Scholarly Papers
Mar 30, 2022

Handling Unbalanced Pricing in Bidding Regulations for Public Construction Projects

Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 14, Issue 3

Abstract

Unbalanced pricing is a common strategy adopted by contractors who participate in competitive bidding for construction contracts. This strategy exposes owners to several risks, and therefore bidding regulations of a number of contracting authorities include provisions that address this practice. Such provisions vary and range from restraining excessive utilization of unbalanced pricing up to the rejection of unbalanced bid offers as irregular and nonresponsive bids. This paper presents an analysis of the bidding regulations of state DOTs that address the unbalanced pricing of competitive bids in order to evaluate the adequacy of the current provisions in protecting the owner’s interests. The paper includes the standpoints of these regulations toward unbalanced pricing and their adopted procedures and guidelines to detect and combat this practice. The paper presents an evaluation of the effectiveness of specific measures used by some state DOTs against unbalanced pricing. The evaluation indicates that available measures are somehow effective in handling overpricing early items in the contract performance, while they are less effective in handling the greater risks associated with pricing manipulations that exploit errors in estimated quantities of line items. The paper concludes with proposed rules that can be used by owners to handle unbalanced pricing more effectively, and can help in promoting fair competition among contractors.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

References

Works Cited

AK DOT (Alaska DOT). 2020. Standard specifications for highway construction. Juneau, AK: AKDOT.
ALDOT (Alabama DOT). 2018. Standard specifications for highway construction. Montgomery, AL: ALDOT.
Alhyari, O., and K. H. Hyari. 2021. “Impact of variation in estimated quantity clauses on allocating financial risks in measurement contracts.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 13 (4): 04521032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000499.
An, X., H. Li, J. Zuo, O. Ojuri, Z. Wang, and J. Ding. 2018. “Identification and prevention of unbalanced bids using the unascertained model.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (11): 05018013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001563.
Arditi, D. 2016. “Preventing unethical and illegal practices in construction.” In Proc., Int. Structural Engineering and Construction. Fargo, ND: ISEC Press. https://doi.org/10.14455/ISEC.res.2016.37.
Arditi, D., and R. Chotibhongs. 2009. “Detection and prevention of unbalanced bids.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 27 (8): 721–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190903117785.
AZDOT (Arizona DOT). 2008. Standard specifications for road and bridge construction. Phoenix: AZDOT.
Bell, M. 1989. “Unbalanced bidding in government contracts.” Master’s thesis, Faculty of the National Law Center, George Washington Univ.
Burnett, J., and B. Wampler. 1998. “Unit price contracts: A practical framework for determining competitive bid prices.” J. Appl. Bus. Res. 14 (3): 63–72. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v14i3.5704.
CDOT (Colorado DOT). 2019. Standard specifications for road and bridge construction. Denver: CDOT.
FDOT (Florida DOT). 2020. Standard specifications for road and bridge construction. Tallahassee, FL: FDOT.
GDOT (Georgia DOT). 2013. Standard specifications: Construction of transportation systems. Atlanta: Georgia DOT.
Gransberg, D. D., and C. Riemer. 2009. “Impact of inaccurate engineer’s estimated quantities on unit price contracts.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 135 (11): 1138–1145. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000084.
Hyari, K. H. 2015. “Handling unbalanced bidding in construction projects: Prevention rather than detection.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (2): 04015060. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001045.
Hyari, K. H. 2017a. “The controversy around unbalanced bidding in construction: Seeking a fair balance.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 143 (1): 04016015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000300.
Hyari, K. H. 2017b. “Owner’s countermeasures to skewed bidding in construction projects: Review of current practices and proposal for new countermeasures.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (3): 04016053. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000502.
Hyari, K. H., Z. S. Tarawneh, and H. N. Katkhuda. 2016. “Detection model for unbalanced pricing in construction projects: A risk-based approach.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (12): 04016078. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001203.
IDOT (Illinois DOT). 2021. Supplemental specifications and recurring special provisions. Springfield, IL: IDOT.
