Technical Papers
Oct 12, 2018

Bridge Quality Appraisal Methodology: Application in a Reinforced Concrete Overpass Roadway Bridge

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 24, Issue 4

Abstract

Bridge quality control plans and asset management systems are often integrated in collective frameworks used by authorities nationally and internationally. Similarities among these frameworks include the utilization of performance indicators for quality appraisal. However, there are discrepancies in the ways such frameworks are researched, developed, and applied. Additionally, there are problematic aspects even in their common characteristics, like the relative absence of correlation between observed performance indicator values and benchmarked ones, and the deliverables’ disparity due to the diversity of the quantified indicator variables. For the alleviation of such problematic aspects, this paper presents a bridge quality appraisal methodological and computational framework. It builds on (1) the adaptation of the sustainable building methodology and its combination with expert input solicitation methods and the research findings of the European Cooperation in Science & Technology (COST) Action TU1406, and (2) a multi-input adaptation of the analytical hierarchy process. The methodology is presented in terms of its general procedural steps and calculating requirements, and then it is tailored to reinforced concrete overpass roadway bridges. The methodology’s application in a real case study concludes the presented research.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The scientific and financial support of COST Action TU1406 for the successful development of the framework of this research is gratefully acknowledged. In addition, the help and support of distinct colleagues at the Civil Engineering Department of the University of Minho is cordially acceded. Furthermore, the response of all the COST Action TU1406 colleagues and fellow engineers during the expert interviews stage (especially Mr. Sander Sein) and the questionnaire survey is kindly appreciated. Finally, the offered data, expert input, and invested time of the colleagues and fellow engineers of Infrastruturas de Portugal (and especially Dr. João Amado) are warmly acknowledged.

References

Aguarón, J., and J. M. Moreno-Jiménez. 2003. “The geometric consistency index: Approximated thresholds.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 147 (1): 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00255-2.
Alampalli, S., and R. Lund. 2006. “Estimated fatigue life of bridge components using measured strains.” J. Bridge Eng. 11 (6): 725–736. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:6(725).
Alonso, J. A., and M. T. Lamata. 2006. “Consistency in the analytical hierarchy process: A new approach.” Int. J. Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowledge Based Syst. 14 (4): 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488506004114.
Arya, C., A. Amiri, and P. Vassie. 2015. “A new method for evaluating the sustainability of bridges.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Struct. Build. 168 (6): 441–453. https://doi.org/10.1680/stbu.14.00069.
Barone, G., and D. M. Frangopol. 2014. “Reliability, risk and lifetime distributions as performance indicators for life-cycle maintenance of deteriorating structures.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 123: 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.09.013.
Behn, R. D. 2003. “Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures.” Public Administration Rev. 63 (5): 586–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00322.
Biondini, F., and D. M. Frangopol. 2016. “Life-cycle performance of deteriorating structural systems under uncertainty: Review.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (9): F4016001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001544.
Black, J. A., A. Paez, and P. A. Suthanaya. 2002. “Sustainable urban transportation: Performance indicators and some analytical approaches.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 128 (4): 184–209. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2002)128:4(184).
Blanchard, S. B. 1995. Maintainability: A key to effective serviceability and maintenance management. New York: Wiley.
Bragança, L. 2016. “Indicators for sustainability assessment.” In Proc., COST Action TU1406: eBook of the 2nd Workshop Meeting, edited by J. C. Matos, J. Casas, R. Hajdin, S. Mašović, N. Tanasić, A. Strauss, and I. Stipanović, 61–107. Belgrade, Serbia: Univ. of Belgrade.
Bragança, L., R. Mateus, and H. Koukkari. 2010. “Building sustainability assessment.” Sustainability 2 (7): 2010–2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2072010.
Casas, J. R. 2017. “Quality control plans and performance indicators for highway bridges across Europe.” In Life-cycle of engineering systems: Emphasis on sustainable civil infrastructure, edited by J. Bakker, D. M. Frangopol, and K. van Breugel, 1532–1539. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.
