Scholarly Papers
Mar 11, 2022

An Analysis of the Demarcation of Construction Projects for Dispute Resolution by Adjudication

Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 14, Issue 2

Abstract

The Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 seeks to improve productivity of the UK construction industry by imposing on qualifying construction industry contracts a transparent payment protocol and a right to contractual parties to refer disputes for resolution by adjudication. A qualifying construction contract is defined to exclude certain types of construction industry contracts from the ambit of the legislation. These exclusions have been the subject of extensive and costly litigation concerning the demarcation between contracts types within, as against those outside, the legislation. Using legal research methods, this paper critically analyzes the issues in the litigation to extract implications for adjudication practice and policy review. As a reflection of the global nature of payment challenges and disputes on construction projects, the UK legislative intervention is being emulated in many countries. The UK experience therefore offers lessons on how the demarcation problem may be approached in other jurisdictions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

No data, models, or code were generated or used during the study.

References

List of Cases

ABB Construction Ltd. v. Norwest Holst Engineering Ltd.
ABB Zantingh Ltd. v. Zedal Building Services Ltd.
Absolute Rentals Ltd. v. Gencor Enterprises Ltd.
Allen Wilson Shopfitters v. Buckingham.
Aspect Contracts (Asbestos) Ltd. v. Higgins Construction PLC.
Baldwins Industrial Services PLC v. Barr Ltd.
Barrie Green v. GW Integrated Building Services and G&M Floorlayers (Derby) Ltd.
Bryen & Langley Ltd. v. Boston.
C Spencer Ltd. v. MW High Tech Projects UK Ltd.
Captiva Estates Ltd. v. Rybarn Ltd. (in Administration).
Cartwright v. Lydia Fay.
Cleveland Bridge UK Ltd. v. Whessoe-Volker Stevin Joint Venture.
Edenbooth Ltd. v. Cre8 Developments Ltd.
Equitix ESI CHP (Wrexham) Ltd. v. Bester Generacion UK Ltd.
Fahstone Ltd. v. Biesse Group UK Ltd.
Gibson Lea Retail Interiors Ltd. v. Makro Self Service Wholesalers Ltd.
ICCT Ltd. v. Pinto.
Laker Vent Engineering Ltd. v. Jacobs E&C Ltd.
Lovell Projects Ltd. v. Legg and Carver.
Midland Expressway Ltd. v. Carillion Construction Ltd. (No. 2).
Millers Specialist Joinery Co. Ltd. v. Nobles Construction.
North Midland Construction PLC v. AE&E Lentjes (UK) Ltd.
Nottingham Community Housing Association Ltd. v. Powerminster Ltd.
Palmers Ltd. v. ABB Power Construction Ltd.
Parkwood Leisure Ltd. v. Laing O’Rourke Wales and West Ltd.
Picardi (t/a Picardi Architects) v. Cuniberti.
Samuel Thomas Construction v. J & B Developments.
Savoye v. Spicers Ltd. No. 1.
Savoye v. Spicers Ltd. No. 2.
Severfield (UK) Ltd. v. Duro Felguera UK Ltd. No. 1.
Severfield (UK) Ltd. v. Duro Felguera UK Ltd. No. 2.
Shaw v. Massey Foundation & Pilings Ltd.
Staveley Industries PLC v. Odebrecht Oil & Gas Services Ltd.
Steve Domsalla (t/a Domsalla Building Services) v. Dyason.
Westfields Construction Ltd. v. Lewis.
Westminster Building Co. Ltd. v. Beckingham.
Westshield Ltd. v. Whitehouse.

List of Statutes

Construction Contracts (England and Wales) Exclusion Order 1998, SI 1998 No. 648.
Consumer Rights Act 2015.
Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996.
Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009.
Statutory Instrument 648/1998.

