Abstract

Change orders continue to be one of the main challenges faced by the construction industry. Despite many previous research efforts related to managing change orders in the construction industry, there is still a lack of research that investigates the contractual aspects of change orders for transportation projects. This paper tackles this knowledge gap within the context of Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) highway projects. To this end, the authors used an integrated research method comprised of (1) selection and analysis of ODOT case studies; (2) identification of the main change orders aspects that lead to conflicts, claims, and/or disputes in the considered case studies; and (3) analysis of the contractual provisions and procedures related to change orders on ODOT projects. The authors consulted throughout all the research steps with ODOT experts for verification and validation. Through the analysis of 10 ODOT case studies, results show that the major contractual challenges related to change orders on ODOT projects are caused by definition terms and their associated processes, approvals according to the contractual provisions, and approvals in light of the applicable laws. Accordingly, this paper identifies (1) a list of opportunities and risks, and (2) a series of checklist questions. These research outcomes shall help project parties in identifying the contract terms that can lead to improper handling of change orders, and thus facilitate better managing of change orders on ODOT projects. Ultimately, this research adds to the body of knowledge by providing contractual guidelines to facilitate a better administration of the contractual procedures of change orders for a timely and cost-effective execution of highway transportation projects.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data used and/or generated during this study are included in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Mr. Gary Angles, Mr. Clint Bishop, and Ms. Merka Flynn from the Office of Construction Administration at the Ohio Department of Transportation for their help and support for this study in terms of providing input in verifying reasons for change orders, the list and details of case studies used in the paper, and ultimately validating research outcomes.

References

List of Cases

Complete General Construction Company (CGCC) v. Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) (2002). No. 00-1276 (Supreme Court of Ohio).
Tony Zumbo and Son Construction Co. (TZSC) v. Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) (1984). No. 83AP-823 (Court of Appeals of Ohio, Franklin County).

