Abstract

Worldwide, numerous economies have been subjected to the unnecessary economic and social impacts that materialize from the collusion that has taken place when public infrastructure has been procured. In an attempt to mitigate this collusion, the Brazilian government introduced laws (e.g., Law 8666/93) that require the procurement of public goods and services to be subjected to capped first-price auctions. For public infrastructure projects, bids are limited by median market prices that are recorded in specific databases and relied on during the selection of bidders. We examine 187 capped first-price auctions with eight or more bids. We reveal that full collusion can be detected if the collective behavior of any auction’s bidders is compared to a “but for” scenario that expresses the expected behavior of a group of honest competitors bidding randomly. This comparison makes it possible to flag, using different confidence levels, whether participants in a particular auction fully colluded at the time the bids are known. The contribution of our approach is twofold. It can be used independently or in conjunction with other existing methods to detect the presence of collusive behavior in a capped first-price auction.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all of the data, models, or code generated or used during this study are available from the corresponding author by request. Data will be provided in Excel format.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Brazilian Federal Police and Curtin University for supporting the fight against collusion in public procurement.

References

Abrantes-Metz, R., and P. Bajari. 2010. “Screens for conspiracies and their multiple applications.” Competition Policy Int. 6 (2): 129–144.
Australian Government Competition Policy Review. 2015. “Competition policy review.” Accessed June 19, 2018. http://competitionpolicyreview.gov.au/files/2015/03/Competition-policy-review-report_online.pdf.
Ballesteros-Pérez, P., M. C. González-Cruz, and A. Cañavate-Grimal. 2013a. “On competitive bidding: Scoring and position probability graphs.” Int. J. Project Manage. 31 (3): 434–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.012.
Ballesteros-Pérez, P., M. C. González-Cruz, A. Cañavate-Grimal, and E. Pellicer. 2013b. “Detecting abnormal and collusive bids in capped tendering.” Autom. Constr. 31 (May): 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.11.036.
Ballesteros-Pérez, P., M. C. González-Cruz, J. P. Pastor-Ferrando, and M. Fernández-Diego. 2012. “The Iso-Score curve graph. A new tool for competitive bidding.” Autom. Constr. 22 (Mar): 481–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.11.007.
Ballesteros-Pérez, P., and M. Skitmore. 2017. “On the distribution of bids for construction contract auctions.” Constr. Manage. Economics 35 (3): 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2016.1247972.
Ballesteros-Pérez, P., M. Skitmore, R. Das, and M. L. Del Campo-Hitschfeld. 2015. “Quick abnormal-bid-detection method for construction contract auctions.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 141 (7): 04015010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000978.
Brannman, L., J. Douglass Klein, and L. W. Weiss. 1987. “The price effects of increased competition in auction markets.” Rev. Econ. Stat. 69 (1): 24–32.
Brazil. 1993. “Lei 8.666, de 21 de junho de 1993. Regulamenta o art. 37, inciso XXI, da Constituição Federal, institui normas para licitações e contratos da Administração Pública e dá outras providências.” [In Portuguese.] Accessed June 15, 2018. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Leis/l8666cons.htm.
Brazil. 2018. “Painel de Obras.” Accessed June 8, 2018. http://paineldeobras.planejamento.gov.br/.
Conley, T. G., and F. Decarolis. 2016. “Detecting bidders groups in collusive auctions.” Am. Economic J.: Microeconomics 8 (2): 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20130254.
European Commission. 2013. “EU competition law, cartel legislation and other reference texts on 1 January 2013.” Accessed October 16, 2018. http://ec.europa.eu/competition/cartels/legislation/cartel_compilation_en.pdf.
Friedman, L. 1956. “A competitive-bidding strategy.” Oper. Res. 4 (1): 104–112.
Gallo, J. 1977. “A computerized approach to detect collusion in the sealed-bid market.” Antitrust Bull. 22 (3): 593.
Gómez-Lobo, A., and S. Szymanski. 2001. “A law of large numbers: Bidding and compulsory competitive tendering for refuse collection contracts.” Rev. Ind. Organ. 18: 105–113.
Grega, M., and J. Nemec. 2015. “Factors influencing final price of public procurement: Evidence from slovakia.” Procedia Econ. Finance 25: 543–551.
Gupta, S. 2002. “Competition and collusion in a government procurement auction market.” Atlantic Econ. J. 30 (1): 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299143.
Hardoon, D., and F. Heinrich. 2011. “Bribe payers index 2011. Berlin: Transparency International Secretariat.” Accessed March 26, 2018. https://www.transparency.org/whatwedo/publication/bpi_2011.
Harrington, J. E. 2007. “Behavioral screening and the detection of cartels.” In European competition law annual 2006 – Enforcement and prohibition of cartels, edited by C.-D. Ehlermann and I. Atanasiu, 51–68. Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing.
Kuhlman, J. M., and S. R. Johnson. 1983. “The number of competitors and bid prices.” South. Econ. J. 50 (1): 213–220. https://doi.org/10.2307/1058052.
Le, Y., M. Shan, A. P. C. Chan, and Y. Hu. 2014. “Overview of corruption research in construction.” J. Manage. Eng. 30 (4): 02514001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000300.
