Evaluation of Factors Affecting the Performance of Geogrid-Reinforced Granular Base Material Using Repeated Load Triaxial Tests
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 24, Issue 1
Abstract
This research evaluated the benefits of geogrid reinforcement of granular base specimens and studied the effect of different factors contributing to their performance. This includes geometry, tensile modulus, arrangement/location of geogrids, the moisture content of specimen, and stress state. Five geogrids of different tensile modulus and aperture geometries (three rectangle or biaxial and two triangle or triaxial) were used. The study was experimentally carried out by conducting repeated load triaxial (RLT) tests to evaluate the resilient and permanent deformations of the specimens. The test results demonstrated the potential benefit in placing the geogrid within the granular base specimens. Less permanent deformations were measured under cyclic loading for geogrid-reinforced base specimens compared to unreinforced specimens. The geogrid geometry and tensile modulus had noticeable effects on the specimens’ performance. Of the five geogrids used, the triaxial geogrid (TX1) with triangle geometry and the highest tensile modulus performed consistently better than the other four geogrids. For geogrids with the same geometry, the higher the tensile modulus, the lower was the accumulated permanent deformation. The test results also showed obvious effects of the geogrid arrangement/location on the specimens’ performance, with the double geogrid location consistently yielding the largest improvement. The test results did not show any appreciable improvement in the resilient deformation or resilient modulus of the geogrid-reinforced granular specimens. The effect of moisture content on the performance of geogrid-reinforced specimens was evident, with higher improvement observed for specimens prepared at the optimum and dry of optimum than those prepared at wet of optimum.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by the Louisiana Transportation Research Center (LTRC), the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, and Tensar International Corporation. The authors would like to express their thanks to Mark Morvant, Zhongjie Zhang, Gavin Gautreau, Benjamin Comeaux, and Amar Raghavendra at LTRC for providing valuable help and support in this study.
References
AASHTO. (2003). “Standard method of test for determining the resilient modulus of soils and aggregates.” T307-99, Washington, DC.
Abu-Farsakh, M., Nazzal, D., and Mohammad, L. (2007). “Effect of reinforcement on resilient and permanent deformations of base course material.” Transportation Research Record 2004, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 120–131.
Ahmed Kamel, M., Chandra, S., and Kumar, P. (2004). “Behavior of subgrade soil reinforced with geogrid.” Int. J. Pavement Eng., 5(4), 201–209.
Al-Qadi, I. L., Brandon, T. L., and Bhutta, S. A. (1997). “Geosynthetic stabilized flexible pavements.” Proc., Conf. Geosynthetics, Industrial Fabrics Association International (IFAI), Roseville, MN, 647–661.
Al-Qadi, I. L., Barndon, T. L., Valentine, R. J., Lacina, B. A., and Smith, T. E. (1994). “Laboratory evaluation of geosynthetics reinforced pavement sections.” Transportation Research Record 1439, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 25–31.
Al-Qadi, I. L., Dessouky, S. H., Kwon, J., and Tutumluer, E. (2008). “Geogrid in flexible pavements: validated mechanism.” Transportation Research Record 2045, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 102–109.
Arnold, G. K. (2004). “Rutting of granular pavements.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Austin, A. (2009). “Fundamental characterization of unbound base course materials under cyclic loading.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA.
Barksdale, R. D. (1972). “Laboratory evaluation of rutting in base course materials.” Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements, International Society for Asphalt Pavements, Lino Lakes, MN, 161–174.
Barksdale, R. D. (1991). The aggregate handbook, National Stone Association, Washington, DC.
Barksdale, R. D., Brown, S. F., and Chan, F. (1989). “Potential benefits of geosynthetics in flexible pavement systems.” NCHRP Rep. No. 315, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.
Berg, R. R., Christopher, B. R., and Perkins, S. W. (2000). “Geosynthetic reinforcement of the aggregate base course of flexible pavement structures.” GMA white paper II, Geosynthetic Material Association, Roseville, MN, 100.
