TECHNICAL PAPERS
May 11, 2011

Indicator Bacteria Performance of Storm Water Control Measures in Wilmington, North Carolina

Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 138, Issue 2

Abstract

Indicator bacteria are a common source of impairment in surface waters in the United States. Urban storm water runoff has been identified as a contributor to elevated indicator bacteria concentrations. Six storm water control measures (SCMs) were monitored in Wilmington, North Carolina, for E. coli and enterococci. Monitored SCMs included two storm water wet ponds, two bioretention cells, and two storm water wetlands. Sandier watersheds in Wilmington potentially lead to differences in SCM performance for indicator bacteria compared to SCMs implemented in clayey watersheds. Results showed E. coli and enterococci concentration reductions between 70 and 98% for the two wet ponds and a bioretention cell with a 60-cm-deep fill media. Other SCMs showed poor removal of indicator bacteria, in some cases negative, with storm water wetlands performing the poorest overall for the three SCM types. Further analysis showed that SCMs with high concentration reductions tended to have geometric mean effluent concentrations lower than the U.S. EPA’s target surface-water concentration for E. coli. Conversely, no SCM had a geometric mean effluent enterococci concentration lower than the U.S. EPA target value. SCM geometric mean effluent concentrations were typically higher during North Carolina’s swimming season between the beginning of April and the end of October, although no statistically significant relationship could be found (p<0.05). Despite a lack of statistically significant relationships, the potential for higher effluent indicator bacteria concentrations from SCMs during the peak recreational season may have implications for both public health and watershed management and should be further evaluated by the scientific community.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the funding agencies for this research, the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources and North Carolina Urban Water Consortium—Stormwater Group. The authors would like to thank Joe Abbate of the Cape Fear River Watch for support with sample collection in Wilmington. Last, the authors acknowledge Jason Wright of Tetra Tech Inc. and Dr. Michael Burchell II of the Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering at North Carolina State University for their work in designing, constructing, and monitoring four of the six SCMs evaluated in this study.

