Technical Papers
Dec 12, 2018

Condition State–Based Civil Infrastructure Deterioration Model on a Structure System Level

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 25, Issue 1

Abstract

The successful prediction of civil infrastructure’s deterioration process is crucial for making optimal maintenance, rehabilitation, and replacement (MR&R) decisions under financial constraints. The majority of current deterioration models simulate the deterioration process of a single structure element of civil infrastructure; such models thus ignore the interaction between dependent elements. However, the interaction between structure elements often plays an important role in the deterioration of the overall structure. Therefore, the primary objective of this paper is to address the interaction of these structure elements by developing a method to simulate the deterioration process of civil infrastructure on a system level. The proposed method will also provide a measure of the uncertainty of the simulation using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) to estimate the optimal parameters of the Markov chain and the probability distribution of those parameters. The Monte Carlo simulation is then used to generate a large number of deterioration process samples, which serve as the base of the uncertainty analysis of the simulation. The model was applied to simulate the deterioration process of a bridge element subsystem as an example application. In this example application, the model was calibrated and evaluated by the bridge inspection record collected in the Commonwealth of Virginia. The results demonstrate that including the interaction between elements in the model improves the accuracy of deterioration simulation while also reducing the uncertainty of the results. Furthermore, the proposed model is relatively easy to implement in current infrastructure management systems (IMSs) compared with other methods such as neural networks and fuzzy logical models.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge support from the Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC) for sponsoring this research.

