Technical Notes
Sep 8, 2018

Sharing Risks in Toll Motorway Concessions: Subsidies as Real Options on Traffic Volume

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 24, Issue 4

Abstract

Public Administrations need to raise private financial resources to provide for infrastructures. These projects are, however, perceived by investors as risky, so it is necessary to look for risk-sharing mechanisms that make them attractive and fundable. The establishment of a contingent subsidy linked to the volume of traffic reduces the variance of cash flows and reduces the risk of the project. The optional nature of this type of mechanism means that the project must be assessed within the real options framework, because traditional methods of project valuation are inappropriate when they incorporate flexibility and uncertainty. This work quantifies the value of a subsidy to the project depending on the volume of traffic under two different approaches: using analytical methods and simulation. The results show that the establishment of a subsidy according to traffic levels contributes an important value to the project.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Alonso-Conde, A. B., C. Brown, and J. Rojo-Suarez. 2007. “Public private partnerships: Incentives, risk transfer and real options.” Rev. Financial Econ. 16 (4): 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rfe.2007.03.002.
Bain, R. 2009. “Error and optimism bias in toll road traffic forecasts.” Transportation 36 (5): 469–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-009-9199-7.
Bain, R., and J. W. Plantagie. 2003. Traffic forecasting risk: Study update 2003. London: Standard & Poor’s.
Bain, R., and J. W. Plantagie. 2004. Traffic forecasting risk: Study update 2004. London: Standard & Poor’s.
Bain, R., and L. Polakovic. 2005. Traffic forecasting risk study 2005: Through ramp-up and beyond. London: Standard & Poor’s.
Bain, R., and M. Wilkins. 2002. The credit implications of traffic risk in start-up toll facilities. London: Standard & Poor’s.
Bowe, M., and D. L. Lee. 2004. “Project evaluation in the presence of multiple embedded real options: Evidence from the Taiwan High-Speed Rail Project.” J. Asian Econ. 15 (1): 71–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2003.12.001.
Brandão, L. E. 2002. “Uma aplicação da Teoria das Opções Reais em Tempo Discreto para Avaliação de uma Concessão Rodoviária no Brasil.” Doctoral thesis, Industrial Engineering Dept., Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro.
Cabero, F., A. Sánchez-Soliño, and A. Lara-Galera. 2017. “Default and abandonment option in motorway concessions.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 23 (1): 04016022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000309.
Chiara, N., M. Garvin, and J. Vecer. 2007. “Valuing simple multiple-exercise real options in infrastructure projects.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 13 (2): 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2007)13:2(97).
Dixit, A. K., and R. S. Pindyck. 1994. Investment under uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Flyvbjerg, B., M. K. Skamris, and S. L. Buhl. 2005. “How (in)accurate are demand forecasts in public works projects? The case of transportation.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 71 (2): 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360508976688.
Huang, Y., and S. Chou. 2006. “Valuation of the minimum revenue guarantee and the option to abandon in BOT infrastructure projects.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 24 (4): 379–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190500434997.
Hull, J. C. 2006. Options, futures and other derivatives. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice-Hall.
Irwin, T. 2003. Public money for private infrastructure: World bank working paper, 10. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Lara-Galera, A. L. 2006. “Desarrollo de un Modelo de Valoración de Concesiones de Autopistas basado en la Teoría de Opciones Reales. Validación mediante el Análisis de Series Históricas de Datos de Concesiones en Servicio.” Tesis doctoral, E.T.S.I. Caminos Canales y Puertos, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
Lara-Galera, A. L., and A. Sánchez-Soliño. 2010. “A real options approach for the valuation of highway concessions.” Transp. Sci. 44 (3): 416–427. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.1090.0299.
Lara-Galera, A. L., A. Sánchez-Soliño, and R. Galindo. 2016. “First generation highways. Participation loans valuation in the framework of real options.” J. Constr. 15 (2): 115–124. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-915X2016000200012.
Næss, P., B. Flyvbjerg, and S. Buhl. 2006. “Do road planners produce more ‘honest numbers’ than rail planners? An analysis of accuracy in road-traffic forecasts in cities versus peripheral regions.” Transp. Rev. 26 (5): 537–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640500532005.
PITVI (Plan de Infraestructuras, Transporte y Vivienda). 2015. Plan de Infraestructuras, Transporte y Vivienda 2012–2024. Madrid, Spain: Ministerio de Fomento. Gobierno de España.
Sánchez-Soliño, A., and A. L. Lara-Galera. 2012. “Unit root analysis of traffic time series in toll highways.” J. Civ. Eng. Archit. 6 (12): 1641–1647.
Sharpe, W. F. 1964. “Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk.” J. Finance 19 (3): 425–442. https://doi.org/10.2307/2977928.
Wibowo, A. 2004. “Valuing guarantees in BOT infrastructure project.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 11 (6): 395–403. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980410571543.
Wooldridge, S. C., M. J. Garvin, Y. J. Cheah, and J. B. Miller. 2002. “Valuing flexibility in private toll road development: Analysis of the Dulles Greenway.” J. Struct. Project Finance 7 (4): 25–36. https://doi.org/10.3905/jsf.2002.320264.
Zhao, T., S. K. Sundararajan, and C. Tseng. 2004. “Highway development decision-making under uncertainty: A real options approach.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 10 (1): 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2004)10:1(23).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 24Issue 4December 2018

History

Received: Nov 16, 2017
Accepted: May 29, 2018
Published online: Sep 8, 2018
Published in print: Dec 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Feb 8, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering-Construction, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Profesor Aranguren, 3, Madrid 28040, Spain (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6367-3278. Email: [email protected]
Antonio Sánchez Soliño [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering-Construction, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Profesor Aranguren, 3, Madrid 28040, Spain. Email: [email protected]
Begoña Guirao Abad [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering-Transport, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Profesor Aranguren, 3, Madrid 28040, Spain. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share