Casas, J. R., and J. C. Matos. 2016. “Quality specifications for highway bridges: Standardization and homogenization at the European level (COST TU-1406).” In Vol. 106 of Proc., IABSE Symp. Report, 976–983. Zurich, Switzerland: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering.
Casas, J. R., and J. C. Matos. 2017. “Standardization of quality control plans for highway bridges in Europe: COST Action TU 1406.” In Vol. 236 of IOP conference series: Materials science and engineering, 012051. Bristol, UK: IOP Publishing.
Casas, J. R., and J. J. Moughty. 2017. “Bridge damage detection based on vibration data: Past and new developments.” Front. Built Environ. 3 (4): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2017.00004.
Chan, A. P. C., and A. P. L. Chan. 2004. “Key performance indicators for measuring construction success.” Benchmarking 11 (2): 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770410532624.
Coronelli, D., K. Z. Hanjari, and K. Lundgren. 2013. “Severely corroded RC with cover cracking.” J. Struct. Eng. 139 (2): 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000633.
del-Rey-Chamorro, F. M., R. Roy, B. van Wegen, and A. Steele. 2003. “A framework to create key performance indicators for knowledge management solutions.” J. Knowl. Manage. 7 (2): 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270310477289.
DIN (Deutsches Institut für Normung). 1999. Ingenieurbauwerkeim Zuge von Straßen und Wegen—Überwachung und Prüfung. DIN 1076. Berlin: DIN.
Dong, Y., and D. M. Frangopol. 2017. “Probabilistic assessment of an interdependent healthcare–bridge network system under seismic hazard.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 13 (1): 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2016.1198399.
Du, G., M. Safi, L. Pettersson, and R. Karoumi. 2014. “Life cycle assessment as a decision support tool for bridge procurement: Environmental impact comparison among five bridge designs.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 19 (12): 1948–1964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0797-z.
Ebeling, C. E. 1997. An introduction to reliability and maintainability engineering. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Elfgren, L., P. Linneberg, G. V. Gudmundsson, and M. Leivo. 2017. “Quality control plans for European concrete road bridges: Experiences from cooperation within COST action TU 1406.” In Proc., 23rd Nordic Concrete Research Symp., 249–252. Oslo, Norway: Nordic Concrete Federation.
Escobar, M. T., J. Aguarón, and J. M. Moreno-Jiménez. 2004. “A note on AHP group consistency for the row geometric mean prioritization procedure.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 153 (2): 318–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00154-1.
Estes, A. C., and D. M. Frangopol. 2002. “Updating bridge reliability based on bridge management systems visual inspection results.” J. Bridge Eng. 8 (6): 374–382. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2003)8:6(374).
Everett, T. D., P. Weykamp, H. A. Capers, W. R. Cox, T. S. Drda, L. Hummel, P. Jensen, D. A. Juntunen, T. Kimball, and G. A. Washer. 2008. Bridge evaluation quality assurance in Europe. Washington, DC: Office of International Programs.
Frangopol, D. M., Y. Dong, and S. Sabatino. 2017. “Bridge life-cycle performance and cost: Analysis, prediction, optimisation and decision-making.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 13 (10): 1239–1257. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2016.1267772.
Frangopol, D. M., S. Sabatino, and Y. Dong. 2016. “Bridge life-cycle performance and cost: Analysis, prediction, optimization and decision making.” In Maintenance, monitoring, safety, risk and resilience of bridges and bridge networks, edited by T. N. Bittencourt, D. M. Frangopol, and A. T. Beck, 3–14. London: CRC Press/A.A. Balkema.
Frangopol, D. M., and M. Soliman. 2015. “Life-cycle of structural systems: Recent achievements and future directions.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 12 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2014.999794.
Frangopol, D. M., A. Strauss, and S. Kim. 2008. “Bridge reliability assessment based on monitoring.” J. Bridge Eng. 13 (3): 258–270. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2008)13:3(258).
