Residential Irrigation Water Use in the Central Piedmont of North Carolina. II: Evaluation of Smart Irrigation Technologies
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 141, Issue 4
Abstract
A study was conducted in Cary, North Carolina, in the spring and summer of 2009 with the purpose of evaluating the effectiveness of two “smart irrigation” controllers based on the amount of irrigation applied and resulting turf quality in residential settings. Twenty-four residential sites were selected, in clusters of four, representing six geographical areas within the town. Each geographical cluster included one site of each treatment. The treatments were standard irrigation controller with an add-on soil moisture sensor system (SMS); standard irrigation controller with an add-on evapotranspiration-based adjustment system (ET); standard irrigation controller using seasonal runtimes based on historical climate data (ED); and a control group which used a standard irrigation controller with no intervention (CON). Weekly water usage was obtained from irrigation meter readings and turf quality was characterized using a visual rating and a normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) meter. Maximum water savings were achieved by the SMS treatment (42% less than CON), followed by ET and ED treatments. No statistical difference in average weekly water use was found between the ET group and the ED group provided with controller run-time guidance. The mean weekly visual turf quality index was highest for the SMS treatment, but only statistically different from the ED group. Average weekly NDVI was greatest for the ED group, although average NDVI values were not statistically different among any of the groups. Although water use was less during the 2009 study period contrasted against the three previous years for those receiving some form of intervention (ED, ET, and SMS), the same trend in water use was found by the CON group, rendering any findings in change in behavior inconclusive. Variability in water application by cooperator groups receiving an intervention decreased in the study period compared to the three previous years, suggesting an impact.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Marie Cefalo and Jeff Hall, Department of Public Works and Utilities, Town of Cary, for providing water use data and assistance in arranging irrigation system audits. The Town of Cary provided funding towards this project.
References
Allen, R. G. (1997). “Demonstration of potential for residential water savings using a soil-moisture controlled irrigation monitor.”, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Provo, UT.
Allen, R. G. (2003). REF-ET: Reference evapotranspiration calculation software for FAO and ASCE standardized equations. Version 2.01.17, Univ. of Idaho, Moscow, ID.
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M. (1998). “Crop evapotranspirationGuidelines for computing crop water requirements.”, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
Baum, M. C., Dukes, M. D., and Miller, G. L. (2005). “Analysis of residential irrigation distribution uniformity.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 336–341.
Boyles, R. P., Holder, C., and Raman, S. (2004). “North Carolina climate: A summary of climate normal and averages at 18 agricultural research stations.”, NC State Univ., Raleigh, NC.
Bruneau, A. H., Miller, G. L., and Peacock, C. H., eds. (2008). Carolina lawns, North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, Raleigh, NC.
Cardenas-Lailhacar, B., Dukes, M. D., and Miller, G. L. (2008). “Sensor based automation of irrigation on bermudagrass, during wet weather conditions.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 120–128.
Cardenas-Lailhacar, B., Dukes, M. D., and Miller, G. L. (2010). “Sensor-based automation of irrigation on bermudagrass, during dry weather conditions.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 184–193.
Davis, S., Dukes, M. D., Sudeep, V., and Miller, G. L. (2009). “Landscape irrigation by evapotranspiration-based irrigation controllers under dry conditions in southwest Florida.” Agric. Water Manage., 96(12), 1828–1836.
Davis, S. L., and Dukes, M. D. (2010). “Irrigation scheduling performance by evapotranspiration-based controllers.” Agric. Water Manage., 98(1), 19–28.
Davis, S. L., and Dukes, M. D. (2012). “Landscape irrigation with evaportranspiration controllers in a humid climate.” Trans. ASABE, 55(2), 571–580.
Devitt, D. A., Carstensen, K., and Morris, R. L. (2008). “Residential water savings associated with satellite-based et irrigation controllers.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 74–82.
Dukes, M. D. (2012). “Water conservation potential of landscape irrigation smart controllers.” Trans. ASABE, 55(2), 563–569.
