Technical Papers
Oct 8, 2015

Environmental and Economic Consequences of Permanent Roadway Infrastructure Commitment: City Road Network Lifecycle Assessment and Los Angeles County

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 22, Issue 1

Abstract

The environmental impacts and economic costs associated with passenger transportation are the result of complex interactions between people, infrastructure, urban form, and underlying activities. When it comes to roadway infrastructure, the ongoing resource commitments (which can be measured as embedded impacts) enables vehicle travel, which is a dominant source of air emissions in regional inventories. The relationship between infrastructure and the environmental impacts it enables are not often considered dynamic. Furthermore, the environmental effects of roadway infrastructure are typically assessed at a fine geospatial and temporal scale (i.e., a short distance of roadway over a short period of time) and there is generally poor knowledge of how the growth of a roadway network over time creates a need for long-term maintenance commitments that create environmental impacts and lock-in vehicle travel. A framework and operational lifecycle assessment (LCA) tool [City Road Network (CiRN) LCA] are developed to assess the extent to which roadway commitments result in ongoing and increasing environmental and economic impacts. Known for its extensive road network and automobile reliance, Los Angeles County is used as a case study to explore the relationship between historic infrastructure deployment decisions and the emergent behavior of vehicle travel. The results show that every kilogram of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions resulting from construction and maintenance has led to 27 kg of GHG emissions in fuel combustion. Similarly, every public dollar invested into the network has created $21–$46 in private user spending. As states and regions grapple with financing the upkeep of aging infrastructure, a solid understanding of the relationship between upfront infrastructure capital costs, long-term maintenance costs, and associated long-term environmental effects are critical. In Los Angeles, the infrastructure that exists was largely deployed by 1987. Since then, maintenance costs are estimated to have exceeded city budgets despite minimal growth in infrastructure. The research demonstrates how infrastructure matures (i.e., its stages of growth toward completion), it becomes locked-in, leading to transitions from a capital financing focus to foci on securing rehabilitation and maintenance costs, and the share of environmental impacts changing from being somewhat balanced between embedded infrastructure construction impacts and vehicle use to today where vehicle use creates impacts several orders of magnitude greater than those associated with rehabilitation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research has been funded by the National Transportation Center–University of Maryland (Project NTC2015-SU-R-01).

