Experimental Study of the Core-Drilling Method for Evaluating In Situ Stresses in Concrete Structures
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 28, Issue 2
Abstract
The core-drilling method (CDM) is a stress-relief technique used to determine in situ stresses in concrete. A small hole is drilled into the concrete of a structure and the resulting displacements are measured and then converted into in situ stresses using elasticity theory. Three major factors that influence stresses determined with the CDM have been identified: (1) swelling of concrete around the core hole caused by exposure to water used during the drilling process; (2) changes in the measured deformations caused by relief of differential shrinkage stresses; and (3) steel reinforcement in close proximity to a core hole. Recent research has addressed each of these factors through analytical and numerical techniques that adjust CDM-calculated stresses. This paper describes experiments performed to verify these approaches and to show that the CDM can determine accurate in situ stresses in concrete structures. Concrete plates loaded in compression were subjected to hole drilling, and the resulting displacements were measured with three-dimensional digital image correlation. Stresses calculated from measured displacements agreed with applied stresses to within 28%. When the calculated stresses were modified to account for the effects of the three influencing factors, the relative error in applied versus measured in situ stresses in the experiments was less than 10%.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by the Pennsylvania Infrastructure Technology Alliance, the Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute, and the Center for Advanced Technology for Large Structural Systems at Lehigh University. Additional financial support was provided by Trilion Quality Systems, Dywidag Systems International, the Gibson Family Fellowship, and Lehigh University. This support is gratefully acknowledged.
References
ACI (American Concrete Institute). (2005). “Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary.” ACI 318-05, Detroit.
Akita, H., Fujiwara, T., and Ozaka, Y. (1997). “A practical procedure for the analysis of moisture transfer within concrete due to drying.” Mag. Concr. Res., 49(179), 129–137.
Alexander, M. G. (1985). “Prediction of elastic modulus for design of concrete structures.” Civ. Eng. South Afr., 27(6), 313, 316–321.
ASTM. (1994). “Standard test method for static modulus of elasticity and Poisson’s ratio of concrete in compression.” C469–94, West Conshohoken, PA.
ASTM. (2001). “Standard test method for determining residual stresses by the hole-drilling strain-gage method.” E837-01e1, West Conshohoken, PA.
Gardner, N. J., and Lockman, M. J. (2001). “Design provisions for drying shrinkage and creep of normal-strength concrete.” ACI Mater. J., 98(2), 159–167.
Hall, C., and Hoff, W. (2002). Water transport in brick, stone and concrete, Spon Press, London, 318.
Hu, C. N. (1986). “Recent developments achieved in China about the centre hole relaxation technique for residual stress measurement.” Strain, 22(3), 119–126.
Mathar, J. (1934). “Determination of initial stresses by measuring the deformations around drilled holes.” Trans. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng., 56(4), 249–254.
McGinnis, M. J. (2006). “Experimental and numerical development of the core-drilling method for the nondestructive evaluation of in-situ stresses in concrete structures.” Ph.D. dissertation, Lehigh Univ., Bethlehem, PA, 333.
McGinnis, M. J., and Pessiki, S. (2006). “Influence of steel reinforcement on in-situ stress determination in concrete structures by the core-drilling method.” Review of progress in quantitative nondestructive evaluation, D. O. Thomson and D. E. Chimenti, eds., Vol. 25, American Institute of Physics, New York, 1358–1365.
McGinnis, M. J., and Pessiki, S. (2007a). “Differential shrinkage effects in the core-drilling method.” Mag. Concr. Res., 59(3), 155–164.
McGinnis, M. J., and Pessiki, S. (2007b). “Water induced swelling displacements in the core-drilling method.” ACI Mater. J., 104(1), 13–22.
McGinnis, M. J., Pessiki, S., and Turker, H. (2005). “Application of digital image correlation to the core-drilling method.” Exp. Mech., 45(4), 359–367.
Muskhelishvili, N. I. (1954). “Some basic problems of the mathematical theory of elasticity.” Fourth corrected and augmented edition, J. R. M. Radok, ed., P. Noordhoff, Groningen, Netherlands, 718.
Neville, A. M. (1981). Properties of concrete, 3rd Ed., Pittman Publishing, London, 779.
Pann, K. S., Yen, T., Tang, C-W., and Lin, T. D. (2003). “New strength model based on water-cement ratio and capillary porosity.” ACI Mater. J., 100(4), 311–318.
Rendler, N. J., and Vigness, I. (1966). “Hole drilling strain gauge method of measuring residual stresses.” Exp. Mech., 6(12), 577–586.
Turker, H. (2003). “Theoretical development of the core-drilling method for nondestructive evaluation of stresses in concrete structures.” Ph.D. dissertation, Lehigh Univ., Bethlehem, PA, 300.
Wang, H., and Li, Q. (2006). “Prediction of elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio for unsaturated concrete.” Int. J. Solids Struct., 44(5), 1370–1379.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 28 • Issue 2 • February 2016
Copyright
© 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 11, 2014
Accepted: Jan 28, 2015
Published online: Jul 9, 2015
Discussion open until: Dec 9, 2015
Published in print: Feb 1, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.