TECHNICAL PAPERS
Sep 22, 2010

Life-Cycle Assessment of Urban Water Provision: Tool and Case Study in California

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 17, Issue 1

Abstract

The exploration of life-cycle energy use and environmental effects from U.S. water infrastructure has been limited in spite of the strong connection between energy and water use. This research presents a methodology for quantifying the life-cycle energy consumption and associated air emissions from water supply, treatment, and distribution. A decision-support tool, the Water-Energy Sustainability Tool (WEST), has been developed to aid such analysis. WEST calculates the environmental effects of material production, including the supply chain, material delivery and transportation, construction and maintenance equipment use, energy production, and sludge disposal. Deterministic and probabilistic results for a California case study utility are provided to show the tool’s capabilities. Results indicate that producing a million liters of water consumes 5.4 GJ and produces 390 kg of CO2-equivalent greenhouse gases. Energy production is the most significant activity (50%), but material production, especially for treatment chemicals, is also important (37%). This case study is contrasted with two previously published case study utilities, and the reasons for the range of results are analyzed. The results demonstrate that estimating water supply’s energy needs and emissions without a life-cycle lens can underestimate the total effects significantly.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the California Energy Commission under Contract UNSPECIFIEDMR-06-08.
This report was prepared as a result of work sponsored by the California Energy Commission (Energy Commission) and the University of California (UC). It does not necessarily represent the views of the Energy Commission, UC, their employees, or the State of California. The Energy Commission, the State of California, its employees, and UC make no warranty, express or implied, and assume no legal liability for the information in this report; nor does any party represent that the use of this information will not infringe upon privately owned rights. This report has not been approved or disapproved by the Energy Commission or UC, nor has the Energy Commission or UC passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of the information in this report.

