Technical Papers
Feb 25, 2014

Fuzzy-Based Model for Predicting Failure of Oil Pipelines

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 20, Issue 4

Abstract

Oil and gas pipelines transport millions of dollars of goods worldwide every day. Even though they are the safest way to transport petroleum products, pipelines do still sometimes fail, generating hazardous and irreparable environmental damages. Many models have been developed in the last decade to predict pipeline failures and conditions. However, most of these models were limited to one failure type, such as corrosion failure, or relied mainly on expert opinions. The objective of this paper is to develop a fuzzy-based model to predict the failure type of oil pipelines using historical data of pipeline accidents. The model was able to satisfactorily predict pipeline failures due to mechanical, operational, corrosion, third-party, and natural hazards with an average percent validity of 83%. This research contributes to the body of knowledge by developing a robust failure type prediction model for oil pipelines using a fuzzy approach. The model will assist pipeline operators to predict the expected failure type(s) in order to take the necessary preventive actions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support provided by Qatar National Research Fund (QNRF) for this research project under award No. QNRF-NPRP 09-901-2-343.

References

Ahammed, M. (1998). “Probabilistic estimation of remaining life of a pipeline in the presence of active corrosion defects.” Int. J. Pres. Ves. Pip., 75(4), 321–329.
Bersani, C., Citro, L., Gagliardi, R. V., Sacile, R., and Tomasoni, A. M. (2010). “Accident occurance evaluation in the pipeline transport dangerous goods.” Chem. Eng. Trans., 19, 249–254.
Bertolini, M., and Bevilacqua, N. (2006). “Methodology and theory oil pipeline cause analysis a classification tree approach.” J. Qual. Mainten. Eng., 12(2), 186–198.
Chao, L., and Skibniewski, M. (1998). “Fuzzy logic for evaluating alternative construction technology.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 297–304.
Davis, P. M., Dubois, J., Gambardella, F., and Uhlig, F. (2010). “Performance of European cross-country oil pipelines: Statistical summary of reported spillages in 2008 and since 1971.” CONCAWE Oil Pipelines Management Group, Special Task Force, Brussels.
Dawotola, A. W., VanGelder, P. H. A. J. M., and Vrijling, J. K. (2009). “Risk assessment of petroleum pipelines using a combined analytical hierarchy process—fault tree analysis (AHP-FTA).” Proc., 7th Int. Probabilistic Workshop, Dirk Proske Verlag, Delft, The Netherlands.
Detyniecki, M., Moubeche, B., and Bouchon-Meunier, B. (2012). “On the paradoxical success of mamdani’s minimum-based inference.” Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Combining Experimentation and Theory, Vol. 271. Scientific Publishing Services, Springer, Chennai, India, 259–270.
Dey, P. K. (2001). “A risk based model for inspection and maintenance of cross country petroleum pipelines.” J. Qual. Mainten. Eng., 7(1), 25–43.
Dey, P. K., Ogunlana, S. O., and Naksuksakul, S. (2004). “Risk-based maintenance model for offshore oil and gas pipelines: A case study.” J. Qual. Mainten. Eng., 10(3), 169–183.
Dikmen, I., Birgonul, M., and Kiziltas, S. (2005). “Prediction of organizational effectiveness in construction companies.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 252–261.
Elbeltagi, E. E., and Hegazy, T. (2001). “A hybrid Ai-based system for site layout planning in construction.” Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 16(2), 79–93.
Fishman, G. S. (1996). Monte Carlo: Concepts, algorithms, and applications, Springer, New York.
Fu, G., Kapelan, Z., and Reed, P. (2012). “Reducing the complexity of multiobjective water distribution system optimization through global sensitivity analysis.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 196–207.
Goodland, R. (2005). “Oil and gas pipelines social and environmental impact assessment: State of the art.” IAIA 2005 Conf., Robert Goodland, McLean, VA.
Hallen, J. M., Caleyo, F., and Gonzalez, J. L. (2003). “Probabilistic condition assessment of corroding pipelines in Mexico.” Proc., 3rd Pan American Conf. for Nondestructive Testing (PANNDT), Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY.
Hanna, A. S., and Lotfallah, W. B. (1999). “A fuzzy logic approach to the selection of cranes.” Autom. Constr., 8(5), 597–608.
Horstkotte, E. (2002). “What is a fuzzy expert system?” Togai InfraLogic, 〈http://www.austinlinks.com/Fuzzy/expert-systems.html〉 (Sept. 18, 2013).
Hwang, G. J., and Huang, S. T. (1999). “A new environment for developing fuzzy expert systems.” J. Inform. Sci. Eng., 15(1), 53–69.
Karwowski, W., and Mital, A. (1986). “Potential applications of fuzzy sets in industrial safety engineering.” Fuzzy Set Syst., 19(2), 105–120.
Kennedy, J. L. (1993). Oil and gas pipeline fundamentals, 2nd Ed., PennWell Publishing Company, Oklahoma.