References

AAA (American Automobile Association). (2013). Your cost of driving, Heathrow, FL.
AASHTO. (1993). “Guide for design of pavement structures.” Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2007). “Maintenance manual for roadways and bridges.” Washington, DC.
Argone National Laboratory. (2014). “Greenhouse gases, regulated emissions, and energy use in transportation model.” U.S. Dept. of Energy, Lemont, IL.
ATHD (Arkansas State and Highway Transportation Department). (2009). “Estimated costs per mile.” Little Rock, AR.
Becerra, T. A., Wilhelm, M., Olsen, J., Cockburn, M., and Ritz, B. (2013). “Ambient air pollution and autism in Los Angeles County, California.” Environ. Health Perspect., 121(3), 380–386.
Brookings Institution. (2001). “Sprawl hits the wall.” Southern California Studies Center, Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, Washington, DC.
California Air Resources Board. (2011). “EMFAC2011 user’s guide.” Sacramento, CA.
California Department of Finance. (2014). “California’s five-year infrastructure plan.” Sacramento, CA.
California Department of Motor Vehicles. (2005). “Number of vehicles registered.” Sacramento, CA.
California DOT. (2006). “Motor vehicle stock, travel, and fuel forcast.” Sacramento, CA.
California DOT. (2011). “Highway performanance monitoring system—California public road data.” Sacramento, CA.
California DOT. (2012). “Chapter 610 pavement engineering considerations.” Highway Design Manual, Sacramento, CA.
Chester, M., Horvath, A., and Madanat, S. (2010). “Parking infrastructure: Energy, emissions, and automobile life-cycle environmental accounting.” Environ. Res. Lett., 5(3), 034001.
Delamater, P. L., Finley, A. O., and Banerjee, S. (2012). “An analysis of asthma hospitalizations, air pollution, and weather conditions in Los Angeles County, California.” Sci. Total Environ., 425, 110–118.
Engineering News-Record. (2011). “Construction cost index.” Dodge Data & Analytics, New York.
Federal Highway Adminstration. (1988). “Highway statistics series, table VM-2.” Washington, DC.
Federal Highway Adminstration. (2010a). “Highway statistics series, table HF-2.” Washington, DC.
Federal Highway Adminstration. (2010b). “Highway statistics series, table HM-20.” Washington, DC.
Federal Highway Adminstration. (2010c). “Highway statistics series, table VM-1.” Washington, DC.
Federal Highway Adminstration. (2012). “Highway statistics series, table HM-71.” Washington, DC.
Florida DOT. (2014). “Generic cost per mile models.” Tallahassee, FL.
Gambatese, J. A., and Rajendran, S. (2005). “Sustainable roadway construction: Energy consumption and material waste generation of roadways.” Proc., Construction Research Congress 2005: Broadening Perspectives, ASCE, Reston, VA, 104–110.
Häkkinen, T., and Mäkelä, K. (1996). “Environmental adaption of concrete. Environmental impact of concrete and asphalt pavements.” Technical Research Center of Finland, Espoo, Finland.
Hall, K. T., Correa, C. E., Carpenter, S. H., and Elliot, R. P. (2001). “Rehabilitation strategies for highway pavements.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Horvath, A., and Hendrickson, C. (1998). “Comparison of environmental implications of asphalt and steel-reinforced concrete pavements.”, 105–113.
Huang, Y., Bird, R., and Heidrich, O. (2009). “Development of a life cycle assessment tool for construction and maintenance of asphalt pavements.” J. Cleaner Prod., 17(2), 283–296.
Kim, B., Lee, H., Park, H., and Kim, H. (2012). “Framework for estimating greenhouse gas emissions due to asphalt pavement construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 1312–1321.
Lidicker, J., Sathaye, N., Madanat, S., and Horvath, A. (2012). “Pavement resurfacing policy for minimization of life-cycle costs and greenhouse gas emissions.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 129–137.
Linn, W. S., Szlachcic, Y., Gong, H., Jr., Kinney, P. L., and Berhane, K. T. (2000). “Air pollution and daily hospital admissions in Metropolitan Los Angeles.” Environ. Health Perspect., 108(5), 427–434.
Loijos, A., Santero, N., and Ochsendorf, J. (2013). “Life cycle climate impacts of the U.S. concrete pavement network.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 72, 76–83.
Los Angeles City Bureau of Street Services. (2011). “State of the streets report.” City of Los Angeles–Dept. of Public Works, Los Angeles.
Los Angeles City Bureau of Street Services. (2013). “Proposed budget—Detail of department programs.” City of Los Angeles–Dept. of Public Works, Los Angeles.
Moretti, E., and Neidell, M. (2011). “Pollution, health, and avoidance behavior evidence from the Ports of Los Angeles.” J. Hum. Resour., 46(1), 154–175.
Mroueh, U.-M., Eskola, P., Laine-Ylijoki, J., Wellman, K., Juvankaski, E. M. M., and Ruotoistenmaki, A. (1999). “Life cycle assessment of road construction.” Finnish National Road Adminstration, Helsinki, Finland.
Poston, B. (2013). “L.A.full of roads to ruin for cars.” 〈http://articles.latimes.com/2013/may/04/local/la-me-pavement-20130505〉.
Reyna, J., and Chester, M. (2015). “The growth of urban building stock: Unintended lock-in and embedded environmental effects.” J. Ind. Ecol., 19(4), 524–537.
RSMeans. (2014). “Construction cost estimator.” Reed Construction Data, Rockland, MA.
Santero, N. J., Harvey, J., and Horvath, A. (2011). “Environmental policy for long-life pavements.” Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ., 16(2), 129–136.
Santero, N. J., and Horvath, A. (2009). “Global warming potential of pavements.” Environ. Res. Lett., 4(3), 034011.
Sathaye, N., Horvath, A., and Madanat, S. (2010). “Unintended impacts of increased truck loads on pavement supply-chain emissions.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract., 44(1), 1–14.
Schrank, D., Eisele, B., and Lomax, T. (2012). “2012 urban mobility report.” Texas A&M Transportation Institute, College Station, TX.
Small, K. A., and Winston, C. (1988). “Optimal highway durability.” Am. Econ. Rev., 78(3), 560–569.
Sorensen, P., Wachs, M., Min, E. Y., Kofner, A., and Ecola, L. (2008). Moving Los Angeles: Short-term policy options for improving transportation, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
Southern California Association of Governments. (2012). “Regional transportation plan 2012–2035, transportation conformity appendix.” Los Angeles.
Thomas Brothers Map Company. (2009). “Los Angeles county street network.” 〈http://egis3.lacounty.gov/dataportal/2011/02/01/street-network/〉 (Mar. 1, 2013).
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statstics. (2014). “Producer price index.” Washington, DC.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2014). “Population estimates—Los Angeles County, CA.” Washington, DC.
U.S. Energy Information Adminstration. (2013). “Table 5.24 retail motor gasoline and on-highway diesel fuel prices, 1949–2012.” Washington, DC.
U.S. EPA. (2014). “Motor vehicle emission simulator.” Washington, DC.
USGS. (2006). “Materials in use in U.S. interstate highways.” U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Denver.
Wachs, M. (1996). “The evolution of transportation policy in Los Angeles: Images of past policy and future prospect.” Chapter 5, The city: Los Angeles and urban theory at the end of the twentieth century, A. J. Scott and E. Soja, eds., Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 106–159.
Wang, T., Lee, I.-S., Kendall, A., Harvey, J., Lee, E.-B., and Kim, C. (2012). “Life cycle energy consumption and GHG emission from pavement rehabilitation with different rolling resistance.” J. Cleaner Prod., 33, 86–96.
Warneke, C., et al. (2012). “Multiyear trends in volatile organic compounds in Los Angeles, California: Five decades of decreasing emissions.” J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 117(D21).
White, P., Golden, J. S., Biligiri, K. P., and Kaloush, K. (2010). “Modeling climate change impacts of pavement production and construction.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 54(11), 776–782.
Wunch, D., Wennberg, P., Toon, G., Keppel-Aleks, G., and Yavin, Y. (2009). “Emissions of greenhouse gases from a North American Megacity.” Geophys. Res. Lett., 36(15).
Yu, B. (2013). “Environmental implications of pavements: A life cycle review.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
Zapata, P., and Gambatese, J. A. (2005). “Energy consumption of asphalt and reinforced concrete pavement materials and construction.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 9–20.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 22Issue 1March 2016

History

Received: Nov 26, 2014
Accepted: Jul 16, 2015
Published online: Oct 8, 2015
Published in print: Mar 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Mar 8, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Andrew Fraser [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Civil, Environmental, and Sustainable Engineering, Arizona State Univ., 660 South College Ave., Tempe, AZ 85287-3005 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Mikhail V. Chester, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Civil, Environmental, and Sustainable Engineering, Arizona State Univ., 660 South College Ave., Tempe, AZ 85287-3005. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share