Environmental Systems Resource Institute (ESRI). (2006). ArcGIS 9.2., Redlands, CA.
Grabow, G. L., Ghali, I. E., Huffman, R. L., Miller, G. L., Bowman, D., and Vasanth, A. (2013). “Water application efficiency and adequacy of ET-based and soil-moisture-based irrigation controllers for turfgrass irrigation.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 113–123.
Haley, M., and Dukes, M. D. (2012). “Validation of landscape irrigation reduction with soil moisture sensor irrigation controllers.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 135–144.
Irrigation Association (IA). (2008). “Smart water application technology (SWAT) turf and landscape irrigation equipment testing protocol for climatologically based controllers; 8th draft testing protocol.” Falls Church, VA, 〈http://www.irrigation.org/WorkArea/linkit.aspx?LinkIdentifier=id&ItemID=415&libID=437〉 (Sept. 3, 2013).
McCready, M. S., and Dukes, M. D. (2011). “Landscape irrigation scheduling efficiency and adequacy by various control technologies.” Agric. Water Manage., 98(4), 697–704.
McCready, M. S., Dukes, M. D., and Miller, G. L. (2009). “Water conservation potential of smart irrigation controllers on St. Augustine grass.” Agric. Water Manage., 96(11), 1623–1632.
Morris, K. N. (2002). “A guide to NTEP turfgrass ratings: National turfgrass evaluation program.” 〈http://www.ntep.org/reports/ratings.htm〉 (Sep. 3, 2013).
Morris, K. N., and Shearman, R. C. (1997). “NTEP turfgrass evaluation guidelines.” National Turfgrass Evaluation Program, Beltsville, MD.
National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). (2001). “Climatography of the U.S. No. 81: Monthly station normals 1971-2000.” Asheville, NC.
Nautiyal, M., Grabow, G. L., Huffman, R. L., Miller, G. L., and Bowman, D. (2015). “Residential irrigation water use in the central piedmont of North Carolina. I: Measured use and water requirements.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 04014061.
North Carolina Department of Agriculture, and Consumer Services (NCDA&CS). (2001). “North Carolina turfgrass survey.” Raleigh, NC.
North Carolina Department of Agriculture, and Consumer Services (NCDA&CS). (2004). “North Carolina turfgrass survey.” Raleigh, NC.
Ozan, L. A., and Alsharif, K. A. (2013). “The effectiveness of water irrigation policies for residential turfgrass.” Land Use Policy, 31(2013), 378–384.
Peacock, C. H., and Bruneau, A. H. (2006). “Water requirements of North Carolina turfgrass—A guide for irrigation technicians and turfgrass managers.”, North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, Raleigh, NC.
Qualls, R. J., Scott, J. M., and DeOreo, W. B. (2001). “Soil moisture sensors for urban landscape irrigation: Effectiveness and reliability.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 37(3), 547–559.
Rouse, J. W., Hass, R. H., Schell, J. A., and Deering, D. W. (1973). “Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS.” Proc., 3rd Earth Resources Technology Satellite Symposium, NASA Sp-351, S. C. Freden, E. P. Mercanti, and D. B. Friedman, eds., Vol. 1, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC, 309–317.
SAS. (2004). SAS/STAT 9.1 user’s guide, SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
Soil Conservation Service (SCS). (1971). “Irrigation water requirements.”, United States Dept. of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Conservative Service, Washington, DC.
TOC. (2013). “Department of public work and utilities. Town of Cary water conservation program. ‘let’s be water conscious’.” Cary, NC.
UCCE. (2000). “A guide to estimating irrigation water needs of landscape plantings in California.” The landscape coefficient method and WUCOLS III, Univ. of California Cooperative Extension, Oakland, CA.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 141 • Issue 4 • April 2015
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 20, 2013
Accepted: Aug 19, 2014
Published online: Sep 24, 2014
Discussion open until: Feb 24, 2015
Published in print: Apr 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.