Correlating Disadvantaged Business Enterprises Participation with Highway Project Performance
Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 14, Issue 4
Abstract
The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 49 Part 26 discusses the participation of disadvantaged business enterprises (DBEs) on a state department of transportation’s highway, transit, and airport contracts. Any highway or airport project exceeding the contract value of $250,000 should have a DBE program. Generally, the statute states that no less than 10% of the authorized funds are to be expended with DBEs. Due to this requirement, the prime contractors bidding for state DOT-owned highway contracts have recently set aside some percentage of work for DBE firms. There have been no empirical studies conducted to determine the impact of DBE participation on the cost and schedule performance of these projects. Therefore, this study will focus on determining the impact of DBE participation on the cost, schedule, change order, and construction intensity performance of highway projects. The study hypothesizes that the involvement of DBEs will improve the cost and schedule performance of the highway projects. To test the hypothesis, the authors collected and analyzed data from 109 recently completed highway projects from the Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT). The study’s results show that the schedule growth of projects that involve DBEs are significantly higher than projects that have no DBE participation. However, the change order growth of projects that involve DBEs is significantly lower than projects that have no DBE participation. The authors are collecting more data to determine the reasons for increased schedule growth and decreased change order growth on DBE-participating highway projects.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
References
List of Statutes
USDOT. (2014). 49 CFR Part 26 Sample Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program. https://www.transportation.gov/osdbu/disadvantaged-business-enterprise/49-cfr-part-26-sample-disadvantaged-business.
Works Cited
Ashuri, B., A. Amekudzi-Kennedy, S. Amoaning-Yankson, Y. Liang, and Y. Cao. 2019. “Strategies and resources for government agencies to utilize disadvantaged business enterprises in transportation design-build projects.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 11 (4): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000317.
Bates, T., W. D. Bradford, and R. Seamans. 2018. “Minority entrepreneurship in twenty-first century America.” Small Bus. Econ. 50 (3): 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9883-5.
Chen, P. Y., and P. M. Popovich. 2012. Vol. 139 of Correlation: Parametric and nonparametric measures. Series: Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Kim, A., and D. Arditi. 2010. “Performance of MBE/DBE/WBE construction firms in transportation projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (7): 768–777. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000182.
Kishore, V., and D. M. Abraham. 2009. Construction costs: Using federal vs. local funds: A case study. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Univ.
Marion, J. 2007. “Are bid preferences benign? The effect of small business subsidies in highway procurement auctions.” J. Public Econ. 91 (7–8): 1591–1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.12.005.
Nakabayashi, J. 2013. “Small business set-asides in procurement auctions: An empirical analysis.” J. Public Econ. 100 (Apr): 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.01.003.
Park, J. M. 2002. “Univariate analysis and normality test using SAS, STATA, and SPSS.” Accessed April 4, 2022. http://cef-cfr.ca/uploads/Reference/sasNORMALITY.pdf.
Shrestha, P. P., R. Sharma, M. Karakouzian, and A. Singh. 2016. “Comparing performance and impediments of construction and professional disadvantaged business enterprises in transportation.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 142 (2): 04015012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000267.
USDOT. 2020. “US DOT disadvantaged business enterprises.” Accessed April 4, 2022. https://www.transportation.gov/civil-rights/disadvantaged-business-enterprise.
US Senate Committee on Small Business & Entrepreneurship. 2020. “Minority entrepreneurs.” Accessed March 15, 2022. https://www.sbc.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/minorityentrepreneurs.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 14 • Issue 4 • November 2022
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 29, 2021
Accepted: May 19, 2022
Published online: Aug 4, 2022
Published in print: Nov 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jan 4, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Kishor Shrestha, Cost Comparison of Highway Rest Area Operations: In-House Workforce versus Outsourcing Methods, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13214, 149, 8, (2023).