Scholarly Papers
Oct 12, 2022

Litigation versus Judicial Arbitration as Binding Dispute Settlement Techniques in Public Construction Projects

Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15, Issue 1

Abstract

Dispute resolution is employed to assist project parties in overcoming situational friction and to help them move ahead with project execution. Understanding available binding dispute resolution methods and selecting a proper resolution method can reduce the negative impact of disputes on construction duration and cost. In many countries, dispute resolution is limited and is channeled through official agencies; litigation and judicial arbitration are adopted as binding settlement techniques. This study compared litigation and judicial arbitration in Kuwait by analyzing a sample of 98 real cases collected through convenience sampling from a population of around 1,000 cases that took place between 1995 and 2018. The collected cases consisted of 48 litigation cases and 50 cases of judicial arbitration and represented all the cases available to the research team from Kuwait’s Ministry of Justice. The study’s main objectives were to (1) characterize the time and cost effectiveness of the two techniques and investigate their influencing factors; (2) collect and analyze real data on litigation and judicial arbitration; and (3) compare the two techniques in order to identify their value to owners and contractors. Data on litigation and judicial arbitration cases were categorized according to claim values. It was found that the litigation process consumed more time than judicial arbitration due to multiple legal levels of courts. When claim values exceeded $1.6 million, the results showed that judicial arbitration was more cost effective, but it was not always legally applicable. In contrast, when claim values were below $1.5 million, contrary to existing beliefs, the results showed that judicial arbitration can be more costly than litigation. These findings will help stakeholders better understand both methods and their suitability for settling disputes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

References

List of Statutes

KMJ (Kuwait Ministry of Justice). 1973. “Law No. 17 of 1973 on judicial fees (17/ 1973).” ⟨http://www.moj.gov.kw⟩.
KMJ (Kuwait Ministry of Justice). 1980. “The Civil & Commercial Procedure, Code no. 38 of 1980.” ⟨http://www.moj.gov.kw⟩.
KMJ (Kuwait Ministry of Justice). 1990. “Decree no. 23 of 1990 on the Organization of the Judiciary (23/1990).” ⟨http://www.moj.gov.kw⟩.
KMJ (Kuwait Ministry of Justice). 1995. “Kuwaiti Arbitration Laws: The Relevant by Virtue of Law no. 11 of 1995, Organizing Ministerial Resolutions and the Civil & Commercial Procedure, Code no. 38 of 1980.” ⟨http://www.moj.gov.kw⟩.

