Abstract

Land disturbing construction activities can become nonpoint sources of pollution, particularly due to suspended sediment, if erosion and sediment control measures are ineffective. Wattles have become popular practices among many governing agencies and contractors because of the variety of wattle materials available and their vast array of applications, such as ditch checks, inlet protection practices, and perimeter controls. As technologies continue to emerge, quantifying wattle performance can be a difficult and daunting task. To better understand hydraulic performance, flume experiments were conducted on eight manufactured wattles using a testing regime that used four inflow rates of 0.007, 0.021, 0.035, and 0.057  m3/s (0.25, 0.75, 1.25, and 2.00  ft3/s) and three longitudinal channel slopes of 3.50%, 4.25%, and 5.00%. Hydraulic measurements to assess wattle performance were taken for each trial after flow stabilization. Six different fill materials (excelsior wood fiber, wheat straw, coconut coir, recycled synthetic fiber, chipped wood, and miscanthus fiber) and four containment systems (natural netting, synthetic netting, synthetic socking, and polyester socking) were evaluated. Test results indicated that wattles fall into one of four developed classes based on correlations between hydraulic depth ratios and subcritical length ratios identified in the study. Class 1 wattles are considered the least hydraulically favorable, and Class 4 wattles are considered the most favorable at reducing supercritical flows when compared to the performance of an impervious weir control test. Two-way (flow rate and channel slope) ANOVA analyses were conducted to evaluate the degree of wattle performance variations for each wattle type, and a multiple linear regression model was developed to quantify performance characteristics based on fill material, slope, and flow rate from a base case (i.e., impervious weir) scenario. The ANOVA analyses indicated that synthetic fiber and miscanthus filled wattles had superior hydraulic performance capabilities when subjected to various flow rates and longitudinal slopes based on no statistical difference across flow rates and slopes. The multiple linear regression model suggested that excelsior fiber was the least effective fill material for establishing flow velocities favorable for soil particle settlement, while miscanthus fiber created the most favorable conditions. Lastly, water absorption evaluations suggest that saturated wattle density, as opposed to dry density, can be used to link the wattle fill type to hydraulic performance.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The following data sets are available: raw measurements collected during experimentation and photographs documenting experiments.

References

ASTM. 2014. Standard test method for determination of temporary ditch check performance in protecting earthen channels from stormwater-induced erosion. ASTM D7208-14e1. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bhattarai, R., P. Kalita, C. B. Garcia, J. Monical, and P. Schumacher. 2016. Evaluation of ditch checks for sediment retention. Rantoul, IL: Illinois Center for Transportation.
Bouasker, M., N. Belayachi, D. Hoxha, and M. Al-Mukhtar. 2014. “Physical characterization of natural straw fibers as aggregates for construction materials applications.” Materials (Basel) 7 (4): 3034–3048. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7043034.
Chapman, J. M., C. L. Proulx, M. A. N. Veilleux, C. Levert, S. Bliss, M. Andre, N. W. R. Lapointe, and S. J. Cooke. 2014. “Clear as mud: A meta-analysis on the effects of sedimentation on freshwater fish and the effectiveness of sediment-control measures.” Water Res. 56 (1): 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.02.047.
Cruz, J., A. Leitão, D. Silveira, S. Pichandi, M. Pinto, and R. Fangueiro. 2017. “Study of moisture absorption characteristics of cotton terry towel fabrics.” Procedia Eng. 200 (1): 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.055.
Donald, W. N., W. C. Zech, and X. Fang. 2015. “Comparative evaluation of wattle ditch checks composed of differing materials and properties.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 141 (2): 04014051. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000794.
Donald, W. N., W. C. Zech, X. Fang, and M. A. Perez. 2016. “Hydraulic method to evaluate the performance of ditch check practices and products.” J. Hydro. Eng. 21 (11): 04016042. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001311.
Donald, W. N., W. C. Zech, M. A. Perez, and X. Fang. 2013. “Ditch check installation evaluations of wheat straw wattles used for velocity reduction.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2358 (1): 69–78. https://doi.org/10.3141/2358-08.
Kaufman, H. M. 2000. “Erosion control at construction sites: The science–policy gap.” J. Environ. Manage. 26 (1): 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002670010073.
McLaughlin, R. A., S. E. King, and G. D. Jennings. 2009. “Improving construction site runoff quality with fiber check dams and polyacrylamide.” J. Soil Water Conser. 64 (2): 144–154. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.64.2.144.
Perez, M. A., W. C. Zech, W. N. Donald, and X. Fang. 2015. “Installation enhancements to common inlet protection practices using large-scale testing techniques.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2521 (1): 151–161. https://doi.org/10.3141/2521-16.
Schussler, J. C., B. Kazaz, M. A. Perez, B. Cetin, and J. B. Whitman. 2021. “Field evaluation of wattle and silt fence ditch checks.” Transp. Res. Rec. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198121992073.
Troxel, C. F. 2013. “Life cycle analysis of sediment control devices.” MS thesis, School of Civil Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
US Congress. 1972. Clean water act. Washington, DC: US Congress.
USEPA. 2007. “Developing your stormwater pollution prevention plan: A guide for construction sites.” Accessed March 6, 2020. https://www3.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/sw_swppp_guide.pdf.
Wanielista, M., M. Chopra, M. Hardin, and M. Goolsby. 2010. Inlet protection devices and their effectiveness. Orlando, FL: Stormwater Management Academy, Univ. of Central Florida.
Whitman, J. B., W. C. Zech, and W. N. Donald. 2019. “Full-scale performance evaluations of innovative and manufactured sediment barrier practices.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2673 (8): 284–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119827905.
Whitman, J. B., W. C. Zech, W. N. Donald, and J. J. LaMondia. 2018. “Full-scale performance evaluations of various wire-backed nonwoven silt fence installation configurations.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2672 (39): 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118758029.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 147Issue 7July 2021

History

Received: Oct 14, 2019
Accepted: Mar 5, 2021
Published online: May 11, 2021
Published in print: Jul 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Oct 11, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, School of Concrete and Construction Management, Middle Tennessee State Univ., E.W. Midgett Bldg., Murfreesboro, TN 37132. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0310-1961. Email: [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Auburn Univ., 238 Harbert Engineering Ctr., Auburn, AL 36849. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8568-3338. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Auburn Univ., 238 Harbert Engineering Ctr., Auburn, AL 36849 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0309-3922. Email: [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Auburn Univ., 238 Harbert Engineering Ctr., Auburn, AL 36849. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1245-9973. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Hydraulic Evaluation of Wattle Encasement Materials, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 10.1177/03611981231152255, (036119812311522), (2023).
  • Field-Monitoring Sediment Basin Performance during Highway Construction, Water, 10.3390/w14233858, 14, 23, (3858), (2022).
  • Improving the Design and Performance of Double-Row Sediment Barriers Used During Highway Construction, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 10.1177/03611981221141899, (036119812211418), (2022).
  • Decade of Research in Review at the Auburn University Stormwater Research Facility, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 10.1177/03611981221076449, 2676, 5, (590-604), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share