Sustainability Evaluation of Pavement Technologies through Multicriteria Decision Techniques
Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 25, Issue 3
Abstract
This paper presents findings of a recent study that was conducted in Canada on the quantification of pavement sustainability. The ultimate goal of this study was to develop a framework and explore the use of multicriteria decision-making techniques to formally assess the sustainability of pavement engineering alternatives. While sustainability is of increasing concern in pavement engineering, environmental performance is rarely used by pavement managers to select maintenance practices. There is therefore a need to develop a framework for the practical consideration of environmental effects in pavement management. This paper aims to provide a better understanding on the use of multicriteria decision-making techniques based on hierarchy process (AHP) and choosing by advantages (CBA) for the integration of sustainable aspects in the decision-making process of pavement management. A case study comparing pavement maintenance technologies using cold-in-place recycling and traditional solutions based on mill and overlay is analyzed for illustrative purposes. Results obtained using both multicriteria techniques are compared, including a sensitivity analysis on the importance of sustainability criteria in the evaluation of maintenance alternatives. Results obtained from this case study show that AHP and CBA provide consistent recommendations in which cold-in-place technologies are preferred over traditional alternatives. However, CBA presents the advantage of separating cost from the analysis, letting the agency to decide whether they are willing to pay more to use more sustainable alternatives. This finding has significant implications for engineering practice, given that AHP is widely used not only in the pavement field but in infrastructure management. Further research is needed to incorporate social aspects and existing barriers for the implementation of sustainable technologies in the proposed sustainability evaluation.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Arroyo, P., I. D. Tommelein, and G. Ballard. 2013. “Using ‘choosing by advantages’ to select ceiling tile from a global sustainable perspective.” In Proc., 21st Annual Conf. on Int. Group for Lean Construction (IGLC 21), edited by C. T. Formoso and P. Tzortzopoulos, 309–318. Fortaleza, Brazil: IGLC.
Arroyo, P., I. D. Tommelein, and G. Ballard. 2015. “Comparing AHP and CBA as decision methods to resolve the choosing problem in detailed design.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 141 (1): 04014063. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000915.
Arroyo, P., I. D. Tommelein, and G. Ballard. 2016. “Selecting globally sustainable materials: A case study using choosing by advantages.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (2): 05015015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001041.
AzariJafari, H., A. Yahia, and M. Ben Amor. 2016. “Life cycle assessment of pavements: Reviewing research challenges and opportunities.” J. Cleaner Prod. 112 (4): 2187–2197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.080.
Babashamsia, P., N. Yusoffa, and M. R. Hainin. 2016. “The effect of preservation maintenance activities in asphalt concrete pavement sustainability.” Jurnal Teknologi 78 (4): 117–124. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.8008.
Bennett, C. R., and I. D. Greenwood. 2004. Vol. 7 of Modelling road users and environmental effects in HDM-4: Highway Development and Management Series. Paris: World Road Association PIARC.
Bhavsar, J. 2015. Comparing cold in-place recycling (CIR) and cold in-place recycling with expanded asphalt mixture (CIREAM). Waterloo, Canada: Univ. of Waterloo.
Bryce, J. M., G. Flintsch, and R. P. Hall. 2014. “A multi criteria decision analysis technique for including environmental impacts in sustainable infrastructure management business practices.” Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 32 (Oct): 435–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.08.019.
Celauro, C., F. Corriere, M. Guerrieri, and B. Lo Casto. 2015. “Environmentally appraising different pavement and construction scenarios: A comparative analysis for a typical local road.” Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 34 (Jan): 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.10.001.
Chan, A. P. C., A. Darko, E. E. Ameyaw, and D.-G. Owusu-Manu. 2017. “Barriers affecting the adoption of green building technologies.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (3): 04016057. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000507.
Chan, P. 2010. “Quantifying pavement sustainability for Ontario highways.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Waterloo.
Chan, S., B. Lane, C. Raymond, W. Lee, and T. Kazmierowski. 2009. “Five year performance review of cold in-place recycling and cold in-place recycling with expanded asphalt mix on highway 7, Perth, Ontario.” In Proc., 2009 Annual Conf. on Sustainability of Asphalt Mixes. Ottawa: Transport Association of Canada.
Chester, M. V., and A. Horvath. 2009. “Environmental assessment of passenger transportation should include infrastructure and supply chains.” Environ. Res. Lett. 4 (2): 024008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/2/024008.
Cuelho, E., R. Mokwa, and M. Akin. 2006. Preventive maintenance treatment of flexible pavements: A synthesis of highway practice. Bozeman, MT: Montana State Univ.
Dong, Q., and B. Huang. 2012. “Evaluation of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of asphalt pavement rehabilitations utilizing LTPP data.” J. Transp. Eng. 138 (6): 681–689. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000378.
