Scholarly Papers
Jul 29, 2022

Liability of Designers to Contractors for Proposal-Related Claims in Design-Build Contracts

Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 14, Issue 4

Abstract

Design-build (DB) project proposals generally require the designer on the DB team to advance the level of design provided by the owner in the request for proposals (RFP) to a stage where a firm fixed price can be proposed. The construction contractor on the team uses the designer’s work product to prepare the proposed bid price. Issues can arise if there are errors in the proposal designs that cause the contractor to spend more money than planned. The standards for determining a designer’s liability for errors in completed, signed, and sealed design documents are well understood. However, the standards for determining a designer’s liability to contractors for errors in proposal designs are neither clear nor well understood. This paper reviews several published cases addressing disputes between contractors and designers with respect to design errors arising from these proposal-based designs. It concludes that the question of whether a contractor can recover losses due to errors found in proposal-related design documents is largely dependent on what the agreement for proposal-related services provides as a standard of care and whether the contractor can adequately demonstrate that the losses are attributable to the proposal-related errors. This paper provides several recommendations on what issues should be covered when contractors and designers enter into a teaming agreement or other contract for proposal-related services.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

No data, models, or code were generated or used during the study.

References

List of Cases

C. L. Maddox, Inc. v. The Benham Group, Inc., 88 F.3d 592 (8th Cir. 1996).
CRS Sirrine, Inc. v. Dravo Corp., 445 S.E. 2d 782 (Ga. App. 1994).
Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade and Douglas, Inc. v. Palmetto Bridge Constructors, 647 F.Supp.2d 587 (D. Md. 2009).
Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade and Douglas, Inc. v. Palmetto Bridge Constructors, WL 1969544 (D. Md.) (Cooper River Arbitration Award).
The Middlesex Corporation, Inc. v. Fay, Spofford & Thorndike, Inc., 2019 WL 3552609 (Mass. 2019).
Valley Paving, Inc. v. Stanley Consultants, Inc., 2016 WL 2615956 (Minn. Court of Appeals 2016).
Walsh/Granite JV v. HDR Engineering, Inc., 2019 WL 1382957 (W.D. Pennsylvania 2019).

