Relationship between the Compressive Strength of Concrete Masonry and the Compressive Strength of Concrete Masonry Units
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 27, Issue 9
Abstract
The results of axial compression tests on masonry prisms can be the basis for determining the design capacity of masonry elements since several building codes permit the compressive strength of the masonry to be that of the prisms. The cost and time required to construct and cure the prisms and the cost and time to prepare and test the prisms, in addition to the waiting time to begin construction, makes the overall prism test method expensive. Building codes, therefore, often provide an alternative to the prism test method. Typically, the alternative method establishes the compressive strength of the masonry from the compressive strength of the masonry unit and the mortar type specified by the engineer. The study presented herein is related specifically to concrete masonry, and it determined a relationship between the compressive strength of ungrouted and grouted masonry and the compressive strength of the masonry units. The relationship was established statistically using the results of a comprehensive testing program. Among the many contributions of this research is that masonry units with compressive strength of up to 70 MPa were tested. The tests results show an increase in the compressive strength of the masonry with increasing compressive strength of the units. The increase, however, was not proportional; in other words, the relationship masonry strength–unit strength decreased with increasing unit strength. The test results reported herein for the ratios of compressive strength of ungrouted masonry to compressive strength of masonry units are consistent with results reported by other researchers. Those compressive strength ratios are approximately 0.8 and 0.5 for low and high strength units, respectively. The ratios of compressive strength of grouted masonry to compressive strength of masonry units are approximately 0.7 and 0.4 for low and high strength units, respectively.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the financial Support of the Brazilian Association of Portland Cement, CNPq and the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) through Grant No. 2012/22454-0.
References
ABNT. (2003a). “Aggregates—Sieve analysis of fine and coarse aggregates.” NBR NM 248, Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, Rio de Janeiro, R.J., Brasil.
ABNT. (2003b). “Concrete—Procedure of molding and curing of concrete test specimens.” NBR 5738, Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, Rio de Janeiro, R.J., Brasil.
ABNT. (2005). “Mortars applied on walls and ceilings—Determination of the flexural and the compressive strength in the hardened stage.” NBR 13279, Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, Rio de Janeiro, R.J., Brasil.
ABNT. (2007a). “Concrete—Compression test of cylindrical specimens—Method of test.” NBR 5739, Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, Rio de Janeiro, R.J., Brasil.
ABNT. (2007b). “Hollow concrete blocks for concrete masonry—Requirements.” NBR 6136, Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, Rio de Janeiro, R.J., Brasil.
ABNT. (2009). “Fine aggregate—Determination of the bulk specific gravity and apparent specific gravity.” NRB NM 52, Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, Rio de Janeiro, R.J., Brasil.
ABNT. (2011a). “Hollow concrete blocks for concrete masonry—Test methods.” NBR 12118, Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, Rio de Janeiro, R.J., Brazil.
ABNT. (2011b). “Structural masonry—Concrete blocks. Part 1: Design.” NBR 15961-1, Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, Rio de Janeiro, R.J., Brasil.
ABNT. (2011c). “Structural masonry—Concrete blocks. Part 2: Execution and site control.” NBR 15961-2, Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, Rio de Janeiro, R.J., Brasil.
ASTM. (2012). “Standard test method for compressive strength of masonry prisms.” C1314-12, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
Barbosa, C. S., and Hanai, J. B. (2005). “Strength and deformability of hollow concrete blocks and their correlations with mechanical properties of constituent material.” 10th Canadian Masonry Symp., Univ. of Calgary, AB, Canada.
Casali, J. M., Oliveira, A. L., Sakamoto, C., Schankoski, R., and Prudêncio, L. R., Jr. (2012). “The effect of mortar bedding type and hollow concrete block geometry on the mechanical behavior of high-strength structural masonry.” 15th Int. Brick and Block Masonry Conf., Federal Univ. of Santa Catarina, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
CSA. (2004). “Design of masonry structures.” S304.1-04, Canadian Standards Association, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
Drysdale, R. G., and Hamid, A. A. (1979). “Behavior of concrete block masonry under axial compression.” ACI J., 76(6), 707–721.
Drysdale, R. G., and Hamid, A. A. (2008). Masonry structures: Behaviour and design, 3rd Ed., The Masonry Society, Boulder, CO.
Gayed, M., Korany, Y., and Sturgeon, G. (2012). “Examination of the prescribed concrete block masonry compressive strength in the Canadian masonry design standard, CSA S304.1-04.” 15th Int. Brick and Block Masonry Conf., Federal Univ. of Santa Catarina, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Hamid, A. A., and Drysdale, R. G. (2005). “Masonry structures behaviour and design—Canadian edition.” Canada Masonry Design Centre, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
Masonry Standards Joint Committee. (2011). “Building code requirements for masonry structures (TMS 402-11/ACI 530-11/ASCE 5-11).” The Masonry Society, Boulder, CO.
Masonry Standards Joint Committee. (2013). “Building code requirements for masonry structures (TMS 402-13/ACI 530-13/ASCE 5-13).” The Masonry Society, Boulder, CO.
NCMA. (2012). “Recalibration of the unit strength method for verifying compliance with the specified compressive strength of concrete masonry, MR37.” National Concrete Masonry Association, Herndon, VA.
Parsekian, G. A., Hamid, A. A., and Drysdale, R. G. (2012). Comportamento e Dimensionamento de Alvenaria Estrutural, EdUFSCar, São Carlos, S.P., Brazil (in Portuguese).
Romagna, R. H. (2000). “Resistência á compressão de prismas de blocos de concreto grauteados e não grauteados.” M.S. thesis, Univ. Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, S.C., Brazil.
Ross, M., Korany, Y., and Sturgeon, G. (2013). “Recalibration of the unit strength method in the Canadian masonry design standard, CSA S304.1-04 for grouted masonry.” 12th Canadian Masonry Symp., Univ. of British Columbia, BC, Canada.
Thompson, J., Lang, N., and Witthuhn, T. (2013). “Recalibration of the unit strength method for verifying compliance with the specified compressive strength of concrete masonry.” 12th Canadian Masonry Symp., Univ. of British Columbia, BC, Canada.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 27 • Issue 9 • September 2015
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 7, 2014
Accepted: Sep 24, 2014
Published online: Nov 3, 2014
Discussion open until: Apr 3, 2015
Published in print: Sep 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.