References

Bean, E. Z. (2005). “A field study to evaluate permeable pavement surface infiltration rates, runoff quantity, runoff quality, and exfiltrate quality.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC.
Birch, G. F., Matthai, C., Fazeli, M. S., and Suh, J. Y. (2004). “Efficiency of a constructed wetland in removing contaminants from stormwater.” Wetlands Ecol. Manage., 24(2), 459–466.
Burton, G. A., and Pitt, R. E. (2002). Stormwater effects handbook: A toolbox for watershed managers, scientists, and engineers, CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
Davies, C. M., and Bavor, H. J. (2000). “The fate of stormwater-associated bacteria in constructed wetland and water pollution control pond systems.” J. Appl. Microbiol., 89(2), 349–360.
Dietz, M. E., and Clausen, J. C. (2005). “A field evaluation of rain garden flow and pollutant treatment.” Water Air Soil Pollut., 167(1–4), 123–138.
Hathaway, J. M., Hunt, W. F., Graves, A. K., and Wright, J. D. (2011). “Field evaluation of bioretention indicator bacteria sequestration in Wilmington, North Carolina.” J. Environ. Eng., 137(12), 1103–1113.
Hathaway, J. M., Hunt, W. F., and Jadlocki, S. (2009). “Indicator bacteria removal in storm-water best management practices in Charlotte, North Carolina.” J. Environ. Eng., 135(12), 1275–1285.
Hathaway, J. M., Hunt, W. F., and Simmons, O. D. (2010). “Statistical evaluation of factors affecting indicator bacteria in urban stormwater runoff.” J. Environ. Eng., 136(12), 1360–1368.
Hunt, W. F., Burchell, M. R., Wright, J. D., and Bass, K. L. (2007). “Stormwater wetland design update: Zones, vegetation, soil, and outlet guidance.” AGW-588-12, North Carolina Cooperative Extension, Raleigh, NC.
Hunt, W. F., Jarrett, A. R., Smith, J. T., and Sharkey, L. J. (2006). “Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 132(6), 600–608.
Hunt, W. F., Smith, J. T., Jadlocki, S. J., Hathaway, J. M., and Eubanks, P. R. (2008). “Pollutant removal and peak flow mitigation by a bioretention cell in urban Charlotte, NC.” J. Environ. Eng., 134(5), 403–408.
Jeng, H. C., England, A. J., and Bradford, H. B. (2005). “Indicator organisms associated with stormwater suspended particles and estuarine sediment.” J. Environ. Sci. Health A Tox. Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng., 40(4), 779–791.
Jones, S. H., Roseen, R., Wildey, R. A., Maimes, J., Houle, J., and Ballestero, T. (2008). “Enterococci populations in conventional, manufactured, and LID stormwater treatment systems.” Proc., World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Krometis, L. H., Drummey, P. N., Characklis, G. W., and Sobsey, M. D. (2009). “Impact of microbial partitioning on wet retention pond effectiveness.” J. Environ. Eng., 135(9), 758–767.
Li, H., and Davis, A. P. (2009). “Water quality improvement through reductions of pollutant loads using bioretention.” J. Environ. Eng., 135(8), 567–576.
Li, H., Sharkey, L. J., Hunt, W. F., and Davis, A. P. (2009). “Mitigation of impervious surface hydrology using bioretention in North Carolina and Maryland.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 14(4), 407–415.
Line, D. E., White, N. M., Kirby-Smith, W. W., and Potts, J. D. (2008). “Fecal coliform export from four coastal North Carolina areas.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 44(3), 606–617.
Mallin, M. A., Ensign, S. H., Wheeler, T. L., and Mayes, D. B. (2002). “Pollutant removal efficacy of three wet detention ponds.” J. Environ. Qual., 31(2), 654–660.
Mankin, K. R., Wang, L., Hutchinson, S. L., and Marchin, G. L. (2007). “Escherichia coli sorption to sand and silt loam soil.” Trans. ASABE, 50(4), 1159–1165.
McCarthy, D. T., Deletic, A., Mitchell, V. G., Fletcher, T. D., and Diaper, C. (2008). “Uncertainties in stormwater E. coli levels.” Water Res., 42(6–7), 1812–1824.
McCarthy, D. T., Mitchell, V. G., Deletic, A., and Diaper, C. (2007). “Escherichia coli in urban stormwater: Explaining their variability.” Water Sci. Technol., 56(11), 27–34.
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). (2010). “Soil data mart.” 〈http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov/〉 (Mar. 25, 2010).
North Carolina Division of Environmental Health (NCDEH). (2010). “N.C. recreational water quality.” 〈http://www.deh.enr.state.nc.us/shellfish/Water_Monitoring/RWQweb/home.htm〉 (Mar. 25, 2010).
Passeport, E., Hunt, W. F., Line, D. E., Smith, R. A., and Brown, R. A. (2009). “Field study of the ability of two grassed bioretention cells to reduce storm-water runoff pollution.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 135(4), 505–510.
Selvakumar, A., and Borst, M. (2006). “Variation of microorganism concentrations in urban stormwater runoff with land use and seasons.” J. Water Health, 4(1), 109–124.
Sherer, B. M., Miner, J. R., Moore, J. A., and Buckhouse, J. C. (1992). “Indicator bacteria survival in stream sediments.” J. Environ. Qual., 21(4), 591–595.
U.S. EPA. (1986). “Ambient water quality criteria for bacteria—1986.” EPA 440/5-84-002, Office of Water, Washington, DC.
U.S. EPA. (2001). “Protocol for developing pathogen TMDLs.” EPA-841-R-00-002, Office of Water, Washington, DC.
U.S. EPA. (2002). “Urban stormwater BMP performance monitoring.” EPA-821-B-02-001, Office of Water, Washington, DC.
U.S. EPA. (2003). “Bacterial water quality standards for recreational waters: Status report.” EPA-823-R-03-008, Office of Water, Washington, DC.
U.S. EPA. (2008). “Water quality assessment and total maximum daily loads information (ATTAINS).” 〈http://www.epa.gov/waters/ir/index.html〉 (Nov. 29, 2008).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 138Issue 2February 2012
Pages: 185 - 197

History

Received: May 21, 2010
Accepted: May 9, 2011
Published online: May 11, 2011
Published in print: Feb 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

J. M. Hathaway [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Box 7625, Raleigh, NC 27695 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
W. F. Hunt, M.ASCE
Associate Professor and Extension Specialist, Dept. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share