Dominance-Based Rough Set Approach to Budget Allocation in Highway Maintenance Activities
Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 17, Issue 2
Abstract
This paper presents a decision-support system for the management of highway assets that uses a dominance-based rough set approach (DRSA). The decision concerns the allocation of maintenance funds among various highways owned by a central agency, and it takes into account multiple evaluation criteria. The proposed methodology supports the distribution of available resources to improve safety on highways, and it considers the current condition of each component of the highway infrastructure (pavements, bridges, signs, guardrails, culverts, and vegetation). The multiple-criteria decision problem in this paper is a sorting problem, i.e., the highways are assigned to preference-ordered classes, and the resources are allocated according to this sorting. The DRSA enables consideration of the quantitative and qualitative criteria, and it provides recommendations in terms of if-then decision rules, which are easily understandable by the decision maker. This approach enables an interaction between the analyst and the decision maker, and the decision maker’s preferences can be considered in the allocation of funds. This paper then presents an application of the proposed methodology to a case study performed for an Italian highway agency.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the reviewers and the editor for constructive remarks on earlier versions of this paper.
References
Abaza, K. A., Ashur, S., Abu-Eisheh, S., and Rabay, A. (2001). “Macroscopic optimum system for management of pavement rehabilitation.” J. Transp. Eng., 127(6), 493–500.
Augeri, M. G., Cafiso, S., and La Cava, G. (2004). “Road safety evaluation using GIS for accident analysis.” Sustainable planning and development, E. Beriatos, C. A. Brebbia, H. Coccossis, and A. G. Kungolos, eds., Wit, Southampton, UK, 547–554.
Blaszcynsi, J., Greco, S., and Slowinski, R. (2007). “Multi-criteria classification—A new scheme for application of dominance-based decision rules.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 181(3), 1030–1044.
Chan, W. T., Fwa, T. F., and Tan, J. Y. (2003). “Optimal fund-allocation analysis for multidistrict highway agencies.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 9(4), 167–175.
Cowe Falls, L., Haas, R. C. G., McNeil, S., and Tighe, S. L. (2001). “Using common elements of asset management to maximize overall benefits.” Proc., Transportation Research Board 80th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Figueira, J., Greco, S., and Ehrgott, M., eds. (2005). Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys, Springer, New York.
Fishburn, P. C. (1967). “Methods for estimating additive utilities.” Manage. Sci., 13, 435–453.
Fwa, T. F., and Chan, W. T. (1993). “Priority rating of highway maintenance needs neural network.” J. Transp. Eng., 119(3), 419–433.
Fwa, T. F., Chan, W. T., and Hoque, K. (2000). “Multiobjective optimization for pavement maintenance programming.” J. Transp. Eng., 126(5), 367–374.
Fwa, T. F., Sinha, K. C., and Riverson, J. D. N. (1988). “Highway routine maintenance programming at network level.” J. Transp. Eng., 114(5), 539–554.
Gao, L., Xie, C., and Zhang, Z. (2010). “Network-level multi-objective optimal maintenance and rehabilitation scheduling.” Proc., Transportation Research Board 89th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Gao, L., and Zhang, Z. (2007). “Using Markov process and method of moments for optimizing management strategies of pavement infrastructure.” Proc., Transportation Research Board 86th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Gao, L., and Zhang, Z. (2008). “Robust optimization for managing pavement maintenance and rehabilitation.” Proc., Transportation Research Board 87th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Gharaibeth, N. G., and Darter, M. I. (1999). “Development of prototype highway asset management system.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 5(2), 61–68.
Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., and Slowinski, R. (1999). “The use of rough sets and fuzzy sets in MCDM.” Chapter 14, Advances in multiple criteria decision making, T. Gal, T. Stewart, and T. Hanne, eds., Kluwer Academic, Boston, 14.1–14.59.
Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., and Slowinski, R. (2001). “Rough sets methodology for multi-criteria decision analysis.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 129, 1–47.
Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., and Slowinski, R. (2002a). “Rough sets methodology for sorting problems in presence of multiple attributes and criteria.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 138, 247–259.
Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., and Slowinski, R. (2002b). “Rough approximation by dominance relations.” Int. J. Intelligent Syst., 17(2), 153–171.
Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., and Slowinski, R. (2005). “Decision rule approach.” Chapter 13, Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys, J. Figueira, S. Greco, and M. Ehrgott, eds., Springer-Verlag, New York, 507–562.
Hugo, F., Scholtz, W. J., Sinclair, M., and Curtayne, P. C. (1989). “Management of pavement rehabilitation.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 42, 129–141.