References

California Air Resources Board (CARB). (2007). “Off-road emissions model.” 〈http://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/offroad/offroad.htm〉 (Jan. 11, 2011).
California Energy Commission (CEC). (2005). “California’s water-energy relationship,” Rep. No. CEC-700-2005-011-SF, Sacramento, CA.
Calijuri, M. L., Bhering, E. M., Souza, L. A., Lorentz, J. F., Souza, P. J., and Libanio, M. C. (2005). “Environmental and socioeconomic information system for water resource management.” J. Surv. Eng., 131(3), 97–101.
Carnegie Mellon University Green Design Institute. (2007). “Economic input-output life cycle assessment (EIO-LCA) US 1997 Industry Benchmark model.” 〈http://www.eiolca.net〉 (Oct. 10, 2007).
Chester, M. V., and Horvath, A. (2009). “Environmental assessment of passenger transportation should include infrastructure and supply chains.” Environ. Res. Lett., 4(2), 024008.
Denison, R. (1996). “Environmental life-cycle comparisons of recycling, landfilling, and incineration: A review of recent studies.” Annu. Rev. Energy Environ., 21, 191–237.
Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2009). “Frequently asked questions—Electricity.” 〈http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/ask/electricity_faqs.asp#electricity_use_home〉 (Oct. 13, 2009).
Facanha, C., and Horvath, A. (2007). “Evaluation of life-cycle air emission factors of freight transportation.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 41(20), 7138–7144.
Filion, Y. R., MacLean, H. L., and Karney, B. W. (2004). “Life-cycle energy analysis of a water distribution system.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 10(3), 120–130.
Friedrich, E. (2002). “Life-cycle assessment as an environmental management tool in the production of potable water.” Water Sci. Technol., 46(9), 29–36.
Friedrich, E., Pillay, S., and Buckley, C. A. (2007). “The use of LCA in the water industry and the case for an environmental performance indicator.” Water SA, 33(4), 443–451.
GaBi [Computer software]. Stuttgart, Germany, PE Int.
Gagnon, L., Belanger, C., and Uchiyama, Y. (2002). “Life-cycle assessment of electricity generation options: The status of research in year 2001.” Energy Policy, 30(14), 1267–1278.
Gleick, P. H., et al. (2003). Waste not, want not: The potential for urban California, Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment, and Security, Oakland, CA.
Hall, R. G., et al. (2000). “Status of aquatic bioassessment in U.S. EPA Region IX.” Environ. Monit. Assess., 64(1), 17–30.
Hendrickson, C., Horvath, A., Joshi, S., and Lave, L. (1998). “Economic input-output models for environmental life-cycle assessment.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 32(4), 184A–191A.
Hendrickson, C. T., Lave, L. B., and Matthews, H. S. (2006). Environmental life cycle assessment of goods and services: An input-output approach, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
Herz, R., and Lipkow, A. (2002). “Life-cycle assessment of water mains and sewers.” Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply, 2(4), 51–72.
Houillon, G., and Jolliet, O. (2005). “Life cycle assessment of processes for the treatment of wastewater urban sludge: Energy and global warming analysis.” J. Cleaner Prod., 13(3), 287–299.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (1997). “Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—General principles and framework.” ISO 14040, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Landu, L., and Brent, A. C. (2006). “Environmental life cycle assessment of water supply in South Africa: The Rosslyn industrial area as a case study.” Water SA, 32(2), 249–256.
Lassaux, S., Renzoni, R., and Germain, A. (2007). “Life cycle assessment of water from the pumping station to the wastewater treatment plant.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 12(2), 118–126.
Lenzen, M., and Munksgaard, J. (2002). “Energy and CO2 life-cycle analyses of wind turbines—Review and applications.” Renewable Energy, 26(3), 339–362.
Lundie, S., Peters, G. M., and Beavis, P. C. (2004). “Life cycle assessment for sustainable metropolitan water systems planning.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 38(13), 3465–3473.
Lundin, M., and Morrison, G. (2002). “A life cycle assessment based procedure for development of environmental sustainability indicators for urban water systems.” Urban Water, 4(2), 145–152.
Mann, M., and Spath, P. (1997). Life cycle assessment of a biomass gasification combined-cycle systems, National Renewables Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.
Meier, P. (2002). “Life-cycle assessment of electricity generation systems and applications for climate change policy analysis.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Murray, A., Horvath, A., and Nelson, K. (2008). “Hybrid life-cycle environmental and cost inventory of sewage sludge treatment and end-use scenarios: A case study from China.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 42(9), 3163–3169.
Navigant Consulting. (2006). “Refining estimates of water-related energy use in California.” California Energy Commission, Sacramento, CA.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (1997). “The environmental effects of freight.” Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.
Pacca, S., and Horvath, A. (2002). “Greenhouse gas emissions from building and operating electric power plants in the Upper Colorado River Basin.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 36(14), 3194–3200.
Pehnt, M. (2006). “Dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA) of renewable energy technologies.” Renewable Energy, 31(1), 55–71.
Racoviceanu, A. I., Karney, B. W., Kennedy, C. A., and Colombo, A. F. (2007). “Life-cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions inventory for water treatment systems.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 13(4), 261–270.
Raluy, R. G., Serra, L., and Uche, J. (2005a). “Life cycle assessment of water production technologies—Part 1: Life cycle assessment of different commercial desalination technologies.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 10(4), 285–293.
Raluy, R. G., Serra, L., Uche, J., and Valero, A. (2005b). “Life cycle assessment of water production technologies—Part 2: Reverse osmosis desalination versus the Ebro River water transfer.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 10(5), 346–354.
Rashad, S. M., and Hammad, F. H. (2000). “Nuclear power and the environment: Comparative assessment of environmental and health impacts of electricity-generating systems.” Appl. Energy, 65(1-4), 211–229.
Sahely, H. R., Kennedy, C. A., and Adams, B. J. (2005). “Developing sustainability criteria for urban water infrastructure systems.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 32, 72–85.
Spath, P., and Mann, M. (2000). Life cycle assessment of a natural gas combined-cycle power generation system, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.
Spath, P., Mann, M., and Kerr, D. (1999). Life cycle assessment of coal-fired power production, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.
Stokes, J. (2004). “Life-cycle assessment of alternative water supply sources in California.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Stokes, J., and Horvath, A. (2006). “Life cycle energy assessment of alternative water supply systems.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 11(5), 335–343.
Stokes, J. R., and Horvath, A. (2009). “Energy and air emission effects of water supply.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 43(8), 2680–2687.
Suh, S., et al. (2004). “System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 38(3), 657–664.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). (1995). AP-42 compilation of air pollutant emission factors—Mobile sources, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). (1996). AP-42 compilation of air pollutant emission factors—Natural gas combustion, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). (2000). Emission facts: Average annual emissions and fuel consumption for passenger cars and light trucks, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 〈http://www.epa.gov/OMS/consumer/f00013.htm〉 (Oct. 13, 2009).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). (2006). Waste Reduction Model (WARM)—Excel version, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 〈http://epa.gov/climatechange/wycd/waste/calculators/Warm_home.html〉 (Aug. 10, 2006).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). (2007). The emissions and generation resource integrated database (eGRID2006) Version 2.01, 2006 data, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 〈http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/egrid/index.htm〉 (Apr. 2007).
Vince, F., Aoustin, E., Bréant, P., and Marechal, F. (2008). “LCA tool for the environmental evaluation of potable water production.” Desalination, 220(1-3), 37–56.
Weidema, B. P., and Wesnæs, M. S. (1996). “Data quality management for life cycle inventories—An example of using data quality indicators.” J. Cleaner Prod., 4(3-4), 167–174.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 17Issue 1March 2011
Pages: 15 - 24

History

Received: Nov 20, 2009
Accepted: Jun 22, 2010
Published online: Sep 22, 2010
Published in print: Mar 1, 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jennifer Stokes [email protected]
Assistant Research Engineer, Institute of Transportation Studies, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Arpad Horvath, M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share