Works Cited

Allensworth, W., R. Altman, A. Overcash, and C. J. Patterson. 2009. Construction law. Chicago: Forum on the Construction Industry and American Bar Association.
Castro-Nova, I., G. M. Gad, A. Touran, B. Cetin, and D. D. Gransberg. 2018. “Evaluating the influence of differing geotechnical risk perceptions on design-build highway projects.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 4 (4): 04018038. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000993.
Christensen, M. R., and L. E. Meeker. 2002. “Design-build projects–lessons learned from the contractor’s perspective.” Proc. Am. Railway Eng. Maintenance Way Assoc. 3 (9): 14.
Clark, L. 2015. “How does CMAR differ from design-build?” Accessed July 26, 2018. http://info.waterdesignbuild.com/blog/how-does-cmar-differ-from-design-build?utm.
DBIA (Design Build Institute of America). 2010. Standard form of general conditions of contract between owner and design-builder. Washington, DC: Design-Build Institute of America.
DBIA (Design Build Institute of America). 2014. “Design-build done right: Universally applicable design-build best practices.” Accessed February 2, 2022. https://dbia.org/best-practices/.
El Asmar, M., D. Ramsey, G. E. Gibson Jr., and W. Bearup. 2020. “Design-build for transportation projects: Cost and schedule change performance analysis.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (1): 04519030. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000335.
Enos, K. D., and R. M. Preston. 2005. “The legal pitfalls of design-build.” In AIA 2005 National Convention and Design Exposition. Las Vegas. Washington, DC: American Institute of Architects.
Friedlander, M. C. 1998. “Design/build solutions.” J. Manage. Eng. 14 (6): 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1998)14:6(59).
Gad, G. M., B. Davis, P. P. Shrestha, and M. Fathi. 2020. “Legal and contractual issues in lump-sum design-build implementation on large-scale airport projects.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (1): 05019011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000364.
Golden, K. C., and J. W. Thomas. 1995. “The Spearin doctrine: The false dichotomy between design and performance specifications.” Public Contract Law J. 25 (1): 47–68.
Gransberg, D. D., and R. F. Barton. 2007. “Analysis of federal design-build request for proposals evaluation criteria.” J. Manage. Eng. 23 (2): 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2007)23:2(105).
Gransberg, D. D., and M. C. Loulakis. 2011. Geotechnical information practices in design-build projects. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Academies.
Halsey, C., and W. Quatman. 2014. “Design-build contracts: Revisited, 25 years later.” Constr. Law. 34 (5).
Harbuck, R. H. 2002. “Using models in parametric estimating for transportation projects.” In AACE Int’l Trans, ES51–ES59. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Harfmann, A. C., J. Bray, C. Carlo, S. Carl, T. Gentry, and J. Russell. 2013. “Defragmenting the AEC industry through a single, component-based building information model.” In Proc., Structures Congress 2013: Bridging Your Passion with Your Profession, 938–947. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Hasanzadeh, S., B. Esmaili, G. M. Gad, and D. D. Gransberg. 2018. “Impact of owners’ early decisions on project performance and dispute occurrence in public highway projects.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 10 (28): 04518004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000251.
Holland, J. K. 2015. “Standard of care for design professionals.” Accessed September 2, 2021. https://www.constructionrisk.com/2015/09/standard-of-care-for-design-professionals/.
Karim, A., and H. Adeli. 1999. “OO information model for construction project management.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 125 (5): 361–367. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:5(361).
Kasimer, J., and L. Byrum. 1997. “Engineering subcontractor ‘warranted’ bid information provided to contractor for use in calculating its bid.” Accessed July 1, 2022. https://casetext.com/case/settle-v-sw-rodgers-co-inc.
Koch, J. E., D. D. Gransberg, and K. R. Molenaar. 2010. Project administration for design-build contracts. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Lee, J. H., Y. Zhou, and B. Ashuri. 2020. “Key challenges to design professional liability in the design-build environment.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (3): 04520031. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000413.
Levin, P. 2016. Construction contract claims, changes, and dispute resolution. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Loulakis, M. C., N. C. Smith, D. L. Brady, R. E. Rayl, and D. D. Gransberg. 2015. Liability of design-builders for design, construction, and acquisition claims. Washington, DC: National Cooperative Highway Research Program.
Mahdi, I. M., and K. Alreshaid. 2005. “Decision support system for selecting the proper project delivery method using analytical hierarchy process.” Intl. J. Project Manage. 23 (7): 564–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.05.007.
Molenaar, K. R., D. D. Gransberg, and D. Sillars. 2015. Guidebook on alternative quality management systems for highway construction. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
NSPE (National Society of Professional Engineers). 2013. Engineering body of knowledge. Washington, DC: NSPE.
Pinto Nunez, M., C. Lopez Del Puerto, and D. D. Gransberg. 2018. “Analysis of transportation agencies’ claim history: Partnered versus nonpartnered.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 10 (4): 04518019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000273.
Touran, A., K. Molenaar, and D. Gransberg. 2010. “A system for selecting a project delivery method in US airports.” J. Airport Manage. 4 (4): 360–373.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 14Issue 4November 2022

History

Received: Feb 17, 2022
Accepted: May 12, 2022
Published online: Jul 29, 2022
Published in print: Nov 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Dec 29, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Michael C. Loulakis, J.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
President/CEO, Capital Project Strategies, LLC, 11710 Plaza America Dr., Suite 2000, Reston, VA 20190. Email: [email protected]
Douglas D. Gransberg, Ph.D., F.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5588-5024 [email protected]
P.E.
President, Gransberg & Associates, Inc., P.O. Box 2395, Norman, OK 73070 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5588-5024. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Investigating Causes of Disputes Resulting in Litigation in Airport Development Projects in the United States Using Graph-Based Techniques, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5903, 40, 3, (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share