Framework for Mitigating Human Bias in Selection of Explanatory Variables for Bridge Deterioration Modeling
Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 23, Issue 3
Abstract
This paper presents a procedure to select explanatory variables, without the influence of human bias, for deterioration model development using publicly available data for bridges in Wyoming. Using this information, including geometric data and climate information, candidate explanatory variables can be converted into normalized numeric values and analyzed prior to the development of deterministic or stochastic deterioration models. The prevailing approach for explanatory variable selection for bridge condition modeling is to use expert opinions solicited from experienced engineers. This may introduce personal human influenced biases into the deterioration modeling process. A framework using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) penalized regression and covariance analysis are combined to compensate for this potential bias. The resultant of LASSO, combined with the cross validation, is used to develop a LASSO solution path that visualizes the relative significance of investigated explanatory variables. In order to analyze yearly inspected data in the framework, the cross-validation analysis is used as a standard for the selection of minimum number of explanatory variables using the solution path. The proposed method is demonstrated through the creation of deterministic deterioration models for deck, superstructure, and substructure for Wyoming bridges and compared to explanatory variables using the expert selection method. The comparison shows a significant decrease in error using the presented framework based on the least squares of relative error.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Wyoming Department of Transportation. Special thanks to Paul Cortez, Keith Fulton, and Brenden Schaefer. The aid of Taylor Sorensen and Parker Syndergaard was much appreciated.
References
AASHTO. (2002). Standard specifications for highway bridges, 17th Ed., Washington, DC.
Abed-Al-Rahim, I. J., and Johnston, D. W. (1995). “Bridge element deterioration rates.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1490, 9–18.
Agrawal, A. K., Kawaguchi, A., and Chen, Z. (2010). “Deterioration rates of typical bridge elements in New York.” J. Bridge Eng., 419–429.
Ayyub, B. M., and McCuen, R. H. (2011). Probability, statistics, and reliability for engineers and scientists, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Ben-Akiva, M., and Gopinath, D. (1995). “Modeling infrastructure performance and user costs.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 33–43.
Cesare, M. A., Santamarina, C., Turkstra, C., and Vanmarcke, E. H. (1992). “Modeling bridge deterioration with Markov chains.” J. Transp. Eng., 820–833.
Davis, S. L., Goldberg, D., DeGood, K., Donohue, N., and Corless, J. (2013). The fix we’re in for: The state of our nation’s bridges 2013, Transportation for America, Washington, DC.
Efron, B., Hastie, T., Johnstone, I., and Tibshirani, R. (2004). “Least angle regression.” Ann. Stat., 32(2), 407–499.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (2014). “National bridge inventory (NBI).” ⟨http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbi.cfm⟩ (Jul. 27, 2015).
Frangopol, D. M., Kallen, M. J., and Van Noortwijk, J. M. (2004). “Probabilistic models for life-cycle performance of deteriorating structures: Review and future directions.” Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater., 6(4), 197–212.
Herrmann, A. W. (2013). “ASCE 2013 report card for America’s infrastructure.” Int. Assoc. Bridge Struct. Eng. Symp. Rep., 99(33), 9–10.
Mauch, M., and Madanat, S. (2001). “Semiparametric hazard rate models of reinforced concrete bridge deck deterioration.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 49–57.
Morcous, G., and Hatami, A. (2011). “Developing deterioration models for Nebraska bridges.”, Nebraska Dept. of Roads (NDOR), Lincoln, NE.
Morcous, G., Rivard, H., and Hanna, A. M. (2002). “Modeling bridge deterioration using case-based reasoning.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 86–95.
Osborne, M. R., Presnell, B., and Turlach, B. A. (2000). “A new approach to variable selection in least squares problems.” IMA J. Numer. Anal., 20(3), 389–403.
Sobanjo, J., Mtenga, P., and Rambo-Roddenberry, M. (2010). “Reliability-based modeling of bridge deterioration hazards.” J. Bridge Eng., 671–683.
Tibshirani, R. (1996). “Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso.” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 58(1), 267–288.
Tibshirani, R., Saunders, M., Rosset, S., Zhu, J. and Knight, K. (2005). “Sparsity and smoothness via the fused Lasso.” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 67(1), 91–108.
USDOT (U.S. Department of Transportation). (1999). “Asset management primer.” Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Office of Asset Management, Washington, DC.
Weseman, W. A. (1995). “Recording and coding guide for the structure inventory and appraisal of the nation’s bridges.” U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Williamson, G., Weyers, R. E., Brown, M. C., and Sprinkel, M. M., (2007). “Bridge deck service life prediction and costs.”, Virginia Dept. of Transportation, Richmond, VA.
WYDOT (Wyoming Department of Transportation). (2015). “Interactive transportation system map.” ⟨http://map.wyoroad.info/hi.html⟩ (Jul. 27, 2015).
Zou, H., Hastie, T., and Tibshirani, R. (2007). “On the degrees of freedom of the LASSO.” Ann. Stat., 35(5), 2173–2192.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 23 • Issue 3 • September 2017
Copyright
©2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 20, 2015
Accepted: Sep 22, 2016
Published online: Jan 31, 2017
Discussion open until: Jun 30, 2017
Published in print: Sep 1, 2017
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.