Works Cited

Abotaleb, I. S., and I. H. El-adaway. 2017. “Administering employers’ payment obligations under national and international design–build forms of contract.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 9 (2): 04517003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000213.
Advisory Committee on Transportation Infrastructure. 2019. “Recommendation report to Ohio Governor Mike DeWine.” Accessed December 10, 2020. https://governor.ohio.gov/wps/portal/gov/governor/media/news-and-media/021519.
Ahmed, M. O., M. Abdul Nabi, I. H. El-adaway, D. Caranci, J. Eberle, Z. Hawkins, and R. Sparrow. 2021. “Contractual guidelines for promoting integrated project delivery.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (11): 05021008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002173.
Akhavian, R., and A. H. Behzadan. 2012. “An integrated data collection and analysis framework for remote monitoring and planning of construction operations.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 26 (4): 749–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2012.04.004.
Alnuaimi, A. S., R. A. Taha, M. Al Mohsion, and A. S. Al-Harithi. 2010. “Causes, effects, benefits, and remedies of change orders on public construction projects in Oman.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (5): 615–622. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000154.
Anastasopoulos, P. C., S. Labi, A. Bhargava, C. Bordat, and F. L. Mannering. 2010. “Frequency of change orders in highway construction using alternate count-data modeling methods.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (8): 886–893. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000198.
ASCE. 2021. “A comprehensive assessment of America’s infrastructure.” Accessed May 31, 2021. https://infrastructurereportcard.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/National_IRC_2021-report.pdf.
Assaad, R., I. H. El-Adaway, A. H. El Hakea, M. J. Parker, T. I. Henderson, C. R. Salvo, and M. O. Ahmed. 2020a. “Contractual perspective for BIM utilization in US construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (12): 04020128. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001927.
Assaad, R., I. H. El-Adaway, M. Hastak, and K. L. Needy. 2020b. “Commercial and legal considerations of offsite construction projects and their hybrid transactions.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (12): 05020019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001948.
Carey, L. 2020. “Ohio DOT moves full steam ahead with road construction projects.” Accessed June 23, 2020. https://transportationtodaynews.com/news/17462-ohio-dot-moves-full-steam-ahead-with-road-construction-projects/.
Chen, J. H., and S. C. Hsu. 2007. “Hybrid ANN-CBR model for disputed change orders in construction projects.” Autom. Constr. 17 (1): 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2007.03.003.
Cheng, M. Y., D. K. Wibowo, D. Prayogo, and A. F. V. Roy. 2015. “Predicting productivity loss caused by change orders using the evolutionary fuzzy support vector machine inference model.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 21 (7): 881–892. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2014.893922.
Cheung, S. O., and T. W. Yiu. 2006. “Are construction disputes inevitable?” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 53 (3): 456–470. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2006.877445.
Choi, K., H. W. Lee, J. Bae, and D. Bilbo. 2015. “Time-cost performance effect of change orders from accelerated contract provisions.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (3): 04015085. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001071.
Colin, J., D. Langford, and P. Kennedy. 1996. “The relationship between construction procurement strategies and construction contract conflicts.” In Proc., CIB W-92 Procurement Symp. Hong Kong: Univ. of Hong Kong.
Cox, I. D., J. P. Morris, J. H. Rogerson, and G. E. Jared. 1999. “A quantitative study of post contract award design changes in construction.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 17 (4): 427–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461999371358.
El-adaway, I., S. Fawzy, M. Ahmed, and R. White. 2016a. “Administering extension of time under national and international standard forms of contracts: A contractor’s perspective.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 8 (2): 04516001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000182.
El-adaway, I., S. Fawzy, T. Allard, and A. Runnels. 2016b. “Change order provisions under national and international standard forms of contract.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 8 (3): 03716001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000187.
Equipment Watch. 2020. “Rental rate blue book/cost recovery.” Accessed January 14, 2020. https://equipmentwatch.com/resource-library/product-guides/cost-recovery/.
Fathi, M., P. P. Shrestha, and B. Shakya. 2020. “Change orders and schedule performance of design-build infrastructure projects: Comparison between highway and water and wastewater projects.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (1): 04519043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000353.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2017. “National highway system travel—2017.” Accessed March 18, 2019. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2017/hm44.cfm.
Hanna, A. S., and K. A. Iskandar. 2017. “Quantifying and modeling the cumulative impact of change orders.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (10): 04017076. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001385.
Hsieh, T., S. Lu, and C. Wu. 2004. “Statistical analysis of causes for change orders in metropolitan public works.” Int. J. Project Manage. 22 (8): 679–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.03.005.
Ibbs, W. 2012. “Construction change: Likelihood, severity, and impact on productivity.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 4 (3): 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000089.
Khalafallah, A., and Y. Shalaby. 2019. “Change orders: Automating comparative data analysis and controlling impacts in public projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (11): 04019064. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001700.
Khalef, R., I. H. El-adaway, R. Assaad, and N. Kieta. 2020. “Contract risk management: A comparative study of risk allocation in exculpatory clauses and their legal treatment.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 13 (1): 04520036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000430.
Kim, J. J., J. A. Miller, and S. Kim. 2020. “Cost impacts of change orders due to unforeseen existing conditions in building renovation projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (8): 04020094. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001888.
Kitt, G. 2015. “Failure to understand contractual obligations is losing the industry millions.” Accessed September 8, 2020. http://www.infrastructure-intelligence.com/article/jun-2015/failure-understand-contractual-obligations-losing-industry-millions.
KTC (Kentucky Transportation Center). 2010. “Changes orders and lessons learned. Research Report KTC-10-18/SPR384-09-1F.” Accessed November 24, 2020. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1034&context=ktc_researchreports.
Likhitruangsilp, V., T. N. Handayani, P. G. Ioannou, and N. Yabuki. 2018. “A BIM-enabled system for evaluating impacts of construction change orders.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2018, 622–631. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Maemura, Y., E. Kim, and K. Ozawa. 2018. “Root causes of recurring contractual conflicts in international construction projects: Five case studies from Vietnam.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (8): 05018008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001523.
Moselhi, O., I. Assem, and K. El-Rayes. 2005. “Change orders impact on labor productivity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (3): 354–359. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:3(354).
Noruwa, B. I., A. O. Arewa, and C. Merschbrock. 2020. “Effects of emerging technologies in minimising variations in construction projects in the UK.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1772530.
ODOT (Ohio DOT). 2019. Construction and material specifications, 2019 edition. Accessed December 2, 2019. http://www.dot.state.oh.us/Divisions/ConstructionMgt/OnlineDocs/Specifications/2019CMS/2019_CMS_12122018_for_web_letter_size.pdf.
ODOT (Ohio DOT). 2020. “Final 2020–2023 Major new construction program list.” Accessed June 23, 2020. http://www.dot.state.oh.us/trac/TRAC%20List/FINAL_20_23_MN_CONSTRUCTION_PROGRAM_LIST.pdf.
ODOT (Ohio DOT). 2017. Construction administration manual of procedures. Accessed September 28, 2020. http://www.dot.state.oh.us/Divisions/ConstructionMgt/OnlineDocs/Specifications/2017MOP/2017_MOP_Final_11162016%20for%20print.pdf.
Rovan, R. 2019. “$1.1 billion in new road construction OK’d for Ohio, including I-71 express lane.” Accessed June 23, 2020. https://www.dispatch.com/news/20191106/11-billion-in-new-road-construction-okd-for-ohio-including-i-71-express-lane.
Serag, E., A. Oloufa, L. Malone, and E. Radwan. 2010. “Model for quantifying the impact of change orders on project cost for US roadwork construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (9): 1015–1027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000206.
Shrestha, P. P., and R. Maharjan. 2019. “Effect of change orders on cost and schedule for small low-bid highway contracts.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 11 (4): 04519025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000323.
Taylor, T. R. B., M. Uddin, P. M. Goodrum, A. McCoy, and Y. Shan. 2012. “Change orders and lessons learned: Knowledge from statistical analyses of engineering change orders on Kentucky highway projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 138 (12): 1360–1369. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000550.
USA Facts. 2020. “What does America spend on infrastructure? Is the state of our infrastructure improving?” Accessed June 23, 2020. https://usafacts.org/state-of-the-union/transportation-infrastructure/.
US Census Bureau. 2021. “Value of construction put in place at a glance, October 2021.” Accessed December 10, 2021. https://www.census.gov/construction/c30/c30index.html.
US Department of Commerce. 2020. “Infrastructure.” Accessed December 10, 2021. https://www.commerce.gov/issues/infrastructure.
Walpole, B. 2021. “Decades of ASCE advocacy work culminate in $1.2 trillion Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.” Accessed December 10, 2021. https://www.asce.org/publications-and-news/civil-engineering-source/article/2021/11/06/decades-of-asce-advocacy-work-culminate-in-12-trillion-infrastructure-investment-and-jobs-act.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 14Issue 2May 2022