Works Cited

Abwunza, A. A., T. K. Peter, and K. Muigua. 2022. “Explaining the ineffectiveness of construction arbitration.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 14 (2): 04522009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000541.
Alaloul, W. S., M. W. Hasaniyah, and B. A. Tayeh. 2019. “A comprehensive review of disputes prevention and resolution in construction projects.” In Vol. 270 of Proc., MATEC Web of Conf., 05012. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201927005012.
Alhamidah, K. 2007. “Administrative contracts and arbitration, in light of the Kuwaiti Law of Judicial Arbitration No. 11 of 1995.” Arab. Law Q. 21 (1): 35–63. https://doi.org/10.1163/026805507X197839.
Al Houti, D. 2016. “Arbitration in Kuwait: Time for reform?” Accessed August 20, 2016. http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/2015/02/20/arbitration-in-kuwait-time-for-reform.
Al-Humaidi, H. M. 2014. “Arbitration in Kuwait: Study of current practices and suggestions for improvements.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 6 (1): 03013001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000128.
Alozn, A. E., and A. Galadari. 2018. “Evidence admissibility and evaluation models in commercial arbitration.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 10 (3): 04518008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000258.
Alshbib Almutairi, A. 2020. “Providing a blueprint for Kuwaiti to promote alternative dispute resolution (mediation and arbitration) for commercial disputes to improve the Kuwaiti economy.” Dissertation, School of Law, Washington Univ. in St. Louis.
Arif, F., and F. Saeed. 2021. “Role of construction project documentation for effective arbitration process.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 13 (2): 04521006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000466.
Awwad, R., B. Barakat, and C. Menassa. 2016. “Understanding dispute resolution in the Middle East region from perspectives of different stakeholders.” J. Manage. Eng. 32 (6): 05016019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000465.
Bristow, D., and R. Vasilopoulos. 1995. “The new CCDC 2: Facilitating dispute resolution of construction projects.” Constr. Law J. 11 (2): 95–117.
Çevikbaş, M., and A. Köksal. 2018. “An Investigation of Litigation Process in Construction Industry in Turkey.” Teknik Dergi. 29 (6): 8715–8729. https://doi.org/10.18400/tekderg.389757.
Cheung, S., H. C. Suen, and T. Lam. 2002. “Fundamentals of alternative dispute resolution processes in construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 128 (5): 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:5(409).
Eldib, M. M. S. 2021. “The Parochial Kuwaiti arbitration regime: A case study of the extension of arbitration agreements to non-signatories.” Doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Law, Queen’s Univ.
Hertzog, M. A. 2008. “Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies.” Res. Nurs. Health 31 (2): 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20247.
Muda, I., and S. N. Landau. 2019. “The implementation theory of conservative accrual accounting to the quality of accounting information systems.” J. Southwest Jiaotong Univ. 54 (1): 1–12.
Muigua, K. 2018. “Utilizing alternative dispute resolution mechanisms to manage commercial disputes.” In Proc., 1st Nairobi Centre for Int. Arbitration (NCIA) Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) National Conf. Nairobi, Kenya: InterContinental Hotel.
Rendell, M. O. 2000. “ADR versus litigation.” Dispute Resolut. J. 55 (1): 69–72.
Sayed-Gharib, T., A. Price, and W. Lord. 2010. “Improving dispute resolution on construction projects in Kuwait.” In Proc., 18th CIB World Building Congress (Special Track, CIB-W113 Law and Dispute Resolution working commission), 514–526. Rotterdam, Netherlands: International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction.
She, L. 2011. “Factors which impact upon the selection of dispute resolution methods for commercial construction in the Melbourne industry: Comparison of the Dispute Review Board with other Alternative Dispute Resolution methods.” In Proc., RICS Construction and Property Conf., COBRA 2011, 51–65. London, UK: The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors.
Stipanowich, T. J. 1997. “At the cutting edge: Conflict avoidance and resolution in the U.S. construction industry.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 15 (6): 505–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461997372700.
T4D (Tools4Dev). 2022. “How to choose a sample size (for the statistically challenged).” Accessed June 25, 2022. https://tools4dev.org/resources/how-to-choose-a-sample-size/.
Treacy, T. B. 1995. “Use of alternative dispute resolution in the construction industry.” J. Manage. Eng. 11 (1): 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1995)11:1(58).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15Issue 1February 2023

History

Received: Mar 31, 2022
Accepted: Aug 4, 2022
Published online: Oct 12, 2022
Published in print: Feb 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Mar 12, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Khaled Alrasheed [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Kuwait Univ., P.O. Box 5969, Safat 13060, Kuwait. Email: [email protected]
Teaching Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State Univ., 212 Sackett Bldg., University Park, State College, PA 16802 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8846-7398. Email: [email protected]
Afrah AlShaheen [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Kuwait Univ., P.O. Box 5969, Safat 13060, Kuwait. Email: [email protected]
Associate Research Scientist, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, P.O. Box 24885, Safat 13109, Kuwait. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0518-1413. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Investigating Causes of Disputes Resulting in Litigation in Airport Development Projects in the United States Using Graph-Based Techniques, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5903, 40, 3, (2024).
  • Delay Dispute Cases: Comparative Analysis and Claimed Value Prediction Model, Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1038, 16, 1, (2024).
  • Dispute Classification in Construction Projects Based on Litigation Cases, Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-910, 15, 3, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share