Comparing the Hydrologic Performance of a Bioretention Cell with Predevelopment Values
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 139, Issue 2
Abstract
Bioretention cells have been found to improve the hydrologic and water quality performance of urban impervious areas. This study recorded continuous hydrologic data from a bioretention cell in Silver Spring, Maryland, over a period of 2 years. Two evaluation methods were used to assess bioretention performance, curve number (CN) volumetric analysis, and flow-duration flow regime analysis. CN-derived Woods B and C land uses were used to analyze cell volumetric performance, and data from a nearby forested stream were used to evaluate the cell flow regime. A CN of 75 was fit to the cell outflow with relation to rainfall depth. A larger cell, from 4.5 to 8.3% of the drainage area, was required to match the CN of woods land use. Flow duration comparisons between cell outflow and forested streamflow data suggested that bioretention may not match the predevelopment hydrologic regime despite performing similarly volumetrically. The overall natural hydrologic regime, not only peak flows and flow volume, of an area should be used both as a design factor as well as a performance metric for bioretention cells and other low-impact development (LID) facilities.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This project was partially supported by the Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology, CICEET, NOAA Grant Number NA06N054190167. Appreciation is extended to the Montgomery County, Maryland, Dept. of Environmental Protection for supporting the Silver Spring bioretention site and to the USGS for providing Pond Branch stream flow and rainfall data.
References
Ayyub, B. M., and McCuen, R. H. (2003). Probability, statistics, and reliability for engineers and scientists., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Barco, J., Hogue, T., Curto, V., and Rademacher, L. (2008). “Linking hydrology and stream geochemistry in urban fringe watersheds.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 360(1–4), 31–47.
Chapman, T. G. (1991). “Comment on ‘Evaluation of automated techniques for base-flow and recession analyses’.” Water Resour. Res., 27(7), 1783–1784.
Davis, A. P. (2008). “Field performance of bioretention: Hydrology impacts.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 13(2), 90–95.
Davis, A. P., Traver, R. G., Hunt, W. F., Brown, R. A., Lee, R., and Olszewski, J. M. (2012). “Hydrologic performance of bioretention stormwater control measures.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 17(5), 604–614.
DeBusk, K. M., Hunt, W. F., and Line, D. E. (2011). “Bioretention outflow: Does it mimic nonurban watershed shallow interflow?” J. Hydrol. Eng., 16(3), 274–279.
Dietz, M. E., and Clausen, J. C. (2005). “A field evaluation of rain garden flow and pollutant treatment.” Water Air Soil Pollut., 167(1–4), 123–138.
Eckhardt, K. (2005). “How to construct recursive digital filters for baseflow separation.” Hydrol. Processes, 19(2), 507–515.
Fetter, C. W. (2001). Applied hydrology, 4th Ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Flowlink Version 4.12 [Computer software]. Isco, Lincoln, NE.
Hunt, W., Jarrett, A., Smith, J., and Sharkey, L. (2006). “Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 132(6), 600–608.
Hunt, W., Smith, J., Jadlocki, S., Hathaway, J., and Eubanks, P. (2008). “Pollutant removal and peak flow mitigation by a bioretention cell in urban Charlotte, N.C.” J. Environ. Eng., 134(5), 403–408.
Iman, R. L. (1977). “Graphs for use in testing equality of 2 correlation-coefficients.” J. Quality Tech., 9(4), 172–175.
King, K., Smiley, P., Jr., and Fausey, N. (2009). “Hydrologie de cours d’eau recalibres et naturels de tete de bassin (Hydrology of channelized and natural headwater streams).” J. Sci. Hydrol. (Hydrol. Sci. J.), 54(5), 929–948.
Konrad, C. P., and Booth, D. B. (2005). “Hydrologic changes in urban streams and their ecological significance.” Am. Fish. Soc. Symp., 47, 157–177.
Kreeb, L. B., and McCuen, R. H. (2003). Hydrologic efficiency and design sensitivity of bioretention facilities, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Li, H. (2007). “Urban particle and pollutant capture via stormwater filter facilities and the concomitant water quality and hydrological benefits.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Li, H., and Davis, A. P. (2009). “Water quality improvement through reductions of pollutant loads using bioretention.” J. Environ. Eng., 135(8), 567–576.
Li, H., Sharkey, L., Hunt, W. F., and Davis, A. P. (2009). “Mitigation of impervious surface hydrology using bioretention in Maryland and North Carolina.” J. Hydrol. Eng, 14(4), 407–415.
McCuen, R. H. (2005). Hydrologic analysis and design, Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Nathan, R. J., and McMahon, T. A. (1990). “Evaluation of automated techniques for base-flow and recession analyses.” Water Resour. Res., 26(7), 1465–1473.
Palhegyi, G. E. (2010). “Modeling and sizing bioretention using flow duration control.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 15(6), 417–425.
The Prince George’s County, Maryland, Dept. of Environmental Services. (2007). Bioretention manual, Largo, MD, 〈http://www.princegeorgescountymd.gov/Government/AgencyIndex/DER/ESG/Bioretention/pdf/Bioretention%20Manual_2009%20Version.pdf〉.
Sevruk, B. (1996). “Adjustment of tipping-bucket precipitation gauge measurements.” Atmos. Res., 42(1–4), 237–246.
Shields, C. A., Band, L. E., Law, N., Groffman, P. M., Kaushal, S. S., Savvas, K., Fisher, G. T., and Belt, K. T. (2008). “Streamflow distribution of non-point source nitrogen export from urban-rural catchments in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.” Water Resour. Res., 44(9), W09416.
Shields, F. D., Jr., Knight, S. S., and Cooper, C. M. (1994). “Effects of channel incision on baseflow stream habitats and fishes.” Environ. Manage., 18(1), 43–57.
Spänhoff, B., and Arle, J. (2007). “Setting attainable goals of stream habitat restoration from a macroinvertebrate view.” Restor. Ecol., 15(2), 317–320.
USDA, Maryland National Resources Conservation Services Office (NRCS). (2012). “Hydrologic soil groups for Maryland and the District of Columbia.” 〈http://www.md.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/soils/reports.html〉 (Jun. 27, 2012).
USGS. (2010). “Current Pond Branch flow data.” 〈http://waterdata.usgs.gov/md/nwis/nwisman?site_no=01583570〉 (Jul. 1, 2010).
Walsh, C., Roy, A., Feminella, J., Cottingham, P., Groffman, P., and Morgan, R. (2005). “The urban stream syndrome: Current knowledge and the search for a cure.” J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 24(3), 706–723.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 139 • Issue 2 • February 2013
Pages: 124 - 130
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 7, 2011
Accepted: Jul 31, 2012
Published online: Aug 7, 2012
Published in print: Feb 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.