Ontology-Based Approach to Risk-Factor Identification to Support the Management of Provisions in Bridge Design
Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15, Issue 1
Abstract
Requirement management is crucial in the design stage of infrastructure project delivery to ensure the designed facility satisfies the owner expectations and avoids any costly redesign, rework, and disputes. The requirements are primarily described in design codes and standards. The relevant requirements from codes are transformed into a set of in computer-readable rules required for computer-aided design and compliance verification. Prior to the construction of rules, the requirements in codes must be converted into an organized, structured format in terms of risks to support easy retrieval of the relevant applicable requirements. However, the unavailability of risk information in the requirement text makes it challenging for a designer to extract the relevant requirements of specific risks to support design tasks, including compliance checking. The manual process of requirement classification according to risk factors is time-consuming, laborious, and error-prone because the codes are mostly voluminous, including thousands of specifications. Much less attention has been paid to develop an automated framework to organize the requirements in terms of risks addressed in them. To address this need, this study has attempted to develop an ontology-based framework to identify relevant risk factors addressed in bridge design requirements to support requirement management. The nine risk factors of bridge engineering used in this study included flood, earthquake, fire, snowfall, wind, temperature, overloading, vessel collision, and blast loading. A risk ontology was developed to represent the conceptualized semantic knowledge associated with each of the nine risk factors. The algorithm was validated on a human-annotated requirement dataset based on the AASHTO bridge design specifications and state design manuals. The developed model yielded a Spearman, Kendall tau, and Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.7223, 0.6021, and 0.7222, respectively. The proposed model is expected to improve specifications retrieval for rules construction, thereby enabling ease of requirement classification for the design process.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Works Cited
Al-dosary, B. K. 2015. Integrating 3D-CAD and cost estimating at the conceptual design stage of bridge project. Ottawa: Univ. of Ottawa.
Allahyari, M., S. Pouriyeh, K. Kochut, and H. Reza. 2017. “A knowledge-based topic modeling approach for automatic topic labeling.” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 8 (9): 335–349. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2017.080947.
Björnsson, I. 2016. “From code compliance to holistic approaches in structural design of bridges.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 142 (1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000255.
Björnsson, I. 2017. “Holistic approach for treatment of accidental hazards during conceptual design of bridges—A case study in Sweden.” Saf. Sci. 91 (Jan): 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.009.
Bulleit, W., J. Schmidt, I. Alvi, E. Nelson, and T. Rodriguez-Nikl. 2015. “Philosophy of engineering: What it is and why it matters.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 141 (3): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000205.
Bulleit, W. M. 2012. “Structural building codes and communication systems.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 17 (4): 147–151. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000136.
Caldas, C. H., and L. Soibelman. 2003. “Automating hierarchical document classification for construction management information systems.” Autom. Constr. 12 (4): 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-5805(03)00004-9.
Caldas, C. H., L. Soibelman, and J. Han. 2002. “Automated classification of construction project documents.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 16 (4): 234–243. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2002)16:4(234).
Chang, Y. H., and H. Y. Huang. 2008. “An automatic document classifier system based on naïve Bayes classifier and ontology.” In Vol. 6 of Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, ICMLC, 3144–3149. New York: IEEE.
Coeckelbergh, M. 2006. “Regulation or responsibility? Autonomy, moral imagination, and engineering.” Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 31 (3): 237–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243905285839.
Deviyanti, F. J. K., S. S. Kusumawardani, and P. I. Santosa. 2019. “Ontology-based social media talks topic classification (twitter case).” Int. J. Inf. Technol. Electr. Eng. 3 (1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijitee.46534.
El-Diraby, T. A., C. Lima, and B. Feis. 2005. “Domain taxonomy for construction concepts: Toward a formal ontology for construction knowledge.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 19 (4): 394–406. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2005)19:4(394).
El-Gohary, N. M., and T. E. El-Diraby. 2010. “Domain ontology for processes in infrastructure and construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (7): 730–744. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000178.
Elms, D. G. 1999. “Achieving structural safety: Theoretical considerations.” Struct. Saf. 21 (4): 311–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(99)00027-2.
Erk, K. 2012. “Vector space models of word meaning and phrase meaning: A survey.” Ling. Lang. Compass 6 (10): 635–653. https://doi.org/10.1002/lnco.362.
Fidan, G., I. Dikmen, A. M. Tanyer, and M. T. Birgonul. 2011. “Ontology for relating risk and vulnerability to cost overrun in international projects.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 25 (4): 302–315. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000090.
Firth, I. P. T. 2007. “Adding confidence and reducing risk—The role of independent design checking in major projects.” In Vol. 93 of Proc., IABSE Symp., Weimar 2007: Improving Infrastructure Worldwide, 28–33. Zürich, Switzerland: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering.
Glaser, I., E. Scepankova, and F. Matthes. 2018. “Classifying semantic types of legal sentences: Portability of machine learning models.” Front. Artif. Intell. Appl. 313 (Dec): 61–70. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-935-5-61.
Goodhead, S., E. Farrow, and J. Hughes. 2016. “Determining baseline performance and the application to performance based design.” Accessed November 23, 2021. https://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.sfpe.org/resource/resmgr/PBD_Conference/TUE-Conference_Proceeding/Tue_B_-_1050_-_Simon_Goodhea.pdf.