Jiang, Y., Y. Bai, S. Han, and T. Lin. 2019. “Probability of failure in infrastructure project unbalanced bidding.” In Proc., ASC Annual Int. Conf. Cheyenne, WY: Associated Schools of Construction.
JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency). 2010. Evaluation guide for prequalification and bidding under Japanese ODA loans: Procurement of goods and services. Tokyo: JICA.
Mandell, S., and J. Nystrom. 2011. “Endogenous risk in unbalanced bidding.” In Proc., Management and Innovation for a Sustainable Built Environment. Rotterdam, Netherlands: International Council for Building Research Studies and Documentation.
MassDOT (Massachusetts DOT). 2019. Supplemental specifications to the 1988 English standard specifications for highways and bridges, and the 1995 metric standard specifications for highways and bridges highways and bridges. Boston: MassDOT.
MDOT (Michigan DOT). 2012. Standard specifications for construction. Lansing, MI: MDOT.
MoDOT (Missouri DOT). 2019. Missouri standard specifications for highway construction. Jefferson City, MI: MoDOT.
NCDOT (North Carolina DOT). 2018. Standard specifications for roads and structures. Raleigh, NC: NCDOT.
NHDOT (New Hampshire DOT). 2016. Standard specifications for road and bridge construction. Concord, NH: NHDOT.
Nikpour, B., A. Senouci, and N. Eldin. 2017. “Detection tool for unbalanced bids.” Open J. Civ. Eng. 7 (3): 409–422. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2017.73028.
NJDOT (New Jersey DOT). 2019a. Cost estimating guideline. Trenton, NJ: Program Management Office, NJDOT.
NJDOT (New Jersey DOT). 2019b. Standard specifications for road and bridge construction. Trenton, NJ: NJDOT.
NVDOT (Nevada DOT). 2014. Standard specifications for road and bridge construction. Carson City, NV: NVDOT.
NYSDOT (New York State DOT). 2016. Standard specifications: Construction and materials. Albany, NY: NYSDOT.
Nystrom, J., and S. Mandell. 2019. “Skew to win, not to profit: Unbalanced bidding among informed bidders.” J. Public Procurement 19 (1): 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-03-2019-024.
ODOT (Oregon DOT). 2017. Construction manual. Salem, OR: ODOT.
OKDOT (Oklahoma DOT). 2019. Standard specifications for highway construction. Oklahoma City: OKDOT.
Renes, S. 2011. Balancing the bids, solutions for unit-price auctions. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Tinbergen Institute.
RIDOT (Rhode Island DOT). 2018. Standard specifications for road and bridge construction. Rhode Island: RIDOT.
Rosenbaum, N. 1942. “Criteria for awarding public contracts to the lowest responsible bidder.” Cornell Law Rev. 28 (1): 37–53.
Skitmore, M., and D. Cattell. 2013. “On being balanced in an unbalanced world.” J. Oper. Res. Soc. 64 (1): 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2012.29.
Su, L., T. Wang, H. Li, Y. Chao, and L. Wang. 2020. “Multi-criteria decision making for identification of unbalanced bidding.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 26 (1): 43–52. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2019.11568.
TXDOT (Texas DOT). 2014. Standard specifications for construction and maintenance of highways, streets, and bridges. Austin, TX: TXDOT.
TXDOT (Texas DOT). 2019. Project development process manual. Austin, TX: TXDOT.
USAID (US Agency for International Development). 2003. “Procurement of construction services.” Chap. 2 in Country contracting handbook. Washington, DC: USAID.
WisDOT (Wisconsin DOT). 2020. Construction and materials manual. Madison, WI: WisDOT.
World Bank. 2012. Standard bidding documents: Procurement of works & user’s guide. Washington, DC: Procurement Policy and Services Group, The World Bank.
WSDOT (Washington State DOT). 2018. Standard specifications for road, bridge, and municipal construction. Olympia, WA: WSDOT.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 14Issue 3August 2022

History

Received: Aug 9, 2021
Accepted: Feb 13, 2022
Published online: Mar 30, 2022
Published in print: Aug 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Aug 30, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Omar Alhyari [email protected]
Assistant Professor of Construction Law and Dispute Resolution, Dept. of Construction Law and Dispute Resolution, The British Univ. in Dubai, P.O. Box 345015, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Email: [email protected]
Professor of Construction Engineering and Management, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hashemite Univ., P.O. Box 330127, Zarqa 13133, Jordan (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4005-5490. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Responsiveness of the Bid and Responsibility of the Bidder in Public Construction Bids, Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1162, 16, 4, (2024).
  • Data-Driven Analysis of Construction Bidding Stage–Related Causes of Disputes, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5426, 39, 5, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share