Technical Papers
Jul 25, 2017

Comparison of Effects of Root Water Uptake Functions for Simulating Surface Water and Heat Fluxes within a Corn Farmland Ecosystem in Northeast China

Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 143, Issue 10

Abstract

The root water uptake (RWU) process plays an important role in the terrestrial water cycle by connecting the soil environment to the atmosphere. Inaccurate representation of RWU functions (RWUFs) in land surface models (LSMs) has been one of the principal causes of error. Various RWUFs have been proposed for application in LSMs to simulate surface water–heat fluxes within diverse ecosystems. However, none have proven suitable for maize farmland ecosystems where vegetation differs from perennial plants, maize being a typical annual crop with significant human intervention. This study evaluated the performance of the common land model (CoLM) to reproduce energy and water-vapor fluxes during the growing season measured with an eddy covariance system in a maize farmland ecosystem of northeastern China. The simulation performance of the default CoLM differed with the interannual diversity of precipitation: it was relatively poor in the low rainfall year with underestimation of latent heat flux and overestimation of sensible heat flux, but was excellent in the high rainfall year. The effects of two different RWUFs were compared: RWUFZ, an empirical approach to represent a dynamic RWU efficiency by introducing two thresholds; and RWUFL, modifying the original RWUF with a linear function of soil water potential to one with an exponential function. The CoLM performance for simulating water and heat exchanges was significantly improved when the default RWUF was replaced with RWUFL and RWUFZ, respectively, using reasonable parameter assignments. The improvements of modified model performance demonstrated obvious interannual and intermonthly variations, which were more significant for RWUFZ than RWUFL. Thus, RWUFZ is recommended for use in the CoLM in northeast China’s maize farmland ecosystems and possibly for other similar agriculture ecosystems.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Dr. R.P. Li for providing the EC data. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41305058) and Cultivation Plan for Youth Agricultural Science and Technology Innovative Talents of Liaoning Province (2014060,2015060).