Ghasemi, H., J. Penrod, and J. M. Hooks. 2009. “Developing advanced methods of assessing bridge performance.” Public Roads 73 (3): 28–35.
Ghosn, M., et al. 2016a. “Performance indicators for structural systems and infrastructure networks.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (9): F4016003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001542.
Ghosn, M., et al. 2016b. “Reliability-based performance indicators for structural members.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (9): F4016002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001546.
Goepel, K. D. 2013. “Implementing the analytic hierarchy process as a standard method for multi-criteria decision making in corporate enterprises—A new AHP Excel template with multiple inputs.” In Proc., Int. Symp. on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 1–10. Pittsburgh: Library of Congress Publication of Data.
Guimarães, H., J. Fernandes, J. Matos, and A. Henriques. 2017. “Robustness assessment—A new perspective to achieve a performance indicator.” In Proc., 14th Int. Probabilistic Workshop, edited by R. Caspeele, L. Taerwe, and D. Proske, 499–507. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
Hajdin, R., J. C. Matos, J. R. Casas, A. M. Ivanković, and A. Strauss. 2016. “Performance reliability-based key performance indicators and thresholds for roadway bridges (COST TU 1406).” In Proc., 9th Int. Forum on Engineering Decision Making (IFED). Guimarães, Portugal: Univ. of Minho Repository.
Hammervold, J., M. Reenaas, and H. Brattebø. 2013. “Environmental life cycle assessment of bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (2): 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000328.
Hanley, C., J. C. Matos, D. Kelliher, and V. Pakrashi. 2016. “Integrating multivariate techniques in bridge management systems for life-cycle prediction.” In Proc., Civil Engineering Research in Ireland 2016 (CERI2016), edited by J. Goggins, 237–242. Dublin, Ireland: Civil Engineering Research Association of Ireland.
Helmerich, R., E. Niederleithinger, D. Algernon, D. Streicher, and H. Wiggenhauser. 2008. “Bridge inspection and condition assessment in Europe.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2044: 31–38. https://doi.org/10.3141/2044-04.
Highways England. 2017. Inspection of highway structures. BD 63/17. Guildford, UK: Highways England.
iiSBE (International Initiative for a Sustainable Built Environment). 2009. Evaluation Guide SBToolPT– H V2009/2. Guimarães, Portugal: iiSBE Portugal.
Ishizaka, A., and A. Labib. 2011. “Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process.” Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (11): 14336–14345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143.
ISO. 2015. General principles on reliability for structures. ISO 2394:2015(E). Geneva: ISO.
Ivanković, A. M., J. Matos, S. Thöns, and N. P. Høj, eds. 2017a. “The value of structural health monitoring for the reliable bridge management.” In Proc., Joint COST TU1402–COST TU1406—IABSE WC1 Workshop. Zagreb, Croatia: Univ. of Zagreb.
Ivanković, A. M., M. Srbic, and J. Radic. 2016. “Performance indicators in assessment of concrete arch bridges.” In Maintenance, monitoring, safety, risk and resilience of bridges and bridge networks, edited by T. N. Bittencourt, D. M. Frangopol, and A. T. Beck, 948–955. London: CRC Press/A.A. Balkema.
Ivanković, A. M., A. Strauss, and M. K. Maric. 2017b. “Extracting performance indicators for arch bridge assessment.” In Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Construction Materials for Sustainable Future, edited by E. B. Pecur, A. Baricevic, N. Stirmer, and D. Bjegovic, 621–628. Zagreb, Croatia: Univ. of Zagreb.
Jost, L. 2006. “Entropy and diversity.” OIKOS 113 (2): 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14714.x.
Jost, L. 2007. “Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components.” Ecology 88 (10): 2427–2439. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1736.1.
Kumar, P., and B. Imam. 2013. “Footprints of air pollution and changing environment on the sustainability of built infrastructure.” Sci. Total Environ. 444: 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.056.
