Guidance for Cost-Effective Selection of Pavement Marking Materials for Work Zones
Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 17, Issue 2
Abstract
Pavement markings provide important information to motorists, especially in a work zone environment where alignments are often changed from what is typical. Unlike normal roadway applications, work zone pavement markings are often placed on the roadway for a limited period of time, such as during an interim phase of construction. The performance and total cost for each material may vary greatly depending on a number of factors, such as traffic volume, surface type, and project duration. The objective of this study is to develop a systematic approach to provide practitioners with objective guidance for selecting cost-effective pavement marking materials for work zones that meet specific performance requirements. A Monte Carlo simulation and sensitivity analyses were conducted to establish a cost-based decision support guidance given a set of factors influencing the performance of marking materials. Four types of materials considered in this study were paint, thermoplastics, temporary tapes, and traffic buttons. The analysis results indicated that traffic buttons perform slightly better at shorter phase durations and moderate traffic levels on the concrete surface. The use of thermoplastics was recommended as the lowest-cost alternative only on the asphalt surface with moderate project durations and traffic levels. Paint markings are recommended for short-duration projects regardless of traffic conditions or pavement surfaces.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This study was sponsored by, and performed in cooperation with, the Texas Department of TransportationTXDOT and Federal Highway AdministrationFHA. The writers would like to thank Keith K. Knapp for his assistance in this study. In addition, the writers appreciate all the valuable comments and suggestions from the anonymous reviewers.
References
AASHTO. (2005). “2002 NTPEP—Pavement marking materials: Second year field performance & lab test results.” AASHTO’s National Transportation Product Evaluation Program, 2002 Mississippi Test Deck, Washington, DC.
Bahar, G., et al. (2004). “Safety evaluation of raised pavement markers.” Final Rep. NCHRP 518, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.
Benz, R. J., Pike, A. M., Kuchangi, S. P., and Brackett, R. Q. (2009). “Serviceable pavement marking retroreflectivity levels: Technical report.” Research Rep. 0-5656-1, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX.
Daniels, G., Ellis, D. R., and Stockton, W. R. (1999). “Techniques for manually estimating road user costs associated with construction projects.” Final Rep., Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX.
Debaillon, C., Carlson, P. J., He, Y., Schnell, T., and Aktan, F. (2007). “Updates to research on recommended minimum levels for pavement marking retroreflectivity to meet driver night visibility needs.” Rep. FHWA-HRT-07-059, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Ethen, J. L., and Woltman, H. L. (1986). “Minimum retroreflectance for nighttime visibility of pavement markings.” Transportation Research Record 1093, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 43–47.
Fu, H., and Wilmot, C. G. (2008). “Assessing performance of alternative pavement marking materials.” Rep. No. 08-4TA, Louisiana Transportation Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA.
Gibbons, R. B., McElheny, M. J., and Edwards, C. (2006). “The impact of pavement marking width on visibility distance.” Proc. 85th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
Graham, J. R., Harold, J. K., and King, L. E. (1996). “Pavement marking retroreflectivity requirements for older drivers.” Transportation Research Record 1529, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 65–70.
Graham, J. R., and King, L. E. (1991). “Retroreflectivity requirements for pavement markings.” Transportation Research Record 1316, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 18–23.
Hofmann, K., and Dunning, M. (1995). “Evaluation of raised and recessed pavement markers.” Rep. OR-RD-96-06, Oregon Dept. of Transportation, Salem, OR.
Lindly, J., and Wijesundera, R. (2003). “Evaluation of profiled pavement markings.” UTCA Rep. 01465, Univ. Transportation Center for Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.
Loetterle, F. E., Beck, R. A., and Carlson, J. (2000). “Public perception of pavement marking brightness.” Transportation Research Record 1715, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 51–59.
Martin, P., Perrin, J., Jitprasithsiri, S., and Hansen, B. (1996). A comparative analysis of the alternative pavement marking materials for the state of Utah, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Migletz, J., and Graham, J. (2002). “Long-term pavement marking practices.” NCHRP Synthesis 306, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., and Wasserman, W. (1996). Applied linear statistical models, McGraw-Hill, Chicago.
Oh, U. H., and Lee, H. S. (2006). “Minimum retroreflectivity for pavement markings from static and dynamic tests.” Proc. 85th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
Texas Dept. of Transportation (TxDOT). (2004). Pavement marking handbook, Austin, TX.
Texas Dept. of Transportation (TxDOT). (2009). “TxDOT project information.” 〈http://www.txdot.gov/project_information/default.htm〉 (May 18, 2009).
Tielking, J. T., and Noel, J. S. (1989). “Research on raised pavement markers.” Transportation Research Record 1230, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 56–66.
Ullman, G. L. (1994). “Retroreflective raised pavement markers: A two-year field evaluation in Texas.” Research Rep. 1946-3F, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX.
Ullman, G. L., Finley, M. D., Pike, A. M., Knapp, K. K., Songchitruksa, P., and Williams, A. A. (2008). “Studies to improve temporary traffic control at urban freeway interchanges and pavement marking material selection in work zones.” Research Rep. 0-5238-2, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX.
U.S. Dept. of Labor (USDOL). (2009). “Consumer price index (CPI).” Bureau of Labor Statistics, 〈http://www.bls.gov/cpi/data.htm〉 (May 18, 2009).
Venables, W. N., and Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with S, Springer, New York.
Zhang, Y., and Madiri, S. (2009). “Study of the field performance of retroreflective raised pavement markers.” Proc. Transportation Research Board 2009 Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
Zwahlen, H. T., and Schnell, T. (2000). “Minimum in-service retroreflectivity of pavement markings.” Transportation Research Record 1715, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 60–70.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 17 • Issue 2 • June 2011
Pages: 55 - 65
Copyright
© 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 5, 2008
Accepted: Jul 28, 2010
Published online: Aug 31, 2010
Published in print: Jun 1, 2011
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.