Applying Water-Level Difference Control to Central Arizona Project
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 137, Issue 12
Abstract
The Central Arizona Project (CAP) has been supplying Colorado River water to Central Arizona for roughly 25 years. The CAP canal is operated remotely with a supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system. Gate-position changes are made either manually or through the use of automatic controls with a controlled-volume approach. In this paper, the writers examine the potential application to the CAP canal of water-level difference control, a new feedback canal-control method. The main objective of this method is to keep the downstream water-level errors in equal pools. The control model is a multiple input and multiple output (MIMO) system, and the controller is solved as a linear quadratic regulator (LQR). A feed-forward routine called volume compensation was also used to route the flow changes. Simulation results show that this method is stable and can deal with different kinds of changes relatively quickly. For small changes, the water-level difference controller can operate well even without routing flow changes. For large flow changes, the water-level difference control alone can take up to 12 h to stabilize all water levels. Performance is greatly improved with the inclusion of the feed-forward routine. This new method provides better water-level control than the current method, and it is much less sensitive to errors in gate calibration. The writers suggest that this water-level difference-control method is quite promising, especially for large canals.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. NNSFC51009108) on the Coupling ID model and resonance filter algorithm study for open-channel water delivery control systems, and the Doctoral Found of Ministry of Education of China (No. UNSPECIFIED20090141120029) on Centralized ID modeling and LQR Controller design on canal systems.
References
Bautista, E., and Clemmens, A. J. (2005). “Volume compensation method for routing irrigation canal demand changes.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 131(6), 494–503.
Becker, L., Graves, A. L., and Yeh, W. W.-G. (1981). “Central Arizona Project operation.” Proc., Int. Symp. on Rainfall-Runoff Modeling, 1981, Mississippi State Univ., Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Clemmens, A. J. (2011). “Water-level difference controller for main canals.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., in press.
Clemmens, A. J., and Schuurmans, J. (2004). “Simple optimal downstream feedback canal controllers: Theory.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 130(1), 26–34.
Clemmens, A. J., and Wahlin, B. T. (2004). “Simple optimal downstream feedback canal controllers: ASCE test case results.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 130(1), 35–46.
HEC-RAS. (2008). HEC-RAS manual and hydraulic references, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources, Hydraulic Engineering Center, Davis, CA.
Schuurmans, J. (1997). “Control of water levels in open-channels.” Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Delft Univ. of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
Schuurmans, J., Bosgra, O. H., and Brouwer, R. (1995). “Open-channel flow model approximation for controller design.” Appl. Mah. Model., 19, 525–530.
Wahlin, B. T., et al. (2009). “Water system operator training for the Central Arizona Project.” Irrigation District Sustainability—Strategies to Meet the Challenges, Proc., USCID Conf., USCID, Denver, 121–131.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 9, 2010
Accepted: Jan 26, 2011
Published online: Jan 28, 2011
Published in print: Dec 1, 2011
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.