Technical Papers
Apr 16, 2012

Assessing the Impact of Irrigation Return Flow on River Salinity for Colorado’s Arkansas River Valley

Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 138, Issue 5

Abstract

A river salinity model has been developed on the 21 major canal areas in the lower Arkansas River Basin in Colorado to address the impact of irrigation return flow on the river. The quantity of the return flow is predicted by constructing response functions for tailwater, canal leakage, and in-field deep percolation so that the spatial and temporal distribution of the return flow can be simulated. A groundwater table surface is generated using water table elevation data from 974 wells in the study area to establish flow paths and travel time for groundwater. The quality of the return flow is predicted by simulating the evapoconcentration process in the root zone soil in which hydro-chemical reactions occur and affect the salinity of in-field deep percolation water. The effects of shallow water table and high soil salinity on crops are simulated to account for the impacts that these two factors have on crop consumptive use. Model calibration and validation over a 192-month period from January 1986 to December 2001 show strong agreement between the observed and simulated values of river flow volume and river salinity. The simulation results show that irrigation return flows, including tailwater and groundwater return flows, significantly increase river quantity, but that groundwater return flow is also a major component of river salinity. There is significant seasonal fluctuation in river salinity and soil water salinity. The increase of soil water salinity from the soil surface to the bottom of the root zone is significant and will cause salt to be loaded to the groundwater. The simulation from 1991–2001 indicates that 20.9% of the 19,944 million m3 of irrigation water applied to Colorado’s lower Arkansas Valley becomes canal leakage, 22.5% is in-field deep percolation, and 22.9% becomes tailwater. This study assesses the effect of reducing agricultural irrigation on river salinity. Consider the scenario of three major canals stopping irrigation and transferring a portion of the curtailed water to off-basin cities with the remaining portion released to the river. The results indicate that, in order not to increase river salinity for downstream reaches, the portion of water transferred to cities should not exceed 50%.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Abbott, P. O. (1985). “Description of water-systems operations in the Arkansas River Basin, Colorado.” USGS Water-Resources Investigation Rep. 85-4092, USGS, Lakewood, CO.
Bear, J. (1972). Dynamics of fluids in porous media, American Elsevier, New York.
Burkhalter, J. P., and Gates, T. K. (2005). “Agroecological impacts from salinization and waterlogging in an irrigated river valley.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 131(2), 197–209.JIDEDH
Burkhalter, J. P., and Gates, T. K. (2006). “Evaluating regional solutions to salinization and waterlogging in an irrigated river valley.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 132(21), 21–30.JIDEDH
Burns, A. W. (1989). “Calibration and use of an interactive-accounting model to simulate dissolved solids, streamflow, and water supply operations in the Arkansas River Basin.” Water-Resources Investigation Rep. 88-4214, USGS, Lakewood, CO.
Cain, D. (1985). “Quality of the Arkansas River and irrigation-return flows in the lower Arkansas River Valley Colorado.” USGS Water-Resources Investigations Rep. 84-4273, USGS, Lakewood, CO.
Dai, T., and Labadie, J. W. (2001). “River basin network model for integrated water quantity/quality management.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 127(5), 295–305.JWRMD5
District Court, Water Division No. 2, State of Colorado. (1994). Amended rules and regulations governing the diversion and use of tributary ground water in the Arkansas River Basin, Colorado Division of Water Resources, Denver.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2004). “Crop evaporation, guidelines for computing crop water requirements.” Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
Garcia, L. A. (2000). South Platte consumptive use (cu) model: User manual Version 1.5, Integrated Decision Support Group, Fort Collins, CO.
Gates, T. K., Burkhalter, J. P., Labadie, J. W., Valliant, J. C., and Broner, I. (2002). “Monitoring and modeling flow and salt transport in a salinity-threatened irrigated valley.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 128(2), 87–99.JWRMD5
Goff, K., Michael, E. L., Person, M. A., and Konikow, L. F. (1998). “Simulated effects of irrigation on salinity in the Arkansas River Valley in Colorado.” Ground Water, 36(1), 76–86.GRWAAP
Jenkins, C. T. (1968). “Techniques for computing rate and volume of stream depletion by wells.” Ground Water, 6(2), 37–44.GRWAAP
Konikow, L. F., and Bredehoeft, J. D. (1974). “Modeling flow and chemical quality changes in an irrigated stream-aquifer system.” Water Resour. Res., 10(3), 546–562.WRERAQ
Lin, Y. (2005). “Development of a model for hydro-salinity simulation in irrigated river basins.” Ph.D. thesis, Civil Engineering Dept., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO.
Lin, Y., and Garcia, L. A. (2008). “Development of a hydro-salinity simulation model for Colorado’s Arkansas Valley.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 134(6), 757–767.JIDEDH
Livingston, K. R. (1978). “Transit losses and traveltimes of reservoir releases along the AR River from Pueblo Reservoir to John Martin Reservoir, southeastern Colorado.” Water-Resources Investigations Rep. 78-75, USGS, Lakewood, CO.
Major, T. J., Hurr, R. T., and Moore, J. E. (1970). Hydrogeologic data for the lower Arkansas River Valley, Colorado, Vol. 21, Colorado Water Conservation Board, Denver.
Oster, J. D., and Rhoades, J. D. (1975). “Calculated drainage water compositions and salt burdens resulting from irrigation with river waters in the western United States.” J. Environ. Qual.JEVQAA, 4(1), 73–79.
Person, M., and Konikow, L. F. (1986). “Recalibration and predictive reliability of a solute-transport model of an irrigated stream-aquifer system.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 87(1–2), 145–165.JHYDA7
Price, J. M., and Gates, T. K. (2008). “Assessing uncertainty in mass balance calculation of river nonpoint source loads.” J. Environ. Eng., 134(4), 247–258.JOEEDU
Tanji, K. K. (1990). Agriculture salinity assessment and management, ASCE, New York.
Triana, E., Labadie, J. W., and Gates, T. K. (2003). “Conjunctive stream-aquifer modeling using artificial neural networks.” Proc., World Water and Environmental Resources Congress, Environmental and Water Resources Institute (EWRI) and ASCE, Philadelphia.
USGS. (1989a). Hydrogeologic characteristics of the valley-fill aquifer in the Arkansas River Valley, Crowley and Otero Counties, Colorado, The survey: Books and open-file reports section, Denver.
USGS. (1989b). Hydrogeologic characteristics of the valley-fill aquifer in the Arkansas River Valley, Prowers County, Colorado, The survey: Books and open-file reports section, Denver.
USGS. (1989c). Hydrogeologic characteristics of the valley-fill aquifer in the Arkansas River Valley, Pueblo County, Colorado, The survey: Books and open-file reports section, Denver.
Viessman, W. Jr., Knapp, J. W., Lewis, G. L., and Harbaugh, T. E. (1977). Introduction to hydrology, Harper & Row, New York.
Walpole, R. E., and Myers, R. H. (1989). Probability and statistics for engineers and scientists, Macmillan, New York.
Wilson, W. W. (1965). “Pumping tests in Colorado.” Circular 11, Colorado Water Conservation Board, Denver.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 138Issue 5May 2012
Pages: 406 - 415

History

Received: May 16, 2011
Accepted: Aug 17, 2011
Published online: Apr 16, 2012
Published in print: May 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Y. Lin, Ph.D. [email protected]
Hydraulic Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento, CA 95814 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
L. A. Garcia, M.ASCE
Director and Professor, Integrated Decision Support Group, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share