Lima, M. C. 2010. “Comparação de custos referenciais do DNIT e licitações bem sucedidas.” [In Portuguese.] In Proc., XIII SINAOP—Simpósio Nacional de Auditoria de Obras Públicas. Florianópolis, Brazil: Instituto Brasileiro de Auditoria de Obras Públicas.
Mitchell, M. S. 1977. “The probability of being the lowest bidder.” J. Royal Stat. Soc. Series C (Appl. Stat.) 26 (2): 191–194. https://doi.org/10.2307/2347028.
Moro, S. F. 2018. “Preventing systemic corruption in Brazil.” Daedalus 147 (3): 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_00508.
National Research Council. 2011. “Reference manual on scientific evidence: Third edition.” Accessed March 23, 2018. https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/2015/SciMan3D01.pdf.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2010. “Policy roundtables: Collusion and corruption in public procurement.” Accessed September 29, 2018. https://www.oecd.org/competition/cartels/46235884.pdf.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2011. “Quantification of harm to competition by National Courts and competition agencies.” Accessed June 22, 2018. http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/QuantificationofHarmtoCompetition2011.pdf.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2016. Fighting bid rigging in public procurement: Report on implementing the OECD recommendation.” Accessed March 13, 2018. http://www.oecd.org/competition/Fighting-bid-rigging-in-public-procurement-2016-implementation-report.pdf.
Pereira, G. P. C. 2002. “O mercado da construção civil para obras públicas como instrumento de auditoria: Uma abordagem probabilistic.” [In Portuguese.] Mestrado, Dissertação, Departamento de Engenharia de Produção, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco.
Porter, R., and J. Zona. 1993. “Detection of bid rigging in procurement auctions.” J. Political Economy 101 (3): 518–538. https://doi.org/10.1086/261885.
Priemus, H. 2004. “Dutch contracting fraud and governance issues.” Build. Res. Inf. 32 (4): 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/0961321042000221089.
Rothkopf, M. H., and R. M. Harstad. 1994. “Modelling competitive bidding: A critical essay.” Manage. Sci. 40 (3): 364–384. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.3.364.
Selten, R. 1973. “A simple model of imperfect competition, where 4 are few and 6 are many.” Int. J. Game Theory 2 (1): 141–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01737566.
Shi, H., X. Li, and H. Xu. 2013. “Game analysis on collusion tender in the construction projects bidding.” Appl. Mech. Mater. 357–360 (2013): 2414–2419. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.357-360.2414.
Signor, R., P. E. D. Love, A. T. N. Belarmino, and O. Olatunji. 2020. “Detection of collusive tenders in infrastructure projects: Learning from operation car wash.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (1): 05019015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001737.
Signor, R., P. E. D. Love, and O. Olatunji. 2016a. “Determining overpricing in Brazilian infrastructure projects: A forensic approach.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (9): 06016001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001156.
Signor, R., P. E. D. Love, O. Olatunji, F. F. Marchiori, and W. G. Gripp. 2016b. “A probabilistic method for forensic cost estimating of infrastructure projects.” Appl. Math. Modell. 40 (21/22): 9197–9211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2016.05.025.
Signor, R., P. E. D. Love, O. Olatunji, J. J. C. B. Vallim, and A. B. Raupp. 2017. “Collusive bidding in Brazilian infrastructure projects.” Proc. Ins. of Civ. Eng.-Forensic Eng. 170 (3): 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1680/jfoen.17.00013.
Signor, R., P. E. D. Love, J. J. C. B. Vallim, A. B. Raupp, and O. Olatunji. 2019. “It is not collusion unless you get caught: The case of ‘Operation Car Wash’ and unearthing of a Cartel.” J. Antitrust Enforcement 7 (2): 177–202. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaenfo/jnz009.
Silva Filho, L. O., M. C. Lima, and R. G. Maciel. 2010. “Efeito barganha e cotação: fenômenos que permitem a ocorrência de superfaturamento com preços inferiores às referências oficiais.” [In Portuguese.] Accessed July 12, 2018. http://revista.tcu.gov.br/ojs/index.php/RTCU/article/view/188/182.
Skitmore, M. 2002. “Identifying non-competitive bids in construction contract auctions.” Omega 30 (6): 443–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(02)00057-9.
Smith, A. 1776. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.
Transparency International. 2018. “Corruption perceptions index 2017.” Accessed June 19, 2018. https://www.transparency.org/news/feature/corruption_perceptions_index_2017.
Tukey, J. W. 1977. Exploratory data analysis. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
Tukey, J. W., and M. B. Wilk. 1966. “Data analysis and statistics: An expository overview.” In Vol. 29 of Proc., AFIPS Conf., 695–709. Washington, DC: Spartan Books. https://doi.org/10.1145/1464291.1464366.
Watts, J. 2017. “Operation Car Wash: Is this the biggest corruption scandal in history?” The Guardian, June 1, 2017. Accessed March 14, 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jun/01/brazil-operation-car-wash-is-this-the-biggest-corruption-scandal-in-history.
Whitefield, M. 2017. “Brazil engulfed in a corruption scandal with plots as convoluted as a telenovela.” Accessed June 19, 2018. http://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/world/americas/article171222962.html.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 26Issue 2June 2020