Kušar, M., and J. Šelih. 2017. “Challenges in BMS quality plan development.” In Life-cycle of engineering systems: Emphasis on sustainable civil infrastructure, edited by J. Bakker, D. M. Frangopol, and K. van Breugel, 1526–1531. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.
Larsson, N. 2015. “Overview of the SBTool assessment framework.” Accessed April 11, 2017. http://iisbe.org/system/files/private/SBTool%202016%20description%2021Jul16.pdf.
Liang, Y., D. Wu, D. Huston, G. Liu, Y. Li, C. Gao, and Z. J. Ma. 2017. “Civil infrastructure serviceability evaluation based on big data.” In Guide to big data applications (studies in big data), edited by S. Srinivasan, 295–325. New York: Springer.
Liang, Y., D. Wu, G. Liu, Y. Li, C. Gao, Z. J. Ma, and W. Wu. 2016. “Big data-enabled multiscale serviceability analysis for aging bridges.” Digital Commun. Networks 2 (3): 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcan.2016.05.002.
Linneberg, P., S. Mašović, and R. Hajdin. 2017. “Quality control plans for girder and frame bridges.” In Vol. 109 of Proc., IABSE Symp. Report, 2651–2658. Zurich, Switzerland: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering Publications.
Liu, M., and D. M. Frangopol. 2004. “Optimal bridge maintenance planning based on probabilistic performance prediction.” Eng. Struct. 26 (7): 991–1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.03.003.
Lop, N. S., K. Ismail, and H. M. Isa. 2017. “The implementation of key performance indicators in the Malaysian private finance initiative projects.” In Proc., 5th AMER Int. Conf. on Quality of Life (AicQoL2017Bangkok), 95–104. Sheffield, UK: e-International Publishing House.
Lu, P., H. Shao, and R. Zhao. 2017. “Investigation and verification of the fatigue characteristic of the composite bridge deck of a steel truss arch bridge.” Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 42 (3): 1283–1293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-016-2397-7.
Mašović, S., and R. Hajdin. 2014. “Modelling of bridge elements deterioration for Serbian bridge inventory.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 10 (8): 976–987. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2013.774426.
Mateus, R., and L. Bragança. 2011. “Sustainability assessment and rating of buildings: Developing the methodology SBToolPT-H.” Build. Environ. 46 (10): 1962–1971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.04.023.
Matos, J. C. 2015. “TU1406: Quality specifications for roadway bridges, standardization at a European level (BridgeSpec).” In Proc., 1st COST Action TU1406 MC Meeting. Brussels, Belgium: COST Association.
Matos, J. C. 2016. “TU1406 COST action—Quality specifications for roadway bridges, standardization at a European level (BridgeSpec).” In Proc., SBE16 Malta Int. Conf.—Europe and the Mediterranean: Towards a Sustainable Built Environment, 43–50. Tarxien, Malta: Gutenberg Press.
Matos, J. C. 2017. “COST Action TU 1406—Main outcomes from the first training school.” In Vol. 108 of Proc., IABSE Symp. Report, 277–278. Zurich, Switzerland: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering Publications.
Matos, J. C., J. Amado, S. Fernandes, and N. Galvão. 2017a. “An overview of COST action TU1406, quality specifications for roadway bridges (BridgeSpec).” In Life-cycle of engineering systems: Emphasis on sustainable civil infrastructure, edited by J. Bakker, D. M. Frangopol, and K. van Breugel, 1511–1517. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.
Matos, J. C., J. R. Casas, E. Chatzi, N. P. Høj, A. Strauss, I. Stipanovic, and R. Hajdin, eds. 2015. COST action TU1406: eBook of the 1st workshop meeting. Zürich, Switzerland: ETH-Zürich.
Matos, J. C., J. R. Casas, and S. Fernandes. 2016a. “COST action TU1406 quality specifications for roadway bridges (BridgeSpec).” In Maintenance, monitoring, safety, risk and resilience of bridges and bridge networks, edited by T. N. Bittencourt, D. M. Frangopol, and A. Beck, 935–942. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group.