References

Agrawal, A. K., and A. Kawaguchi. 2009. “Bridge element deterioration rates.” New York State Dept. Project Rep. C-01-51. Accessed March 2009. https://www.dot.ny.gov/divisions/engineering/technical-services/trans-r-and-d-repository/C-01-51_Final%20Report_March%202009.pdf.
ASCE. 2017. 2017 Infrastructure report card: A comprehensive assessment of America’s Infrastructure. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Baik, H., H. S. Jeong, and D. M. Abraham. 2006. “Estimating transition probabilities in Markov Chain-based deterioration models for management of wastewater systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 132 (1): 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2006)132:1(15).
Biondini, F., and D. M. Frangopol. 2016. “Life-cycle performance of structural systems under uncertainty.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (9): F4016001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001544.
Bland, J. M. 2005. The half-normal distribution method for measurement error: Two case studies. York, UK: Dept. of Health Sciences, Univ. of York.
Cavalline, T. L., M. J. Whelan, B. Q. Tempest, R. Goyal, and J. D. Ramsey. 2015. Determination of bridge deterioration models and bridge user costs for the NCDOT bridge management system. Charlotte, NC: North Carolina Dept. of Transportation.
Davis-McDaniel, C., M. Chowdhury, W. Pang, and K. Dey. 2013. “Fault-tree model for risk assessment of bridge failure: Case study for segmental box girder bridges.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 19 (3): 326–334. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000129.
Green, P. L., and K. Worden. 2015. “Bayesian and Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for identifying nonlinear systems in the presence of uncertainty.” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 373 (2051): 20140405. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0405.
Gupta, A. K., and S. Nadarajan. 2004. Handbook of beta distribution and its applications. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Hong, F., and J. A. Prozzi. 2006. “Estimation of pavement performance deterioration using Bayesian approach.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 12 (2): 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2006)12:2(77).
Huang, Y.-H. 2010. “Artificial neural network model of bridge deterioration.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 24 (6): 597–602. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000124.
Jeong, H., H. Kim, K. Kim, and H. Kim. 2017. “Prediction of flexible pavement deterioration in relation to climate change using fuzzy logic.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 23 (4): 04017008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000363.
Kanji, G. K. 2006. 100 statistical tests. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Kaufmann, A., and M. M. Gupta. 1985. Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic: Theory and applications. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Kleiner, Y., R. Sadiq, and B. Rajani. 2006. “Modelling the deterioration of buried infrastructure as a fuzzy Markov process.” J. Water Supply Res. Technol. AQUA 55 (2): 67–80. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2006.074.
Kobayashi, K., M. Do, and D. Han. 2010a. “Estimation of Markovian transition probabilities for pavement deterioration forecasting.” J. Civ. Eng. 14 (3): 343–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-010-0343-x.
Kobayashi, K., K. Kaito, and N. Lethanh. 2010b. “Deterioration forecasting model with multistage Weibull hazard functions.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 16 (4): 282–291. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000033.
LeBeau, K. H., and S. J. Wadia-Fascetti. 2007. “Fault tree analysis of Schoharie Creek Bridge collapse.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 21 (4): 320–326. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2007)21:4(320).
Lee, J., H. Guan, Y.-C. Loo, and M. Blumenstein. 2014. “Development of a long-term bridge element performance model using Elman Neural Networks.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 20 (3): 04014013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000197.
Marzouk, M., and A. Osama. 2017. “Fuzzy-based methodology for integrated infrastructure asset management.” Int. J. Computat. Intell. Syst. 10 (1): 745–759. https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.2017.10.1.50.
McCalmont, D. 1990. “A Markovian model of bridge deterioration.” Bachelor’s thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering and Operations Research, Princeton Univ.
Micevski, T., G. Kuczera, and P. Coombes. 2002. “Markov model for storm water pipe deterioration.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 8 (2): 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2002)8:2(49).
Morcous, G., H. Rivard, and A. M. Hanna. 2002. “Modeling bridge deterioration using case-based reasoning.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 8 (3): 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2002)8:3(86).
Ng, S.-K., and F. Moses. 1998. “Bridge deterioration modeling using semi-Markov theory.” A. A. Balkema Uitgevers B. V, Struct. Saf. Reliab. 1 (1): 113–120.
Reardon, M. F. 2015. “Deterioration modeling of subordinate elements and element interaction for bridge management systems.” Master’s thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Virginia. https://libraetd.lib.virginia.edu/public_view/ks65hc42v.
Rubinstein, R. Y., and D. P. Kroese. 2007. Simulation and the Monte Carlo method. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Setunge, S., W. Zhu, R. Gravina, and N. Gamage. 2016. “Fault-tree-based integrated approach of assessing the risk of failure of deteriorated reinforced-concrete bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 30 (3): 04015058. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000754.
Sianipar, P. R. M., and T. M. Adams. 1997. “Fault-tree model of bridge element deterioration due to interaction.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 3 (3): 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1997)3:3(103).
Son, J., J. Lee, H. Guan, Y.-C. Loo, and M. Blumenstein. 2010. “ANN-based structural element performance model for reliable bridge asset management.” In Proc., 21st Australasian Conf. on Mechanics of Structures and Materials. Oxfordshire, UK: Taylor & Francis Group.
Sun, L., and W. Gu. 2011. “Pavement condition assessment using fuzzy logic theory and analytic hierarchy process.” J. Transp. Eng. 137 (9): 648–655. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000239.
Tagherouit, W. B., S. Bennis, and J. Bengassem. 2011. “A fuzzy expert system for prioritizing rehabilitation of sewer networks.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 26 (2): 146–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2010.00673.x.
Tarighat, A., and A. Miyamoto. 2009. “Fuzzy concrete bridge deck condition rating method for practical bridge management system.” Expert Syst. Appl. 36 (10): 12077–12085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.04.043.
Thomas, O., and J. Sobanjo. 2013. “Comparison of Markov chain and semi-Markov models for crack deterioration on flexible pavements.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 19 (2): 186–195. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000112.
Thomas, O., and J. Sobanjo. 2016. “Semi-Markov models for the deterioration of bridge elements.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 22 (3): 04016010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000298.
Tran, D. H., A. W. M. Ng, and B. J. C. Perera. 2007. “Neural networks deterioration models for serviceability condition of buried stormwater pipes.” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 20 (8): 1144–1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2007.02.005.
Tran, D. H., B. J. C. Perera, and A. W. M. Ng. 2009. “Comparison of structural deterioration models for stormwater drainage pipes.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 24 (2): 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2008.00577.x.
Tran, H. D., B. J. C. Perera, and A. W. M. Ng. 2010. “Markov and neural network models for prediction of structural deterioration of storm-water pipe assets.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 16 (2): 167–171. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000025.
VDOT (Virginia Department of Transportation). 2007. Element data collection manual. Richmond, VA: VDOT.
VDOT (Virginia Department of Transportation). 2016. “State of the structures and bridges report fiscal year 2016.” Richmond, VA. Accessed July 1, 2016. http://www.virginiadot.org/info/resources/2016SOSBridge.pdf.
VDOT (Virginia Department of Transportation). 2017. “State of the structures and bridges report fiscal year 2017.” Richmond, VA. Accessed July 1, 2017. http://www.virginiadot.org/info/resources/2017-07-FY2017-State_of_the_Structures_and_Bridge_Report-Generated_2017-11-03.pdf.
Waheed, A., and H. Adeli. 2004. “Case-based reasoning in steel bridge engineering.” Knowl.-Based Syst. 18 (1): 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2004.06.001.
Wang, Y., and T. M. S. Elhag. 2007. “An adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for bridge risk assessment.” Expert Syst. Appl. 34 (4): 3099–3106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.06.026.
Wellalage, N. K. W., T. Zhang, and R. Dwight. 2015. “Calibrating Markov Chain–based deterioration models for predicting future conditions of railway bridge elements.” J. Bridge Eng. 20 (2): 04014060. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000640.
Yuan, X. X., D. Mao, and M. D. Pandey. 2009. “A Bayesian approach to modeling and predicting pitting flaws in steam generator tubes.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94 (11): 1838–1847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2009.06.001.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 25Issue 1March 2019

History

Received: Sep 26, 2017
Accepted: Jul 20, 2018
Published online: Dec 12, 2018
Published in print: Mar 1, 2019
Discussion open until: May 12, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Virginia, Olsson Hall, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4742. Email: [email protected]
Jonathan L. Goodall, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Virginia, Olsson Hall, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4742 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Steven B. Chase [email protected]
Research Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Virginia, D223 Thornton Hall, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4742. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share