History

Received: Dec 28, 2020
Accepted: Nov 2, 2021
Published online: Dec 28, 2021
Published in print: May 1, 2022
Discussion open until: May 28, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Muaz O. Ahmed, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, 326 Butler-Carlton Hall, 1401 N. Pine St., Rolla, MO 65409. Email: [email protected]
Rayan H. Assaad, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering, Construction Engineering and Management and Critical Infrastructure Systems, John A. Reif, Jr. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ 07102. Email: [email protected]
Hurst-McCarthy Professor of Construction Engineering and Management, Professor of Civil Engineering, and Founding Director of Missouri Consortium of Construction Innovation, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering/Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, 228 Butler-Carlton Hall, 1401 N. Pine St., Rolla, MO 65409 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7306-6380. Email: [email protected]
Emily Echele [email protected]
Undergraduate Student, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Butler-Carlton Hall, 1401 N. Pine St., Rolla, MO 65409. Email: [email protected]
Undergraduate Student, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Butler-Carlton Hall, 1401 N. Pine St., Rolla, MO 65409. Email: [email protected]
John Watson [email protected]
Undergraduate Student, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Butler-Carlton Hall, 1401 N. Pine St., Rolla, MO 65409. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Investigating Causes of Disputes Resulting in Litigation in Airport Development Projects in the United States Using Graph-Based Techniques, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5903, 40, 3, (2024).
  • Data-Driven Analysis of Construction Bidding Stage–Related Causes of Disputes, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5426, 39, 5, (2023).
  • Performance of Chinese International Contractors in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Uganda, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5167, 39, 3, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share