still in service, it is recommended that they continue to be monitored in order to evaluate their long-term performance.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the Federal Highway Administration, Asphalt Research Consortium, Oldcastle Material Group, APAC Missouri, and Green Asphalt Technologies for their support and assistance in this research project.
References
AASHTO. (2007). “Standard method of test for determining the creep compliance and strength of hot-mix asphalt (HMA) using the indirect tensile test device.” AASHTO T322, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2009). “Standard practice for preparation of cylindrical performance test specimens using the superpave gyratory compactor (SGC).” AASHTO PP60, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2010a). “Standard practice for developing dynamic modulus master curves for hot mix asphalt (HMA) using the asphalt mixture performance tester (AMPT).” AASHTO PP61, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2010b). “Standard specification for performance-graded asphalt binder.” AASHTO M320, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2011b). “Practice for grading or verifying the performance grade (PG) of an asphalt binder.” AASHTO R29, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2011a). “Standard method of test for hamburg wheel-track testing of compacted hot-mix asphalt (HMA).” AASHTO T324, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2012c). “Standard method of test for determining the dynamic modulus and flow number for asphalt mixtures using the asphalt mixture performance tester (AMPT).” AASHTO TP79, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2012b). “Standard method of test for resistance of compacted asphalt mixtures to moisture-induced damage.” AASHTO T283, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2012a). “Standard practice for superpave volumetric design for asphalt mixtures.” AASHTO R35, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2014). “Standard method of test for quantitative extraction of asphalt binder from hot mix asphalt (HMA).” AASHTO T164, Washington, DC.
ASTM. (2012). “Standard practice for recovery of asphalt from solution using the rotary evaporator.” ASTM D5404/D5404M, West Conshohocken, PA.
Bennert, T., and Maher, A. (2013). “Forensic study on the cracking distress of New Jersey’s LTPP SPS-5 sections–30% RAP versus virgin hot mix asphalt (HMA).” Transp. Res. Rec., 2371, 74–86.
Carvalho, R., Shirazi, H., Ayres, M., and Selezneva, O. (2010). “Performance of recycled hot-mix asphalt overlays in rehabilitation of flexible pavements.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2155, 55–62.
Cooper, S., Mohammad, L., and Elseifi, M. (2014). “Laboratory performance of asphalt mixtures containing recycled asphalt shingles.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2445, 94–102.
Cooper, S., Mohammad, L., Elseifi, M., and Medeiros, M. (2015). “Effect of recycling agents on the laboratory performance of asphalt mixtures containing recycled asphalt shingles.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2506, 54–61.
Copeland, A. (2011). “Reclaimed asphalt pavement in asphalt mixtures: State of the practice.”, FHWA, Washington, DC.
Hajj, E., Souliman, M., Alavi, M., and Salazar, L. (2013). “Influence of Hydrogreen bioasphalt on viscoelastic properties of reclaimed asphalt mixtures.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2371, 13–22.
Hansen, K., and Copeland, A. (2014). “Annual asphalt pavement industry survey on recycled materials and warm-mix asphalt usage: 2009–2013.” National Asphalt Pavement Association, Lanham, MD.
Hong, F., Chen, D., and Mikhail, M. (2010). “Long-term performance evaluation of recycled asphalt pavement results from Texas.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2180, 58–66.
Im, S., and Zhou, F. (2014). “Field performance of RAS test sections and laboratory investigation of impact of rejuvenators on engineering properties of RAP/RAS mixes.”, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX.
Johnson, E., and Olson, R. (2009). “Best practices for RAP use based on field performance.”, Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, Maplewood, MN.
Kandhal, P. S., Rao, S., Watson, D., and Young, B. (1995). “Performance of recycled hot mix asphalt mixtures.”, National Center for Asphalt Technology (NCAT), Auburn, AL.
Mallick, R., Tao, M., O’sullivan, K., and Frank, R. (2010). “Why not (use rejuvenator for) 100% RAP recycling?” Proc., 89th TRB Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Miller, J., and Bellinger, W. (2003). “Distress identification manual for the long-term pavement performance program.”.
Mogawer, W., Bennert, T., Austerman, A., and Ericson, C. (2015). “Investigating the aging mitigation capabilities of rejuvenators in high RAP mixtures using black space diagrams, binder rheology and mixture tests.” Road Mater. Pavement Des., 16(2), in press.
O’Sullivan, K. (2011). “Rejuvenation of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) in hot mix asphalt recycling with high RAP content.” Master’s thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI), Worcester, MA.
Tran, N., Taylor, A., and Willis, R. (2012). “Effect of rejuvenator on performance properties of HMA mixtures with high RAP and RAS contents.”, National Center for Asphalt Technology (NCAT), Worcester, MA.
West, R., Kvasnak, A., Tran, N., Powell, B., and Turner, P. (2009). “Testing of moderate and high reclaimed pavement content mixes: Laboratory and accelerated field performance testing at the national center for asphalt technology test track.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2126, 100–108.
West, R., Michael, J., Turochy, R., and Maghsoodloo, S. (2011). “Use of data from specific pavement studies experiment in the long-term pavement performance program to compare virgin and recycled asphalt pavements.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2208, 82–89.
West, R., Willis, J. R., and Marasteanu, M. (2013). “Improved mix design, evaluation, and materials management practices for hot mix asphalt with high reclaimed asphalt pavement content.”, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC.
Willis, R. (2012). “Reclaimed asphalt shingles characterization: Best practices.”, Auburn, AL.
Zhao, S., Huang, B., Shu, X., Jia, X., and Woods, M. (2012). “Laboratory performance evaluation of warm-mix asphalt containing high percentages of reclaimed asphalt pavement.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2294, 98–105.
Zhao, S., Huang, B., Shu, X., and Woods, M. (2013). “Comparative evaluation of warm mix asphalt containing high percentages of reclaimed asphalt pavement.” Constr. Build. Mater., 44, 92–100.
Zhao, S., Huang, B., Shu, X., and Woods, M. (2015). “Quantitative characterization of binder blending how much recycled binder is mobilized during mixing?” Transp. Res. Rec., 2506, 72–80.
Zhou, F., Cindy, E., and Tom, S. (2014). “Literature review: Performance of RAP/RAS mixes and new direction.”, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX.
Zhou, F., Hu, S., Hu, X., Das, G., and Scullion, T. (2011). “High RAP mix design methodology with balanced performance.”, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX.
Zhou, F., Im, S., Morton, D., Lee, R., Hu, S., and Scullion, T. (2015). “Rejuvenator characterization, blend characteristics, and proposed mix design method.” J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol., 84, 675–704.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 29 • Issue 1 • January 2017
Copyright
© 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 17, 2015
Accepted: May 25, 2016
Published online: Jul 26, 2016
Discussion open until: Dec 26, 2016
Published in print: Jan 1, 2017
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.