Influence of Spatial Variability on Pavement Responses Using Latin Hypercube Sampling on Two-Dimensional Random Fields
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 26, Issue 11
Abstract
Although uncertainties in material properties have been addressed in the design of flexible pavements, most current modeling techniques assume that pavement layers are homogeneous. The paper addresses the influence of the spatial variability of the resilient moduli of pavement layers by evaluating the effect of the variance and correlation length on the pavement responses to loading. The integration of the spatially varying log-normal random field with the finite-difference method has been achieved through an exponential autocorrelation function. The variation in the correlation length was found to have a marginal effect on the mean values of the critical strains and a noticeable effect on the standard deviation which decreases with decreases in correlation length. This reduction in the variance arises because of the spatial averaging phenomenon over the softer and stiffer zones generated because of spatial variability. The increase in the mean value of critical strains with decreasing correlation length, although minor, illustrates that pavement performance is adversely affected by the presence of spatially varying layers. The study also confirmed that the higher the variability in the pavement layer moduli, introduced through a higher value of coefficient of variation (COV), the higher the variability in the pavement response. The study concludes that ignoring spatial variability by modeling the pavement layers as homogeneous that have very short correlation lengths can result in the underestimation of the critical strains and thus an inaccurate assessment of the pavement performance.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Al-Bittar, T. (2012). “Probabilistic analysis of shallow foundations resting on spatially varying soils.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Nantes, Nantes, France.
Ali, A. W., Abbas, A. R., Nazzal, M., and Sett, K. (2013). “Incorporation of subgrade modulus spatial variability in performance prediction of flexible pavements.” Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol., Chinese Soc. Pavement Eng., 6(2), 136–140.
Baecher, G. B., and Christian, J. T. (2003). Reliability and statistics in geotechnical engineering, Wiley, New York, 605.
Bourdeau, P. L. (1990). “Probabilistic modeling of flexible pavements.”, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 184–191.
Der Kiureghian, A., and Ke, J.-B. (1988). “The stochastic finite element method in structural reliability.” Probab. Eng. Mech., 3(2), 83–91.
Fenton, G. A., and Griffiths, D. V. (2002). “Probabilistic foundation settlement on a spatially random soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 381–390.
Fenton, G. A., and Griffiths, D. V. (2003). “Bearing capacity prediction of spatially random soils.” Canadian Geotech. J., 40(1), 54–65.
Griffiths, D. V., Fenton, G. A., and Manoharan, N. (2006). “Undrained bearing capacity of two-strip footings on spatially random soil.” Int. J. Geomech., 421–427.
Griffiths, D. V., Huang, J., and Fenton, G. A. (2011). “Probabilistic infinite slope analysis.” Comput. Geotech., 38(4), 577–584.
Hisada, T., and Nakagiri, S. (1981). “Stochastic finite element method developed for structural safety and reliability.” Third Int. Conf. on Structural Safety and Reliability, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 409–417.
Hua, J. (2000). “Finite element modeling and analysis of accelerated pavement testing devices and rutting phenomenon.” Ph.D. thesis, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN.
Iman, R. L., and Conover, W. J. (1982). “A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables.” Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput., 11(3), 311–334.
Itasca. (2007). FLAC—fast Lagrangian analysis of continua, ver. 5.0 user’s guide, Itasca Consulting Group, Minneapolis, MN.
Jaksa, M. B., Brooker, P. I., and Kaggwa, W. S. (1997). “Inaccuracies associated with estimating random measurement errors.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 393–401.
Kenis, W., and Wang, W. (1999). “Pavement variability and reliability.” Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Accelerated Pavement Testing, Univ. of Nevada, Reno, NV.
Lea, J. D. (2010). “The effect of spatial variability on the reliability of pavements.” Dissertation, Univ. of California, Davis, CA.
Liu, W. K., Belytschko, T., and Lua, Y. J. (1992). “Stochastic computational measures for aerospace structures.” Computational nonlinear mechanics in aerospace engineering, Satya N. Atluri, ed., Progress in astronautics and aeronautics, 146, AIAA, Washington, DC, 245–278.
Liu, W. K., Belytschko, T., and Lua, Y. J. (1995). Probabilistic finite element method, probabilistic structural mechanics handbook: Theory and industrial applications, 4th Ed., Chapman and Hall, New York, 70–105.
Lua, Y. J., and Sues, R. H. (1996). “Probabilistic finite-element analysis of airfield pavements.”, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 29–38.
MATLAB 7.8.0 [Computer software]. Natick, MA, MathWorks.
McKay, M. D., Conover, W. J., and Beckman, R. J. (1979). “A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code.” Technometrics, 21(2), 239–245.
National Cooperative Highway Research 537 Program (NCHRP). (2004). “Guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures.” National Cooperative Highway Research Program Rep. 1-37A, Washington, DC., 1–35.
Olsson, A. M. J., and Sandberg, G. E. (2002). “Latin hypercube sampling for stochastic finite element analysis.” J. Eng. Mech., 121–125.
Papaioannou, I., and Straub, D. (2012). “Reliability updating in geotechnical engineering including spatial variability of soil.” Comput. Geotech., 42, 44–51.
Pereira, A., and Broed, R. (2006). “Methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis: Review and recomendations for implementation in Ecolego.” Fysikum, Stockholm.
Roque, R., Romereo, P., and Hiltunen, D. R. (1992). “The use of linear elastic analysis to predict non-linear response of pavements.” Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Asphalt Pavements, Vol. 3, International Society of Asphalt Pavements, Nottingham, U.K., 296–310.
Schü eller, G. I., Bucher, C. G., and Pradlwarter, H. J. (1995). “Computational methods in stochastic structural dynamics.”, Germany.
Stefanou, G. (2009). “The stochastic finite element method: Past, present and future.” Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 198(9–12), 1031–1051.
Vanmarcke, E. H. (1983). Random field: Analysis and synthesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Vorechovsky, M., and Novak, D. (2005). “Simulation of random fields for stochastic finite element analysis.” Proc., Ninth Int. Conf. on Structural Safety and Reliability, Millpress, Rotterdam, Italy.
White, D. J., Morris, M. D., and Thompson, M. (2006). “Power-based compaction monitoring using vibratory padfoot roller.” Proc., GeoCongress, Geotechnical Engineering in the Information Technology Age, ASCE Geo-Institute, Atlanta, 1–6.
White, D. J., Rupnow, T., and Ceylan, H. (2004). “Influence of subgrade/subbase nonuniformity on pavement performance.” Geotechnical engineering for transportation projects, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1058–1065.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 26 • Issue 11 • November 2014
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 24, 2013
Accepted: Dec 2, 2013
Published online: Dec 4, 2013
Published in print: Nov 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Nov 5, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.