Technical Papers
Dec 21, 2019

Data Analytics in Asset Management: Cost-Effective Prediction of the Pavement Condition Index

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 26, Issue 1

Abstract

Understanding the deterioration of roads is an important part of road asset management. In this study, the long-term pavement performance (LTPP) data and machine learning algorithms were used to predict the deterioration in the pavement condition index (PCI) over 2, 3, 5, and 6 years. In selecting the attributes for conducting the analysis, we targeted ones that are freely available. This approach can help smaller municipalities, which could be short on money or required expertise. For larger ones and transportation agencies, this can save the increasingly significant costs for collecting field data and any associated safety or traffic implications. In addition, we used this category of attributes to better examine the role of data analytics in asset management. Without considering a causal model, can trends in data help assess deterioration in the PCI? Several models using combinations of 15 attributes were learned and tested. The algorithms used in this study were two types of decision trees and their boosted models based on gradient boosted trees. The accuracy of the ensemble of boosted classifiers was considerably higher than their base learners, with some reaching over 80% in predicting unseen data. We also found that dividing data into different climatic zones can change the relative importance of attributes and the overall accuracy of the models. Increasing the prediction span reduces accuracy, while reducing the number of prediction classes (levels of deterioration) increases the accuracy. In addition to automating the calculation and prediction of PCI, this study presented informative or important attributes for prediction. Such analyses could help municipalities and departments of transportations with forming a more effective policy for data collection and management.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Input and evaluation as well as support in suggesting work steps provided by Dr. James Smith, Manager, Member/Technical Services, Ontario Good Roads Association (OGRA) is highly appreciated and is recognized here.