History

Received: Feb 16, 2019
Accepted: Dec 9, 2019
Published online: Mar 27, 2020
Published in print: Jun 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Aug 27, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Regis Signor, Ph.D. [email protected]
Engineering Forensics Expert of the Brazilian Federal Police, Technical-Scientific Sector of the Brazilian Federal Police’s Superintendence in Santa Catarina’s State, Rua Paschoal Apóstolo Pítsica, Florianópolis, SC 4744, Brazil. Email: [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin Univ., GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3239-1304. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Acir Oliveira Jr. [email protected]
Engineering Forensics Expert of the Brazilian Federal Police, Forensic Engineering Unit of the National Criminalistics Institute of the Brazilian Federal Police, SAIS, Quadra 23, Lote 07, Brasília, DF, Brazil. Email: [email protected]
Engineering Forensics Expert of the Brazilian Federal Police, Forensic Engineering Unit of the National Criminalistics Institute of the Brazilian Federal Police, SAIS, Quadra 23, Lote 07, Brasília/DF, Brazil. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2990-3241. Email: [email protected]
Pedro S. Oliveira Jr. [email protected]
Engineering Forensics Expert of the Brazilian Federal Police, Forensic Engineering Unit of the National Criminalistics Institute of the Brazilian Federal Police, SAIS, Quadra 23, Lote 07, Brasília/DF, Brazil. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share