References

Baker, I. T., Prihodko, L., Denning, A. S., Goulden, M., Miller, S., and Rocha, H. R. (2008). “Seasonal drought stress in the Amazon: Reconciling models and observations.” J. Geophys. Res., 113(G1), G00B01.
Cai, F., et al. (2012). “Effects of dynamic parameterization of albedo on land-atmosphere flux exchanges: A case study of rainfed maize field in Northeast China.” Acta Meteorol. Sin., 70(5), 1149–1164.
Cai, F., Ming, H. Q., Mi, N., Zhang, S. J., Xie, Y. B., and Zhang, Y. S. (2015). “Effects of root distribution on land-atmosphere water and heat flux exchanges based on CoLM: A case study of corn field.” Acta Meteorol. Sin., 73(3), 566–576.
Cai, F., Zhou, G. S., Li, R. P., and Ming, H. Q. (2011). “Sensitivity of land surfaces model to dynamic parameters of land surface.” Adv. Earth Sci., 26(3), 300–310.
Dai, Y. J., and Ji, D. Y. (2007). “The common land model user & developer’ guide.” ⟨⟩ (Mar. 7, 2017).
Davidson, E. A., et al. (2011). “Carbon inputs and water uptake in deep soils of an eastern Amazon forest.” Forest Sci., 57(1), 51–58.
Dickinson, R. E., Shaikh, M., Bryant, R., and Graumlich, L. (1998). “Interactive canopies for a climate model.” J. Clim., 11(11), 2823–2836.
Feddes, R. A., et al. (2001). “Modeling root water uptake in hydrological and climate models.” Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc., 82(12), 2797–2809.
Feddes, R. A., Kowalik, P. J., and Zaradny, H. (1978). Simulation of field water use and crop yield, Pudoc, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Gordon, W. S. (2003). “Climate change, hydrology and ecological models: Intercomparison and validation.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Jackson, R. B., Canadell, J., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E., and Schulze, E. D. (1996). “A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes.” Oecologia, 108(3), 389–411.
Jackson, R. B., Sperry, J. S., and Dawson, T. E. (2000). “Root water uptake and transport: Using physiological processes in global predictions.” Trends Plant Sci., 5(11), 482–488.
Ji, D. Y., and Dai, Y. J. (2010). “The common land model (CoLM) technical guide.” ⟨http://globalchange.bnu.edu.cn/download/doc/CoLM/CoLM_Technical_Guide.pdf⟩ (Mar. 7, 2017).
Jing, C. Q., Li, L., Chen, X., and Luo, G. P. (2013). “Comparison of root water uptake functions to simulate surface energy fluxes within a deep-rooted desert shrub ecosystem.” Hydrol. Processes, 28(21), 5436–5449.
Jobbagy, E. G., and Jackson, R. B. (2000). “The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation.” Ecol. Appl., 10(2), 423–436.
Lai, C. T., and Katul, G. (2000). “The dynamic role of root-water uptake in coupling potential and actual transpiration.” Adv. Water Resour., 23(4), 427–439.
Laio, F., D’Odorico, P., and Ridolfi, L. (2006). “An analytical model to relate the vertical root distribution to climate and soil properties.” Geophys. Res. Lett., 33(18), L18401.
Lee, J. E., Oliveira, R. S., Dawson, T. E., and Fung, I. (2005). “Root functioning modifies seasonal climate.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 102(49), 17576–17581.
Li, K. Y., De Jong, R., Coe, R. T., and Ramankutty, N. (2006). “Root-water-uptake based upon a new water stress reduction and an asymptotic root distribution function.” Earth Interact., 10(14), 1–22.
Li, L., et al. (2012). “Improving the responses of the australian community land surface model (CABLE) to seasonal drought.” J. Geophys. Res., 117(G4), G04002.
Li, L., Van der Tol, C., Chen, X., Jing, C., Su, B., Luo, G., and Tian, X. (2013). “Representing the root water uptake process in the Common Land Model for better simulating the energy and water vapour fluxes in a Central Asian desert ecosystem.” J. Hydrol., 502, 145–155.
Li, Y. J., Xu, Z. Z., Wang, Y. L., Zhou, L., and Zhou, G. S. (2007). “Latent and sensible heat fluxes and energy balance in a maize agroecosystem.” J. Plant Ecol., 31(6), 1132–1144.
Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., and Veith, T. L. (2007). “Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations.” Trans. ASABE, 50(3), 885–900.
Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). “River flow forecasting through conceptual models. I: A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol., 10(3), 282–290.
Oliveira, R. S., Dawson, T. E., Burgess, S. S. O., and Nepstad, D. C. (2005). “Hydraulic redistribution in three Amazonian trees.” Oecologia, 145(3), 354–363.
Saleska, S. R., et al. (2003). “Carbon in amazon forests: Unexpected seasonal fluxes and disturbance induced losses.” Science, 302(5650), 1554–1557.
Schenk, H. J., and Jackson, R. B. (2002). “The global biogeography of roots.” Ecol. Monogr., 72(3), 311–328.
Shi, X. Y., Mao, J. F., Wang, Y. P., Dai, Y. J., and Tang, X. L. (2011). “Coupling a terrestrial Biogeochemical model to the common land model.” Adv. Atmos. Sci., 28(5), 1129–1142.
Xu, H., Li, Y., Xu, G. Q., and Zou, T. (2007). “Ecophysiological response and morphological adjustment of two Central Asian desert shrubs towards variation in summer precipitation.” Plant Cell Environ., 30(4), 399–409.
Zeng, X. B. (2001). “Global vegetation root distribution for land modeling.” Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc., 2(5), 525–530.
Zheng, Z., and Wang, G. L. (2007). “Modeling the dynamic root water uptake and its hydrological impact at the reserve Jaru site in Amazonia.” J. Geophys. Res., 112(G4), G04012.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 143Issue 10October 2017

History

Received: Feb 18, 2016
Accepted: Feb 28, 2017
Published online: Jul 25, 2017
Published in print: Oct 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Dec 25, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Institute of Atmospheric Environment, China Meteorological Administration, No. 388, Changbainan Rd., Shenyang 110166, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5983-6510. E-mail:[email protected]
Huiqing Ming [email protected]
Senior Engineer, Liaoning Province Meteorological Service Center, Shenyang 110166, China. E-mail: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Institute of Atmospheric Environment, China Meteorological Administration, No. 388, Changbainan Rd., Shenyang 110166, China. E-mail: [email protected]
Yanbing Xie [email protected]
Research Assistant, Institute of Atmospheric Environment, China Meteorological Administration, No. 388, Changbainan Rd., Shenyang 110166, China. E-mail: [email protected]
Yushu Zhang [email protected]
Professor, Institute of Atmospheric Environment, China Meteorological Administration, No. 388, Changbainan Rd., Shenyang 110166, China (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share