Large Diameter Triaxial Tests on Geosynthetic-Reinforced Granular Subbases
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 27, Issue 4
Abstract
The estimation of strength and stiffness of reinforced aggregates is very important for the design and construction of reinforced unpaved/paved road sections. This paper presents the experimental results from static and cyclic triaxial tests carried out on granular subbase samples reinforced with multiple layers of geogrid reinforcement. Aggregates of different size ranges were mixed in calculated proportions by weight to obtain the gradation specified for rural roads. Triaxial samples of 300 mm diameter and 600 mm height were prepared using this sampled aggregate. The strength and stiffness characteristics of this aggregate reinforced with geogrids at different elevations were determined from static and cyclic triaxial tests. Triaxial tests were also carried out on geocell encased aggregates, and the results are compared. From the experimental results it is observed that reinforced systems carried more stresses than unreinforced systems at the same strain level. The beneficial effect increased with increase in the quantity of reinforcement, whereas for geocell reinforcement, the advantage was evident only at higher strains.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Anderson, W. F., and Fair, P. (2008). “Behavior of railroad ballast under monotonic and cyclic loading.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 316–327.
ASTM. (2006). “Standard test methods for maximum index density and unit weight of soils using a vibratory table.” D4253, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2011a). “Standard test method for consolidated undrained triaxial compression test for cohesive soils.” D4767, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2011b). “Standard test method for tensile properties of geotextiles by the wide-width strip method.” D4595, West Conshohocken, PA.
Aursudkij, B. (2007). “A laboratory study of railway ballast behaviour under traffic loading and tamping maintenance.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Nottingham, Nottingham, U.K.
Bathurst, R. J., and Karpurapu, R. (1993). “Large-scale triaxial compression testing of geocell-reinforced granular soils.” Geotech. Test. J., 16(3), 296–303.
Charles, J. A., and Watts, K. S. (1980). “The influence of confining pressure on the shear strength of compacted rockfill.” Geotechnique, 30(4), 353–367.
Fabian, K., and Fourie, A. (1986). “Performance of geotextile-reinforced clay samples in undrained triaxial tests.” Geotext. Geomembr., 4(1), 53–63.
Fannin, R. J., and Sigurdsson, O. (1996). “Field observations on stabilization of unpaved roads with geosynthetics.” J. Geotech. Eng., 544–553.
Geremew, A. M., and Yanful, E. K. (2013). “Dynamic properties and influence of clay mineralogy types on the cyclic strength of mine tailings.” Int. J. Geomech., 441–453.
Haeri, S. M., Noorzad, R., and Oskoorouchi, A. M. (2000). “Effect of geotextile reinforcement on the mechanical behavior of sand.” Geotext. Geomembr., 18(6), 385–402.
Indraratna, B., Khabbaz, H., Salim, W., and Christie, D. (2006). “Geotechnical properties of ballast and the role of geosynthetics in rail track stabilisation.” Proc., ICE-Ground Improvement, Vol. 10, 91–101.
Indraratna, B., Satkunaseelan, K. S., and Rasul, M. G. (1991). “Laboratory properties of a soft marine clay reinforced with woven and nonwoven geotextiles.” Geotech. Test. J., 14(3), 288–295.
Indraratna, B., Thakur, P. K., and Vinod, J. S. (2010). “Experimental and numerical study of railway ballast behavior under cyclic loading.” Int. J. Geomech., 136–144.
Indraratna, B., Wijewardena, L. S. S., and Balasubramaniam, A. S. (1993). “Large-scale triaxial testing of grey wacke rockfill.” Geotechnique, 43(1), 37–51.
Indian Roads Congress (IRC). (2004). “Code book on specification for rural roads.” Second Revision, Ministry of Rural Road Development, Indian Roads Congress, New Delhi, India.
Latha, G. M., and Murthy, V. S. (2007). “Effects of reinforcement form on the behavior of geosynthetic reinforced sand.” Geotext. Geomembr., 25(1), 23–32.
Leng, J. (2003). “Characteristics and behavior of geogrid-reinforced aggregate under cyclic load.” Ph.D. thesis, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC.
Marachi, N. D., Chan, C. K., and Seed, H. B. (1972). “Evaluation of properties of rockfill materials.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 97(1), 95–114.
Marsal, R. J. (1967). “Large scale testing of rockfill materials.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 93(2), 27–43.
Nair, A. M., and Latha, G. M. (2012). “Taming of large diameter triaxial setup.” Geomech. Eng., 4(4), 251–262.
Omarov, M. (2010). “Liquefaction potential and post-liquefaction settlement of saturated clean sands: And effect of geofiber reinforcement.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Alaska, Fairbanks, AK.
Origin 6.1 [Computer software]. OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA.
Palmeira, E. M., and Antunes, L. G. S. (2010). “Large scale tests on geosynthetic reinforced unpaved roads subjected to surface maintenance.” Geotext. Geomembr., 28(6), 547–558.
Sevi, A., and Ge, L. (2011). “Cyclic behaviors of railroad ballast within the parallel gradation scaling framework.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 797–804.
Sitharam, T. G., Govindaraju, L., and Srinivasa Murthy, B. R. (2004). “Evaluation of liquefaction potential and dynamic properties of silty sand using cyclic triaxial testing.” Geotech. Test. J., 27(5), 423–429.
Suiker, A. S. J., Selig, E. T., and Frenkel, R. (2005). “Static and cyclic triaxial testing of ballast and subballast.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 771–782.
Varadarajan, A., Sharma, K. G., Venkatachalam, K., and Gupta, A. K. (2003). “Testing and modeling two rockfill materials.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 206–218.
Vasudevan, A. K. (2007). “Effect of coir fibers on the engineering properties of soils in the context of sustainable development.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Enginnering, Indian Institute of Science, Banaglore, India.
Xu, M., Song, E., and Chen, J. (2012). “A large triaxial investigation of the stress-path-dependent behavior of compacted rockfill.” Acta Geotech., 7(3), 167–175.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 18, 2013
Accepted: Mar 24, 2014
Published online: Jul 24, 2014
Discussion open until: Dec 24, 2014
Published in print: Apr 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.