Works Cited

Abdul-Rahaman, H., M. Kho, and C. Wang. 2014. “Late payment and nonpayment encountered by contracting firms in a fast-developing economy.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 140 (2): 04013013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000189.
Agapiou, A. 2013. “UK construction participation experience of adjudication.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Manage. Procure. Law 166 (3): 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1680/mpal.11.00047.
Anderson, R. N. M., and J. T. Aycock. 2007. “The introduction of the payment and adjudication provision into the construction laws of the Isle of Man.” Arbitration: Int. J. Arbitration Mediation Dispute Manage. 73 (2): 320–333.
Assaf, S. A., and S. Al-Hejji. 2006. “Causes of delay in large construction projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 24 (4): 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.11.010.
Bailey, D., and L. Norbury. 2017. Bennion on statutory interpretation. 8th ed. London: Lexis Nexis.
Barakat, M., M. A. Abdul-Malak, and H. Khoury. 2020. “Pivotal new roles and changes introduced by the 2017 FIDIC claim and dispute resolution mechanism.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (1): 04519049. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000355.
Bell, J., and G. Engle. 1994. Cross on statutory interpretation. 3rd ed. London: Lexis Nexis Butterworth.
Bell, M. 2018. “Security of payment in the construction industry: Does international experience provide a crystal ball for North America?” Constr. Law J. 34 (8): 601–632.
Bell, M., and J. Coggins. 2015. “Beyond the Nutcracker suite: International harmonisation of construction industry payment legislation.” Int. Constr. Law Rev. 32 (2): 186–213.
Bunni, N. G. 2005. “The gap in sub-clause 20.7 of the 1999 FIDIC contract for major works.” Int. Constr. Law Rev. 22 (3): 272–283.
Bunni, N. G., C. Ong, and M. O’Reilly. 2015. “The enforcement of dispute adjudication decisions: Persero and the FIDIC standard form of contract.” Arbitration: Int. J. Arbitration Mediation Dispute Manage. 81 (4): 367–374.
Burr, A., and S. Magintharan. 2016. “Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012.” Constr. Law J. 32 (7): 699–723.
Coulson, P. 2018. Coulson on construction adjudication. 4th ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Doloi, H., A. Sawhney, K. C. Iyer, and S. Rentala. 2012. “Analysing factors affecting delays in Indian construction projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 30 (4): 479–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.10.004.
El-Adaway, I., S. Fawzy, H. Burrell, and N. Akroush. 2017. “Studying payment provisions under national and international standard forms of contracts.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 9 (2): 04516011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000200.
Freedman, C. 2011. “Non-statutory adjudication: Is it expert determination, or something different?” Constr. Law J. 27 (1): 3–14.
Gaitskell, R. 2007. “International statutory adjudication: Its development and impact.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 25 (7): 777–784. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190701499609.
Gordon, K. 1998. Adjudication in the construction industry: Special report. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Griffiths, R., W. Lord, and J. Coggins. 2017. “Project bank accounts: The second wave of security of payment?” J. Financ. Manage. Property Constr. 22 (3): 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMPC-04-2017-0011.
Gündüz, M., Y. Nielsen, and M. Özdemir. 2013. “Quantification of delay factors using the relative importance index method for construction projects in Turkey.” J. Manage. Eng. 29 (2): 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000129.
Holborn, G. 2001. Legal research guide. 2nd ed. London: Butterworth.
Kennedy, P. 2008. “Evolution of statutory adjudication as a form of dispute resolution in the UK construction industry.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 134 (2): 214–219. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2008)134:2(214).
Latham, S. M. 1994. Constructing the team. London: HM Stationery Office.
Maiketso, N. C., and M. J. Maritz. 2012. “Adjudication as an alternative dispute resolution in the South African construction industry.” J. South Afr. Inst. Civ. Eng. 54 (2): 65–70.
Mansfield, N., O. Ugwu, and T. Doran. 1994. “Causes of delay and cost overruns in Nigerian construction projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 12 (4): 254–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(94)90050-7.
Maritz, M. J., and V. Hattingh. 2015. “Adjudication in South African construction industry practice: Towards legislative intervention.” J. South Afr. Inst. Civ. Eng. 57 (2): 45–49. https://doi.org/10.17159/2309-8775/2015/v57n2a6.
McConville, M. 2017. Research method for law. Edingburgh, UK: Edingburgh University Press.
