Technical Papers
Sep 10, 2011

Pavement Network Maintenance Optimization Considering Multidimensional Condition Data

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 18, Issue 4

Abstract

Pavement management systems inventory historical and current conditions of roadway networks, predict the future conditions of such networks, and suggest schedules for maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation activities. Such systems typically rely on a composite condition index, a one-dimensional and often discrete measure of the overall structural health and/or serviceability of pavement. The index is used during deterioration modeling, user and agency cost estimation, and selection and scheduling of maintenance activities. Pavement can suffer from a large number of related but distinct distresses. Difficulties associated with unobserved heterogeneity have hampered efforts to accurately model deterioration through composite condition indexes. At the same time, optimization techniques used to generate recommended maintenance plans have been shown both to be sensitive to deterioration model specification and to become computationally intractable as condition data increase. This research describes how a large network of related sections of pavement, each one of which may be plagued by a number of different distresses, can be managed without reducing condition data to a composite index. The use of approximate dynamic programming mitigates the curse of dimensionality that has haunted distinct Markov decision problem formulations of the maintenance optimization problem and limited their complexity. A computational study illustrates how the proposed approach leads to more sophisticated maintenance decision rules, which can be used to ensure the suggestions of pavement management systems more closely match engineering best practices. The use of multidimensional condition data can also yield more accurate deterioration models and cost estimates. The techniques introduced in this paper in the context of pavement management could easily be applied within any infrastructure management system.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Ben-Akiva, M., and Gopinath, D. (1995). “Modeling infrastructure performance and user costs.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 1(1), 33–43.
Ben-Akiva, M., and Ramaswamy, R. (1993). “An approach for predicting latent infrastructure facility deterioration.” Transp. Sci., 27(2), 174–193.
Burger, W., Canisius, P. P., and Sulten, P. (1994). “Toward a new pavement management system in Germany: Organization, data collection, experiences, and innovations.” 3rd Int. Conf. on Managing Pavements, Vol. 1, Transportation Research Board (TRB) Committee on Pavement Management Systems, San Antonio, TX, 150–160.
Carnahan, J., Davis, W., Shahin, M., Keane, P., and Wu, M. (1987). “Optimal maintenance decisions for pavement management.” J. Transp. Eng., 113(5), 554–572.
Childress, S., and Durango-Cohen, P. (2005). “On parallel machine replacement problems with general replacement cost functions and stochastic deterioration.” Nav. Res. Logist., 52(5), 409–419.
Chu, C., and Durango-Cohen, P. (2007). “Estimation of infrastructure performance models using statespace specications of time series models.” Transp. Res. Part C, 15(1), 17–32.
Durango-Cohen, P. (2007). “A time series analysis framework for transportation infrastructure management.” Transp. Res. Part B, 41(5), 493–505.
Durango-Cohen, P., and Tadepalli, N. (2006). “Using advanced inspection technologies to support investments in maintenance and repair of transportation infrastructure facilities.” J. Transp. Eng., 132(1), 60–68.
Gharaibeh, N. G., Zou, Y., and Saliminejad, S. (2010). “Assessing the agreement among pavement condition indices.” J. Transp. Eng., 136(8), 765–772.
Golabi, K., Kulkarni, R., and Way, G. (1982). “A statewide pavement management system.” Interfaces, 12(6), 5–21.
Golabi, K., and Shepard, R. (1997). “Pontis: A system for maintenance optimization and improvement of US bridge networks.” Interfaces, 27(1), 71–88.
Golroo, A., and Tighe, S. (2009). “Fuzzy set approach to condition assessments of novel sustainable pavements in the Canadian climate.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 36(5), 754–764.
Henning, T. (2008). “The development of pavement deterioration models on the state highway network of New Zealand.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Auckland, Aukland, New Zealand.
Humplick, F. (1992). “Highway pavement distress evaluation: Modeling measurement error.” Transp. Res. Part B, 26(2), 135–154.
Kuhn, K. (2010). “Network-level infrastructure management using approximate dynamic programming.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 16(2), 103–111.
Kuhn, K., and Madanat, S. (2005). “Robust maintenance and rehabilitation policies for a system of infrastructure facilities.” Transp. Res. Part C, 13(5–6), 391–404.
Madanat, S. (1993). “Optimal infrastructure management decisions under uncertainty.” Transp. Res. Part C, 1(1), 77–88.
Madanat, S., and Ben-Akiva, M. (1994). “Optimal inspection and repair policies for infrastructure facilities.” Transp. Sci., 28(1), 55–62.
Madanat, S., Bulusu, S., and Mahmoud, A. (1995). “Estimation of infrastructure distress initiation and progression models.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 1(3), 146–150.
Paterson, W. D. O. (1987). Road deterioration and maintenance effects: Models for planning and management, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Powell, W. (2007). Approximate dynamic programming: Solving the curses of dimensionality, Wiley, New York.
Prozzi, J., and Madanat, S. (2003). “Incremental nonlinear model for predicting pavement serviceability.” J. Transp. Eng., 129(6), 635–641.
Tighe, S., Ningyuan, L., and Kazmierowski, T. (2008). “Evaluation of semiautomated and automated pavement distress collection for network-level pavement management.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Wirahadikusumah, R., Abraham, D., and Iseley, T. (2001). “Challenging issues in modeling deterioration of combined sewers.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 7(2), 77–84.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 18Issue 4December 2012
Pages: 270 - 277

History

Received: Feb 2, 2011
Accepted: Sep 8, 2011
Published online: Sep 10, 2011
Published in print: Dec 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Kenneth D. Kuhn [email protected]
RAND Corporation, 1776 Main St., Santa Monica, CA; formerly, Dept. of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, Univ. of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share