Technical Papers
Jun 23, 2017

Accounting for Endogeneity in Maintenance Decisions and Overlay Thickness in a Pavement-Roughness Deterioration Model

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 23, Issue 4

Abstract

Pavement deterioration models are an important part of any pavement management system. Many of these models suffer from endogeneity bias because of the inclusion of independent variables correlated with unobserved factors, which are captured by the model’s error terms. Examples of such endogenous variables include pavement overlay thickness and maintenance and rehabilitation activities, both of which are not randomly chosen but are in fact decision variables selected by pavement engineers based on field conditions. Inclusion of these variables in a pavement deterioration model can result in biased and inconsistent model parameter estimates, leading to incorrect insights. Previous research has shown that continuous endogenous variables, such as pavement overlay thickness, can be corrected using auxiliary models to replace the endogenous variable with an instrumented variable that has lower correlation with the unobserved error term. Discrete endogenous variables, such as the type of maintenance and rehabilitation activities, have been accounted for by modeling the likelihood of each potential outcome and developing individual deterioration models for each of the potential responses. This paper proposes an alternative approach to accommodate discrete endogenous variables—the selectivity correction method—that allows a single model to incorporate the impacts of all discrete choices. This approach is applied to develop a pavement-roughness progression model that incorporates both continuous and discrete endogenous variables using field data from Washington State. The result is a roughness progression model with consistent parameter estimates, which have more realistic values than those obtained in previous studies that used the same data.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the help provided by John Harvey, of UC Davis, in obtaining the data set used in this paper.

References

Al-Omari, B., and Darter, M. (1994). “Relationships between international roughness index and present serviceability rating.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1435, 130–136.
Freedman, D. (2005). Statistical models: Theory and practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
GEIPOT (Empersa Brasilera de Panejamento de Transportes). (1982). “Research on the interrelationships between costs of highway construction, maintenance, and utilization (PICR).”, Brasilia, Brazil.
Gulen, S., Zhu, K., Weaver, J., Shan, J., and Flora, W. (2001). “Development of improved pavement performance prediction models for the Indiana pavement management system.”, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Karan, M., Christison, T., Cheetham, A., and Berdahl, G. (1983). “Development and implementation of Alberta’s pavement information and needs system.” Transp. Res. Rec., 938, 11–20.
Kay, R., Mahoney, J., and Jackson, N. (1993). “The WSDOT pavement management System—A 1993 update.”, Washington State Dept. of Transportation, Olympia, WA.
Li, J., Mahoney, J., Muench, S., and Pierce, L. (2008). “Bituminous surface treatment protocol for the Washington State Department of Transportation.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2084, 65–72.
Madanat, S., Bulusu, S., and Mahmoud, A. (1995). “Estimation of infrastructure distress initiation and progression.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 146–150.
Madanat, S., and Mishalani, R. (1998). “Selectivity bias in modeling highway pavement maintenance effectiveness.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 134–137.
Madanat, S., Nakat, Z., and Jin, E. (2010). “Empirical modeling of pavement overlay crack progression with field data.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 292–298.
Madanat, S., Nakat, Z., and Sathaye, N. (2005). “Development of empirical-mechanistic pavement performance models using data from the Washington State PMS database.”, Univ. of California Berkeley Pavement Research Center, Richmond, CA.
Mannering, F. (1998). Modeling driver decision making: A review of methodological alternatives, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 187–216.
Mannering, F., and Hensher, D. (1987). “Discrete continuous econometric models and their application to transport analysis.” Transp. Rev., 7(3), 227–244.
Ozbay, K., and Laub, R. (2001). “Models for pavement deterioration using LTPP.”, New Jersey Dept. of Transportation, Trenton, NJ.
Paterson, W. (1987). Road deterioration and maintenance effects: Models for planning and management, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Prozzi, J., and Madanat, S. (2003). “Incremental nonlinear model for predicting pavement serviceability.” J. Transp. Eng., 635–641.
Prozzi, J., and Madanat, S. (2004). “Development of pavement performance models by combining experimental and field data.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 9–22.
Puccinelli, J., and Jackson, N. (2007). “Development of pavement performance models to account for frost effects and their application to mechanistic-empirical design guide calibration.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1990, 95–101.
Rudd, P. (2000). An introduction to classical econometric theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
Train, K. (1986). Qualitative choice analysis: Theory, econometrics, and an application to automobile demand, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Washington, S., Karlaftis, M., and Mannering, F. (2003). Statistical and econometric methods for transportation data analysis, CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
Way, G., and Eisenburg, J. (1980). Pavement management system for Arizona—Phase II: Verification of performance prediction models and development of database, Arizona Dept. of Transportation, Phoenix.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 23Issue 4December 2017

History

Received: Dec 18, 2015
Accepted: Mar 28, 2017
Published online: Jun 23, 2017
Discussion open until: Nov 23, 2017
Published in print: Dec 1, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Vikash V. Gayah, M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State Univ., 231L Sackett Bldg., University Park, PA 16802 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Samer Madanat [email protected]
Dean, NYUAD’s Engineering Division, New York Univ. Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE; Xenel Distinguished Professor of Engineering, Dept. of Civil and Urban Engineering, Tandon School of Engineering, New York Univ., New York, NY 10003. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share