Jiang, R., Zhang, W. J., and Ji, P. (2004). “Selecting the best alternative based on life-cycle cost distributions of alternatives.” Int. J. Prod. Econ., 89, 69–75.
Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H. (1976). Decision with multiple objectives—Preferences and value tradeoffs, Wiley, New York.
Kuhn, K. D., and Madanat, S. M. (2005). “Model uncertainty and management of a system of infrastructure facilities.” Transp. Res. Part C, 13, 391–404.
Li, Y., and Madanat, S. (2002). “A steady-state solution for the optimal pavement resurfacing problem.” Transp. Res. Part A, 36, 525–535.
Li, Z., and Puyan, M. (2006). “A stochastic optimization model for highway project selection and programming under budget uncertainty.” Proc., Application of Advanced Technology in Transportation 9th Int. Conf., ASCE, Reston, VA, 74–80.
Liu, C., Hammad, A., and Itoh, Y. (1997). “Multiobjective optimization of bridge deck rehabilitation using a genetic algorithm.” Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 12(6), 431–443.
Martello, S., and Toth, P. (1990). Knapsack problems: Algorithms and computer implementations, Wiley, New York.
Mellano, M., Dell’Orco, M., and Sassanelli, D. (2009). “User-oriented model to support funding decisions in pavement management.” Proc., Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Mousseau, V. (1993). “Problémes liés à l’évaluation de l’importance en aide multicritére à la décision: Réflexions théoriques et expérimentations.” Ph.D. thesis, Université de Paris-Dauphine, Paris (in French).
Northwest Pavement Management Systems Users Group, and Kay, R. K. (1992). Pavement surface condition rating manual, Washington State Transportation Center, Univ. of Washington, Seattle.
Ouyang, Y., and Madanat, S. (2004). “Optimal scheduling of rehabilitation activities for multiple pavement facilities: Exact and approximate solutions.” Transp. Res. Part A, 38, 347–365.
Pilson, C., Hudson, W. R., and Anderson, V. (1999). “Multiobjective optimization in pavement management by using genetic algorithms and efficient surfaces.” Transportation Research Record 1655, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 42–48.
Ravirala, V., and Grivas, D. A. (1995). “Goal-programming methodology for integrating pavement and bridge programs.” J. Transp. Eng., 121(4), 345–351.
Roy, B. (1991). “The outranking approach and the foundation of ELECTRE methods.” Theory Decis., 31(1), 49–73.
Shivakoti, A., and Soleymani, H. R. (2006). “Optimum decision making and uncertainty analysis at the programming level of pavement management systems.” Proc., Transportation Research Board 87th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Sittithumwat, A., Tomsovic, K., and Soudi, F. (1999). “Optimizing maintenance resources in distribution system with limited information.” Proc., 1999 Int. Conf. on Intelligent System Application to Power Systems, National Technical Univ., Athens, Greece.
Slovic, P. (1975). “Choice between equally-valued alternatives.” J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 1, 280–287.
Slowinski, R., Greco, S., and Matarazzo, B. (2005). “Rough set based decision support.” Chapter 16, Search methodologies: Introductory tutorials in optimization and decision support techniques, E. K. Burke and G. Kendall, eds., Springer-Verlag, New York, 475–527.
Slowinski, R., Greco, S., and Matarazzo, B. (2009). “Rough sets in decision making.” Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science, R. A. Meyers, ed., Springer, New York, 7753–7787.
Smith, J. T., and Tighe, S. L. (2006). “Analytic hierarchy process as a tool for infrastructure management.” Transportation Research Record 1974, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 3–9.
Wang, F., Zhang, Z., and Machemehl, R. B. (2003). “Decision-making problem for managing pavement maintenance and rehabilitation projects.” Transportation Research Record 1853, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 21–28.
Worm, J. M., and van Harten, A. (1996). “Model based decision support for planning of road maintenance.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 51(3), 305–316.
Wu, Z., and Flintsch, G. W. (2009). “Pavement preservation optimization considering multiple objectives and budget variability.” J. Transp. Eng., 135(5), 305–315.
Wu, Z., Flintsch, G. W., and Chowdhury, T. (2008). “Hybrid multiobjective optimization model for regional pavement-preservation resource allocation.” Transportation Research Record 2084, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 28–37.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 17 • Issue 2 • June 2011
Pages: 75 - 85
Copyright
© 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 9, 2009
Accepted: Sep 25, 2010
Published online: Oct 9, 2010
Published in print: Jun 1, 2011
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.