Munaaim, M. E. C. 2020. “Statutory adjudication around the world.” Constr. Law J. 36 (2): 132–163.
Ndekugri, I. 1999. “Performance bonds and guarantees: Construction owners and professionals beware.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 125 (6): 428–436. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:6(428).
Ndekugri, I., and V. Russell. 2005. “Insolvency and resolution of construction contract disputes by adjudication in the UK construction industry.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 23 (4): 399–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144619042000326747.
Odusote, O. O., and R. F. Fellows. 1992. “An examination of the importance of resource considerations when contractors make project selection decisions.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 10 (2): 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446199200000013.
O’Malley, P. 2020. “The Irish Construction Contract Act 2013: Adjudication—What has happened and where next.” Arbitration: Int. J. Arbitration Mediation Dispute Manage. 86 (2): 133–156.
Peters, E., K. Subar, and H. Martin. 2019. “Late payment and nonpayment within the construction industry: Causes, effects, and solutions.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 11 (3): 04519013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000314.
Ramachandra, T., and J. O. Rotimi. 2011. “The nature of payment problems in the New Zealand construction industry.” Aust. J. Constr. Econ. Build. 11 (2): 22–33. https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v11i2.2171.
Ramachandra, T., and J. O. B. Rotimi. 2015. “Mitigating payment problems in the construction industry through analysis of construction payment disputes.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 7 (1): A4514005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000156.
Reynolds, B., S. Vogel, and J. Little. 2019. “A report on the introduction of prompt payment and adjudication legislation in the province of Ontario.” Int. Law Rev. 36 (1): 73–100.
Seifert, B. M. 2005. “International construction dispute adjudication under International Federation of Consulting Engineers conditions of contract and the Dispute Adjudication Board.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 131 (2): 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2005)131:2(149).
Seppala, C. R. 1997. “The new FIDIC provision for a dispute adjudication board.” Accessed December 18, 2021. http://www1.fidic.org/resources/contracts/seppala_dab_1997.asp.
Teo, P. J. 2008. “Adjudication: Singapore perspective.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 134 (2): 224–230. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2008)134:2(224).
Tweeddale, A. 2014. “FIDIC guidance memorandum to users—A half-baked solution?” Constr. Law Int. 9 (2): 23–26.
Uher, T. E., and M. C. Brand. 2005. “Analysis of adjudication determinations made under security of payment legislation in New South Wales.” Int. J. Project Manage. 23 (6): 474–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.05.002.
Watson, D., and M. Burton. 2013. Research methods in law. London: Routledge.
Watts, V. M., and J. C. Scrivener. 1993. “Review of Australian building dispute settled by litigation.” Build. Res. Inf. 21 (1): 59–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613219308727257.
Wilson, C. 2018. “Ontario’s new Construction Act: Summary and timeline of major changes.” Constr. Law J. 34 (8): 656–660.
Wu, J., M. M. Kumaraswamy, and G. Soo. 2011. “Regulative measures addressing payment problems in the construction industry: A calculative understanding of their potential outcomes based on gametric models.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (8): 566–573. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000336.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 14Issue 2May 2022

History

Received: Sep 16, 2021
Accepted: Nov 17, 2021
Published online: Mar 11, 2022
Published in print: May 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Aug 11, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Issaka Ndekugri, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, School of Architecture and Built Environment, Univ. of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, UK. Email: [email protected]
Principal Lecturer, School of Architecture and Built Environment, Univ. of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, UK (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8257-9380. Email: [email protected]
Senior Lecturer in Quantity Surveying, Dept. of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Aston Univ., Birmingham B4 7ET, UK. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9221-0096. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Disputes and Claim Management during the COVID-19 Crisis: The Lessons Learned, Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-843, 15, 1, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share