Dong, Q., B. Huang, S. H. Richards, and X. Yan. 2013. “Cost-effectiveness analyses of maintenance treatments for low- and moderate-traffic asphalt pavements in Tennessee.” J. Transp. Eng. 139 (8): 797–803. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000556.
Environment and Climate Change Canada. 2017. “Criteria air contaminants.” Accessed May 31, 2017. https://www.ec.gc.ca/air//default.asp?lang=En&n=7C43740B-1.
Farhan, J., and T. F. Fwa. 2011. “Use of analytic hierarchy process to prioritize network-level maintenance of pavement segments with multiple distresses.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2225 (1): 11–20. https://doi.org/10.3141/2225-02.
Giustozzi, F., M. Crispino, and G. Flintsch. 2012. “Multi-attribute life cycle assessment of preventive maintenance treatments on road pavements for achieving environmental sustainability.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 17 (4): 409–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0375-6.
Gosse, C., B. Smith, and A. Clarens. 2013. “Environmentally preferable pavement management systems.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 19 (3): 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000118.
Gurganus, C. F., and N. G. Gharaibeh. 2012. “Project selection and prioritization of pavement preservation.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2292 (1): 36–44. https://doi.org/10.3141/2292-05.
Harvey, J., T. Wang, and J. Lea. 2014. “Application of LCA results to network-level highway pavement management.” In Climate change, energy, sustainability and pavements: Green energy and technology, edited by K. Gopalakrishnan, W. J. Steyn, and J. Harvey, 41–73. Berlin: Springer.
Horvath, A. 2007. “PaLATE—Pavement life-cycle tool for environmental and economic effects.” Accessed June 2, 2018. http://faculty.ce.berkeley.edu/horvath/palate.html.
Hudson, W. R., W. Uddin, and R. Haas. 1997. Infrastructure management: Integrating design, construction, maintenance, rehabilitation and renovation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Inti, S., and V. Tandon. 2017. “Application of fuzzy preference-analytic hierarchy process logic in evaluating sustainability of transportation infrastructure requiring multicriteria decision making.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 23 (4): 04017014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000373.
Kabir, G., R. Sadiq, and S. Tesfamariam. 2014. “A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for infrastructure management.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 10 (9): 1176–1210. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2013.795978.
Khurshid, M. B., M. Irfan, and S. Labi. 2009. “Comparison of methods for evaluating pavement interventions: Evaluation and case study.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2108 (1): 25–36. https://doi.org/10.3141/2108-03.
Khurshid, M. B., M. Irfan, and S. Labi. 2011. “An analysis of the cost-effectiveness of rigid pavement rehabilitation treatments.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 7 (9): 715–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470902836566.
Kim, Y., and S. Im. 2011. “Impacts of curing time and moisture content on engineering properties of cold in-place recycling mixtures using foamed or emulsified asphalt.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 23 (5): 542–553. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000209.
Kodippily, S., G. Holleran, and T. F. P. Henning. 2017. “Deformation and cracking performance of recycled asphalt paving mixes containing polymer-modified binder.” Road Mater. Pavement Des. 18 (2): 425–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2016.1181559.
Kucukvar, M., M. Noori, G. Egilmez, and O. Tatari. 2014. “Stochastic decision modeling for sustainable pavement designs.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 19 (6): 1185–1199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0723-4.
Lane, B., and T. Kazmierowski. 2005. “Implementation of cold in-place recycling with expanded asphalt technology in Canada.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1905 (1): 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105190500102.
Lane, B., and W. Lee. 2014. Comparing 10 year performance of cold in-place recycling (CIR) with emulsion versus CIR with expanded asphalt on Highway 7, Perth, Ontario. Montreal: Transportation Association of Canada.
Lee, E.-B., and C. W. Ibbs. 2005. “Computer simulation model: Construction analysis for pavement rehabilitation strategies.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (4): 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:4(449).
Lines, B. C., A. J. Perrenoud, K. T. Sullivan, D. T. Kashiwag, and A. Pesek. 2017. “Implementing project delivery process improvements: Identification of resistance types and frequencies.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (1): 04016031. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000480.
Mousa, M., M. A. Elseifi, M. Bashar, Z. Zhang, and K. Gaspard. 2018. “Field evaluation and cost effectiveness of crack sealing in flexible and composite pavements.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2672 (12): 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118767417.
MTO (Ministry of Transportation Ontario). 2010. Pavement design and rehabilitation manual, 351–353. Toronto: MTO.
Muench, S. T., J. L. Anderson, and M. Söderlund. 2010. “Greenroads: A sustainability performance metric for roadways.” J. Green Build. 5 (2): 114–128. https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.5.2.114.
NYSDOT (New York State Department of Transportation). 2013. GreenLITES: Recognizing leadership in transportation environmental sustainability. New York: NYSDOT.
