Technical Papers
May 2, 2012

Using the Economic and Financial Reequilibrium Model to Decrease Infrastructure Contract Incompleteness

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 19, Issue 1

Abstract

Renegotiations are becoming an undesirable protagonist in infrastructure concessions, raising doubts about the merit of this procurement model. Renegotiations emerge as a consequence of contract incompleteness. When contracts are unable to forecast conditions in the long run and anticipate all possible contingencies, they become obsolete, and both parties must negotiate new terms. The economic and financial reequilibrium (EFR) model, applied in most infrastructure concessions contracts in Portugal, provides a tool to manage the renegotiation process. Given that it is not possible, or affordable, to write complete contracts because of high transaction costs, parties negotiate the rules under which the process of renegotiation might occur. By doing so, it is possible to reduce the incompleteness of contracts, but the model is not immune to opportunistic behaviors. This paper reflects on the effects of the EFR model by providing real data and a case study of a concession and provides some alternatives that are able to improve the performance and management of infrastructure contracts regarding the renegotiation phenomenon.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., and Rey, P. (1994). “Renegotiation design with unverifiable information.” Econometrica, 62(2), 257–282.
Allen, G. (2001). “The private finance initiative (PFI).”, Economic Policy and Statistics Section, House of Commons Library, London.
Artana, D., Navajas, F., and Urbiztondo, S. (1998). “Regulation and contractual adaptation in public utilities: The case of Argentina.”, Inter-American Development Bank, Sustainable Development Department, Infrastructure and Financial Markets Division, Washington, DC.
Baeza, M. A., and Vassallo, J. M. (2010). “Private concession contracts for toll roads in Spain: Analysis and recommendations.” Public Money Manage., 30(5), 299–304.
Bennett, J., and Iossa, E. (2006). “Building and managing facilities for public services.” J. Public Econ., 90(10), 2143–2160.
Betancor, O., and Rendeiro, R. (1999). Regulating privatized infrastructure and airport services, World Bank Institute, Washington, DC.
Bosch-Rekveldt, M., Jongkind, Y., Mooi, H., Bakker, H., and Verbraeck, A. (2011). “Grasping project complexity in large engineering projects: The TOE (technical, organizational and environmental) framework.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 29(6), 728–739.
Chadwick, E. (1859). “Results of different principles of legislation and administration in Europe: Of competition for the field, as compared with the competition within the field of service.” J. Royal Stat. Soc. London, 22(3), 381–420.
Coase, R. H. (1960). “The problem of social cost.” J. Law Econ., 3(1), 1–44.
Crocker, K., and Reynolds, K. J. (1993). “The efficiency of incomplete contracts: An empirical analysis of air force engine procurement.” Rand J. Econ., 24(1), 126–146.
Cruz, C. O., and Marques, R. C. (2012). “Exogenous determinants for renegotiating public infrastructure concessions: evidence from Portugal.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., (submitted).
Cruz, C. O., and Marques, R. C. (2013). “Endogenous determinants of concession renegotiation: evidence from local infrastructure.” Local Govern. Stud. (in press).
Demsetz, H. (1968). “Why regulate utilities?” J. Law Econ., 11(1), 55–65.
Dewatripont, M. (1988). “Commitment through renegotiation-proof contracts with third parties.” Rev. Econ. Stud., 55(3), 377–390.
Engel, E., Fischer, R., and Galetovic, A. (2003). “Privatizing highways in Latin America: Is it possible to fix what went wrong?” Economia, 4(1), 129–143.
Engel, E., Fischer, R., and Galetovic, R. (2009). “Soft budgets and renegotiations in public-private partnerships.”, Yale Univ., New Haven, CT.
Estache, A., Guasch, J. L., and Trujillo, L. (2009). “Multidimensionality and renegotiation: Evidence from transport-sector public-private-partnership transactions in Latin America.” Rev. Ind. Organ., 35(1–2), 41–71.
Ezulike, E. I., Perry, J. G., and Hawwash, K. (1997). “The barriers to entry into the PFI market.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage., 4(3), 179–193.
Flyvbjerg, B., Holm, S. M. K., and Buhl, S. L. (2004). “What causes cost overrun in transport infrastructure projects?” Transport Rev., 24(1), 3–18.
Goldberg, V. P. (1987). “Price adjustment in long-term contracts: A case-study of petroleum coke.” J. Law Econ., 30(2), 369–398.