Matos, J. C., J. R. Casas, and S. Fernandes. 2017b. “COST TU1406—An overview of European standardization on quality control of road bridges.” In Vol. 109 of Proc., IABSE Symp. Report, 296–303. Zurich, Switzerland: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering Publications.
Matos, J. C., J. R. Casas, R. Hajdin, S. Mašović, N. Tanasić, A. Strauss, and I. Stipanović, eds. 2016b. COST action TU1406: eBook of the 2nd workshop meeting. Belgrade, Serbia: Univ. of Belgrade.
Matos, J. C., J. R. Casas, A. Strauss, and S. Fernandes. 2016c. “COST action TU1406: Quality specifications for roadway bridges, standardization at a European level (BridgeSpec).” In Proc., Performance-Based Approaches for Concrete Structures: Materials Technology, Structural Design, Analytical Modelling, Conformity Assessment and Testing—fib Symp., edited by H. Beushausen, 1–10. Lausanne, Switzerland: International Federation for Structural Concrete (fib) Publications.
Matos, J. C., A. Strauss, H. Guimarães, and I. Zambon. 2016d. “An overview of performance indicators for arch bridges in Europe.” In Proc., 8th Int. Conf. on Arch Bridges (ARCH 2016). Fujian, China: International Conference on Arch Bridges.
Matthews, B. 2009. “Intersections of brainstorming rules and social order.” CoDesign 5 (1): 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880802522403.
Mitra, A. 2016. Fundamentals of quality control and improvement. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Munshi, J. 2014. “A method for constructing Likert scales.” SSRN Cognition Math. Sci. Technol. eJournal 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2419366.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program. 2007. Bridge inspection practices: A synthesis of highway practice. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
Okoli, C., and S. D. Pawlowski. 2004. “The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications.” Inf. Manage. 42 (1): 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002.
Padgett, J. E., and C. Tapia. 2013. “Sustainability of natural hazard risk mitigation: Life cycle analysis of environmental indicators for bridge infrastructure.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 19 (4): 395–408. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000138.
Patton, J. D., Jr. 2005. Maintainability and maintenance management. Durham, NC: Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society.
Quirk, L., J. Matos, J. Murphy, and V. Pakrashi. 2017. “Visual inspection and bridge management.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 14 (3): 320–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2017.1352000.
Saaty, R. W. 1987. “The analytic hierarchy process—What it is and how it is used.” Math. Modell. 9 (3–5): 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8.
Saaty, T. L., and L. G. Vargas. 2007. “Dispersion of group judgments.” Math. Comput. Modell. 46 (7): 918–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.004.
Sabatino, S., D. M. Frangopol, and Y. Dong. 2016. “Life cycle utility-informed maintenance planning based on lifetime functions: Optimum balancing of cost, failure consequences and performance benefit.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 12 (7): 830–847. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2015.1064968.
Saydam, D., and D. M. Frangopol. 2011. “Time-dependent performance indicators of damaged bridge superstructures.” Eng. Struct. 33 (9): 2458–2471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.04.019.
Shannon, C. 1948. “A mathematical theory of communication.” Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27 (4): 623–656. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x.
Shao, Y., J. Yuan, and Q. Li. 2017. “Identification of the residual value risk factors for road PPP projects in China: Questionnaire survey and analysis.” In Proc., 20th Int. Symp. on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate, edited by Y. Wu, S. Zheng, J. Luo, W. Wang, Z. Mo, and L. Shan, 379–389. Singapore: Springer.
Stipanovic, I., et al. 2017a. Performance goals for roadway bridges of COST action TU1406. Braga, Portugal: Boutik.
Stipanovic, I., N. Høj, and G. Klanker. 2017b. “Multi-objective bridge performance goals.” In Life-cycle of engineering systems: Emphasis on sustainable civil infrastructure, edited by J. Bakker, D. M. Frangopol, and K. van Breugel, 1540–1547. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.