Khatri, K. B., Vairavamoorthy, K., and Akinyemi, E. (2011). “Framework for computing a performance index for urban infrastructure systems using a fuzzy set approach.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 163–175.
Li, S. X., Yu, S. R., Zeng, H. L., Li, J. H., and Liang, R. (2009). “Predicting corrosion remaining life of underground pipelines with a mechanically-based probabilistic model.” J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., 65(3–4), 162–166.
Meesad, P. (2001). “Quantitative measures of a fuzzy expert system.” Final Rep. IEEE NNC Student Summer Research, Intelligent Systems and Control Laboratory, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Oklahoma State Univ., IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC.
Miller, G. A. (1956). “The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.” Psychol. Rev., 63(2), 81–97.
Muhlbauer, W. K. (2004). Pipeline risk management manual, 3rd Ed., Gulf Professional Publishing, Burlington, MD.
Noor, N. M., Ozman, N. A. N., and Yahaya, N. O. R. D. I. N. (2011). “Deterministic prediction of corroding pipeline remaining strength in marine environment using DNV RP—F101 (Part A).” J. Sustain. Sci. Manage., 6(1), 69–78.
Noor, N. M., Yahaya, N., Ozman, N. A. N., and Othman, S. R. (2010). “The forecasting residual life of corroding pipeline based on semi-probabilistic method.” UNIMAS J. Civ. Eng., 1(2), 246–263.
Panetta, P. D., Diaz, A. A., Pappas, R. A., Taylor, T. T., Francini, R. B., and Johnson, K. I. (2001). Mechanical damage characterization in pipelines, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, U.S. Dept. of Energy, Richland, WA.
Peng, X. Y., Zhang, P., and Chen, L. Q. (2009). “Long-distance oil/gas pipeline failure rate prediction based on fuzzy neural network model.” CSIE 2009 Proc., World Congress on Computer Science and Information Engineering, Vol. 5, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC.
Robert, C. P., and Casella, G. (2004). Monte Carlo statistical methods, Springer, New York.
Saltelli, A., and Annoni, P. (2010). “How to avoid a perfunctory sensitivity analysis.” Environ. Modell. Softw., 25(12), 1508–1517.
Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., and Ratto, M. (2004). Sensitivity analysis in practice: A guide to assessing scientific models, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, England.
Senouci, A., El-Abbasy, M. S., Elwakil, E., Abdrabou, B., and Zayed, T. (2011). “A model for predicting failure of oil pipelines.” J. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 1–13.
Singh, M., and Markeset, T. (2009). “A methodology for risk-based inspection planning of oil and gas pipes based on fuzzy logic framework.” Eng. Fail. Anal., 16(7), 2098–2113.
Sinha, S. K., and Pandey, M. D. (2002). “Probabilistic neural network for reliability assessment of oil and gas pipelines.” Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 17(5), 320–329.
Sobol, I. M. (2001). “Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their monte carlo estimates.” Math. Comput. Simulat., 55(1–3), 271–280.
Tang, Y., Reed, P., Van Werkhoven, K., and Wagener, T. (2007a). “Advancing the identification and evaluation of distributed rainfall-runoff models using global sensitivity analysis.” Water Resour. Res., 43(6), W06415.
Tang, Y., Reed, P., Wagener, T., and Van Werkhoven, K. (2007b). “Comparing sensitivity analysis methods to advance lumped watershed model identification and evaluation.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 11(2), 793–817.
Tsoukalas, L. H., and Uhrig, R. E. (1997). Fuzzy and neural approaches in engineering, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
Wilson, P., Wheeler, D., Wilson, R., Coleman, R., and Wolfe, N. (1997). An Assessment of Low Pressure Crude Oil Pipelines and Crude Oil Gathering Lines in California, Office of State Fire Marshal, Pipeline Safety and Enforcement Division, Sacramento, CA.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). “Fuzzy sets.” Inf. Control, 8(3), 338–353.
Zayed, T. (2005). “Selecting pile construction method using fuzzy approach.” Proc., Construction Research Congress Conf., ASCE, Reston, VA.
Zayed, T. M., and Halpin, D. W. (2005). “Deterministic models for assessing productivity and cost of bored piles.” J. Constr. Manage. Econ., 23(5), 531–543.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 20Issue 4December 2014

History

Received: Sep 5, 2012
Accepted: Jul 22, 2013
Published online: Feb 25, 2014
Discussion open until: Jul 25, 2014
Published in print: Dec 1, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ahmed Senouci [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Qatar Univ., P.O. Box 2713, Doha, Qatar. E-mail: [email protected]
Mohamed S. El-Abbasy [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia Univ., Montreal, QC, Canada H3G 1M8. E-mail: [email protected]
Tarek Zayed [email protected]
M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia Univ., Montreal, QC, Canada H3G 1M8 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share