Gómez-Ibañez, J. (2003). Regulating infrastructure: Monopoly, contracts, and discretion, 3rd Ed., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Green, J. R., and Laffont, J. (1992). “Renegotiation and the form of efficient contracts.” Ann. Econ. Stat., 25, 123–150.
Grimsey, D., and Lewis, M. (2002). “Evaluating the risks of public private partnerships for infrastructure projects.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 20(2), 107–118.
Guasch, J. L. (2004). Granting and renegotiating infrastructure concessions: Doing it right, World Bank Institute (WBI) Development Studies, Washington, DC.
Guasch, J. L., Laffont, J., and Straub, S. (2008). “Renegotiation of concession contracts in Latin America: Evidence from the water and transport sectors.” Int. J. Ind. Organ., 26(2), 421–442.
Hart, O., and Moore, J. (2003). “Incomplete contracts and public ownership: Remarks, and an application to public-private partnerships.” Econ. J., 113(486), 69–76.
Hart, O., and Moore, J. (2007). “Incomplete contracts and ownership: Some new thoughts.” Am. Econ. Rev., 97(2), 182–186.
Hong, H., and Shum, M. (2002). “Increasing competition and the winner’s curse: Evidence from procurement.” Rev. Econ. Stud., 69(4), 871–898.
Jones, B. D. (1994). Reconceiving decision-making in democratic politics: Attention, choice, and public policy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Ke, Y., Wang, S., and Chan, A. P. C. (2010). “Risk allocation in public-private partnership infrastructure projects: Comparative study.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 16(4), 343–351.
Koch, C., and Buser, M. (2006). “Emerging metagovernance as an institutional framework for public private partnerships networks in Denmark.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 24(7), 548–556.
Marques, R. C., and Berg, S. (2010). “Revisiting the strengths and limitations of regulatory contracts in infrastructure industries.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 16(4), 334–342.
Marques, R. C., and Berg, S. (2011). “Risks, contracts and private sector participation in infrastructure.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 137(11), 925–932.
Marrewijk, A., Clegg, S. R., Pitsis, T. S., and Veenswijk, M. (2008). “Managing public-private megaprojects: Paradoxes, complexity, and project design.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 26(6), 591–600.
Martins, A. C., Marques, R. C., and Cruz, C. O. (2011). “Public-private partnerships for wind power generation: The Portuguese case.” Energy Policy, 39(1), 94–104.
Meda, F. (2007). “A game theory approach for the allocation of risks in transport public private partnerships.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 25(3), 213–218.
Nisar, T. (2007). “Risk management in public-private partnership contracts.” Public Organ. Rev., 7(1), 1–19.
Nombela, G., and Rus, G. (2004). “Flexible-term contracts for road franchising.” Transport. Res. A-Policy Pract., 38(3), 163–179.
Pantelias, A., and Zhang, A. (2010). “Methodological framework for evaluation of financial viability of public-private partnerships: Investment risk approach.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 16(4), 241–250.
Skamris, M. K., and Flyvbjerg, B. (1997). “Inaccuracy of traffic forecasts and cost estimates on large transport projects.” Transport Policy, 4(3), 141–146.
Tirole, J. (1986). “Procurement and renegotiation.” J Polit. Econ., 94(2), 235–259.
Truitt, L., and Esler, M. (1996). “Airport privatization.” Policy Stud. J., 24(1), 100–110.
Ubbels, B., and Verhoed, E. T. (2008). “Auctioning concessions for private roads.” Transport. Res. A-Policy, 42(1), 155–172.
Vives, A., Benavides, J., and Paris, A. M. (2010). “Selecting infrastructure delivery modalities: No time for ideology or semantics.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 136(4), 412–418.
Williamson, O. E. (1976). “Franchise bidding for natural monopolies—In general and with respect to CATV.” Bell J. Econ., 7(1), 73–104.
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institution of capitalism, Free Press, New York.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 19Issue 1March 2013
Pages: 58 - 66

History

Received: Jun 27, 2011
Accepted: Apr 30, 2012
Published online: May 2, 2012
Published in print: Mar 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Carlos Oliveira Cruz [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Instituto Superior Técnico, Technical Univ. of Lisbon, Ave. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Rui Cunha Marques [email protected]
Associate Professor, Center for Management Studies (CEG-IST), Technical Univ. of Lisbon, Ave. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share