Cancelli, A., and Montanelli, F. (1999). “In-ground test for geosynthetic reinforced flexible paved roads.” Proc., Conf. Geosynthetics, Industrial Fabrics Association International (IFAI), Roseville, MN, 863–878.
Collin, J. G., Kinney, T. C., and Fu, X. (1996). “Full scale highway load test of flexible pavement system with geogrid reinforced base courses.” Geosynth. Int., 3(4), 537–549.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2009). “Highway statistics 2009.” 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2009〉 (Jun. 1, 2011).
Gandara, J. A., Kancherla, A., Alvarado, G., Nazarian, S., and Scullion, T. (2005). “Impact of aggregate gradation on base material performance.” Rep. TX-0-4358-2, Texas Dept. of Transportation, Austin, TX, 63.
Hass, R., Walls, J., and Carroll, R. G. (1988). “Geogrid reinforcement of granular bases in flexible pavements.” Transportation Research Record 1188, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 19–27.
Heath, A. C., Pestana, J. M., Harvey, J. T., and Bejerano, M. O. (2004). “Normalizing behavior of unsaturated granular pavement materials.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 130(9), 896–904.
Kinney, T. C., Abbott, J., and Schuler, J. (1998). “Benefits of using geogrids for base reinforcement with regard to rutting.” Transportation Research Record 1611, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 86–96.
Kwon, J., Tutumluer, E., and Konietzky, H. (2008). “Aggregate base residual stresses affecting geogrid reinforced flexible pavement response.” Int. J. Pavement Eng., 9(4), 275–285.
Moghaddas-Nejad, F., and Small, J. C. (2003). “Resilient and permanent characteristics of reinforced granular materials by repeated load triaxial tests.” Geotech. Testing J. ASTM, 26(2), 152–166.
Montanelli, F., Zhao, A., and Rimoldi, P. (1997). “Geosynthetic-reinforced pavement system: testing & design.” Proc., Conf. Geosynthetics, Industrial Fabrics Association International (IFAI), Roseville, MN, 619–632.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). (2004). “Laboratory determination of resilient modulus for flexible pavement design.” Research Results Digest for NCHRP 1-28A Project, Washington, DC.
Nazzal, M. (2007). “Laboratory characterization and numerical modeling of geogrid reinforced bases in flexible pavements.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA.
Nazzal, M., Abu-Farsakh, M., and Mohammad, L. (2007). “Laboratory characterization of reinforced crushed limestone under monotonic and cyclic loading.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 19(9), 772–783.
Perkins, S. W. (1999). “Geosynthetic reinforcement of flexible pavements laboratory based pavement test sections.” Rep. FHWA/MT-99-001/8138, Montana Dept. of Transportation, Helena, MT, 109.
Perkins, S. W. (2002). “Evaluation of geosynthetic reinforced flexible pavement systems using two pavements test facilities.” Rep. FHWA/MT-02-008/20040, Montana Dept. of Transportation, Helena, MT, 120.
Perkins, S. W., et al. (2004). “Development of design methods for geosynthetic reinforced flexible pavements.” Rep. FHWA/DTFH61-01-X-00068, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, 263.
Sweere, G. T. H. (1990). “Unbound granular bases for roads.” Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Univ. of Delft, Delft, Netherlands.
Webster, S. L. (1993). “Geogrid reinforced base courses for flexible pavements for light aircraft: test section construction, behavior under traffic, laboratory tests, and design criteria.” Technical Rep. GL-93-6, U.S. Army Engrs. Waterways Experiment Station (USAE-WES), Vicksburg, MS, 86.
Werkmeister, S. (2003). “Permanent deformation behavior of unbound granular materials in pavement constructions.” Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Technical Univ. of Dresden, Germany.
Werkmeister, S., Dawson, A., and Wellner, F. (2001). “Permanent deformation behavior of granular materials and the shakedown concept.” 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 24 • Issue 1 • January 2012
Pages: 72 - 83
Copyright
© 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 15, 2010
Accepted: Jun 17, 2011
Published online: Jun 21, 2011
Published in print: Jan 1, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.