Reduction of Impulse-Response Data on Rigid Pavement: Comparison of Single Degree of Freedom, Cone, and Lumped Parameter Dynamic Models
Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 21, Issue 4
Abstract
The Impulse Response (IR) method is a nondestructive method that has been successfully used to detect voids or loss of support underneath rigid pavement and to evaluate the pavement subgrade. Voids or loss of support can be detected due to changes in the pavement’s mobility spectra, while the subgrade is evaluated based on the static stiffness. The fundamental assumption of the IR method is that the response of rigid pavements can be represented by a single degree of freedom (SDOF) system, with the controlling stiffness being that of the subgrade. Although simple to analyze, this oversimplification of a complex dynamic problem introduces deficiencies that are primarily attributed to a deviation of the shape of the impedance function for rigid pavement systems from that of an SDOF system for frequencies beyond the fundamental frequency. Other dynamic models [i.e., cone and lumped parameter (LP)] are investigated as alternatives to the SDOF model and are implemented in the reduction of field data collected with the Seismic Pavement Analyzer (SPA). These alternative models with additional degrees of freedom provide a significantly better representation of the effect of individual pavement layers and the subgrade on the overall pavement response, and a better fit to the pavement dynamic response curve. In general, the SDOF model results in a higher modulus compared to the cone and lumped parameter models. However, no consistent trend was established between the moduli from the different models, especially when there is a loss of pavement support or void underneath the pavement. Part of the field data used in the analysis came from a grouting program to repair a rigid pavement with voids underneath the slabs. The IR method was successfully used to evaluate support conditions before and after grouting and to determine the effectiveness of the program.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Dobry, R., and Gazetas, G. (1986). “Dynamic response of arbitrary shaped foundations.” J. Geotech. Eng., 109–135.
Gucunski, N., and Jackson, H. (2001a). “Finite element analysis of the impulse response technique for void detection underneath rigid pavements.” Proc., 6th Int. Conf. Previous Experience and Current Innovations in Nondestructive Testing, Slovenian Society of Non-Destructive Testing, 339–348.
Gucunski, N., and Jackson, H. (2001b). “Void detection underneath rigid pavements: Numerical simulation of the impulse response method.” Proc., Symp. the Application of Geophysics to Eng. and Environ. Problems (SAGEEP), Environment and Engineering Geophysical Society.
Higgs, J. S., and Robertson, S. A. (1979). “Integrity testing of concrete piles by shock method.” Concrete, 13, 31–33.
Hoffman, M. S., and Thompson, M. R. (1981). “Mechanistic interpretation of nondestructive pavement testing deflections.”, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL.
Hsieh, T. K. (1962). “Foundation vibrations.” Proc., Institute of Civil Engineers, Vol. 22, 211–226.
Lysmer, J. (1965). “Vertical motions of rigid footings.” Ph.D. thesis Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Nazarian, S., Baker, M., and Crain, K. (1993). “Development and testing of a seismic pavement analyzer.”, Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
Nazarian, S., Baker, M., and Reddy, S. (1994). “Determination of voids under rigid pavements using impulse response method.”, ASTM, Philadelphia, 473–487.
Richart, F. E., and Whitman, R., V. (1967). “Comparison of footing vibration tests with theory.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Eng. Div., 93(SM6), 143–167.
Roesset, M. (1980). “Stiffness and damping coefficients of foundations.” Dynamic response of pile foundations: Analytical aspects, ASCE, New York, 1–30.
Veletsos, A. S., and Verbic, B. (1974). “Basic response functions for elastic foundations.” J. Eng. Mech. Div., 100(2), 189–202.
Wolf, J. P. (1994). Foundation vibration analysis using simple physical models, PTR Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 19, 2014
Accepted: Mar 26, 2015
Published online: Jun 3, 2015
Discussion open until: Nov 3, 2015
Published in print: Dec 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.