Harris, Z. S. 1954. “Distributional structure.” Word 10 (2–3): 146–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1954.11659520.
Hooton, R. D., and J. A. Bickley. 2012. “Prescriptive versus performance approaches for durability design—The end of innocence?” Mater. Corros. 63 (12): 1097–1101. https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.201206780.
Hurd, M. E. 2012. “Quantitative design decision method: Performance-based design utilizing a risk analysis framework.” Master’s thesis, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Univ. of Waterloo.
Indukuri, K. V., and P. R. Krishna. 2010. Mining e-contract documents to classify clauses, 1–5. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Keet, C. M. 2004. “Aspects of ontology integration.” In The PhD proposal, school of computing. Edinburgh, UK: Napier Univ.
Lobo, C., L. Lemay, and K. Obla. 2006. “Performance-based specifications for concrete.” In Vol. 2006 of Proc., AEI 2006: Building Integration Solutions—Proc., 2006 Architectural Engineering National Conf., 45. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Madhusudhanan, S., and P. Sideris. 2018. “Capacity spectrum seismic design methodology for bridges with hybrid sliding-rocking columns.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (8): 04018052. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001248.
Mao, W., and W. W. Chu. 2007. “The phrase-based vector space model for automatic retrieval of free-text medical documents.” Data Knowl. Eng. 61 (1): 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2006.02.008.
Mikolov, T., K. Chen, G. Corrado, and J. Dean. 2013. “Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space.” Preprint, submitted January 16, 2013. https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781.
Muneeb, T. H., S. Sahu, and A. Anand. 2015. “Evaluating distributed word representations for capturing semantics of biomedical concepts.” Proc. BioNLP 15 (Jul): 158–163. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w15-3820.
Palaneeswaran, E., P. E. Love, and J. T. Kim. 2014. “Role of design audits in reducing errors and rework: Lessons from Hong Kong.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 28 (3): 511–517. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000450.
Patil, S. S., and K. R. Molenaar. 2011. “Risks associated with performance specifications in highway infrastructure procurement.” J. Public Procur. 11 (4): 482–508. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-11-04-2011-B002.
Pennington, J., R. Socher, and C. D. Manning. 2014. “GloVe: Global vectors for word representation jeffrey.” In Proc., 2014 Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 1532–1543. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Pohl, R. 2020. “Quantifying resilience in hydraulic engineering: Floods, flood records, and resilience in urban areas.” WIREs Water 7 (3): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1431.
Pritchard, R. W. 2013. “2011 to 2012 Queensland floods and cyclone events: Lessons learnt for bridge transport infrastructure.” Aust. J. Struct. Eng. 14 (2): 167–176. https://doi.org/10.7158/S13-009.2013.14.2.
Qin, C., P. Zhao, J. Mou, and J. Zhang. 2018. “Construction of personal knowledge maps for a peer-to-peer information-sharing environment.” Electron. Lib. 36 (3): 394–413. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-03-2017-0071.
Schütze, H., C. D. Manning, and P. Raghavan. 2007. An introduction to information retrieval. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Shapiro, S. 1997. “Degrees of freedom: The interaction of standards of practice and engineering judgment.” Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 22 (3): 286–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399702200302.
Si, Y., J. Wang, H. Xu, and K. Roberts. 2019. “Enhancing clinical concept extraction with contextual embeddings.” J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 26 (11): 1297–1304. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz096.
Wei, F., H. Qin, S. Ye, and H. Zhao. 2019. “Empirical study of deep learning for text classification in legal document review.” In Proc., 2018 IEEE Int. Conf. on Big Data, Big Data 2018, 3317–3320. New York: IEEE.
Zhang, J., and N. M. El-Gohary. 2016. “Semantic NLP-based information extraction from construction regulatory documents for automated compliance checking.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 30 (2): 04015014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000346.
Zhou, P., and N. El-Gohary. 2016a. “Domain-specific hierarchical text classification for supporting automated environmental compliance checking.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 30 (4): 04015057. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000513.
Zhou, P., and N. El-Gohary. 2016b. “Ontology-based multilabel text classification of construction regulatory documents.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 30 (4): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000530.
Zhou, Z., Y. M. Goh, and L. Shen. 2016. “Overview and analysis of ontology studies supporting development of the construction industry.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 30 (6): 04016026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000594.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15 • Issue 1 • February 2023
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 1, 2022
Accepted: Jul 26, 2022
Published online: Oct 7, 2022
Published in print: Feb 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Mar 7, 2023
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Architectural engineering
- Bridge design
- Bridge engineering
- Bridge management
- Building design
- Building management
- Business management
- Computer aided design
- Construction engineering
- Construction management
- Design (by type)
- Engineering fundamentals
- Information management
- Maintenance and operation
- Management methods
- Practice and Profession
- Standards and codes
- Structural engineering
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Chuanni He, Min Liu, Simon M. Hsiang, Nicholas Pierce, Synthesizing Ontology and Graph Neural Network to Unveil the Implicit Rules for US Bridge Preservation Decisions, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5803, 40, 3, (2024).