Oswald, B., and C. Treat. 2015. “Integrating GIS and AHP to prioritize transportation infrastructure using sustainability metrics.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 21 (3): 04014053. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000245.
Saaty, T. L. 2008. “Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors the analytic hierarchy/network process.” Estadística e Investigación Operativa/Stat. Oper. Res. 102 (2): 251–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03191825.
Saaty, T. L., L. G. Vargas, and R. Whitaker. 2009. “Addressing with brevity criticisms of the analytic hierarchy process.” Int. J. Anal. Hierarchy Process 1 (2): 121–134. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v1i2.53.
Sala, S., B. Ciuffo, and P. Nijkamp. 2015. “A systemic framework for sustainability assessment.” Ecol. Econ. 119 (Nov): 314–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.015.
Sanchez, X. 2014. “Effect of reclaimed asphalt pavement on Ontario hot mix asphalt performance.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Waterloo.
Santos, J., J. Bryce, G. Flintsch, A. Ferreira, and B. Diefenderfer. 2015a. “A life cycle assessment of in-place recycling and conventional pavement construction and maintenance practices.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 11 (9): 1199–1217. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2014.945095.
Santos, J., A. Ferreira, and G. Flintsch. 2015b. “A life cycle assessment model for pavement management: Methodology and computational framework.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 16 (3): 268–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2014.942861.
Shindell, D. T. 2015. “The social cost of atmospheric release.” Clim. Change 130 (2): 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1343-0.
Smith, J., and S. Tighe. 2006. “Analytic hierarchy process as a tool for infrastructure management.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1974 (1): 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198106197400101.
Smith, K. L., and D. G. Peshkin. 2011. “Pavement preservation on high-traffic-volume roadways.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2235 (1): 54–65. https://doi.org/10.3141/2235-07.
Suhr, J. 2009. The choosing by advantages decision making system. Westport, CT: Quorum.
TAC (Transportation Association of Canada). 2013. Pavement asset design and management guide. Ontario, Canada: TAC.
Tighe, S., and D. D. Gransberg. 2011. “Sustainable pavement maintenance practices.” In Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Maintenance and Rehabilitation of Pavements and Technological Control. Auckland, New Zealand: Univ. of Auckland.
Torres-Machi, C., J. Achebe, and S. L. Tighe. 2017a. “Evaluating innovative pavement sustainability tools.” In Proc., MAIREINFRA 2017 Conf. Seoul, South Korea: International Society for Maintenance and Rehabilitation of Transportation Infrastructures.
Torres-Machi, C., A. Chamorro, E. Pellicer, V. Yepes, and C. Videla. 2015. “Sustainable pavement management: Integrating economic, technical and environmental aspects in decision making.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2523 (1): 56–63. https://doi.org/10.3141/2523-07.
Torres-Machi, C., A. Chamorro, V. Yepes, and E. Pellicer. 2014. “Current models and practices of economic and environmental evaluation for sustainable network-level pavement management.” Rev. Construcción 13 (2): 49–56. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-915X2014000200006.
Torres-Machi, C., A. Osorio-Lird, A. Chamorro, C. Videla, S. L. Tighe, and C. Mourgues. 2018. “Impact of environmental assessment and budgetary restrictions in pavement maintenance decisions: Application to an urban network.” Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 59 (Mar): 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.017.
Torres-Machi, C., E. Pellicer, V. Yepes, and A. Chamorro. 2017b. “Towards a sustainable optimization of pavement maintenance programs under budgetary restrictions.” J. Cleaner Prod. 148 (Apr): 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.100.
USGBC (US Green Building Council). 2017. “LEEDUS green building council.” Accessed May 31, 2017. http://www.usgbc.org/leed.
Varamini, S. 2016. “Technical, economic and environmental evaluation of warm mix asphalt and coloured asphalt for usage in Canada.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Waterloo.
Varamini, S., and S. L. Tighe. 2015. “Survey on current practices for evaluating warm mix asphalt moisture susceptibility.” In Proc., 2015 Conf. on Green Technology in Pavement and Materials Engineering Session. Charlottetown, Canada: Transportation Association of Canada.
WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). 1987. Our common future. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Whitaker, R. 2007. “Criticisms of the analytic hierarchy process: Why they often make no sense.” Math. Comput. Modell. 46 (7): 948–961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.016.
Wu, Z., G. Flintsch, A. Ferreira, and L. Picado-Santos. 2012. “Framework for multiobjective optimization of physical highway assets investments.” J. Transp. Eng. 138 (12): 1411–1421. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000458.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 25 • Issue 3 • September 2019
Copyright
©2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 2, 2017
Accepted: Apr 8, 2019
Published online: Jun 27, 2019
Published in print: Sep 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Nov 27, 2019
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.