References

Alsugair, A. M., and A. A. Al-Qudrah. 1998. “Artificial neural network approach for pavement maintenance.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 12 (4): 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1998)12:4(249).
Al-Zou’bi, M. M., C. M. Chang, S. Nazarian, and V. Kreinovich. 2015. “Systematic statistical approach to populate missing performance data in pavement management systems.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 21 (4): 04015002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000247.
Anyala, M., J. B. Odoki, and C. J. Baker. 2014. “Hierarchical asphalt pavement deterioration model for climate impact studies.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 15 (3): 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2012.687105.
Beckwith. 2013. Asset management plan. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Veterans Affairs.
Black, M., A. T. Brint, and J. R. Brailsford. 2005. “A semi-Markov approach for modelling asset deterioration.” J. Oper. Res. Soc. 56 (11): 1241–1249. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601967.
Chi, S., M. Murphy, and Z. Zhang. 2014. “Sustainable road management in Texas: Network-level flexible pavement structural condition analysis using data-mining techniques.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 28 (1): 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000252.
Chong, G. J., W. A. Phang, and G. Wrong. 1982. SP-024, Manual for Condition Rating of Flexible Pavements. Downsview, ON: Ministry of Transportation.
Elbagalati, O., M. A. Elseifi, K. Gaspard, and Z. Zhang. 2017. “Implementation of the structural condition index into the Louisiana pavement management system based on rolling wheel deflectometer testing.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2641 (1): 39–47. https://doi.org/10.3141/2641-06.
El-Diraby, T. E., S. Kinawy, and S. M. Piryonesi. 2017. “A comprehensive review of approaches used by Ontario municipalities to develop road asset management plans.” In Proc., Transportation Research Board 96th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Elkins, G. E., P. Schmalzer, T. Thompson, and A. Simpson. 2003. Long-term pavement performance information management system pavement performance database user reference guide. McLean, VA: Federal Highway Administration.
Ens, A. 2012. Development of a flexible framework for deterioration modelling in infrastructure asset management. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto.
Farhan, J., and T. Fwa. 2014. “Augmented stochastic multiple imputation model for airport pavement missing data imputation.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2449 (1): 96–104.
Ferregut, C., I. Abdallah, O. Melchor-Lucero, and S. Nazarian. 1999. Artificial neural network-based methodologies for rational assessment of remaining life of existing pavements. El Paso, TX: Center for Highway Materials Research.
Ford, K., M. Arman, S. Labi, K. C. Sinha, P. D. Thompson, A. M. Shirole, and Z. Li. 2012. Estimating life expectancies of highway assets. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Guillaumot, V. M., P. L. Durango-Cohen, and S. M. Madanat. 2003. “Adaptive optimization of infrastructure maintenance and inspection decisions under performance model uncertainty.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 9 (4): 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2003)9:4(133).
Haider, S. W., K. Chatti, N. Buch, R. W. Lyles, A. S. Pulipaka, and D. Gilliland. 2007. “Effect of design and site factors on the long-term performance of flexible pavements.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 21 (4): 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2007)21:4(283).
Hall, M. 1999. Correlation-based feature selection for machine learning. Hamilton, New Zealand: Univ. of Waikato.
Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman. 2009. “The elements of statistical learning.” Bayesian Forecasting Dyn. Models 1: 1–694.
InfoPave. 2017. “LTPP Infopave–Home.” Accessed July 27, 2017. https://infopave.fhwa.dot.gov/.
Kargah-Ostadi, N., S. Stoffels, and N. Tabatabaee. 2010. “Network-level pavement roughness prediction model for rehabilitation recommendations.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2155 (1): 124–133.
Kargah-Ostadi, N., and S. M. Stoffels. 2015. “Framework for development and comprehensive comparison of empirical pavement performance models.” J. Transp. Eng. 141 (8): 04015012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000779.
Karlaftis, A. G., and A. Badr. 2015. “Predicting asphalt pavement crack initiation following rehabilitation treatments.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technologies 55 (Jun): 510–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.03.031.
Kira, K., and L. Rendell. 1992. The feature selection problem: Traditional methods and a new algorithm., 129–134. San Jose, CA: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Press.
Kleiner, Y. 2001. “Scheduling inspection and renewal of large infrastructure assets.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 7 (4): 136–143. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2001)7:4(136).
Li, N., W.-C. Xie, and R. Haas. 1996. “Reliability-based processing of Markov chains for modeling pavement network deterioration.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1524 (1): 203–213. https://doi.org/10.3141/1524-24.
Lin, S.-W., and S.-C. Chen. 2012. “Parameter determination and feature selection for C4.5 algorithm using scatter search approach.” Soft Comput. 16 (1): 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-011-0734-z.
Lou, Z., M. Gunaratne, J. J. Lu, and B. Dietrich. 2001. “Application of neural network model to forecast short-term pavement crack condition: Florida case study.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 7 (4): 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2001)7:4(166).
Memarzadeh, M., and M. Pozzi. 2016. “Value of information in sequential decision making: Component inspection, permanent monitoring and system-level scheduling.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 154 (Oct): 137–151.
Miradi, M., and A. A. A. Molenaar. 2006. “Application of artificial neural network (ANN) to PA lifespan: Forecasting models.” In Proc., 2006 IEEE Int. Joint Conf. on Neural Network, 3679–3685. New York: IEEE.
Najibi, N., N. Devineni, and M. Lu. 2017. “Hydroclimate drivers and atmospheric teleconnections of long duration floods: An application to large reservoirs in the Missouri River Basin.” Adv. Water Resour. 100 (Feb): 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.12.004.
Neves, L. C., and D. M. Frangopol. 2005. “Condition, safety and cost profiles for deteriorating structures with emphasis on bridges.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 89 (2): 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.08.018.
Osorio-Lird, A., A. Chamorro, C. Videla, S. Tighe, and C. Torres-Machi. 2018. “Application of Markov chains and Monte Carlo simulations for developing pavement performance models for urban network management.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 14 (9): 1169–1181. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2017.1402064.
Pantelias, A., G. W. Flintsch, J. W. Bryant, and Chen Chen. 2008. “Asset management data practices for supporting project selection decisions.” Public Works Manage. Policy 13 (3): 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X08327574.
Piryonesi, S. M., and T. E. El-Diraby. 2018. Using data analytics for cost-effective prediction of road conditions: Case of the pavement condition index. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Piryonesi, S. M., and M. Tavakolan. 2017. “A mathematical programming model for solving cost-safety optimization (CSO) problems in the maintenance of structures.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 21 (6): 2226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-0531-z.
Pozzi, M., M. Memarzadeh, and K. Klima. 2017. “Hidden-model processes for adaptive management under uncertain climate change.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 23 (4): 04017022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000376.
Provost, F., and T. Fawcett. 2013. Data science for business. Newton, MA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.
Ramia, A. P., and N. Ali. 1997. “Bayesian methodologies for evaluating rutting in Nova Scotia’s Special B asphalt concrete overlays.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 24 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1139/l96-082.
Rapidminer. 2017. “Optimize selection–RapidMiner documentation.” Accessed July 27, 2017. https://docs.rapidminer.com/studio/operators/modeling/optimization/feature_selection/optimize_selection.html.
Shahin, M. A., M. B. Jaksa, and H. R. Maier. 2009. “Recent advances and future challenges for artificial neural systems in geotechnical engineering applications.” Adv. Artif. Neural Syst. 2009 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/.
Shalaby, A., and A. Reggin. 2007. “Optimization of data collection needs for manual and automated network-level pavement condition ratings based on transverse variability and neural networks.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 34 (2): 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1139/l06-126.
Špačková, O., and D. Straub. 2017. “Long-term adaption decisions via fully and partially observable Markov decision processes.” Sustainable Resilient Infrastruct. 2 (1): 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2017.1278995.
Terzi, S. 2007. “Modeling the pavement serviceability ratio of flexible highway pavements by artificial neural networks.” Constr. Build. Mater. 21 (3): 590–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.11.001.
Tighe, S. 2002. “Evaluation of subgrade and climatic zone influences on pavement performance in the Canadian Strategic Highway Program’s (C-SHRP) long-term pavement performance (LTPP) study.” Can. Geotech. J. Can. 39 (2): 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1139/t01-111.
Way, N. C., P. Beach, and P. Materials. 2015. Standard practice for roads and parking lots pavement condition index surveys. ASTM D6433-07. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Woldesenbet, A., H. D. Jeong, and H. Park. 2015. “Framework for integrating and assessing highway infrastructure data.” J. Manage. Eng. 32 (1): 4015028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000389.
Wu, K. 2015. Development of PCI-based pavement performance model for management of road infrastructure system. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State Univ.
Wu, X., et al. 2008. “Top 10 algorithms in data mining.” Knowl. Inf. Syst. 14 (1): 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-007-0114-2.
Yang, J., J. Lu, and Q. Xiang. 2003. “Forecasting overall pavement condition with neural networks: Application on Florida highway network.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1853 (1): 3–12. https://doi.org/10.3141/1853-01.
Ziari, H., J. Sobhani, J. Ayoubinejad, and T. Hartmann. 2016. “Prediction of IRI in short and long terms for flexible pavements: ANN and GMDH methods.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 17 (9): 776–788. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2015.1019498.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 26Issue 1March 2020

History

Received: Aug 2, 2018
Accepted: Jun 3, 2019
Published online: Dec 21, 2019
Published in print: Mar 1, 2020
Discussion open until: May 21, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

S. Madeh Piryonesi [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Mineral Engineering, Univ. of Toronto, 35 St. George St., Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 1A4 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Tamer E. El-Diraby [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Mineral Engineering, Univ. of Toronto, 35 St. George St. Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 1A4. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share