Stipanovic, I., and G. Klanker. 2016. “Performance goals of roadway bridges.” In Maintenance, monitoring, safety, risk and resilience of bridges and bridge networks, edited by T. N. Bittencourt, D. M. Frangopol, and A. Beck, 303. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Stipanovic, I., G. Klanker, J. Matos, J. Casas, and R. Hajdin, eds. 2016. COST action TU1406: eBook of the 3rd workshop meeting. Enschede, Netherlands: Univ. of Twente.
Strauss, A., K. Bergmeister, A. M. Ivanković, and J. C. Matos. 2017. “Applied and research based performance indicator database for highway bridges across Europe.” In Life-cycle of engineering systems: Emphasis on sustainable civil infrastructure, edited by J. Bakker, D. M. Frangopol, and K. van Breugel, 1503–1510. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.
Strauss, A., A. M. Ivanković, J. C. Matos, and J. R. Casas, eds. 2016a. WG1 technical report: Performance indicators for roadway bridges of COST action TU1406. Braga, Portugal: Boutik.
Strauss, A., A. Vidovic, I. Zambon, F. Dengg, N. Tanasic, and J. C. Matos. 2016b. “Performance indicators for roadway bridges.” In Maintenance, monitoring, safety, risk and resilience of bridges and bridge networks, edited by T. N. Bittencourt, D. M. Frangopol, and A. T. Beck, 965–970. London: CRC Press/A.A. Balkema.
Strauss, A., R. Wendner, K. Bergmeister, and C. Costa. 2013. “Numerically and experimentally based reliability assessment of a concrete bridge subjected to chloride-induced deterioration.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 19 (2): 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000125.
Tung, C. T., H. Chao, and J. Peterson. 2012. “Group geometric consistency index of analytic hierarchical process (AHP).” Afr. J. Bus. Manage. 6 (26): 7659–7668. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM11.637.
Ugwu, O. O., and T. C. Haupt. 2007. “Key performance indicators and assessment methods for infrastructure sustainability—A South African construction industry perspective.” Build. Environ. 42 (2): 665–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.10.018.
Wagner, W. 2012. “RAMSSHE€P analysis: A tool for risk-driven maintenance for primary flood defense systems in the Netherlands.” M.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Hydraulic Engineering, TU Delft.
Wagner, W., and P. H. J. A. M. van Gelder. 2014. “Applying RAMSSHEEP analysis for risk-driven maintenance.” In Safety, reliability and risk analysis: Beyond the horizon, edited by R. D. J. M. Steenbergen, P. H. A. J. M. van Gelder, S. Miraglia, and A. C. W. M. Vrouwenvelder, 703–713. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.
Xu, Z. 2000. “On consistency of the weighted geometric mean complex judgement matrix in AHP.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 126 (3): 683–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00082-X.
Yuan, J., A. Y. Zeng, M. J. Skibniewski, and Q. Li. 2009. “Selection of performance objectives and key performance indicators in public-private partnership projects to achieve value for money.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 27 (3): 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190902748705.
Zhang, W., and N. Wang. 2017. “Bridge network maintenance prioritization under budget constraint.” Struct. Saf. 67: 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.05.001.
Zhu, B., and D. M. Frangopol. 2012. “Reliability, redundancy and risk as performance indicators of structural systems during their life-cycle.” Eng. Struct. 41: 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.029.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 24Issue 4December 2018

History

Received: Oct 24, 2017
Accepted: Jun 22, 2018
Published online: Oct 12, 2018
Published in print: Dec 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Mar 12, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dimosthenis Kifokeris [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Civil Engineering, Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 541 24, Greece. Email: [email protected]
José António Campos e Matos [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Minho, Guimarães 4800-058, Portugal. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 541 24, Greece (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1415-2051. Email: [email protected]
Luís Bragança [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Minho, Guimarães 4800-058, Portugal. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share